MySpace

Click here to subscribe to Manning's blog
Manning



Last Updated: 10/17/2007

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Age: 41
City: Sydney
State: New South Wales
Country: AU
Signup Date: 3/1/2007
Tuesday, August 28, 2007 

Current mood:  cranky
Category: Life

 

OK, I haven't thrown a good tantrum for a while, so this is long overdue.

But first - some business news from Australia. We have four "major" banks here, and one of them just appointed a new CEO. Generally this sort of news only appears in the business pages of the newspapers, but this particular case was a big deal. This is because the new CEO of the Westpac Banking Corporation is a woman, Gail Kelly.


Gail Kelly, newly appointed CEO of Westpac.

I'm disappointed about this.

My disappointment is not that Ms Kelly is the new CEO - I've worked in banking and insurance long enough to know that she is highly respected and that she turned St George Bank (where she was previously the CEO) into a streamlined and profitable entity. It was no secret that a number of Australia's largest companies were very keen to sign her up, and Westpac now consider themselves fortunate.

NO, I am disappointed because I checked my watch this morning and it's apparently 2007. Yet in 2007 the fact that a woman takes the helm of a major corporation is still unusual enough to make headlines. She is, sadly, very much alone in the Australian business world.

Frankly, I'd like to live in a world where the fact that a CEO is female isn't regarded as particularly interesting or newsworthy. But it definitely still is.

In the 80's Maggie Thatcher was elected prime minister of the U.K., the first female leader of a major western democracy. At the time it was mooted as the "end of the era where women were secondary". But her leadership was an aberration for the most part. Women are still very minor players in business, politics and academia. And I'm sitting here asking myself why there has been so little change in the past twenty-five years.

Here's some movie trivia for you. The gender balance of all of the directors being graduated from the major film schools is pretty much even. Yet the percentage of Hollywood films made by female directors last year was only 4%.  And only three women have ever received a 'Best Director' Oscar nomination (none have won it).

I have no idea what the causes are or what the answer is. I could rattle off the traditional platitudes - "glass ceiling", "business is a boy's club", "women take the primary caregiver roles", "lack of opportunity", etc. They're probably all true. I just wish it wasn't and I'm frustrated by why it is still this way.

One thing I will say though, is that we just don't celebrate women who achieve in these areas. Some token acknowledgement of Oprah happens, but did you know that Fortune Magazine only ranks Oprah as the 8th most powerful businesswoman in America? This means there are seven women regarded as more powerful than her, and I will bet that you can't name any of them. (Here's a link if you want to look them all up.) The CEO's of major companies like Pepsi, Xerox and Kraft are in there.

But we sure as hell celebrate Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan. Vapid minds and nubile eroticism are the hallmarks of female achievement in our media-obsessed age. Young girls are constantly being told that their sexuality is their only significant asset.

Here's a comedy skit which lampoons attitudes from an era which is supposedly "bygone".

But with everything I see in the media today, I'm not convinced that this message is so out-dated.

 


Addendum: Glen (AKA Mr Belligerent) raises the interesting observation that, for the most part, women are the better bloggers on MySpace. Anyone agree?


Second addendum: I can't think of a way to justify including this video given the blog topic, but it's just too damn funny not to. Yes I'm being cruel, yes I'm being insensitive. So sue me. At least she is cute.

*UPDATE* An addendum to the addendum... Apparently Miss South Carolina isn't as dumb as she looks. She says she just had a brain lock at that particular moment. She defends herself quite eloquently in this NBC interview.

Listing 1-50 of 158
1234
of
4
Lucia

 
Its true that things are unbalanced and often unfair. ...But I have to say that I see alot of women who spend their time complaining about the way things are rather than getting out there and doing something about it. Success is the best form of revenge. So come on, Ladies! Get out there and make some money! :o)
 
Posted by Lucia on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 02:01 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
That may well be true, but they keep refusing to do my laundry.
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:44 AM
[Reply to this
ERock

 
Me too. Oh well at least if you pound them good enough they're more than happy to take you to breakfast.

-Eric James
 
Posted by ERock on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 06:06 PM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Well I'm off to go watch the lunar eclipse now - aren't you?

Back in a few hours :)
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:15 AM
[Reply to this
Voxhumana

 
I'm watching it from my back porch - it is VERY cool. The moon is half gone now.
 
Posted by Voxhumana on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:34 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
How can you miss it? It's still happening! It doesn't finish until nearly 10 PM.

The moon is fully blood red now - very spooky.

I'm off to conduct a virgin sacrifice... of course finding a virgin at such late notice could be challenging.
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:58 AM
[Reply to this
Krissie

 
I can't believe i missed this blood red moon...

(gets head out of sand)
 
Posted by Krissie on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 06:33 PM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Here's a shot that the Sydney Morning Herald just posted... this is taken from the Harbour Bridge.



How cool is that!
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 03:56 PM
[Reply to this
Syd Andy

 
Way cool - where did you watch it?

I went into the observatory with friends, which was very cool - jazz band playing, good company, strange lights in the sky...

:D
 
Posted by Syd Andy on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 06:05 PM
[Reply to this
ʎןןǝɥs

 
Haha!!! I loved that video!

Maybe its 2007 this finally happened, but it's better late than never!
 
Posted by ʎןןǝɥs on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:09 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
It's a gem of a video :)

"Overeducation of women leads to ugliness, premature aging and beard-growth".
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:28 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
I said sorry!

I posted the blog twice and while you were first on the other one, this one already had three comments. So you lost out :)
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:16 AM
[Reply to this
Jase @ The Virtual Couch

 
Agree with what you have said Manning.

Actually I had an interesting conversation with one of my best friends the other day. Her opinion (and she is a successful mother twice over & business analyst in a software company) is that perhaps women want too much in life (ie career, children & successful husband) and that maybe the 'traditional' role of the stay at home Mum isn't so bad.

What surprised me is not what she said, but rather my reaction to it. I found myself arguing vehemently against it, in that why shouldn't a woman be able to have a career, a family etc.

Maybe it is the papers we read, but I think the coverage in the Financial Review wasn't so much as "oh looky a woman as CEO" but rather "so and so is now CEO and this is what she did at St George's etc" ... so I think at least some of the media isn't so sensationalist about it.

But I whole-heartedly share your frustration.
 
Posted by Jase @ The Virtual Couch on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:16 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Oh the fact that Gail Kelly got the job was no surprise. The woman is a kickass CEO regardless of her gender. Just ask any shareholders of St George Bank, she made them a lot of money. That she was going to end up heading one of the "big four" banks was inevitable.

But the fact that women are so under-represented is what bothers me.
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:19 AM
[Reply to this
Jase @ The Virtual Couch

 
Do you think it could be that the percentage of women who want to get to the top who have that "drive or strive" for success is lower than that percentage in men?

Speaking for myself, I've hit a level at which I'm comfortable, I don't aspire to become Mr Manager.

I've also got a friend who has achieved incredible success in her career (from getting a degree in marine biology she ended up in charge of a large department in GE Capital & seconded to the US parent company) but has settled for a job with lower responsibilities to enjoy her life more, she doesn't feel the need to keep pushing to get to the top of the heap (and the resultant stress/effort)

Dunno .... but I do know I'm a product of my generation. I don't believe a woman's place is in the kitchen washing dishes, I believe her place is wherever she wants to be (in work, life, home etc).

I'd like to think as more of my generation hits "positions of responsibility" it will be less of problem.
 
Posted by Jase @ The Virtual Couch on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:26 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
"I'd like to think as more of my generation hits "positions of responsibility" it will be less of problem."

Yes, but MY generation was saying that back in the 80's when we were teens. And now my generation IS hitting those "positions of responsibility" and not a lot has really changed.
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:30 AM
[Reply to this


 
I disagree with you on two points.

Firstly, and this applies to both men and women, is in respect of the "have it all" (and its extension "have it now") mentality. I believe the message that has been drummed in to people that they have a right to have it all is part of the great malaise in (especially Western) societies that is leading to higher incidence of people being dissatisfied and unhappy with their lives.

I think it's about time people actually started being given the realistic message that only a very exceptional few can have it all, and that for the rest of us we can have part of what we desire, but that involves trade-offs in other areas of our lives. Very little is achieved without some element of sacrifice:

Yes, you can have the great career - but it is likely that comes at a cost of time with your family (or a family altogether), or time on your interests, or with great stress, or the cost of a nanny or day care, etc;

Yes, you can have a great family life, but this may come at the cost of pursuing other interests, or causing you to lose time from your career at the point in your life when you should be your most professionaly productive and when the ground work is laid for achieving the higher positions within that profession;

Yes, you can have the great "dream home", but also at great cost (and not just financial).

If you have the "great" career and you have the "great" family - what does that mean? The baby's in daycare from 12 months old while both parents are at work? The parents might be feeling satisified that they now have a child, but is that arrangement in the best interests of the child? And does picking up a kid from daycare at 4 or 5pm really equate to a great family life?

It comes down to setting priorities and deciding what is important to you (as someone below said - defining what "all" means to you personally). But it's about time "they" stopped selling (and "we" stopped buying) a message that we can have it all and without cost. The overwhelming majority of people just don't have the capacity for it.

Secondly - paid maternity leave directly imposes on employers an additional cost for employing women (especially those in the prime child-bearing period). There is a common sense, economically rational response of an employer to this situation when faced with a decision between two job candidates who are otherwise of equal capability - employ the male or offer the female a lower salary that factors in the expected cost of maternity leave (bearing in mind that anti-discrimination legislation actually prevents asking questions in interviews about prospects/desire for children and so prevents treating women as individuals and forces the employer to play the odds across the entire gender). Don't think this doesn't happen - it does.

Paid maternity leave is a benefit to women already established in the workforce, but is counterproductive to the overall employment prospects of women and unfairly penalises those women who don't want children by effecting pay rates for the entire gender.
 
Posted by on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 03:23 PM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
I aim to please ... :)
 
Posted by Manning on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 04:49 AM
[Reply to this
Jase @ The Virtual Couch

 
Actually Sakura, once I drilled her down to what she really felt, I think she enjoyed the year or so she had off with her latest baby. Since going back to work she has enjoyed that too & successfully juggled being a mother and having her career. It does help that her hubby is also supportive in that regard & works for the same company that is flexible enough to let them leave early or come in late depending on who is dropping off or picking up the kids.

I think companies that are smart & view their employees as ASSETS, will find ways to keep women in the workforce. There are such things as remote access/working from home which are becoming more prevalent. I know the company I work for (one of the biggest in Australia) encourages this sort of thing and is flexible with part-time work.
 
Posted by Jase @ The Virtual Couch on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:40 AM
[Reply to this
Lucia

 
You make good points, Sakura. Yes, men make most of the laws or are more often in positions that shape a company's work place. I think here, in Canada, a single mom can collect welfare up until the time the child is 6. I'm not going to have children and I believe that tax dollars should go to women who want to have children and a paid maternity leave.
 
Posted by Lucia on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 06:43 AM
[Reply to this
Lisa

 
I completely agree with you Manning. The same is over here in the US. I work in a very male dominated profession (Technical Lead for software applications as well as Sr. Scientist for a Civil Engineering firm) and it is very difficult to be taken seriously. Even some of my clients have trouble accepting a woman in a position of authority. And I have the abilitity to tell my clients where they can build their hotel and where they cannot based on the sensitivity of the surrounding environmental constraints. Not to mention the fact I don't get paid the same as my male counterparts.

So I commend you for bringing this issue to light.
 
Posted by Lisa on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:29 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Great comment!

I've worked under a lot of female project managers and frankly I can see no meaningful difference either.

And we are in agreement on another point. The fact that I am better at my job than any woman is irrelevant - I am also better at my job than any man as well :)
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:41 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Well that IS an interesting point - and one I hadn't thought about. I'll update the blog to reflect that question...
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 09:59 AM
[Reply to this
Syd Andy

 
LOL. Gotta love, and expect that!
 
Posted by Syd Andy on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 06:09 PM
[Reply to this
Nessa
Vanessa Fravel

 
Bravo Alyssa!
Hear! Hear!
 
Posted by Nessa on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 02:56 PM
[Reply to this
Roseee

 
Love the Video!!!
Manning its great to read a man voice his views on Woman in the corporation world and how still in 2007 its making news ..I believe woman can have it all Career, kids, partner etc etc

Looking at the Elipse from my lounge... absolutely awesome!!!!
 
Posted by Roseee on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:00 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Thanks Roseee :)

Are you a new reader?
 
Posted by Manning on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 04:50 AM
[Reply to this
Roseee

 
Hey Manning..

Well fairly new, i have been reading your blogs for the last 5 months and haave commented on a few previousl. I did discover you on RSVP...

Great blogs...
 
Posted by Roseee on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 11:56 AM
[Reply to this
Pretty Pet

 
Hi Manning

Good post - though I side with the others. The eclipse takes precedence :)
 
Posted by Pretty Pet on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:03 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Ah well, it's over now. That's two I've seen: I saw one in South Africa back in January 2001.

Have yet to see a solar eclipse though.
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 02:00 PM
[Reply to this
=The Devil's Advocate=

 
Just watch 'Apocalypto'. Save a lot of stuffing around....

I can luckily say that I have known few women in my life who believe they are treated differently in the workplace because they are a woman. The few who HAVE would have to admit that any inequality has actually worked in their favour. Not saying it doesn't exist (of course it does), just saying not every woman experiences it or cares.

I grew up spending a lot of time with my mum who had 5 kids and a job. My two older sisters have done exactly what they want to do - one a teacher , one a professional mum. Without anyone in the family ever mentioning Feminism I have a strong inherent understanding of male vs female relations. The problems like these in the world sometimes seem more about Parent-Child relationships than Birth Order Theory than aging Feminist dogma.

Having said this, I think Garry is right with his Economic Rationalism explanation...

On a slight tangent, the day so many women stop longing for a fantasy lifestyle is the day sexes will become completely equal. But will this ever happen when so many women still cling to this romantic notion that one day a man will sweep them off their feet and make them happy.

A gross generalisation? Well how many women in your life have, at some point, expressed this desire? OK, now consider this: How many MEN do have you known in your life who have expressed the desire for a WOMAN to sweep them off their feet and ride off into the sunset...?

=pb=

ps - Great blog again. Keeping me interested after all these years!
 
Posted by =The Devil's Advocate= on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 04:19 AM
[Reply to this
=The Devil's Advocate=

 
Man, what a terrible day for getting things right:

I meant: "...seem more about Parent-Child relationships AND Birth Order Theory THAN aging Feminist dogma..."

Bloody 'ell....
 
Posted by =The Devil's Advocate= on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 04:42 AM
[Reply to this
Pineapple ❀

 
In my work experience men had to problem taking orders from me and I being their boss. The problem came when I had to deal with other women in the industry(few though they are) The questioned everything I said and made the simplest thing difficult. Instead of bonding together they were too busy trying to prove that they could do it with no ones help. The men in the industry help each other all the time and gladly helped me when ever i asked. But women trucking company owners want to do it all alone and won;'t ask for help and in this industry you need partners to get your back and help in a pinch if you don't ask or accept help you fail so a lot of women fail trying to prove they don't need anyone to succeed

good rant

good subject


I am sleepy I just hope somewhere in there I got my point across
 
Posted by Pineapple ❀ on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:14 AM
[Reply to this
Jay

 
its the same old story, we (men) have been the establishment for so long, and the roots run so deep that its hard to make change from the outside. the boys clubs dont want to relent the power they've become accustomed to. that said when the shift does take place, and it will. it always does, given our history we will probably undercut it like we always do, by passing a ton of laws that go to far in womens favor. we do this every time we cheat a group, and as wrong as it is, its a briliant tactic. we undercut racial harmony by passing laws that are supposed to make black and white people equal under law, but infact favors black people. this in turn pisses off white racists who were starting to come around. they then push harder against those laws so that, law not withstanding we still have no racial harmony.
this same tactic will be applied to women. probably already has. we always fight balance. it isnt right it just is.
 
Posted by Jay on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:39 AM
[Reply to this
~kate~

 
Being in charge of something as prioritizing and stressful as a bank isn't something that most women really WANT to do. My mom was the President of a bank here in the states for 15 years; I grew up in this setting.

There were many nights that I heard mom crying herself to sleep because of the stresses that a bank can bring to a woman who leans more toward the nurture side of the spectrum.
 
Posted by ~kate~ on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:14 AM
[Reply to this
Ms Beautiful Soul

 
To you question... YES I agree, but perhaps that is because I am a women so cvan relate to a woman's life/ way of reasoning more...
 
Posted by Ms Beautiful Soul on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:28 AM
[Reply to this
Julianne
Julianne Anderson

 
My sister still has it all.....very successful, high impact, high pay career and two beautiful children.

I played the game far too long. I started young in Stock Brokerage. Had many licenses, my own branch office, success, and money....all under the age of 24. Many years in that industry came to an end...........caught a man imbezzling, turned him in, shut down his company, helped the SEC for a few weeks, and gave up the rat race.

wanted a mindless job to "rest" for a while and decide what career path to take. I began bartending (which shortly led to payroll and far too many other responsibilities).

So....off I go to a manufacturing company in a small town. Just something to do until I decide a new career path. Front desk, receptionist. That's how I started in stock brokerage. No problem. Smile, answer phones, type, what a breeze.

Well, I worked for the company for nine years. Customer Service then scheduling. Before I left, I was holding a traditionally "man's job" within the company, making a man's salary, had a nanny for my children, and "had it all".

I just got tired.

When you have a demanding job, you must maintain that "drive"....and I mean you must really be 300% motivated every day and every night. Work does not stay at work (and those that say it does are lying). I got calls in the middle of the night, had to lay off people two weeks before Christmas (corporate decision, no input from me, but I had to do the dirty work), took the high-power butt-chew for all the idiots that didn't perform daily (and had to chew on them a little), and much more.

Now, I DO stay at home with my kids. Life is different, but I'm not as tired any more. The work is harder (yes, I said harder) than any "outside the home" job I ever had.

Women can have it all. I have what I consider "it all". Having it all is different for different people.
 
Posted by Julianne on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 10:31 AM
[Reply to this
Stephanie

 
Hey, we have a woman and a black man running for president and it's making headlines. But the good news is, it's making LESS headlines now than it did a few months ago. People are coming to accept it and starting to talk about them as people, not just a member of a minority. So I do think we're making progress but we may not see it in our time. It may be two or three generations away still. It will take these kids growing up with a female president or a mom that is a CEO to really change the way people view gender roles.
 
Posted by Stephanie on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 11:02 AM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
IF Hilary (or Barack) gets elected, then I can safely say we will be in a new era...

But that's a long way off yet. And I am far from convinced it will happen. (As much as I'd like it to).
 
Posted by Manning on Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 04:52 AM
[Reply to this
CoCo

 
It does eem silly the women we pay attention to.
 
Posted by CoCo on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 12:44 PM
[Reply to this
~ Woman in the Moon ~
Sue Hood

 
I have teenage daughters who watched that show... so I had to watch it too... and yes he is out saved by the bell... LOL
 
Posted by ~ Woman in the Moon ~ on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 12:50 PM
[Reply to this
~ Woman in the Moon ~
Sue Hood

 
Hey Manning,

didn't you write something in a blog a couple of months ago about women suited to HR etc ... anyway my point being that the owner of the company I worked for in Sydney was great at her job, but absolutely shocking with people at work, out of work - fun, caring, but the fact that on average an employee who had to work with her on a a daily basis only stayed with the company for a max of 1 year... it was a standing joke that I was nearly up for long service leave having lasted nearly 3 years!

Unfortunately, women have to prove themselves much more than men do, to get as far.

Both sexes can be great at anything, some men make great "house-husbands" whilst some women are more suited to the corporate world.

I just don't think that in the long run that it is an equal playing field when a lot of the decision makers are still part of the "old boy" club.

PS... that last clip made me laugh!!
 
Posted by ~ Woman in the Moon ~ on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 12:48 PM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
Yes but the blog in question was a "Wind Up Wednesday" and was completely full of shit.
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 01:52 PM
[Reply to this
Alicia

 
So by this measure New Zealand would be one of the most advanced countries in the world? I may not get this exactly right as I'm quoting an old article from memory, but the out of the top 10 positions of power I think 8 were women including the PM, the Attorney General, maybe the Trade and Foreign Ministers and maybe the opposition leader a deputy and the Governor General. I'm sure this could be easily googled but it's tired and I'm late...
 
Posted by Alicia on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 12:51 PM
[Reply to this
Manning

 
All that is true, but like anyone cares about New Zealand. I mean, c'mon...

:p
 
Posted by Manning on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 02:02 PM
[Reply to this
Syd Andy

 
Well, the reason for that in NZ, is that we have poached all the decent men and brought them over here to claim them as Aussies!

:D
 
Posted by Syd Andy on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 06:19 PM
[Reply to this
Lisa

 
I believe a woman's place is anywhere she wants it to be. Not all of us have the drive or desire to be president of a company or a country.

Interestingly enough, there is an article in today's Minneapolis paper about the first-ever female homicide unit. She says that it is just a fluke she is the first woman, and that her gender is NOT what other officers, victims' families and the community care about.
 
Posted by Lisa on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 12:54 PM
[Reply to this
Rosjian

 
That's exactly it. Why do we care if a job is held by a man or a woman, as long as the best person for teh job is doing the best possible job? The problem however is not necessarily a "boys club" issue either. I know a lot of American women who are against Hilary for president on the basis she is a woman. In fact, I only know one who is for her. (could be the whole republican state crap too)
 
Posted by Rosjian on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 01:38 PM
[Reply to this
CyberSoulSista

 
So true Manning and that video of Miss SC...I want to say the girl was nervous and just didn't know what to say but I couldn't even convince myself of that so I couldn't force that opinion on anyone else.
 
Posted by CyberSoulSista on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 01:03 PM
[Reply to this
bErOliNa

 
Hi Manning,

I think on this space you are trying to convert the converted ;)

In Germany the glass ceiling is made from bullet proof glass. Eventually Germany has a female chancellor ( Angela Merkel ).
My aunt was a member of parliament and a minister for many years, and what got her into the press? The outfits she wore and having a male secretary. Not her work for the foreign ministry, for the building ministry or the World Bank. She did not become chancellor (and I doubt that she was too keen on it of many years of fighting to be acknowledged for her intelligence, not for her looks).

My youngest sister studied engineering and was one of only 5% females and finished as one of the top 4%. She started her work career in consulting. When clients asked for the best case worker, she was sent. Then they complained to her bosses why they didn’t send some old bloke who new his trade. She was their best ‘man’, until she got fed up with the discrimination. She did her PhD on consulting (summa cum laude) – now people accept she is the best woman in her area. Is she paid the same as the ‘old blokes’… I doubt it.
Her are of special interest is „Corporate Social Responsibility“(CSR).

When I reached my ‘ceiling’ in Germany I moved to Asia, where I by-and-large was accepted for my qualifications. I learned what I can do, and how often I had to work with men in the ‘driver seat’, that thought themselves superior. I have walked out of jobs twice because of it. The second time I did it my bossed begged me to come back, and gave me a fat promotion.
What did I learn? As a woman you have to work harder and smarter than your male peer. You may need to develop the same willingness to gamble and can earn a million dollar salary, but you also ‘pay’ for it. In the moment I have a job that is not challenging me. But it was a conscious choice to achieve other things that are more important to me than a title and the recognition that comes with it. Working here has definitely shown me where the glass ceiling is… and on which side of it men work.

If I had daughters I would probably put up a harder fight for equality. For myself I do not need that anymore. I know what I can and can not do. I know how to negotiate the best deal for myself.

By the way the lunar eclipse was amazing. Spring has arrived and what a beautiful night it was. And now I need my beauty sleep, so I can face the world tomorrow looking pretty.

Cheers Barbara
 
Posted by bErOliNa on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 01:07 PM
[Reply to this
Listing 1-50 of 158
1234
of
4