MySpace


Persistent Resistance is Fertile



Last Updated: 10/15/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 40
Sign: Gemini

City: Decatur
State: Georgia
Country: US
Signup Date: 4/12/2004
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 

Category: Jobs, Work, Careers

People Over Profit - A Radical Proposal to Deal with the Economic Crisis

Category: Jobs, Work, Careers

People Over Profit
A Proposal for How to Deal with the Economic Crisis

This is a summary (with a few additions) of an essay called “Demand, Don’t Succumb” (http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/20982) by Michael Albert, creator of “the 3rd economic system” Participatory Economics, or Parecon, which rejects capitalism or markets as well as communism or central planning.
Albert has suggested some radical reforms for how to deal seriously with our current economic crisis/insecurity.

We believe these reforms would go far to reduce our economic woes and improve our capitalist/corporate system, which we believe is the main reason for the crisis in the first place.

Homes for All

No one may be kicked out of his or her home – no home (less than $1 million) may be foreclosed upon and no one may be evicted from his or her house or apartment. We will simply pass a law stating that to do so is against the law. In the meantime, we can organize to prevent foreclosures on a case-by-case basis, as people have already been doing. People cannot simply stop paying their mortgage payments, though, either. They’d have to be refinanced so people can afford to pay them.

We can collectively decide who will get what level of refinancing (for rent or mortgage payments, etc) by people who need help within a given legislative district getting together in an open forum, perhaps mediated by the local member(s) of Congress and even local high school civics teachers, and facilitated by everyone.

The lower the average income in a given area, the more rewrite they’re entitled to – a redistribution of wealth. Neighbors must cooperatively negotiate with each other the total percentage each will receive from the rewrite.

We can also make sure everyone has a home or decent shelter to reduce insecurity.

Businesses Can’t Close Due to Loss of Profits

Ownership is given less bargaining power – business owners with more than 20 employees or over $5 million in assets can’t stop operations due to a predicted loss of profit. We will simply pass a law stating that to do so is against the law.

If owners don’t want to take the losses in profits that may come with continuing production, then they can work like everyone else, and the firm’s deed is turned over to the workforce and surrounding community. They are not allowed to move the residence or sell the firm overseas.

Save Jobs, NOT Profits

To deal with decreased demand leading to decreased production leading to an increase in firings, we will simply pass a law stating that it is against the law to fire people until the crisis has passed.

Down Timing, NOT Down Sizing

To produce less output without firing people, employers can reduce everyone’s hours by about 10% so the output level can adjust to whatever society needs, and more people can be hired.

Additionally, so people don’t lose even more income from reduced working hours, employers would have to pay employees the same amount they were paid when they worked more hours. This is raising hourly wages.

We can simply pass a law to require that employers cut back everyone’s hours and pay people at higher rates – they cannot reduce the overall wage bill. Executives and stockholders can make less money if need be. If the only way to save a business is to cut into the workforce or cut into profits, we should cut into profits.

Effects

No one worries about losing his or her home or exploitative mortgages. No one is being fired, and people are being hired. People have more leisure time from reduced working hours and higher pay her hour. There are additional taxes levied from the currently unemployed and from higher pay for new or improved social programs. Workers and society generally can have more control over workplace decisions.

These radical reforms would bring us closer to a system that respects people’s lives and livelihoods over profits for the rich and institutions. This is the direction in which we need to be moving, because the market system is the problem.

Suggestions for Tactics

We can make this a national movement, where tons of groups sign on and promote this holistic, radical agenda in response to the economic crisis, and capitalism generally, as well as make sure these ideas can be locally controlled to reflect what makes sense in a give region. Our goal can be the passage and enforcement of laws that make this vision real.

WE NEED EVERYONE INVOLVED – WE NEED COALITION.

Here are some suggestions of what we can specifically do to make this happen:

1) Spread the word – online, face to face, in workplaces, classrooms, living rooms, town hall meetings, organization conventions and meetings, etc.

2) Pressure banks and businesses to apply these reforms

3) Pressure congress – nationally, more specifically - as well as the president to pass laws and executive orders that demand these reforms

4) Hold events for proposals, discussion, and planning

5) Talk to the media – especially alternative media, but also the corporate media

Questions

Is this realistic? Is it possible? We won’t know until we try – and try again and again and again. Our individual and collective assumptions that something won’t or can’t happen are the biggest factors keeping things from happening. Are these tactics complete, helpful or harmful? What else can we do to make this vision real, or what can we do instead? Please pass this movement on – tell people about it and make it happen – and help create what it will be with your own insights and ideas. We want a Participatory Society after all, don’t we?
Currently listening:
The Shepherd's Dog
By Iron & Wine
Release date: 2007-09-25
Previous Post: White Privilege | Back to Blog List
Barry Kennedy
Barry Kennedy

 
Unfortunately, I think it's highly unrealistic to pass laws saying people can't be evicted due to inability to pay rent. What position does that put the landlord in? Also, making it illegal to close a business due to being unprofitable? Kind of ridiculous.

I think the fundamental solution is to achieve more of an economic balance of power by passing worker's rights reforms, from which other reforms will stem. Stronger unions that can actually accomplish gains for workers will result. Secondly, we need massive trade reform. Actually, now that I think about it... what we really need is campaign finance reform and electoral reform. In order to accomplish that we need to clean the Democratic Party out of corrupt individuals.

Would it be easier to reform the Democratic party or start another party from scratch? I think it'd be easier to reform the Democratic Party - why reinvent the wheel.

As far as not knowing until we try, we can make intelligent guesses based on probable outcomes... and I would say this approach will nt work and would be economically disastrous. I understand the motivation behind it, and people do need more protection, but making owning a business a prison sentence or making owning rental property a gauranteed losing proposition helps no one.
 
Posted by Barry Kennedy on Saturday, May 09, 2009 - 3:32 PM
[Reply to this
Gilbert Kaneda
Gilbert Kaneda

 
I hope Michael Moore's new documentary about Wall Street ("CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY") debunks the fallacy that capitalism is synonymous with free enterprise. In fact, they're incompatible. "Free market capitalism" is an oxymoron. Rigged market capitalism is more like it. A market ruled by fratboys who had the right drinking buddies in college. Also, you teabaggers: The United States wasn't founded on capitalism. It was founded on debt, which forced Alexander Hamilton to seek loans from European bankers which resulted in the USA becoming capitalist. Similarly, the UK became socialist after World War II because no banks would cover their debt, so John Maynard Keynes had to secure a loan from Harry Truman. The difference between socialism and capitalism is the lender: Private bank or government. And communism is a socialist heresy.

And speaking of heresy. Right wing evangelicals need to read Acts 4:32-5:11. The early
church was SOCIALIST!

The GOP isn't really opposed to big government. They're opposed to big government that isn't in cahoots with big business.  I'll agree to small government when the corporations become smaller.

 
Posted by Gilbert Kaneda on Thursday, August 27, 2009 - 8:06 PM
[Reply to this
retail

 
Go see CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY
Mylinks_facebook
 
Posted by retail on Thursday, October 15, 2009 - 8:40 PM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: White Privilege | Back to Blog List