MySpace
myspace music


Laura Burhenn



Last Updated: 11/18/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

City: WASHINGTON
State: WASHINGTON D.C.
Country: US
Signup Date: 5/11/2004

Who Gives Kudos:


28 Jul 07 Saturday 


the u.s. should take a lesson from the chapter in the psychology-on-friendships textbook -- particularly that one on buying your friends. the lesson? it never works.

seriously, everybody has known someone like this: the kid with money who didn't know how to develop real relationships (he/she wasn't taught) and so gained admiration and made "friends" with his/her parents' big house and collection of flashy new things. coming from a small town where swimming pools (particularly the in-ground variety) were such a rarity, i always felt especially bad for the kids who had them -- the influx of friends in the summer and the rather lonely months that followed must've been tough to handle... this is, of course, not to say that all kids with pools are socially awkward or emotionally underdeveloped and wander through life forging only shallow, meaningless relationships. that is not my point at all.

what i'm getting at is the u.s.'s most recent plan to sell arms to saudi arabia and "five other oil-rich Persian Gulf states as well as new 10-year military aid packages to Israel and Egypt" -- all in an effort to gain allies should iran decide it wants to pick a fight. what's most awesome about this is that we've tried it before, and it backfired -- literally. take, for example, the iran-contra affair. shit, you mean we sold weapons to IRAN a mere 20 years ago, the very enemy we may be up against next? and how about those weapons sales to iraq in the 80's? wait, that country -- iraq -- that sounds familiar. i feel like i've heard of that place recently...

there were also the billions of dollars of arms sold to afghanistan in the 80's, which, according to this report from the u.s. arms trade resource center "ended up empowering Islamic fundamentalist fighters across the globe." just in case you don't follow the link, i'm gonna paste the most illuminating quote here:

"Perhaps no single policy is more at odds with President Bush's pledge to 'end tyranny in our world' than the United States' role as the world's leading arms exporting nation... Although arms sales are often justified on the basis of their purported benefits, from securing access to overseas military facilities to rewarding coalition partners, these alleged benefits often come at a high price."

if that doesn't outline the large-scale failure of arms deals, i don't know what does.

what the u.s. should consider is billion-dollar deals of medical and educational aid -- or something else real and meaningful -- with the countries we want to make friends with. i mean, think about it. had we supplied afghanistan with truckloads of medicine and books in the 1980's, the early 2000's might have turned out a lot differently.

scene: the oval office. the president sits at his desk, stacks of official documents piled high. an aide bursts through the door, his hair a mess, sweat dripping down his temple, his tie loosened and top shirt button undone. he's clutching a thick, rolled up report in his left hand. he shakes it as he speaks:

"mr. president! mr. president! i've got some bad news... al-qaeda's gotten ahold of the penicillin. and goddammit, we think they might know how to use it!!"



...
Currently reading:
Sagmeister: Made You Look
By Peter Hall
Release date: 01 March, 2001
Previous Post: the wind will blow. | Back to Blog List | Next Post: three stories.
DJ GOLD a\k\a TAXI GANG

 
thanks for postimg this
we need a revolution
i am talking about starting with impeachment
its not too late
-a
 
Posted by DJ GOLD a\k\a TAXI GANG on 28 Jul 07 Saturday - 9:08 PM
[Reply to this
Cassieopeia

 
hell yeah.
 
Posted by Cassieopeia on 28 Jul 07 Saturday - 9:10 PM
[Reply to this
evo

 
This makes me sad - when does this all stop finally?
 
Posted by evo on 28 Jul 07 Saturday - 9:13 PM
[Reply to this
Laura Burhenn

 
it stops when we stop it!!

that is the call to action.

[revolution]
 
Posted by Laura Burhenn on 28 Jul 07 Saturday - 9:14 PM
[Reply to this
evo

 
Ok, you're right - 100% agree!
WE have to stop this!
I hope we will have enough strength & power...

...let's do ours. now!
martin <k>luther</k>

 
Posted by evo on 06 Aug 07 Monday - 1:31 PM
[Reply to this
billy zero®
Billy Zero

 
so very true..
check out http://www.worldometers.com

30,000 people will die in the next 24 hours from hunger,
the average is that about 75% of them are under the age of 5
and at any given moment there are 250 MILLION people that are starving or hungry.

literally worrying about where they will eat next..

there is almost 6.5 Billion people on the planet.
that's 1 in every 26 people on the planet,, hungry right now.

and yet we still fight our silly battles over natural resources that belong to the world

FACT:
United states = 5% of the Population of planet earth
and yet we crate 25% of the worlds garbage and use 25% of the worlds resrources.

wake up people.. the revolution begins now..

Thank you for posting this Laura.. you rock.
 
Posted by billy zero® on 30 Jul 07 Monday - 12:22 PM
[Reply to this
billy zero®
Billy Zero

 
I GOT THE WEBSITE WRONG,, MY BAD<<<<
it's http://www.worldometers.info
please do check it out.
 
Posted by billy zero® on 31 Jul 07 Tuesday - 7:32 PM
[Reply to this
Walter of the Skies

 
This isn't 100% on topic, but you made me think of a miniseries the history channel had on the american revolution. It's funny to see how much we're like england and the iraqis are like the revolutionaries (in tactics, not beliefs). The king had this idea that the americans could be beaten by a simple show of force. He sent the full armada into New York, and then they sat there for weeks as a way to intimidate the revolutionaries. And that year went terribly for our army, we were almost destroyed until General Washington decided to switch to something more akin to guerilla warfare. And as things went on, England just thought they could throw money and bodies at the problem until it solved itself. Unfortunately, when a body of people stick by an ideal, it's hard to break them unless you basically commit genocide.

It's sad to see how far we've come from the idea of liberty that we started with. No government interferance with our lives, our property, or our income. Someone in the government got slick and switched "liberty" to "freedom". It's a small measure of semantics, but freedom implies you can make decisions. Liberty implies no one can control you.
 
Posted by Walter of the Skies on 30 Jul 07 Monday - 7:27 PM
[Reply to this
Firestorm

 
So true and so very sickening.

Go back to the late 70s and early 80s, where we were holding training camps here in the US for people from Central and South America. We were giving them weapons, teaching them how to use them, then sending them back to overthrow their governments and set up juntas in their place.

Catholic nuns being raped and murdered by these junta-governments.

This whole backfiring motif has been with us throughout our history. Consistently backing the wrong people, only to find that they'd just as easily turn against us.

You would think we would have learned something by now.
 
Posted by Firestorm on 05 Aug 07 Sunday - 5:29 AM
[Reply to this
Laura Burhenn

 
...and then the pentagon lost track of 190,000 ak-47s that they gave to iraq in 2004 and 2005. where do you think they all went? right into the hands of the insurgents who are fighting back and killing U.S. (and other allied) soldiers -- as well as a whole lot of innocent iraqis.

so essentially our tax dollars paid to kill our own soldiers. good one, america. that really makes me proud.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/05/AR2007080501299.html?hpid=topnews
 
Posted by Laura Burhenn on 06 Aug 07 Monday - 5:14 AM
[Reply to this
evo

 
I've read the article and i'm also proud of the US gov...
...hmmm, i think you (and the most of us) have recognized the following thing...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/07/28/saudi.arms/

sometimes it is official, sometimes nobody has known anything


...hmmm proudly present you something in my blog:

important & instructive I "Why We Fight", documentary


You have to watch this documentary, everybody has to see it! Please....
...and recognize that the military-industrial complex can not to be stopped anymore...
...sadly.
In order not to let the US economy collapse completely,
the US gov must produce and sell weapons and lead wars...
...sadly.
 
Posted by evo on 12 Aug 07 Sunday - 6:48 AM
[Reply to this
David

 
Egypt and Israel have been the largest aid recipients from the United States for quite a long time. It's not new. If the money was averaged out in Israel each citizen would recieve 500 dollars a year. But it doesn't go there it goes to settlement activity and arms and Israel's weapons industry. Our involvement is probably the biggest reason you see Palestinians living in squalor today. However never fear Iran will get the Nuke and then really think about that because I hope it is never dropped but I do guarantee you the middle east as you see it today will drastically change. Israel and the US will never run amok again. Iran and nukes are the only possible revolution. Read the Israeli Lobby piece in my blogs. It is not by some quack, these are Harvard professors and they are dead on.
 
Posted by David on 29 Aug 07 Wednesday - 10:18 PM
[Reply to this
Ruby

 
I've only just read this, hence the very late reply.

Laura, what an excellent issue to raise, and very well expressed. Just one point though...

"what the u.s. should consider is billion-dollar deals of medical and educational aid -- or something else real and meaningful -- with the countries we want to make friends with. i mean, think about it. had we supplied afghanistan with truckloads of medicine and books in the 1980's, the early 2000's might have turned out a lot differently."

It sounds really sensible, doesn't it? However unfortunately the pharmaceutical industry is almost as bad as the arms industry, and is very unlikely to get behind this idea. They won't sell cheap drugs to the developing world for fear that they'll be re-imported to the West, and your government spends a great deal of effort in preventing drug manufacturers in developing countries from making cheap generic (unbranded) copies of drugs which are desperately needed to save lives. This is all done to prolong the monopolies of US pharma firms and protect their patents. Meanwhile, people everywhere keep on dying of treatable diseases. Check this article out for example:

http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/703/36494

First world governments are strongly dedicated to protecting and increasing the profits of the corporate giants, i.e. food, pharma, oil, etc, not just the arms industry. It's all about protecting the super-rich, and lulling the rest of us into compliance and indifference about what is done to people in the developing world.
 
Posted by Ruby on 29 Aug 07 Wednesday - 10:19 PM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: the wind will blow. | Back to Blog List | Next Post: three stories.