MySpace


Dana J. Bein



Last Updated: 3/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: CAMBRIDGE
State: MASSACHUSETTS
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/22/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Thursday, April 12, 2007 
Now I'm not a Don Imus fan and I don't condone what he said.
At all. I'm wondering, though, if all of the fallout is necessary. I don't believe Imus made a racist comment. I believe Imus tried to make a joke. Michael Richards he is not. Michael Richards yelled 'the' slur to a group of black hecklers. Imus made a dumb joke.
What's interesting to me is that I hear Boston police officers say more offensive things everyday when I walk through Downtown Crossing. Should they be fired? Should they apologize to everyone? Some of the officers are black and some of them are white. Where does this witchhunt end? I mean police officers are supposed to serve and protect. Imus was merely supposed to entertain. (I said supposed to - I didn't say he was entertaining - so if you're going to fire him, fire him for sucking) If police officers can get away with worse language than Imus, how can Imus be justifiably fired? I hate Don Imus, but I think an apology was a sufficient penance. Three athletes from Duke were falsely accused of RAPE and were scrutinized and judged and tormented for months until they were acquitted. All they got was an apology. The DA didn't get fired - all he had to do was apologize (and he didn't even HAVE to). However, those athletes lives will never be the same. (they're still jarheaded lacrosse playing douchebags though) What Don Imus needs is an agreeable black cohost to absorb the racism accusations a la Howard Stern with Robin Quivers. Then, he can also get little people drunk and encourage callers to taunt them with threats of violence...but that's another story.

I guess my big concern is that people of more importance and higher status than Imus speak much more ill toward other races, creeds and sexual preferences. In addition, there are blacks who call themselves 'hos' and 'n-words', gays that call themselves 'fags' and zero white people who call themselves 'crackers'. I heard a black man call a bunch of white people "n-words". If a self proclaimed smaht kid like me is confused by this slang - I can't imagine what someone who doesn't know what self proclaimed means is thinking. I say everyone should get punished for using racially based words or no one does. I know the power and the hate behind slurs and I think that unless you can prove someone used a word maliciously, you don't have a case. Since that is often impossible (not in Kramer's case - gideeyup); it should be all or no one. Also, white people should begin to use the term cracker as frequently as possible to stir the pot even more.

In summary, there are a lot of ignorant people out there - Imus being one of them.
Ignorant people say ignorant things no matter what side of the slur they fall on.
If every ignorant person lost their job for the ignorant things they said, who'd serve my French fries? That's right...Don Imus would serve my French fries...my stinky, arrogant, beret wearing French fries. Sorry, I'm using a stereotypewriter.


SARCASTIC DISCLAIMER
Dana's girlfriend is Jewish and his childhood pet was a black lab so he's definitely not racist.
van s
Van S Thomas sr

 

wow

2007.......is the year of  change

Hey  "Bud"weiser ha! Ha!

So open  media .......freedom of  speech.... we hide  behind that one ...

do we not? Those  are  fighting words.....nappy  headed whore!......

Now.........man's hatered  for women.......is nothing sacred any more?

How  dare  he expose  us  like that!? he should be fired He  betrayed US>>>> you  fools........The  prune should .....should  be  hung out to  dry......

Dana  apply  for his  Job  Will You!? fuck i  will....cap and gown in  tow

Later


 
Posted by van s on Friday, April 13, 2007 - 1:18 PM
[Reply to this
Dana J. Bein

 
Ha ha! I don't want Imus' job. Those are some small shoes to fill.

Don't apply Van! You have a brighter future than that!

djb
 
Posted by Dana J. Bein on Friday, April 13, 2007 - 8:31 PM
[Reply to this
Lindsay

 
<P>Wow...Not to be hyperbolic or sarcastic- but this is probably the only essay on this topic that I have read where I agreed with all the major points.  Very well-conceived and executed.  I too find that the picking and choosing of what is offensive can be tiresome and vexing.  And I also don't believe that having one 'ambassador' of that demographic there to condone the behavior and "absorb" the hate makes it ok.  I know I didn't elect any of the women on the Stern show to be my ambassador and I know alot of the stuff said on that show would be considered SO much more offensive and salacious if it were being said about a specific race rather than "the other gender"...I mean- Howard is an artist right? At least that's what the kids at my college told me: "Degradation is his art form and since his guests are all willing- It empowers all women!" BS! </P><P>Racism will always trump sexism on the FCC no-no list. Case in point with the Imus comment.  If he'd called the white girls "skanky trailer trash" the hulabaloo would have been significantly less and after a few press releases and a guest spot on Oprah, things would calm down and he could go back to normal.  There is so much hate out there and we can't possibly control it all with silly little speech rules.  If people could find out how to express hatred by crocheting angry little doilies, they would do it- and that's what we should be looking for. Angry little doilies.</P>
 
Posted by Lindsay on Monday, April 30, 2007 - 5:21 PM
[Reply to this