Thanks for posting this, very interesting!
 

For many years I have listened to and for a time studied and learned from Chuck Missler who has presented Many studies and interesting presentations on Evolution Theories that bacially bogle the mind. He is highly educated, a marvelous sense of humor and a deep love for God. This is one I enjoyed especially, done by Chuck. If you have a chance, check it out.
Amazing!
DNA: In The Beginning There Was Information
The Evidences Of Design In The Origin Of Life
 

Allahu Akbar...Allah is the Greatest,
thank you Eric
katee
 

Wonderfully informative.
Thank you for posting this!

Barbara
 

This is another great blog Eric. I consider it to be awe inspiring, faith building, evidence. Even consideration of DNA alone ought to tell us something that says 'reprogrammed' intelligent design. All creation is living testimony to the case in question. I, for one, have never ever been able to buy into theories that would have one assume that the complexities of, life, all came about as a result of the roll of a pair of dice...by chance only.


Thank you for sharing your discoveries here, in this wonderful blog. I'd even like to add a link to it from my main website.


I have, by the way, also done a little video of my own based on the Charles Dawson Piltdown Hoax that I intend to have up at some point. That's another side of the coin...the fact that psedio scientists, desperately wanting to prove a theory, would, in fact, fake the evidence that, by the way, many University Professors, as in my son's, still teaches as gospel truth, even though it has long since been proved, irrefutably, to be a hoax. There's a heck of a lot of other stuff available online worth viewing and listening to as well, the point being this: if you seek you shall find - hmmmm, now where did I read something like that...oh, an ancient manuscript that many would still like to believe is mythical, out of date, and not very scientific. Well, a person would have to 'research' that manuscript to discover how much science is actually contained therein, up to and including passages that describe the design of things as if it were talking about DNA. By the way, there's a lot of DNA in a rib, you know. Whatever the case, once you've understand the implications, as most scientists seem to be doing nowadays especially, you can never rid yourself of the curiosity that leaves you hankering to discover even more. Is there more to be discovered? Yes, you bet, and it's a thrilling adventurous discovery that will keep you riveted for a long, long time to come.


Kudos again on another excellent blog.

 

Have you ever wondered why something is considered “magnificent” or “beautiful”? Is it not because of its self-evident design?
It’s amazing how casually anthropomorphisms are thrown around by evolutionists. Nature is “brilliant”, or “clever”, or “seeks/affirms life”. But what they are really marvelling at (sub-consciously) is self-evident design, whether they admit it to themselves or not.


Leave it to a depraved person to assume that nothing is designed because there is variation. Variation, or, intelligent selection, is part of the glory contained in art itself. But a technological society such as ours with a fetish for efficiency and utility simply will not see it. Maybe an oil painter mixed his own greens by combining his blues and yellows. Would one deny his work, saying that “a real artist would have simply used the green paint that comes in the tube.
That would have been more efficient”? Or, “a real artist would have used orange instead, so that the painting could be displayed in more living rooms”?

An artistic decision need not be made in order to facilitate creative efficiency. Slighlty varying the rhythm in the second verse of a song, double-tracking a guitar solo, singing the same background parts under each chorus instead of cutting/pasting them digitally. All these are simply good artistic decisions. Until one has disected a Beethoven symphony, all the artistic decisions seem to be random - until you start to pull the details apart and realize the alternatives that were NOT implemented - which leads to a further revelation and deeper understanding of the mind of the composer.


No matter how granular one’s view is of anything created - whether one is analzing a piece of music, or genetic information, a revelation of the mind of the creator is always possible. Always able to be revealed to those with eyes to see (or with ears to hear, as the case may be). Denying the existence of the creative mind in either case leads to some rather foolish statements - like it all happened by "random chance". There can be no true randomness in creativity. Every result can ultimately be traced back to the free decision of a mind, choosing act in the face of nothingness and non-existence. Calling something the result of pure chance, is simply an admission of ignorance of the Creator/Artist's work.


We, a species of artists and creators, with intelligence and language, because we are made in the very image of The Artist/Creator/Logos already inherently know this. But many choose to ignore that.

 

I think many people overlook the fact that complexity emerges out of simplicity every day, everywhere.

 

I agree that complexity emerges out of simplicity everyday when there is energy and intelligent design (such as DNA sequences for an example) directing it.  Otherwise, entropy is the overriding rule of the universe.