MySpace

this is babylon

Y-LOVE will change the world.



Last Updated: 6/24/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Divorced
Age: 31
Sign: Capricorn

City: TOWSON FOR LIFE
State: New York
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/1/2003

Who Gives Kudos:



My Subscriptions
Monday, November 12, 2007 

Current mood:  aggravated
Category: News and Politics
It's really a crying shame.

Our country loves its ADD medications.

Ritalin is the 4th most prescribed "psychotherapeutic" (i.e., ADHD/ADD) medication in America, with sales totalling almost $133 million in 2005. Almost 2.5 million prescriptions for Ritalin were written in 2005. Concerta was the 2nd most prescribed, with 2005 sales totalling over $839 million and over 8.2 million prescriptions.

And now this story comes out.

The Guardian Online reports today the release of the results of a new study from the University of Buffalo, basically stating that Ritalin and other drugs used to treat ADHD are of "no long-term benefit" and may in fact stunt growth in children:
Research released today raises questions about the long-term effectiveness of drugs used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

A team of American scientists conducting the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA) has found that while drugs such as Ritalin and Concerta can work well in the short term, over a three-year period they brought about no demonstrable improvement in children's behaviour. They also found the drugs could stunt growth.

...The report's co-author, Professor William Pelham, of the University of Buffalo, said: "I think we exaggerated the beneficial impact of medication in the first study. We had thought that children medicated longer would have better outcomes. That didn't happen to be the case.

"The children had a substantial decrease in their rate of growth, so they weren't growing as much as other kids in terms of both their height and their weight. And the second was that there were no beneficial effects - none.

"In the short run [medication] will help the child behave better, in the long run it won't. And that information should be made very clear to parents."

Australia's Daily Telegraph adds:
The influential BBC Panorama television program found last year the cost of ADHD drugs had cost the public health system in Britain more than $AUD60 million.

The program aired disturbing footage of a 14-year-old Briton who had been on ADHD medication for a decade. His family kept a video diary of his behaviour; he recently assaulted three school teachers....

Prof Pelham believes behavioural therapy such as concentration tests in the first instance and a simple diet of Omega-3 helped.

Novartis - the manufacturer of Ritalin - declined comment on the study, and Janssen-Cilag, manufacturers of Concerta, stated in response that Concerta was a "very valuable treatment".

These drugs provide, over the long-term, "no demonstrable improvement" in behavior, and, have even caused death in rare cases - and yet are prescribed to the tune of almost $3 billion per year.

Is this the result of some diabolically good marketing on the part of big Pharma? Or is this the result of today's culture? Since we want everything now, give the kids a pill to get the behavioral change now -- and who cares about the kid's mental state 10 years from now? In 2001 the average clinical trial for Ritalin lasted only 3 1/2 weeks, and this is what is being given to millions of children a year? For example, this 2001 Concerta study -- where Dr. Pelham, author of the current study, was one of the heads and did his research on a grant sponsored by Concerta's manufacturer -- published in Pediatrics says in its methodology that "three dosing levels of medication were used" and that "children received each medication condition (i.e., dosage level) for 7 days". There's your 3 weeks.

So it comes out that the same doctor who had been doing the research for the corporations back in 2001, is now saying, that he and his research team "exaggerated the beneficial impact of medication" back then.

Will the market have a change of heart as well?

Or will more and more kids, instead of receiving behavioral therapy or Omega-3 rich diets, be made to buy into the $3 billion pharmaceutical market?

Ultimately, it's up to hospitals and doctors to put their foot down and say -- even though the Novartis sales guy is hooking the hospital up, alternatives to medication have got to be presented to parents and adult patients.
sarah b.
sarah b.

 
Acupuncture is one drug-free alternative to meds for the treatment of ADHD. More info: http://www.pacificcollege.edu/publications/articles/2007/july/treating_ADHD_with_acupuncture.html
 
Posted by sarah b. on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 5:49 PM
[Reply to this
Ari

 
fantastic eye opener, wish more people were aware of the ADD/ADHD bs... do you have any links to truthful information about mood stabilizers? that would be a huuuge help, as treatment options available for bipolar folks are pretty awful.

be well,

aa
 
Posted by Ari on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 5:59 PM
[Reply to this
Tamara תמרה

 
I don't know what the solution is, I don't know how to help kids
and it's sad that one way wasn't the shining ray of hope that millions of parents were hoping for
 
Posted by Tamara תמרה on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 6:08 PM
[Reply to this
bigbabyjezus aka TuBlog Shakur

 
wassup

Ritalin was also mis-used for YEARS......kids who really suffered from lead paint poisoning were often given ritalin......
I think once a study like this is released...some sort of class action suit should follow to et some type of settlement because best believe...the company (like you said) made millions!!!!
 
Posted by bigbabyjezus aka TuBlog Shakur on Monday, November 12, 2007 - 8:07 PM
[Reply to this
Netanya ?????

 
One major problem is that children are put on the drug without proper follow-up. In other words, when it doesn't work, some parents keep giving it to their kids... Others overmedicate their children, which causes even more problems. Most never opt to try natural approaches, which have been shown to do a lot of good.

I've had students that were out of control, despite their desire to do well. One child I taught randomly would do things and nearly was expelled because he couldn't control himself and could have killed another child completely by accident. (I can't give details, but it was pretty bad to walk in on the injured child who had blood all over him.) The child felt horrible, but he couldn't keep himself physically still and yet didn't want to do any thing to upset anyone. He just wanted to be loved. For him, medication was a huge blessing. Within a couple of days on medication, he was able to be like the other children and to function for the first time in his life. I learned that medication isn't a bad thing, when used properly, from that child.

I had another child, last year, who will not be using medication. The child is one that wants just to be loved and to succeed, but little seems to assist in that. I wish the parents would try natural means, but nothing is being done and the child suffers for it. Another child that I have now has the same problem and, although the parents speak of natural methods, they don't seem to be happening in all reality. The result is a child who is becoming isolated socially, as the other children do not always want to be around such. When a friend asked me about her child's birthday party, I sadly told her that if we invited the one friend of her son, one of us would have to spend the whole party just watching that ONE child.

Medications are abused and that is the real root of the problem. Ignorance on alternatives to drugs is a serious threat to our children. For goodness sakes, a child in a nearby school district is having surgery on a daily basis because the antibiotics he was being treated with were useless after people had abused the drugs in the past, causing the disease to become immune.

I wish more people paid attention to the nutrition of their children. I hear so many parents who speak of their kids refusing to eat any vegetables, but then you look at the normal diet in the house... Sure, kids will refuse some foods, but when all they will eat is junk, you know something is up... The parents that I know who made little fuss over veggies are the ones who have no issues with their kids eating vegetables. Sure, one child may not like carrots and the other doesn't like celery, but they love broccoli. I know one child who eats practically any vegetable you put in front of him, as no one has ever indicated that eating vegetables is anything out of the norm. Quite the contrary, as he chooses which ones he wants in his lunch, but they are part of his every meal.

I'm going off on veggies for a reason, as diet does a lot for kids with attention problems. Diet, exercise, and other natural means will do much for a child struggling to keep still, or remain focused. As a teacher, the problem is I can't tell much to parents on that. I can't say much at all, in fact. At least, not in this state.

What isn't helping is that Bush's NCLB has resulted in a reduction of recess. Worse, some schools have eliminated it completely.
 
Posted by Netanya ????? on Monday, November 19, 2007 - 8:24 PM
[Reply to this