MySpace

PR TALK: a blog about public relations

Denis Hiller, PR Specialist

Denis Hiller


Last Updated: 4/6/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 101
Sign: Aquarius

City: Silicon Valley
State: California
Country: US

Who Gives Kudos:


Tuesday, November 04, 2008 

Category: Web, HTML, Tech
By Denis Hiller, New Media Publicist

Nicholle, a fellow publicist, contacted me on LinkedIn with the following question:

"I love that you have a well-rounded background in social networking and I would like to improve my skills in this area. Do you have any advice on how to work with the endless number of social networking platforms?

Thank you,
Nicholle"




Great question!  The image above illustrates your point exactly, " the endless number of social networking platforms."

There are 2 legitimate schools of thought on this issue. The first, I'm calling the Dave Cortex school of thought. Dave is a friend of mine and the owner of Sweet Cherry Music, an electronic dance music record label. It is his job to get the word out about new music produced on his record label. The second, I'm calling the Denis Hiller school of thought, after my own approach to social networking. Dave & I actually had this very conversation when he was out here in the Silicon Valley several weeks ago.

The Dave Cortex school of thought:
Social networks are a means to market music. Fans use all sorts of social networks from massive ones such as MySpace and Facebook, to niche networks like YouTube and imeem. My goal is to be everywhere there is a substantial number of fans.

Summary: Dave's approach is to be on as many relevant social networks as possible.

The Denis Hiller school of thought:
Social networks are a means to build community. I can not help build a community of PR Professionals if I'm spending too much time updating and keeping track of numerous social networks. Instead I choose to split my time between 2 social networks: MySpace and LinkedIn.

Summary: Denis's approach is to focus on a manageable number of social networks.

I would like to open this question to others. Which school of thought do you resonate with and why? What is your unique approach to the social networks?
Maggie

 
Helpful hint to make a Twitter tweet work double: sign up for Twitter Sync on Plaxo and your Tweets appear on both! It's part of the "Social Network Smarter Not Harder" movement now underway. Submitted by: Maggie @DenverPR Holben
 
Posted by Maggie on Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 3:37 PM
[Reply to this
John
John Derek Beedy

 
My thoughts vary on this subject.

As far as personal social networking sites, I contend that being on sites you feel best represent you are in order (i.e. Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.).

For clients, however, I feel the number of social networks you choose to participate in and/or manage is dependent on your target markets, publics, etc. If it is in your client's best interest to be included on several social networks, then by all means make it happen. If the benefits are significant, relevant, and attaintable--then, again--make it happen.

One of truly great things about social networking and all it entails is the ability to niche market or publicize your clients. You can find communities and forums for just about anything.

Best,
~John
 
Posted by John on Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 4:44 PM
[Reply to this
Bright Eyes

 
Great blog, Dennis... we have been doing JUST this in Your PR Girl for numerous musicians. We use a combination of the methods you mentioned.

We take the top 5 and put our bands on it... with basic and simple information that doesn't need to be updated daily. Then, we target the top 10 NITCH sites depending on style, target market, and genre and put them up on them.

We have dozens of networking sites on our master list - just as we have dozens of magazines, news and online publications.

In taking social networking to be the same thing as a publication listing, we go where the fans are. We appreciate the intimacy of smaller networking sites, which has been beneficial - as it's not always the quantity but the quality. Being on MySpace, Friendster or Facebook we use for face value and what it is - volume. What we like is that many smaller sites are genre specific with fewer musicians (b/c they don't make the effort to find them) - thus, less competition.

:)

Plus, it helps when you have College interns that you can teach how to set up the small pages ;-)
 
Posted by Bright Eyes on Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 9:58 PM
[Reply to this
Bright Eyes

 
grr... typo. I meant the Top 5 largest sites (as default) - that everyone gets signed up with (MySpace, Facebook, Friendster, etc)

and at least 10 (depending what tier the client wants to pay for) of the smaller ones. (Soonplatinum.com, etc.) okay.. maybe this lets me do 4 kudos..
 
Posted by Bright Eyes on Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 10:01 PM
[Reply to this