MySpace


Anarchist Federation

Anarchist Federation


Last Updated: 11/19/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Swinger
Age: 23
Sign: Libra

City: Located in Britain and Ireland
State: Midlands
Country: UK
Signup Date: 7/20/2005

Who Gives Kudos:


Saturday, January 10, 2009 

Current mood:  awake
Category: News and Politics
NO STATE SOLUTION IN GAZA
One thing is absolutely clear about the current situation in Gaza: the Israeli state is committing atrocities which must end immediately. With hundreds dead and thousands wounded, it has become increasingly clear that the aim of the military operation, which has been in the planning stages since the signing of the original ceasefire in June, is to break Hamas completely. The attack follows the crippling blockade throughout the supposed ‘ceasefire’, which has destroyed the livelihoods of Gazans, ruined the civilian infrastructure and created a humanitarian disaster which anyone with an ounce of humanity would seek an end to.
But that's not all there is to say about the situation. On both sides of the conflict, the idea that opposing Israel has to mean supporting Hamas and its ‘resistance’ movement is worryingly common. We totally reject this argument. Just like any other set of rulers, Hamas, like all the other major Palestinian factions, are happy and willing to sacrifice ordinary Palestinians to increase their power. This isn’t some vague theoretical point – for a period recently most deaths in Gaza were a result of fighting between Hamas and Fatah. The ‘choices’ offered to ordinary Palestinian people are between Islamist gangsters (Hamas, Islamic Jihad) or nationalist gangsters (Fatah, Al-Aqsa Martyrs brigades). These groups have shown their willingness to attack working class attempts to improve their living conditions, seizing union offices, kidnapping prominent trade unionists, and breaking strikes. One spectacular example is the attack on Palestine Workers Radio by Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, for “stoking internal conflicts”. Clearly, a “free Palestine” under the control of any of these groups would be nothing of the sort.
As anarchists, we are internationalists, opposing the idea that the rulers and ruled within a nation have any interests in common. Therefore, anarchists reject Palestinian nationalism just as we reject Israeli nationalism (Zionism). Ethnicity does not grant “rights” to lands, which require the state to enforce them. People, on the other hand, have a right to having their human needs met, and should be able to live where they choose, freely.
Therefore, against the divisions and false choices set up by nationalism, we fully support the ordinary inhabitants of Gaza and Israel against state warfare – not because of their nationality, ethnicity, or religion, but simply because they're real living, feeling, thinking, suffering, struggling human beings. And this support has to mean total hostility to all those who would oppress and exploit them –the Israeli state and the Western governments and corporations that supply it with weapons, but also any other capitalist factions who seek to use ordinary working-class Palestinians as pawns in their power struggles. The only real solution is one which is collective, based on the fact that as a class, globally, we ultimately have nothing but our ability to work for others, and everything to gain in ending this system – capitalism – and the states and wars it needs .
That this seems like a “difficult” solution does not stop it from being the right one. Any “solution” that means endless cycles of conflict, which is what nationalism represents, is no solution at all. And if that is the case, the fact that it is “easier” is irrelevant. There are sectors of Palestinian society which are not dominated by the would-be rulers – protests organised by village committees in the West Bank for instance. These deserve our support. As do those in Israel who refuse to fight, and who resist the war. But not the groups who call on Palestinians to be slaughtered on their behalf by one of the most advanced armies in the world, and who wilfully attack civilians on the other side of the border.
WHOEVER DIES, HAMAS AND THE ISRAELI STATE WIN
This statement was written by Manchester and Sheffield AF groups. It has also been distributed in Ireland by Organise!
Download the leaflet here: http://www.af-north.org/palestine/gaza%20leaflet%202-1.pdf
Distribute freely at your local Palestine Solidarity demo's!
www.afed.org.uk - www.af-north.org - www.afed.org.uk/blog
 
The Rugged Collectivist
Jay Bro

 
Well put!
 
Posted by The Rugged Collectivist on Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 5:26 PM
[Reply to this
DIRTY_CRUST
Crasher Crust

 
well Israeli has a right to defend it self HAMAS shouldnt have attacked Israeli in the first place but hamas should ceasefire
 
Posted by DIRTY_CRUST on Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 10:03 PM
[Reply to this
Garrett xvx
Garrett Gaston

 
Israel set up blockades to prevent supplies from getting into gaza which violated the terms of the ceasefire, they also killed palestinians during that time. When it became clear the Palestinians weren't benefiting from the ceasefire Hamas started firing rockets, the news just didn't jump on it until it could look like Hamas' fault. long live the resistance. Crush Israel.

 
Posted by Garrett xvx on Monday, January 12, 2009 - 7:37 PM
[Reply to this
Anarchist Federation
Anarchist Federation

 
I think you take an over-simplified view of this. Yes what Hamas is doing is wrong, but that doesn't mean Isreal should state a full scale offensive on a largely civilian population. Recent figures put the death toll on the Palestinian side as 800ish, 200 of which are children. On the Isreali side, 13 have been killed since the start of the conflict a few weeks ago. The truth is, both sides are wrong and the only people that could benefit are the rulers of either side. The working class will bear the brunt of the casualties, as in all wars.


No war but the class war!
 
Posted by Anarchist Federation on Sunday, January 11, 2009 - 2:21 PM
[Reply to this
Garrett xvx
Garrett Gaston

 
we as anarchist are supposed to be all about resistance, but when an actual group is resisting one of the most oppressive gov'ts in the world we say it's wrong? Palestine has it much, much worse than we do, yet we resist our own governments, but when they must use violence, or out of desperation are driven to it we call it wrong? Is it because they are Muslims? ecause they have a different set of ethics? It shouldn't be this is the most real struggle i can see in the world and you're calling it wrong, it sucks some civilains have to die, but palestinians are being killed constantly in much larger numbers than israel's. Hamas is Plaestines only hope,when fatah was put into to power they fell into the US and Israel's pockets, and palestinians continued to suffer. hamas has set up several social welfare programs, but has used money to fund their military because PALESTINE HAS A RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF. Israelhas way more sophisticated weapons and sirens to warn people of attacks. Palestinians are sitting ducks with no where to go, because israel is blowing up UN designated shelters. Hamas should have the supposrt of anarachists.

 
Posted by Garrett xvx on Monday, January 12, 2009 - 7:48 PM
[Reply to this
Anarchist Federation
Anarchist Federation

 
Being an anarchist isn't just about supporting resistance, it's about libertarianism and equality, two things which Hamas aren't too keen on. What Isreal is doing is very wrong, but that doesn't make what Hamas is doing right.
You say Palestine has 'right to defend itself', which means you are ackknowledging the setting up of a state, and therefore government, yet you claim to be an anarchist?
I don't think we should fall into this mindset of supporting any form of resistance, just because they are fighting a well equipped, US backed government. Sure what Isreal is doing is terrible, and we fully understand that, that's why our members are out protesting against it, that's why this leaflet was produced! Hamas are simply a bourgeoise, religious group that would just become another government elite. We should be supporting workers struggle across national boundaries, not the formation of another nation & state.

 
Posted by Anarchist Federation on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 9:43 PM
[Reply to this
Garrett xvx
Garrett Gaston

 
I respect the independance of a people, just because they aren't anarchists doesn't mean Palestine shouldn't be able to decide how their territory, nation, government operates. There is democracy to anarcho communism, and if democratically the people chose to support hamas it's fine. Palestine is a territory, a territory with a right to defend itself. I understand not supporting resistance just to support resistance, but Hamas is offering a better life to palestinians than israel is, because isarel is against non-jews even living there. Hamas isn't racist, like the Israeli gov't, and probably aren't as fascist as you think. Also, we should acknowledge that hamas are RESISTANCE fighters, defending their homeland from an occupying force. Which is a justified resistance. Why support worker struggle to people that voluntarily work? Stop working stop buying, watch capitalism collapse.

 
Posted by Garrett xvx on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 11:18 PM
[Reply to this
B

 
If I can interject here. I don't claim to be the most knowledable about the inner workings of Palestinian democracy, but from what I understand, HAMAS is the current elected government of Palestinians. We could maybe debate about whether there was some sort of interference in the electoral process or something, but for the sake of arguement lets assume that they are the elected government of the Palestinians. I do consider myself an Anarchist, so I oppose 'representative' government having any authority, but I'm not a Palestinian. They should be able to do what they like. It's unfortunate that they are bound to the choices that they are, but they live under conditions of absolute tyranny and oppression. If they elect to be represented by a group that is going to use force and violence to defend against the conquest of their homes, it's difficult for me to principally argue against that, under the current conditions, because I do think that there is some justification for it. Just as I think that when the FAI fought to defend Barcelona from Franco, there was justification for it. However, HAMAS is not the FAI.  Let there be no mistake; if the war was over tomorrow, HAMAS should be gone the next day. That's just my opinion, though I think the Palestinians would see that soon enough. As to the whether or not we should support it; well, that's not really an important question unless you are Palestinian. If you're 'American' (from the U.S.) like me and you're concerned with the plight of the Palestinians, your primary interest should be to get your elected 'representative' government, and by implication; corporate elites, to stop funding and supplying Israel (or anyone for that matter) with the means to commit genocide.

As to why we should support worker's struggles; well because it's a form of popular movement which is what ought to govern. Because it benefits not only workers involved in the union, but all workers. As much as I want Capitalism, as we know it, to come to an end, I don't want it to be at the expense of poverty that would ensue from all of us stopping work and buying things that we need. Workers strikes are a strong tool, but labor unions prepare for strikes and work together to bare the burden and costs that are inherent in disciplining the rich, but even striking workers need to be able to purchase necessities. So, there is a real reason to support workers struggles.

 
Posted by B on Friday, August 14, 2009 - 6:22 PM
[Reply to this
OPIATE RECORDS - new BURNT CROSS 7" out now!

 
Well put - thanks for reposting this here.

 
Posted by OPIATE RECORDS - new BURNT CROSS 7" out now! on Sunday, January 11, 2009 - 6:19 PM
[Reply to this
PIG

 
Excellent words of wisdom. I will repost this in my blog. Peace and freedom.

 
Posted by PIG on Monday, January 12, 2009 - 10:34 AM
[Reply to this