MySpace
myspace music


JMeyer



Last Updated: 11/28/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: Fox Valley
Country: US
Signup Date: 9/16/2005

Who Gives Kudos:


Wednesday, May 13, 2009 

Current mood:  annoyed

Smoking bans.

I admit, cigarettes are unhealthy. However, so are a lot of other things we embrace quite recklessly every day.  

Personally, I believe there should be smoking establishments and non-smoking establishments. Furthermore, it should be left up to the owner. It’s called freedom of choice…this country was built upon the idea…do people even remember? 

If one doesn’t want to be around smoke, one should simply stay away from smoking establishments. For instance, should a person go to a strip bar if they do not want to see tits and ass? No. So why go to a bar that offers smoking if they dislike smoke? I wonder why this is so hard for these people to grasp. This goes for whiny employees too. If you don’t like smoke, don’t work there. 

Perhaps one reason these self-righteous anti-smoking crusaders have such a problem with smoking is that deep down they want you to live within the limited mental boundaries of their restricted ideologies and overly-protective rules of overly-proper conduct in hopes that someday you might just become…just…like…them. Once that happens, these people (and everyone else) can finally be happy, right?  

If these idiots really meant anything they preached pertaining the dangers of bad habits, then alcohol would be getting banned from said establishments, too. However, that will never happen. Alcohol is too lucrative. This is also why cigarettes and tobacco will never be completely done away with, either.  

With the current tax hikes on smokes, it seems the state has found a way to take advantage of people’s addictions. Nice trick. They say it’s to encourage people to quit. Yeah, right. Time will tell how many people actually quit, as opposed to the number that they “tell” us have quit. While they take it out on smokers, there are equally if not worse issues to consider if logic is going to come into play in any of this. 

Now, I’m not an enemy of alcohol by any means but seriously, let’s bring this into focus. First of all, are cigarettes the underlying reason for 99% of social abuses and crimes including but not limited to domestic violence, assault and battery, or any other bad choices made due to inebriation’s blurry judgment? Cigarettes do not make people swerve into other cars, or drive into trees, or pass out at the wheel, or run over two innocent people walking down the street. Is booze really the lesser of two evils?

Let’s not forget the health issues brought upon us – directly or indirectly – due to alcohol consumption. Therefore, let’s ban smoking in bars and taverns because it is bad for everybody’s health. That’s like being in a McDonald’s and not being allowed a Big Mac because it is unhealthy; however, a quarter-pounder with extra cheese and a few strips of bacon on top is just fine. WTF? 

It’s obvious to me the pharmaceutical companies are also a major component behind these bans. They’d love it if all smokers quit because it would cause more people to feel anxiety, as most people generally smoke because it relieves stress. If cigarettes disappeared altogether, people would need other methods for stress management…such as prescription drugs….which ultimately lines the pockets of these companies…in which profit, not care, is the goal.

These companies lobby and hand money under-the-table to politicians that are willing to play along. I really don’t believe the intentions for these smoking bans are for the concern of anyone’s health. If these people care so much, they'd be fighting for cigarettes to be outlawed, period, especially since they are considered to bring harm unto others.

Makes me wonder. Shouldn’t these smoking opponents be more concerned with a household in which people puff away while children are present? In fact, shouldn’t that be considered a form of child abuse to them? However, there doesn’t seem to be much talk about banning people from smoking around their children, even in small confined areas such as a vehicle.

Amazingly, a police officer can bust someone for not wearing a seatbelt, but it’s ok if they have a cigarette (even with a child in the car), while waiting for the policeman to finish writing out the ticket for not being safe and buckling up. Once again, WTF? Double standards at their shiniest.

If our leaders are going to continue to take our freedoms away, they should at least get their priorities straight.


Baffled,
JMeyer



www.jmeyermedia.com

Diane

 
once again, jmeyer! Great blog. I think you should write this in to the local newspapers, and the state legislative!
 
Posted by Diane on Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 1:34 AM
[Reply to this
Mizz Enaid

 
I think this should be sent to the paper. This is good shit. I couldn't have said it better!!!
 
Posted by Mizz Enaid on Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 1:59 AM
[Reply to this
Mystic Tears

 
I love this, it is so great and so true..Do you might if I post this in my blog?

Perfect! xoxo Much love
 
Posted by Mystic Tears on Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 2:20 PM
[Reply to this
raccoon

 
I actually just got home from LA (I'm from Seattle) and one of my friends down there was telling me that it is illegal to smoke in a vehicle while a minor is present.

But, really, I agree with you 100%, these are alot of things that I have thought, and never really been able to articulate... Or rather, not as well as you did. =]

 
Posted by raccoon on Monday, May 25, 2009 - 11:17 PM
[Reply to this
holly

 
all your points kick major ass.....its like the prohabition all over again...I personally am not a smoker....but somebody's establishment is suppose to be run on THEIR vision...for the government to regulate the actions of adults in an adult environment...is so....well... its so like playing GOD.
WTF????

 
Posted by holly on Friday, May 29, 2009 - 11:57 PM
[Reply to this