MySpace

Blog of Choix Du Jour Choice of the Day

Choix Du Jour



Last Updated: 7/1/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 37
City: Clovis, CA
Friday, December 28, 2007 3:47 AM

"Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity can barely control themselves when the subject of global warming comes up. The Republican Party fires off anti-global warming talking points. And everyday conservatives spit and sputter when they discuss the subject. I don't get it. Why does global warming throw conservatives into such a dither?

I understand that climate change -- and who's responsible for it -- seems to be one of those issues that defines liberals and conservatives in our nation today. That part I get. Liberals believe the planet is doomed and humans have caused it and conservatives say the global warmers have swallowed a big mouthful of junk science, and there's nothing to their climate-change claims.

But there are a lot of other issues that break down along firm liberal/conservative lines and don't seem to engender this kind of venom. Taxes, welfare, even the war in Iraq are bread-and-butter issues in the daily political debate, but they don't hit the hot button that global warming does. Mention Al Gore and it sends folks on the right over the cliff. Mention Al Gore getting the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change and there's no controlling them.

Someone out there please explain to me how fighting global warming claims has become such a huge cause for the right."

- This is the start of a blog post at the Fresno Bee, local newspaper. There is quite a lively discussion going on now. For comments and responses please visit http://www.fresnobeehive.com/opinion/2007/12/what_is_it_about_global_warmin.html


Hannah

 
That is an interesting title and attitude. I wonder what the FB hoped to accomplish by them. If a conservative is reading, it will probably offend them- it certainly won't change their minds. If a liberal is reading, it may give them a laugh, but it certainly won't accomplish anything. I don't see how commenting on/making fun of a political party is going to make them see the others' perspective. Not to mention making blanket statements about every person in the party. Perhaps just an excuse to give the topic more press? The question at the end doesn't seem like a real question- it is plain to see the writer is not actually looking for someone to explain why gw has become "such a huge cause for the right". One more thing: it seems a bit strange to purposely try to rile people up by using word choices that are intended to cause debate and make people feel indignant or passionate and then make fun of them for getting riled up. In any case, claiming that an entire party of people "can't control themselves" seems a bit hard.
 
Posted by Hannah on Saturday, December 29, 2007 - 10:01 PM
[Reply to this