From the latest
Socialist Standard.
Socialism won’t be a
problem-free society but it will allow problems to be dealt with
rationally.
Capitalism is a society beset by problems, from poverty, unemployment
and homelessness to war, violence and insecurity. As the current
recession shows, even those who consider themselves to be comfortably
off and with a relatively ‘good’ job may still be thrown out of work
with little notice. The housing market is in such a state that many
people cannot sell their homes and estate agents are closing almost as
quickly as pubs. The fact is that capitalism throws up problem after
problem, and this is an in-built aspect of the system’s operation.
Now, socialism will not be a society without problems. There will
doubtless still be personal disagreements and dislikes, and natural
disasters to disrupt the straightforward functioning of everyday life.
But we can say with some assurance that the problems of socialism will
be very different from those of capitalism.
We may distinguish two situations. The first consists of problems of
capitalism which will simply not arise in socialism; the second of
problems that socialism will be far better equipped to address and to
solve than capitalism is.
All the economic difficulties of capitalism will automatically be
things of the past in a socialist society. The idea that there could be
people who want to work but are forced to sit around idle, while at the
same time there are others who badly need the goods or services that
the first group could provide, would be totally alien. There would be
no unemployed building workers alongside homeless people or inhabitants
of slums. No unemployed agricultural workers alongside the starving.
Anyone who wishes to contribute to production will be able to do so,
without considerations of profit and the market being of any relevance.
Poverty will vanish in a society based on free access and production
for use, and people will not starve while food is exported. So all the
problems of destitution, insecurity and worry will be gone, since these
are created by capitalism’s rationing of goods and its exploitation of
the working class. Concepts like booms and slumps and recession and
unemployment will have been confined to the history books.
Equally, war will no longer exist. With no contending countries and no
ruling classes, there will be no need for vast armies making use of the
latest weapons technology. Issues such as ensuring the availability of
raw materials like oil will not arise, since they will be the common
property of all the earth’s people. Resources, both natural and human,
will no longer be wasted on killing and inventing new ways of killing
other humans.
At the same time, there will be other problems which will exist in
socialism, and for which the establishment of a co-operative
commonwealth will not automatically provide a solution. Environmental
issues would be a prominent example of this. Under capitalism, the
profit motive and the short-term nature of planning combine to cause
pollution and destruction of the environment. Socialism would be unable
to simply stop interfering with the world we live in, since production
of any kind assumes some sort of interaction with our environment. Nor
can we say now how much mess capitalism will leave behind for socialism
to grapple with. To what degree, for instance, will global warming have
gone beyond the point of no return? How much oil will still be
available, and how will energy be produced?
There are no easy answers to such ecological questions, and we cannot
just dismiss them by saying that socialism will evince a concern for
the environment that capitalism never can. Rather we can point out that
satisfying human need and caring for the environment will be at the
forefront of socialism’s priorities. If they come into conflict,
decisions will have to be taken about whether to emphasise one or the
other in a particular case. The answers cannot be given yet, since we
do not even know just what the questions will be. But from anything
other than a capitalist perspective, caring for the world is part of
satisfying human need, since we are part of the planet and must always
live within it.
PAUL BENNETT