I wrote this as a response to some inaccurate propaganda on the Republicans4Obama profile blog, but it has to be approved so who knows if they will approve it. Someone basically said abortion is okay because people are going to do it anyway. Here's my response.
Rape and incest, and threatening the life of the mother are less than one percent of abortions. 99 percent of abortions are from people too stupid or irresponsible to use a condom. With sex should come responsibility. And Obama is just another left winger who, like Clinton, is praised by the likes of unPlanned Parenthood. Abortion will not be limited until it's made illegal except for those rare instances. It's scientifically killing of an innocent human being--a scientific fact, not something to be debated, just like the earth is not flat. I "believe" life begings at conception just like I "believe" that the Pacific Ocean has salt in it. It's a fact. Now it's an opinion that we should not be able to kill innocent human beings, since the "logic" to advocate that murder can and has been also applied to newborns, especially those with Down syndrome or simply unwanted, or from a "botched" abortion, where they let the newborn die. Nazis.
There are so many fallacies you used , and distortions that show your ignorace of the subject. If abortion on demand is made illegal, it won't drive people to back alley abortions. Only a handful did that before Roe v. Wade activist court legislated from the bench and found a right to a dead baby, some invisible right they interpreted by invoking the philosophical leanings of ancient civilizations rather than relying on what biological science tells us today. Besides, the "people are going to do it anyway" is a fallacy. That's like saying people are going to murder and steal, so why not make it legal? Give me a break.
People that will vote for someone just because the candidate makes the giddy are stupid. Obama's just another leftist. If Obama was pro-life, tough on crime, for border security, then I'd vote for him too, but by then he'd be a Republican, not a Democrat.
See
http://www.newsbusters/node/8520
and
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18397
"He voted against a bill that would add penalties for crimes committed as a part of gang activity and against a bill that would make it a criminal offense for accused gang members, free on bond or probation, to associate with other gang members. In 1999, he was the only state senator to oppose a bill that prohibited early prison release for criminal sexual offenders."