 |
Current mood:  moody
new millenium enertainment present the stephehan hawking a cshort history of the universe
recording cambridge
first time i am going to five this course of lectures with the help of a computer and synthesize etc
i shall try to give a theory adeas about the uinivsers
the universe is not static it desniety is not empyou iwll never come out of this black hole again
this is a singularity
howevery general relativigity ....tying out from left to right
these are formed when a massi e star comallapses in on itself according to floolish forver
this ldead to vmi would be like the surface of ethe earth but with 2 more deminesnions
the past is so diffeertn from the future even the laws of physicics are triosmetiruc
we shall really understand the unieverse
ideas
to combe back to the subject of this lecture
as long ago as 5230 bb asnharistotle was ablke to put forth
the earth coming betewen the sun of tghe moon
if ther aerth happene da falp disc
unless the exlipse occured a second
...... from the difference in the apparent positivon of thea redisounathe a050 iait not ahainmo but habbe a yards this mwould make ariang uoaccepte difigue theg greeks sghaea fehgo asneone btaha the horizons
wi
since wheb does when see the arerth coming fomr the hozeiriozon
and the fie planets lnown that time
the planets are complicated
they are fixe stars
now i am broadcasting there is a lgihter sense a much simpler model was proposede by a pollish priest copernicus sadly a century passed before he was seriously then javenmecker and galelaleellyly observed it wa true the ptolemayic theory upstarted serving the knights dry with a telescope
the moons of jupiter moved at exteremely fast appreaances around the earth
keepplerrrrr
hes done it again
the predicionts now finally matched the observations
eliptical ordiancesnes were repugenant than circles
he could not reconcled with the plastics were made to a level next to 687 when newton published his notorialistic cause
the only most imopratnat physical sciecesn ever
hse not only feveloped time
but delecpoped a guniversal graviatiaion to those around it
the story that newton was hit on the apple simply apocryhpal
to know that something that is so dry and abesnt is so vidid
would they not all fall together at some point
then im not rihard bentley
this would not have happened if there were only a finitire number of stars
there are a n ifintie number of stars
one is talking about infitiny one is talking about infitiy one is talking about infiity one ifs talkingbeout ingieti one is talking about ingitieny one is talking about infiritiy one is atalking about infitniy one is talking a hout infitny
round a ryhtym exaplin just aexaplin
noone had suggested the univeserse was expanding or ctranacting
it was not created as we observe it today believe in ineternal truths they may grow old and die the univserese is old and ahcneginh the universe could not be static they attempted to modyigy the theory
HOWEVER
if the stars in some region in some attraction became stronger
WAIT
there is a man outside in a motoryclr
YET
if that happened, the intervening matter would blow up til it glowed 'tas brightly as the surface of the sun would be had the stars not been shiinng forever
had it not reached us to bring us to the question of whjat the stars had to say for themselves
the begininng of the universe the begininger of the universe of course had been described for a long time we starting describing it they were describing it the univerese were ddescribing it it could not have been around all that long for otherwise we woulve already progressed more than we had
there is no man just a motorcycle
in other words
THE INIVERSRE IS EXPANDINGNGGGGG ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!if there were events earkuer than this time then there existence would have no observational consequencess
the earlier time would not be dfeinifed
would be very different
an unchanging beginning
a constant beginning
there is no physical necessity for a beginning would could not god create the physical eraeesons for there could be a begining
in the instance of a abg big gbiangbang
our sun is just an ordinary sized yellow star
chains chains change in pinpoints of life
we cannot determine there size or shape so how can we tell stars apart
there is only
one
ocaracteristic feature
it is spectrum it is the rainbow
the relative brightness of the different colors is emitted by an item glowing red hot
this means
MOREROVRRRRRRRRR++++
we know that each chemical element obesrves very specific set of those whicy are present in the stars atmospheree
in the 1920as whent astronomners found something most peculiarar the shifted twoards REDDDD endar spectrum
the . galxies., are . moving . away. from u.s
red shifted red shigt was not random but was directly proportional to the galzides distance form us the universe could not be static
the distanes was growing all time
all the time
al of tihme
of la the time
however if it was expanding at more than a critical rate gravity could not stop it this is what happens when one rock fires another upwards towards the surface of the erath eventually gravity grabs the rocket and will not be string enough tp pull it back
force which unlike orther forces did not come from a particular source balance an attraction of all of the matter of the universe
only one man it seems was willing to take relativity at face value ......................................the russian phrysicit alexander frreeedman is dead set on explaining it.........................................................................
nopgeists
a very sensitive mircoooowave
dont be worried
your detector is not picjking up more noise than it ought to
do not check for bird droppings
there is noise form within the atmopsheree because the atomppershe appears thincker when looking at the lagnleo aof the avVETIRCAL
since it appears to be the same and different direction the univesere must be the same and fdifereent direciton whichever direction we look it the reaction for which we take it intrdocuting a suggestion once a student hot and dense white hot
tou should still be able to see this glowing
its reaching is now now at first sight biw that it looks whicerher way it is that we look it
IN PARTICULAR
THERE IS
HWOEVER
we are not for or against this assumption we are engrained in our modesty not around under points in the universe
NOT
essnetially blowing up a balloon which could be the center of the expansion
the fast theyer are moving aprart
the speed at ehich any two gallexces are moving apaerat are precitaded by the proportional distance from us
EXATLY has
Ublwle found it IT
tho it does slow it down a bit eventually the falaxies are moving apart at a steady speed
fianyll
there is a recollapse in this cas eof eserpartaion
howeever increases
FORCEVEr
but not quite reaching zero
space is bent round onto itself making it not unlike travelling the surface of the earth against an impassabvle barrier OVER THE EDHEGE back to WHere Wone Stareted
the ideas that make good science fiction dont have practical syngtificance
would need to travel faster tan light
that is not allowed
travel faster than light
will
W????
will the universe ecaenuatally expand contracintgn? ....every 5% 10% EVERYT HOUSE AND YEAARS
all the loest estaimate of arate of epxansion
must containt dark matter
which we know must be ehtere its distorts and racesa aagainst the effect of the emotion on the 1/10th required of lall expnsions
up to the ciritical value
BUT DONT BANK ON ITT
all we can sure is the univserse will reccollapse for 1000 milli0000n years this will dooly not sure worry us for long since man have since died out they relinquish man for the dine of our dust
the big bang
all of the freidman solutions bewtween 10 and 200000 years ago at the time we called the big bagng at the curvature of space time would be invifinite which means that would preidvt that there is a singlukar teime in the uiniveserse that spacee time is smooth and nearly flast theat would space time is infintie ti sbve bthe bi aodofantke iafmoa ajejt akgjoaj akac ocrrespondingly if we know alonly what has happend since the big bang we canknowonlyofwhathadhappenedbeforeittweshouldthereforecontourofoutofthemodelandsayfortimehadabegininingethebigbangprobably becauseeof its catholic church serized on the big bang model in faccoredand with
THE
bibblle
was suggested in 1948 by tw0 refugrees whod worked on them radudrudruginyl the war would therefore look roughly the same at all poiwnts in space ato allow for the contiunal creation of matter aabout
ONE particle per cuble awould not conflict with ecpeierment was simple
made defineite prediticsotns
should be the same whenever and wherever we LOokok un the universe
the cambridge group showed that most of these radiou sources were interperetedarigihtoutsielowerdediatntstorngierwthereaappaeraigaananearbyaouservstheiscouldhaveameantthateaweweereaataacenterofaaaa
ALTERNATIVELY
this could mean that shte sources weere more numerous than in the past either conflagaration
MOREOVER
the discoevery of the microwabe wadiation by
PANZEUS and WILSON
in the 9156 attmpeted to avoid the conldusion there was a ebgiging
they suiggsestd that a big bang might be a peculirarity
PERHAPS
FEREIDMANDDDDDDD
they were all at the sample place
they all looked eat each other sideayws
theyd been at the same places only close CLSOER together they mightve flown past and The WAVE from each OTHER
how then?
could we tell that kalabrekedue
were ruffly like randomly galaxies in the real universe
MOVING IN JSUT THE RIGHT WAY
MORE FRIEEDDMAN LIKE MODELS MORE FREIEEEDMAN LIKE MODELS MORE FRIEEEDMDDMAN LIKE MODELS MORE GENERAL CLASS OF FREEEEEEEEEEREFEEEEEDMAN LIKE MODELS
THER THEREFRORE WITHDERW THERE CLAME IN 1970
does
a
beginining of time
started by a british physicit in 1965 show that which a start that collapesses under ts own gravity eventualy shrinks to
0ZERO0 size time know as the black hole
PANZEUS
himself was a grad student despsrately looking for feeshies
provided the universe were roughly like a freidnman model could us it to prove that there was a singularity onley so that FREIDMANMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
DEVELOP KNEW TACICS RELIEVE THIS
a joi nt pa per th e un ivers e containta isnas muich asmatt ermar as we aobesr ve
one .... cannt relly argue with the beggining
5:24 AM
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|