MySpace


Michael



Last Updated: 11/17/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 30
Sign: Libra

City: MOUNT LAUREL
State: NEW JERSEY
Country: US
Signup Date: 4/29/2004

Who Gives Kudos:



My Subscriptions
Thursday, June 26, 2008 

Category: News and Politics

So, let me get this straight.

 

The U.S. Supreme Court chooses to abstain from hearing hundreds of cases every year on the grounds that they're either too controversial, or the State courts already have them under control.

 

But when their Aide brought the latest list of cases and said, "Here is one dealing with the death penalty for child rapists.  Some states allow it, other don't – but no one likes a child rapist, so I'm guessing we're just going to let this one go and abstain from it for now.  And onto the next case…"

 

For some God unknown reason, at this precise moment, Justice Anthony Kennedy stands up and says, "Whoa, whoa!  'Death for child rapists'?  Who would want to go and do something ridiculous like that?  What's so wrong with raping kids?"

 

Then Justice Steven Breyer says, "'Vaginal reconstruction'?  Women pay thousands of dollars for this surgery every day, and these kids are getting it for free?  What are they complaining for?"

 

"Yeah, I mean, it's only rape," chimes in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, "would someone tell these kids to finish growing a pair?  I would LOVE for someone to rape me.  Look how hideously ugly I am!  They should be grateful that they're getting some!"

 

"Exactly," continued Justice David Souter, "we need to teach these little kids to respect their elders.  When they turn 18 then they can tell their step-dad to stop violating their anus, but until then I firmly believe that 'children should be raped but not heard'."

 

So eight years of a Democrat in office gives us that rarity of rarities in a Liberal majority in the Supreme Court.

 

That Liberal majority then does the next to impossible and survives another eight years with a radical Republican leading the country, and the American people finally learn that a Liberal Supreme Court doesn't necessarily mean that school children will be forced to smoke pot, burn flags, and get daily abortions.

 

Awesome.

 

And now we find ourselves months away from a new Presidential election that could in all actuality see the appointing of even more Supreme Court Justices. 

 

All we've got to do is keep playing it cool.

 

So what do the Liberal geniuses on the Supreme Court decide that it's a good idea to do at such a critical time in our history?  Throw it all away to save the lives of child rapists.

 

Brilliant.

 

Here's a note from the real world – the "evolving sense of decency in America" which these five Justices cited for making sure child rapists can't ever be executed, involves something a lot more along the lines of strangers kissing babies on their forehead, and a lot less with them ripping out their rectums with their erect penis.

 

So if you guys want to start all over again with this one and give us a new ruling that goes along more with how anyone with a heart, mind, or conscience would vote, that would be great…

Steph-E
Stephanie Dulieu

 
this is a little confusing, i can't believe those guys actually said that ? did they for real ? :S
 
Posted by Steph-E on Friday, June 27, 2008 - 10:12 PM
[Reply to this
Michael

 
Haha no they didn't actually say it, but they might as well have!
 
Posted by Michael on Monday, June 30, 2008 - 2:13 AM
[Reply to this