MySpace


Culture Jam for Life



Last Updated: 11/22/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 32
Sign: Scorpio

City: Orlando
State: Florida
Country: US
Signup Date: 8/27/2004

Who Gives Kudos:


Saturday, June 23, 2007 

I recently replied in the pro-life united forum to a strange pro-abort. A pro-lifer had asked why pro-aborts threaten and insult people that disagree with them. That's because they can't debate rationally and they're wrong.

They also rely on tautology:

Pro-abortion points are nonsensical and consist of circular reasoning and tautological arguments.  For the uneducated (or immoral) pro-aborts:

In logic, a tautology is a statement which is true by its own definition, and is therefore fundamentally uninformative. Logical tautologies use circular reasoning within an argument or statement.

For example, "Abortion is right because it's right." Or "Abortion on demand should be allowed." Why?  The 14th Amendment says NOTHING about abortion. It means that a person can't be searched, either on their person (their clothes, patted down), or their house (need a search warrant), by the government, UNREASONABLY. If it's likely a house is filled with Jihadist terrorists or pedophiles or people that abuse kids, then yes the government has a right to search that house and protect innocent life.

It is also very reasonable to prohibit parents from killing their own children, whether they are unborn or born. In fact, one of the dominant responsibilities of a goverment is to protect innocent life.

It's quite interesting that the Roman Empire also used this same reasoning of "privacy," namely the privacy of the head of the household, in this case the father. It was called Patria Potens, and the father could kill his kids at will.

It's also quote interesting that in the Roe v. Wade decision, the justices spent more time considering what these ancient civiliations thought philosophically about the unborn instead of relying on what modern science shows us--that life begins at conception and is a continuous process until death.

The "right" to abortion is more like a "rite" where abortion becomes a false religion, and the pro-aborts are the religious extremists who advocate violence in the name of their (false) religion. One pro-abort even said the "right" to abortion is more important than freedom itself and democracy.

Everyone believes in some sort of philosophy and/or religion, but science is not debatable. Pro-aborts realize this (or should) and therefore rely on propaganda, insults, stalking, threats, semantic acrobats, deception, doublespeak, groupthink, and idiocy.

Currently listening:
Bring It Back
By Mates of State
Release date: 21 March, 2006
Previous Post: DESIGN CONTEST | Back to Blog List | Next Post: evil sicko
♥Ms♥ Kat♥
Kathryn Richardson

 
I can't stand pro-choice or proabortionists..they have every excuse under the sun as to why they have the "right" to murder their unborn child. And that is what it is MURDER but it's an argument that you just can't seem to win. Their most dominating argument is that it's better to end their life than to bring them into the world when they can not financially care for it, depite the fact that there are people who would love to adopt. Then you bring that up and they say some bogus thing about why bring a baby into a cold heartless world. That to me, is like saying, why bring any babies into the world. Why not just stop reproducing have every female in America fixed so they can't have babies because life sucks and why subject a child to that. They are all ignorant and so are their excuses
 
Posted by ♥Ms♥ Kat♥ on Sunday, June 24, 2007 - 1:37 PM
[Reply to this


 
That's about the best argument I've heard against abortion. They're right because they think they're right. Well, we know we're right because we are, and can prove it. I am pro life, I am a democrat (they are not a contradiction, for some reason, people believe that we all believe in abortion), and I am proud. Abortion is the greatest injustice in society today.
 
Posted by on Monday, July 16, 2007 - 1:25 AM
[Reply to this
Thhhhomas

 
Abortion is only sanctioned by those who have not been aborted.
 
Posted by Thhhhomas on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 2:32 PM
[Reply to this
Feminism is a Pro-Life Movement!

 
You made some great points, such as how the Supreme Court Justices spent more time on ancient philosphy and thought rather than on what we know today about life in the womb. I've never looked at it that way.
I just posted a blog in which I included some insults (my favorite is "prolife cockroach") that were recently thrown at me by pro-aborts. My point is to them: Don't insult or attack me, refute my claims and prove me wrong! The immediate anger and hatred that comes from some of them only proves to me that deep down they know abortion is heinous and a crime against humanity. Anyway, great blog!!
 
Posted by Feminism is a Pro-Life Movement! on Sunday, August 26, 2007 - 3:09 PM
[Reply to this
Viet
Viet Tran

 
yo... this is interesting...as a conservative I don’t take too kindly when someone misuse the constitution…the 14th amendment doesn't say anything about Abortion- AND it doesn't say anything about search and seizure either (that the 4th amendment)... The 14th amendment deals with a lot of things but in this particular cases it deals with the government can’t make laws that will deprive Americans of their sacred rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness without due process of law.

The Pro-choice argument is that abortion is a “liberty”. They say that while the baby in the body of the mother it is not yet a living being- thus it is more or less a property of the mother- so with all this the mother is at “liberty to do whatever she wants to do the baby. The Pro-Life stance is that abortion is is contradicts another American rights-Life-. Because their view is that life begins at inception. The difference between when “life” starts is a major point of contention because it is at the heart of the debate.

So a good question that you want to ask your pro-choice friends is… if a stranger walks up to a pregnant woman and knees her in the stomach. He kills the baby but only injured the women. Should this stranger be charged with assault OR assault and murder (because he killed the baby)? In many cases like the Scott Peterson case couple years ago, when he killed his wife and baby, he was charge for two murders… his wife and the baby. (interesting enough I didn’t see any pro choice activist outside protesting that she should only be charged with one murder (his wife) instead of two (his wife and the baby).
 
Posted by Viet on Saturday, November 24, 2007 - 6:41 PM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: DESIGN CONTEST | Back to Blog List | Next Post: evil sicko