Hair Metal…....
....
....
This is actually something that I
find myself contemplating, not knowing exactly what the problem is. I think older gothic/industrial music
is actually really good, I think it works. Punk works in small doses, but because it is relatively simplistic
I can’t listen to too much of it at once.
The
question mark really for me is metal, in particular hair metal. If you want to experience some truly
heinous music, back track into the lesser-known LA hair bands. If you think, well what’s the point, I
must say this- it is an interesting bad.
Gothic/industrial music of the eighties and the nineties has aged fairly
well, as has punk from the late 70’s and early eighties. Hair metal- hair metal is problematic. I can’t stress that enough times.
This
is actually something I’ve been writing about a lot. My favorite label is easily Cleopatra Records, easily.
Cleopatra founder Brian Perara started in the hair metal scene, and then when
those bands were all broke after the Seattle craze and Nine Inch Nails, he went
back to give a whole lot of them contracts, and put out the boxed set. This is the same man who put out
out-of-print Psychic TV albums in 1994.
A
similar problem comes up with Village Voice music critic Chuck Eddy- the list
of his original Stairway To Heaven: 500 Best Heavy Metal Albums of All Time is available on-line, I’ve been downloading as mush
of it as I can find. Metal probably is critically underrated, and he rates
Voivod, one of my favorite bands, quite highly. He digs up some truly heinous hair metal in that book, and
some possibly even worse music from the seventies that was forerunner to it. As
others have pointed out, Chuck Eddy defines metal very oddly, including a large
number of albums that no one except him would consider metal albums, Miles
Davis or Funkadelic for example, but I think actually the albums that you might
consider to be metal or early metal.
Its really unfortunate because he’s big on Voivod and Blue Cheer which are
bands that don’t get nearly enough attention ....
Dokken
is painful. Some of those bands
are so low on the totem pole of musical expression that they are high on
it. There is such a black hole of
meaning. Hair metal is hard to
play, there is no doubt about that, but the basic rifts would seem to be reused
over and over again in slight variance by an endless stream of identical bands,
a lot of them would be almost impossible to tell apart. Lyrical themes circle around sexuality
and drugs maybe sometimes, a lot of the time not even, a lot of the time it
really is just about having sex, and uses the word “baby” a whole lot. A bunch of the bands have either there
love ballad that is every bit as sappy as anything on an easy listening
station. If you check out the band Circle from Finland label Ektro records,
you’ll see any area in which metal and more “experimental” music overlaps
strongly, Ektro records release both and Circle play both. Its not hair metal that Circle play or
release on their label, though its much more abrasive metal. Much of the music
on the label is European or associated with the New Wave of British Heavy Metal
as it was called in the eighties. Hair Metal is just not at all like that. It doesn’t lend itself to musical
exploration. ....
There
is a lot less in terms of musical properties that could be used for artistic
properties then what Circle do with aspects of New Wave of British Heavy Metal
influences. LA hair metal would
melt any art it touches for the most part. ....
Still
there is a perverse joy in discovering the endless depth of this black hole,
which obscures the careers of the otherwise respect worthy Perrara and
Eddy. Eddy in particular has a big
thing for Kix, I must say “Don’t Close Your Eyes” by Kix about a women
overdosing on sleeping pills is beyond amazing, because it utterly trivializes
a woman dying of a sleeping pill overdose. Another great moment in hair metal- I remember Don Dokken on
MTV explaining that his song “Mirror, Mirror” was actually about leaving his
band Dokken. Its striking because
if you didn’t know that you might think it was another romantic break up song,
but if you listen carefully it references the seven years he was in Dokken, and
has the lyric “if this is love, then love is hate” which is not about a woman,
but rather his own band members, which in this context, if you listen to enough
hair metal, sounds radical. There’s a few song that reference ditching school,
most of it is either the song about sex or the love ballad, with the guitar
solo, which is usually about 30 seconds in length, and demonstrates truly
unreal finger speed and some climax high notes. The problem is not musical skills these people had unreal
technical abilities, mostly in the direction of finger speed. Guns N’ Roses do a few things that are
a little different, The Cult started as a gothic band and went through a hair
band phase without completely abandoning that essence, but they are atypical of
the genre. Great White never broke form. White Lion never broke form. Most of
those bands never broke form at all.
It was as tightly studio musicians reproducing a narrow songwriting
format as I’m aware of. ....
“Seventeen”
by Warrant, about having sex with a seventeen-year-old, was a major hit despite
sex with seventeen year olds being illegal in the United States. But to ignore the lyrical content, and
examine the sonic composition, it gives you sense of the general feel of hair
metal musically. There’s a strong emphasis on guitar, pop song structure, no
improvisation, the guitar sound is either left more raw or processed through a
few effects.....
Generally its less ambitious then what it real evolved out
of which is the guitar oriented rock of the seventies that is know played on
classic rock stations. A lot of those bands did a lot of very long songs with a
lot of soloing, “Talk Dirty to Me” by Poison is pretty standard, song about sex
with a woman, pop song structure over a straight guitar chord progression,
until the solo comes. The
distortion on the guitars relative to other music made at the time was actually
pretty tame, the LA hair bands were amazingly tame compared to other forms of
metal (Voivod’s War and Pain is a wall
of noise) and even guitar sounds on albums of what was called college music at
the time like Sonic Youth and Pixies. ....
Its abrasion is rooted in something
else then pure guitar noise.
Plenty of music from the 80’s now sounds very dated or of its period,
that’s not the problem with hair metal. Hair metal was that infantile at the time. The artist Mike Kelley rights about
Baby Huey cartoons as being successful as art because of how uncomfortable it
will make you if you watch it as an adult. If you listen to a lot of it at one time it will bother you,
it will even give you a headache.
They operated within such a strict set of genre formula elements
lyrically and in terms of guitar sounds that nothing operates out of a limit of
total predictability at any point.
It would be very easy to just dismiss it as adolescent boys sexual fantasies,
but the love ballads could have taken their lyrics from hallmark cards, which
introduces the problem that it also has an overwrought sentimental side.
There’s no indication that any of it was at all ironic either. Some of these bands made huge
amounts of money, but many of them remained relatively obscure and did not
score major hits, playing mostly rock clubs on the Sunset Strip of Los Angeles,
so it can’t be reduced to mere capitalist interest, because a lot of these
people made little money at it.
There could be the draw of sex and drugs but some hair bands such as
Stryper were actually evangelical Christians, so it most likely wasn’t a
universal draw. ....
Its hard to imagine why Brian
Perrara who released experimental noise albums by Rozz Williams and Genesis P.
Orridge (who is know a fixture on the New York art gallery circuit) or Chuck
Eddy, who writes about noise jazz, can stomach all this. If you imagine the intensity of guitar
sounds on either some of the live Psychic TV recordings or a Voivod album
you’ll see how odd it really is that Eddy or Perrara would have ever been drawn
to this material. ....
I’m fascinated by it because of its
plasticity and soullessness. It
could not be more formulaic it has no interest in individualistic
expression. I’ve hear people describe
at as having a very juvenile sexuality to it, utilizing hilariously unsubtle
sexual innuendo (Whitesnake’s “Slide It In” for example), but what I’ve seen
less often said of it is how redundant and recycled it was. Older photographs of these bands
demonstrate how visually they conformed no less, bands in matching spandex,
hair spray, bandanas. The drummer
frequently has a drumstick tangled a little in his hair, many men in identical
eye linear and ripped jeans jackets. It just goes round and round. Its painfulness is only subsided by its
comedic quality, but an extended listening, a full CD worth of hair band music,
the irony or the joke ends, and then it becomes discomforting. That is its attraction for me. It’s a
black hole. If you go into the
songs that were album tracks and not singles or the songs by bands that never
made it, the vocalist all made the same hollowing sound, the guitarists all
used the same licks and probably the same set of amplifiers and effects. It was
very much a studio creation, heavily overdubbed. That very slickness, that very emptiness, which really
evokes the Los Angeles commercial film and music industry, is the draw. Hair
metal was professional studio musicians running through the numbers in the
service of embarrassing adolescent male sexual fantasies that somehow had
sentimental romantic melodrama as a flip side. That embarrassment and irritation is key. I like disturbance and shock aesthetically