Most of you are probably familiar with the "who came first, the chicken or the egg" conundrum? Arguments for both sides are reasonable. It seems not too many evolutionary theorists have commented on it though. By the way, the egg came first. The easiest explanation is that it developmentally makes sense, ask Tiffany, she said this and was/is my facilitator. How plausible is it that the chicken would come first, unless there is a big bang chicken theory that i am unaware of, my guess is not very.  Perhaps that is why chicken is very popular fried, a sort of homage to that hot, dense state it was in during the chicken Planck epoch. I digress. Chickens evolved from reptiles i.e. dinosaurs. Reptiles lay eggs, chicken lay eggs, mutant reptile hatches and reproduces passing on that genetic mutation, and enter chickens. The best example of the reptile-chicken connection is the Archaeopteryx. By the way, Panamarenko's work "Archaeopterix IV" is a great little contruction of wood, strings, electronic chips, and solar cells. You should look it up. Anyway, Aracheopterix had both bird and reptile anatomy. It lived during the late Jurassic period. It had wings, flight feathers, and a wishbone. It also had interdental plates, long chevrons in the tail and other bone characteristics associated with reptiles. And now the most damning evidence of all...why is it that every meat that isn't from domestic animals tastes like chicken?

Again, a big thank you to Tiffany.