MySpace


Aaron Russo's America: Freedom To Fascism



Last Updated: 12/13/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 96
Sign: Cancer

City: MILFORD
State: Catania
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/17/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Saturday, September 08, 2007 
BREAKING NEWS-FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 8th, 2007
From:  Dr. Katherine Albrecht

MICROCHIP IMPLANTS CAUSE FAST-GROWING, MALIGNANT TUMORS IN LAB ANIMALS
Damning research findings could spell the end of VeriChip

Exclusive Global Announcement Made on WTPRN Friday Night on EttaroLIVE! [listen]

CLICK HERE TO READ THIS STORY IN HTML FORMAT WITH PICTURES AND AUDIO LINKS



FOR RELEASE:  IMPLANTS CAUSE FAST-GROWING, MALIGNANT TUMORS IN LAB ANIMALS

Damning research could spell the end of VeriChip

The Associated Press will issue a breaking story this weekend revealing that microchip implants have induced cancer in laboratory animals and dogs, says privacy expert and long-time VeriChip opponent Dr. Katherine Albrecht. 

As the AP will report, a series of research articles spanning more than a decade found that mice and rats injected with glass-encapsulated RFID transponders developed malignant, fast-growing, lethal cancers in up to 1% to 10% of cases. The tumors originated in the tissue surrounding the microchips and often grew to completely surround the devices, the researchers said. 

Albrecht first became aware of the microchip-cancer link when she and her "Spychips" co-author, Liz McIntyre, were contacted by a pet owner whose dog had died from a chip-induced tumor. Albrecht then found medical studies showing a causal link between microchip implants and cancer in other animals. Before she brought the research to the AP's attention, none of the studies had received widespread public notice. A four-month AP investigation turned up additional documents, several of which had been published before VeriChip's parent company, Applied Digital Solutions, sought FDA approval to market the implant for humans. The VeriChip received FDA approval in 2004 under the watch of then Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson who later joined the board of the company.  Under FDA policy, it would have been VeriChip's responsibility to bring the adverse studies to the FDA's attention, but VeriChip CEO Scott Silverman claims the company was unaware of the research.

Albrecht expressed skepticism that a company like VeriChip, whose primary business is microchip implants, would be unaware of relevant studies in the published literature.  "For Mr. Silverman not to know about this research would be negligent. If he did know about these studies, he certainly had an incentive to keep them quiet," said Albrecht. "Had the FDA known about the cancer link, they might never have approved his company's product."

Since gaining FDA approval, VeriChip has aggressively targeted diabetic and dementia patients, and recently announced that it had chipped 90 Alzheimer's patients and their caregivers in Florida. Employees in the Mexican Attorney General's Office, workers in a U.S. security firm, and club-goers in Europe have also been implanted.

Albrecht expressed concern for those who have received a chip implant, urging them to get the devices removed as soon as possible. 

"These new revelations change everything," she said. "Why would anyone take the risk of a having cancer chip in their arm?"  
Mario

 
YEAH!!!!!
 
Posted by Mario on Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 7:59 AM
[Reply to this
MichaelSSEC Μολών Λaβέ!
Michael McNamara

 
I am highly skeptical of this alleged research, performed by unnamed sources and constructed under unknown conditions. When so called research is publicized outside of normal peer-reviewed channels, it begins to reek of sensationalism. Now, I'm declaring this stuff a hoax, but I am saying that a lot more study needs to be done before we go around shouting that the sky is falling. I mean, didn't we learn anything from Alar, from the EMF hoax, from the cell phone tumor fraud, the mercury hoax, and the multiple artificial sweetner scares? I could go on and on, citing umpteen instances of the media screaming about death and destruction, going around scaring the hell out of everybody, when it turns out the whole thing was a sensationalistic fraud.

Having said all that, I was speaking to the specific medical claim, only. In terms of the morality of implanting ID microchips in people, I am and always will be vehemently opposed to the concept except perhaps to keep better track of upper-tier sex offenders and others who are likely to pose a genuine risk to society at-large as long as they live.
 
Posted by MichaelSSEC Μολών Λaβέ! on Monday, January 28, 2008 - 5:55 AM
[Reply to this