MySpace


Chicago Bears™



Last Updated: 11/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 89
Sign: Virgo

City: CHICAGO
State: ILLINOIS
Country: US
Signup Date: 6/11/2005

Who Gives Kudos:


Saturday, September 13, 2008 
Okay, me and my buddy are currently feuding.  Each one of us think we have the better article.  Read both articles, decide which one is better, more entertaining, and such.  Then post a comment picking anonymous 1 or anonymous 2

Chicago Bears 2008 Preview
-ANONYMOUS 1
This year's Bears team is much improved over last year's 7-9 squad that disappointed at every turn last season, especially on the defensive end of the ball. 
This offseason proved to be a semi-productive one for the Bears as they added rookie running back Matt Forte who has the ability to be a power back through the middle, as well as a finesse back with a good pop once he hits the open field.  Should Forte stay healthy for the entire year, there is no reason to believe he doesn't have what it takes to run for well over 1000 yards this season.  To add depth behind Forte, the Bears brass added Kevin Jones, looking to come back strong from a knee injury last season, from division rival Detroit Lions, bringing in a solid veteran presence ahead of Adrian Peterson and 3rd down back Garrett Wolfe.
 The impact of these new additions hangs largely on an upgraded offensive line that has seen the addition, and subsequent loss of Chris Williams, a heralded tackle taken in the first round out of Vanderbilt.  To account for this loss, the offensive line has seen a new face in Dan Buenning, a promising young OG from Tampa Bay to bolster the line and free up OT/G John St. Clair to fill the void left by the Williams' injury.  The right side of the line should still be solid with OT John Tait, OG Rob Garza, and C Olin Kreutz, all solidifying the line for their fourth straight year together.
The Bears' receiving core has also seen an unlikely upgrade, even with the loss of Bernard Berrian to the Minnesota Vikings.  The Bears added veterans Marty Booker and Brandon Lloyd to replace departed Muhsin Muhammad, as well as drafting Earl Bennett, the SEC career leader in receptions, in the 3rd round of the draft.  While many around the NFL look at Lloyd as a bust as a premier WR, Lloyd showed flashes of what he has to offer earlier this pre-season in a game against the San Francisco 49er's when he caught consecutive difficult passes during a two-minute drill led by Kyle Orton.  Add to the mix Devin Hester, in his second year as an offensive weapon, paired with the emergence of Rashied Davis as a receiving threat, the Bears look to have the potential for a high-powered aerial attack.  Along with the receivers, the Bears boast twin tight end threats in Greg Olsen and Desmond Clark and the possibility of Kellen Davis earning some playing time could mean trouble for opposing defensive coordinators. 
At quarterback, the Bears have finally put Kyle Orton back as starter for the first time since his remarkable 2005 rookie debut.  Orton gives the Bears' offense the best chance to consistently move the ball downfield with the ability to read a defense and make a smart choice based on what's available.  While Orton lacks the premier arm strength backup Rex Grossman displayed, his ability to keep the ball sets him apart from Grossman, and with a playbook that will finally be readily available to him, Orton should have everything he needs to make it as a solid starter in this league.
    As for the defensive side of the ball, the Bears have depth at all positions along the front four, harboring Alex Brown, Mark Anderson, Israel Idonije, and Adewale Ogunleye in a platoon at defensive end, Tommie Harris, Dusty Dvoracek, and Marcus Harrison at defensive tackle.  With so much depth at the line, the Bears should have fresh legs throughout most of the games, helping limit the opposing running game. 
              Completing the front seven, the Bears bring back the same three linebackers, Lance Briggs, Hunter Hillenmeyer, and captain Brian Urlacher, for the 6th straight year.  Adding to the depth at linebacker, the Bears bring back OLB's Jamar Williams, and Nick Roach and MLB Darrell McClover. 
In the secondary, the Bears have arguably the most underrated tandem of cornerbacks in Charles "Peanut" Tillman and Nathan Vasher with nickelback Trumaine McBride and Corey Graham, and at safety, Mike Brown returns, fully rehabbed from a torn ACL last season, alongside Brandon McGowan.  Backing up Brown and McGowan, rookie Craig Steltz and Kevin Payne provide depth and are both capable starters should anything happen to the starters.
With the improvements the Bears brass has made at key positions in the offseason, both through free agency and the draft, the Bears are poised to pull out a season that should take them to the playoffs and possibly beyond.  After seeing the first team offense and defense through the preseason, and now from their first game against the Colts, hopes are rising for the 2008 Chicago Bears season and the potential lying ahead throughout the season. With the 11th toughest schedule in the league this year, and the club the Bears' management has put together, I see this team going 9-7 and squeaking into the playoffs in week 17 with key wins coming at home against the Philadelphia Eagles on September 28, the Minnesota Vikings on October 19, and the Green Bay Packers at Lambeau Field on November 16.




Brady-less, the NFL, Pats, face challenges
-ANONYMOUS 2

Lightning struck New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady in a bad way.  Only midway through the first game of the season in the first quarter, Brady was struck in the knee, and at that very moment, the landscape of the NFL changed for this season.  Not only that, but the aura the Patriots carried around vanished.

Brady suffered a torn ACL and MCL.  If he had torn his PCL too, he would have a long road back to recovery.  Former quarterback Daunte Culpepper suffeed a similar injury in 2004 and never made it back to the upper echelon of the NFL.  As of right now, he is retired, although the Patriots may give him a ring to hook up Culpepper with his old pal from their days with the Minnesota Vikings, All-Pro wide receiver Randy Moss.  Together, they dominated the then-NFC Central (now North), along with the Favrre-led Green Bay Packers.  It only makes sense for the Patriots to renew their magic if they want a chance to get to the Super Bowl.

With quarterback Matt Cassel, a guy who hasn't started a game since his last game as a senior in high school, the Patriots are looking at a wild card berth at best.

With Brady out, what does this mean for the NFL and the Patriots?

For the NFL, it means a loss of ratings and a chunk of advertising sales.  With a Week 9 primetime game of the Indianapolis Colts vs Patriots in the Colts' new stadium missing one of the two biggest stars in Brady, the annual hot matchup of Peyton Manning vs Tom Brady suddenly looks boring.  If I owned a compnay, I would pay top dollar to advertise my company during this game.  Manning vs Cassel?  I wouldn't pay so much.  After all, who's going to watch that game, despite the hot rivalry these two teams have.

Had it been Manning who suffered the injury instead of Brady, it would be a less deal.  I do not wish injury upon anybody, but it's not hard to admit that most people watch a Patriots game just for their aura, for their greatness, for their dominance, and much more.  They are the blueprint of a perfect team, despite losing the Super Bowl to the New York Giants in Glendale, Arizona. 

Speaking of the Super Bowl, there has a been a trend in recent years with the losing team missing the playoffs the following season, with the exception of the Seattle Seahawks.  They say its a curse.  If its really a curse, then it sure as hell struck Tom Brady and his New England Patriots.  A Matt Cassel-led Patriots team is a wild card team at best.

Speaking of the wild card...

Brett Favre is the wild card in all of this.

How so?

Well, all off-season long, we listened to the Favre-Packers drama and storyline.  Favre wants back in the NFL, wouldn't bulge on playing for a non-competitive team.  As we all know how the story ended, Favre gave up, was traded to the New York Jets, in the same division as the Patriots.  The Jets suddenly look the favorites to win AFC East.  A Week 2 matchup of Brady vs Favre was an interesting match-up.  Look at it this way, though.  If Favre had decided to stay retired, the Jets wouldn't have given up a draft pick for him, or his rights.  However, with Brady out, and knowing full well that Favre has the itch to play, the Patriots could have emerged as a big player for the Favre "sweepstakes".  Week 5 could have seen Favre ready to start for the team following a bye, against San Francisco 49ers.  Easy game for the grey-haired gunslinger to get into the mix of things, against a team he's played many times when he was in the NFC.  A Brett Favre-led Patriots would have kept the Patriots in the hunt for the Super Bowl.  Don't forget he tried to lobby Moss into Green Bay for the past two seasons.  With Moss in New England, the invitiation to Foxborough, Massachusetts is certainly enticing.

It's funny how the NFL works.  I'll miss Tom Brady, but with him being gone for the rest of this season, the AFC is wide open, and suddenly the NFC looks much more powerful than the AFC.  It sure changes everything.

Only 16 more weeks to enjoy all the 32 favorite teams.




Bob

 
id have to go with anon 1. im biased toward the content but it also has a better "flow" to it.

sorry number 2
 
Posted by Bob on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:19 AM
[Reply to this
♥Shannon Leigh♥

 
1 wins
 
Posted by ♥Shannon Leigh♥ on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:24 AM
[Reply to this
$Chronic Bitch$

 
I would deffenitly go with ANONYMOUS 1 because it got my attention from the beginning to the end. Now number 2 wasnt all that interesting..it was kinda boring.,
~Chronic E~
 
Posted by $Chronic Bitch$ on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:26 AM
[Reply to this
♥BRiTNEY♥ [[RIP Geato! ILY ]]
Britney Gettle

 
I'd go with 1 ..
So sorry number2, but one kicked your ass. =]
 
Posted by ♥BRiTNEY♥ [[RIP Geato! ILY ]] on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:29 AM
[Reply to this
♪♪C-Mo GREEN♪♪

 
I am a Bears fan who is willing to respect what Brett Favre has done over his football carrer, all be it against our beloved Bears more than once, but if he wouldve went to the New England Cheatriots all respect wouldve been flushed down the drain :)

Go with article 1
 
Posted by ♪♪C-Mo GREEN♪♪ on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:34 AM
[Reply to this
Chaz
chaz robertson

 
Anon 1, flows better, more entertainment value, more informational, and i actually agree with most of it. I see the bears winning 10 games and maybe winning the NFC North. I don;t agree with the second guys opinion of how huge an impact brady's knee will have on the marketing value of the NFL.
 
Posted by Chaz on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:40 AM
[Reply to this
ღ Susie B. ღ
Susie Bambulas

 
Article 1. =)

sorry 2!
 
Posted by ღ Susie B. ღ on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:51 AM
[Reply to this
*Laurie*
Laurie Jacobs

 
1 wins! :)
 
Posted by *Laurie* on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:54 AM
[Reply to this
THE DEVIL

 
1
 
Posted by THE DEVIL on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 5:03 AM
[Reply to this
Louiss;
Louis P.

 
number one
 
Posted by Louiss; on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 5:05 AM
[Reply to this
Hal

 
Of course the Bear fans are going to pick article one. You both should write an article on The power shifting to the NFC or something.
 
Posted by Hal on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 5:06 AM
[Reply to this
Çhìlî

 
1 is the better article not really because its about the bears just for the simple fact its not about Tom. The NFL and CBS and any other news coverage of any football game have him and his team on the pedestal I mean were they good yes. But they did lose the Superbowl. Are they now? probably not but a great team over comes those problems. Its not good by any means that he got hurt, on the other hand he is out for the season do we as bears fans see the season different? sure. Does it make me not want to watch football heck no! I only see the prime games of them anyway and really, I don't choose to watch them its that they are the only games on. So 2 sorry but I talked about the article just a bit too much mainly from the stand point of Brady is out and the world is ok.
 
Posted by Çhìlî on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 5:40 AM
[Reply to this
Stacia Stoeff

 
I'd have to go with 1
 
Posted by Stacia Stoeff on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 5:43 AM
[Reply to this
James

 
Number one, it kept me more attentive. It was very opinionated but it's aim was toward the Bears. Some opinions also very valid. I continued reading it until the end. Number two started off about some Patriots bullshit - I don't know about anyone else but I've had enough of the Patriots. Their dynasty ended last year, I don't want to hear about them anymore. Article number two lost my attention within seconds.
 
Posted by James on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 5:59 AM
[Reply to this
Reggie & Raylene
Reggie Raylene Winterland

 
I thought 1 was better....



GO BEARS !!!!
 
Posted by Reggie & Raylene on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 6:00 AM
[Reply to this
NathaN ™

 
WTF is up witn the 2007 comments? Being a Bears fan I'm biased to 1 cause that article covers Da Bears!
 
Posted by NathaN ™ on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 9:46 AM
[Reply to this
Justin Credible

 
Two completely different articles... One is a preview, one is strictly editorial. I liked them both for their respective content. Not sure how this is even a 'competition', as both accomplish seperate things...
 
Posted by Justin Credible on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 11:26 AM
[Reply to this
*** JeWeLs***

 
After reading the very 1st sentence of article one, I said f*ck this... Im reading article 2. ( I didnt like the dissing of the bears even if it was last season) So I read article two and thought, "hhmm isnt this a BEARS website?" SO I decided to read article 1.

My pick is article one (only because I am a BEARS fan!!)

ALthough, that might not be the only reason. I mean who doesnt know Bradys out for the season.... yeah yeah we know, I still think the TEAM has a shot. And second and formost F*CK favre!!!! As far as I am concerned that whinning ass should of stayed retired. Yes he was a good quarterback for the crackers for 17 years. But, I mean make up your flippin mind! Do you wanna play or not? Are the managers supposed to be pyschics? I was born and raised in Chicago and am now living in Wisconsin and I tell ya, favre is a very hot topic here, worse than any political debates ever. It is actually comical to see the tension is some peoples face when he is talked about. And the poor crackers fans are left so confused now, do i stay a cracker fan or am I a NYJ fan?? lmao!!

GO BEARS !! What a great game last week. I had my money on the Bears ~ Cha Ching!!
 
Posted by *** JeWeLs*** on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 11:41 AM
[Reply to this
Todd

 
I think 1 is better!!
 
Posted by Todd on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 12:50 PM
[Reply to this
Badge
Ryan Badgley

 
1. Biased toward Da Bears!!!!
 
Posted by Badge on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 1:18 PM
[Reply to this
Jenny

 
1 wins! =o)
 
Posted by Jenny on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 2:29 PM
[Reply to this
Jenny

 
1 wins! =o)
 
Posted by Jenny on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 2:30 PM
[Reply to this
travis
travis david

 
if I had to choose one it would be the first one, but how fare of a comparison can you make when the articles are about two different things?????
couople comments about the articles, in 1 i wouldn't consider Orton's rookie season to be a remarkable one, he had more interceptions than touchdown passes, and just benefitted from a GREAT defense.
in 2, I wouldn't say that brady being out for the season hurts the nfl market substancially. even with brady being gone there is still that rivalry between the colts and patriots, they both hate each other and one quarterback being gone is not going to change that. and whatever hit the NFL market takes with Brady being gone, Farve in New York will sure make up for that and then some........
 
Posted by travis on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 2:41 PM
[Reply to this
Brock

 
1
 
Posted by Brock on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:13 PM
[Reply to this
Gette
Bridgette Richard

 
I beleive Anon 1 to be the better article. I would say this is mostly due to the fact that it isn't something that feels like self-summerized rehash of what's in the media spotlight right now. I also felt like there was more focus in the article, as well as more spirit for the sport and a team that came through.

The thing I find funny though, is why & how did an argument even transpire amidst these two articles. The content isn't comparible. If you strictly based on writing style, & capturing and holding the attention of your audience, article 1 clearly wins. But, I feel that you will continue to fued over this whether one comes out the victor anyway. This is simply because your content is not the same. Now, if you both had written an article on the same topic within your own writing styles & from your own perspectives...then it would be a better match up worth fueding over.

Long story short: Article 1: Engaging, entertaining, overall good read.
Aritcle 2: Same ol' same ol', blah blah blah, hard to finish b/c it was
like reading one of my brother's high school opinion papers that
he paraphrased what everone else had already said somewhere
else, but w/ his own non-creative spin on it.
 
Posted by Gette on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:28 PM
[Reply to this
Rated S for.....

 
1.... who cares about Brady & the Pats!
 
Posted by Rated S for..... on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:42 PM
[Reply to this
Mac D

 
Both are really good articles. That being said, I'm gonna roll wih my bias. Article 1.
 
Posted by Mac D on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 4:48 PM
[Reply to this


 
OKAY LET ME SAY THERE ARE BOTH PRETTY GOOD, BUT 2 WINS..I DONT LIKE ALL THE PUT DOWNS IN NUMBER ONE..U DONT HAVE TO PUT SOMEONE DOWN TO MAKE A POINT! EVEN THOUGH IT SOUNDS OKAY I FELT QUITE OFFENDED WHEN READING IT! BUT I GET 1 POINT! 2 IS SIMPLE AND STRAIGHT TO THE POINT! AND I UNDERSTOOD IT ALOT BETTER! SO SORRY, BUT 2 IS MY CHOICE....GOOD LUCK!
 
Posted by on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 6:33 PM
[Reply to this
Andrea
andrea newnum

 
I would say 1....sorry 2 it was close.
 
Posted by Andrea on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 6:47 PM
[Reply to this
♥NikLovin♥

 
anonymous 1
 
Posted by ♥NikLovin♥ on Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 7:29 PM
[Reply to this
JUSTIN

 
I think most Bears fan would def pick 1. Kinda dumb to ask about articles with different subjects. Both write one on why the Bears are going to the playoffs this year, and it will be better
 
Posted by JUSTIN on Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 11:10 AM
[Reply to this
Nicole
nicole lucht

 
Numero uno. For the content -- this is a Bears page, right? Although 2 had a better lede (intro graf, in journalist-speak) and had it been Bears focused, I might have picked it.
 
Posted by Nicole on Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 4:44 PM
[Reply to this
Loves Karma
Becky Bennett

 
1
 
Posted by Loves Karma on Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 5:09 PM
[Reply to this
Nick
Nick Gerts

 
seeing that you asked for the better article, i am going with 2.
 
Posted by Nick on Monday, September 15, 2008 - 6:02 AM
[Reply to this
Nick
Nick Gerts

 
seeing that you asked for the better article, i am going with 2.
 
Posted by Nick on Monday, September 15, 2008 - 6:02 AM
[Reply to this
Koop
Daniel Wynkoop

 
" I do not wish injury upon anybody, but it's not hard to admit that most people watch a Patriots game just for their aura, for their greatness, for their dominance, and much more. They are the blueprint of a perfect team, despite losing the Super Bowl to the New York Giants in Glendale, Arizona. "

Really? I watch them to see this lose! They are not a perfect team; however, they have learned how to cheat very well!

It's obvious that the Pats are not a "perfect team" as you say due to the fact that without their star QB, they SUCK! Come on...the dolphins?


Oh, I can't give kudos to either one since they weren't even talking about the same subject matter. They were both very different stories. One putting on kneepads because they have gay love for Tom Brady or something, and the other speaking of the true Team of Honor, Da Bears.
 
Posted by Koop on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 2:49 PM
[Reply to this