PRINCIPLES - VALUES - VIRTUES - MORALS

Who Gives Kudos: Wesman Todd.. (1) ty (1) JESUSWEPT1964 (1) Frazzfactor (1) SIMPLEPARAD.. (1) Cherokee (1) War Bitch 6 (1) Kathy Lorai.. (1) (1) (1) William (1) The Great P.. (1) Amy ~ (R-Ma) (1) Soccer Fana.. (1) Truth Seeke.. (1) Ben X is &q.. (1) Amy1precinc.. (1) Los (1) A1pha Wo1f (1) Ryan (1) Christine (1) (1) wife of a f.. (1) The Infidel.. (1) (1) Jim (1) ♥♥♥MARIE♥♥♥ (1) Delta Eagle (2) Yuck (2) Yuck (2) Moony Bener (2) Justin Jeri.. (2) Yuck (2) Larry Willow (2) Deborah & L.. (1) Yuck (2) Eugene Rivers (2) Natasha Wri.. (1) joe (1) (1) Ray Baron (2) ♥ Na.. (1) (2) "Fortu.. (1) Surveys Gal.. (1) ♥†Jen♥† (1) Sandra (1) Miss (2) Liberty Moo.. (1) Claudia (1) Thea (1) Bonnie (1) NEWSFLASH! (1) Jeff Vandal (2) K. C. Santi.. (1) Barbara (2) Tina (2) Ben of Tenn.. (1) Mariane (1) The Tigress (1) Al Gore (2) Tim (2) Jeff (2) GJ (1) Albert (2) Jain (2) Richard (2) Steve (2) "A Fat.. (1) jonald reagan (1) Muffin Tops (1) Timothy (1) Michael M. .. (1) (2) (2) (2) Andy Zeus A.. (1) GavatronX9 (1) P1Conservat.. (1)

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 4:55 PM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Please don't blog dick. - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 8:51 AM

	Andy Zeus Anderson Andy Anderson	Doc on the video with the kids have you noticed the first chant's wording has. Red and yellow, black and white they are equal in his sight. Barrack Hussein Obama Compare to Red and yellow, black and white they are precious in his sight. Jesus loved the little children of the world. The second set to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic and combined send a message to these kids that it is patriotic to worship Obama as if he were Jesus Christ. It's not just words but assimilation two key ingredients for brainwashing. I will not condone, support, or allow these types of actions. You socialist bastards have gone too far, leave our children alone!! Andy   Posted by Andy Zeus Anderson on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 8:41 AM

	BRYCE TUBB	The only blog in the 'myspace top blogs' worth reading: CONGRATS - it's about time we jump off the O(bomb)a train   Posted by BRYCE TUBB on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 1:49 AM

	Amy1precinct CO S TX	b.c.  aka   birth  control, remember  when  You  couldnt be  faithfull too Jennifer  Flowers'? and  now  its   j. edwards  that  has  followed   in your  foot steps', who   pays  for  that  childs  health  ins'?" let  me  guess .!!   uhmmmm    our  (R)   Tax $  correct'?   Posted by Amy1precinct CO S TX on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 9:10 AM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	America is now aware... Her eyes are open.  Keep watching and you will see that "The People" have power, not career politicians. Asshole. - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 21, 2009 - Monday - 7:03 PM

	uBER gOOBER	You are correct!! America has Finally woken up (well, most of us).  We know the lies that were told leading to untold deaths of our children and others.  We know the all the deregulation that led to most of the financial problems we have.  We are aware that racism is alive and well in this country.  We are aware that most conservatives these days are FUCKING CRAZY and have no clue what they're talking about most of the time.  We are aware that you are an ignorant zealot with poor punctuation, and now we know what a blog-dicker i am.  oh boy, oh boy.  As for Fox being No. 1 - those stats, like your blog, is misleading.  See, we libs don't all watch the same channel.  Some of us don't watch msnbc at all (and CNN, btw, is Not a liberal station). Some of us prefer to our information from multiple sources, unlike you Lemmings - we seek Facts and think for ourselves.  And in that vane, if Time is publishing an article on our country's douche-of-the-month, i guess your "liberal media" argument won't hold up anymore than the rest of them do.  Whaaa..... of course, I am also alware that you will probably delete my comment, like any good nazi - oops - conservative - would.  boo hoo.   Posted by uBER gOOBER on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 11:06 PM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Where did you learn how to write? You can have your Socialist Liberal.  We don't want him. - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 11:18 PM

	Svend Christensen Alex Cole	>>Implying Obama's a liberal.   Posted by Svend Christensen on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 2:33 AM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Obama is a Liberal of the worst kind.  He is a Socialist that ultimately believes you need the Government to take care of you.  The very same Government that cannot manage themselves and balance their own budget.  He is the worst leader this country will have only to usurp Carter in this generation. May God Have Mercy on America. - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 2:46 AM

	The Tigress	Mr. Clinton: "America is the richest nation in the world," yea right!   Tell the truth nokey nose.  You and your liberal ponzi friends are printing nothing more valuable than toilet paper.  Tell the American people what you and your deceiving thugs are going to do when China demands to be repaid in their currency.  You and Mr. President Obeyme need to get out of politics and let the real men lead this country.  You need to apologize for turning Bin Laden away.  This war was YOUR war Mr. Clinton not George Bush's.  What did you do when our Marines were bombed in Beirut and when the USS Cole was attacked.  Your a punk!   Posted by The Tigress on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 4:05 AM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Your DAMN Right!  It is America's war and for anyone to say it is "Bush's War" is UNAMERICAN! How much did you borrow in your 8 years again?  Before the REPUBLICAN Congress put your out of control spending ass in check? How much?? - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 4:50 PM

	Timothy	And when Obamie policies destroy the wealth then what?  Your party has no idea how wealth is created.    Posted by Timothy on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 1:26 PM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	You think so?   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 10:50 PM

	BTR RADIO SHOW COMIN SOON 12/14/09 Chief Captain	What the hell are you doing on My Space? Shouldn't you be in Las Vegas getting blown by Air Force Amy?   Posted by BTR RADIO SHOW COMIN SOON 12/14/09 on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 3:28 AM

	BTR RADIO SHOW COMIN SOON 12/14/09 Chief Captain	Posted by BTR RADIO SHOW COMIN SOON 12/14/09 on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 1:39 AM

	Ben of Tennessee Ben reichel	Silly me. I was unaware that public hospitals could turn away someone from the emergency room. Exactly when did this policy change?   Posted by Ben of Tennessee on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 12:40 AM

	Amy1precinct CO S TX	Posted by Amy1precinct CO S TX on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 9:13 AM

	X-Blonde Kim Smallwood	Hospitals employ social workers (required by law) to assist people with serious illness access all public and private programs. Aside from Medicare which can be acquired if you are permanently disabled, there is Medi-caid programs provided by the state. Hospitals also have indigent individual programs which operate on sliding scales based on ability to pay.   Posted by X-Blonde on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 5:03 AM

	M-dawg	The federal-state Medicaid program may cover organ transplants if a state elects  to offer this optional coverage. States may determine the scope of such coverage. There are fourteen states that don't offer heart or liver transplants through Medicaid coverage. Those are: Alabama Alaska Hawaii Idaho Kansas Mississippi Montana Nebraska New Hampshire North Carolina South Carolina South Dakota Virginia Wyoming http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=1065481&pageindex=37   Posted by M-dawg on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM

	X-Blonde Kim Smallwood	They have to get on the list, like everyone else...unless you are wealthy, you have to wait until a liver is available. If some drunk homeless man needs a liver, he will like die just like an insured drunk needing a liver. Unless you are Crosby, you can't just buy one.   Posted by X-Blonde on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 5:51 PM

	wife of a former MARINE	Yes that is exactly what she is trying to say. As a matter of fact I personally know Medicaid will pay for transplants as my mother-in-law had a heart transplant and Medicaid paid for it.   Posted by wife of a former MARINE on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 5:21 PM

	Ben of Tennessee Ben reichel	"America is the richest nation in the world and the only one that lets their citizens die because they don't have proper insurance" POSTED BY BILL CLINTON The point is your post is deceiving. You make it sound like the current health care system just leaves people to die. This is simply NOT TRUE   Posted by Ben of Tennessee on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 2:52 AM

	Lisarae	“The point is your post is deceiving. You make it sound like the current health care system just leaves people to die. This is simply NOT TRUE”   OH REALLY?       September 17, 2009, 4:14 pm Harvard Medical Study Links Lack of Insurance to 45,000 U.S. Deaths a Year By Reed Abelson As the White House and Congress continue debating how best to provide coverage to tens of millions of Americans currently without health insurance, a new study (PDF) is meant to offer a stark reminder of why lawmakers should continue to try. Researchers from Harvard Medical School say the lack of coverage can be tied to about 45,000 deaths a year in the United States — a toll that is greater than the number of people who die each year from kidney disease. http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/harvard-medical-study-links-lack-of-insurance-to-45000-us-deaths-a-year/     Posted by Lisarae on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 7:47 AM

	Lisarae	Who in those studies died from non preventative actions?  Are they people that were refused medical treatment and left to die?  Or are the people that had AIDS, non curable Cancer etc? What are the dynamics of the study? - Doc   There is no “reply” link under your post, so I will post here.  The link to the rest of the article is in my last posting.  In part it says:    The research is being published in the December issue of the American Journal of Public Health and was posted online Thursday.  (You would have to go and see this publication to read the entire study) The Harvard study found that people without health insurance had a 40 percent higher risk of death than those with private health insurance — as a result of being unable to obtain necessary medical care. The risk appears to have increased since 1993, when a similar study found the risk of death was 25 percent greater for the uninsured. The increase in risk, according to the study, is likely to be a result of at least two factors. One is the greater difficulty the uninsured have today in finding care, as public hospitals have closed or cut back on services. The other is improvements in medical care for insured people with treatable chronic conditions like high blood pressure. “As health care for the insured gets better, the gap between the insured and uninsured widens,” Dr. Woolhandler said.   Posted by Lisarae on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 11:31 PM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Who in those studies died from non preventative actions?  Are they people that were refused medical treatment and left to die?  Or are the people that had AIDS, non curable Cancer etc? What are the dynamics of the study? - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 4:57 PM

	toolman Rock51 Rocky Knapp	hey liberal idiot you guys as usual are looking in the wrong place in this health care matter.  The high cost of health care is nothing more than greed just like walstreet and our present government.  The insurance companies are sticking it to us and we can do nothing about it there is no competitive edge.  Why should it cost me 50-100$ to see a Dr who spends 5-15 minuets at the most with me.  And why should a hospital room cost me $1600 and up a night and that is just the cost of the room.  Why should they charge me $200 for a nose piece to help me breath O2 and it is nothing more than a 8ft rubber hose I'll tell you why it is greed and now you greedy liberal idiots want to get in on the pot all just to take more out of my paycheck. I have an example I have a friend of mine that has insurance and he had a stint put in his heart cost his insurance $30,000 bucks and I have another friend who is a retired  patrolman but not old enough to get medicare he had a tripple by pass they charged him $45,000 untill they relized he had no insurance and they dropped it to $22,000 he payed on that for several months and then the hospital sent him a letter and told him if he could come up with $3,000 they would call it paid in full. WAKE UP.   Posted by toolman Rock51 on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 4:22 AM

	M-dawg	(d)            Underserved Population Groups.  Adult or pediatric open heart surgery shall be available to all persons in need.  A patient's eligibility for open heart surgery shall be independent of his or her ability to pay.  Applicants for adult or pediatric open heart surgery programs shall document the manner in which they will meet this requirement.  Adult open heart surgery shall be available in each district to Medicare, Medicaid, and indigent patients.  Pediatric open and closed heart surgery shall be available in each pediatric open heart surgery program service area. Each state is different; this is Florida's policy. It's important not to try and mislead people, Mr. Clinton.   Posted by M-dawg on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 6:16 PM

	X-Blonde Kim Smallwood	They will die under Obamacare just as quickly!   Posted by X-Blonde on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 5:57 PM

	Ben of Tennessee Ben reichel	Fair? Who told you life is supposed to be fair? Funny, I've read the Bible cover to cover several times and I just can't seem to find anything in there about life being "fair"   Posted by Ben of Tennessee on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 9:49 AM

	ty Tyron chad hamilton	Dear All on this thread~ w0w is this thread wack! A Lady bleeds her Heart and you dismiss her?? You that talk trash to blondie can kiss my azz! I Been waiting for new chair!! but i give that up to help her!!  Much Love ty   Posted by ty on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 3:21 AM

	Army of One Standing on God's Word	HMM YOU, WJC HAVE NOT ROOM TO TALK ABOUT MORALS, VALUES AND/OR PRINCIPLES   Posted by Army of One Standing on God's Word on September 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 7:40 PM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 3:42 PM

	Lisarae	Docman, please explin this thing above, how would health care be 'rationed'?   Posted by Lisarae on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 3:39 AM

	Timothy	Explaining it to you is a waste of time.  You are too stupid to get it.  But explain away Jay.  Maybe someone ELSE will read it and get it.   Posted by Timothy on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 1:31 PM

	Lisarae	Apparently you are too ignorant to come up with an answer, Timmy.  It all sounds good when the people on TV talk about it, but when you have to actually explain it, your lost, typical.   Posted by Lisarae on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 11:13 PM

	Magnum Man	I won't waste time insulting you for not knowing the answer to that question. The answer is really quite simple. The government will have a certain amount "set aside" to pay for health care, just like the government has certain amounts set aside for anything and everything it does, departments, programs,etc., in a budget. That being said, decisions will have to be made to decide how, where, and when those funds are spent. You can't possibly believe that the government will have an infinite amount of money, we don't have, set aside for socialized medicine. The bigger questions I have to all the government run "health care" supporters is, how can you be willing to trust your government to run a "health care" program when it can't operate ANY program efficiently, or without fraud and corruption? How are WE going to pay for it? And, where exactly does it mention government "health care" in the Constitution?   Posted by Magnum Man on September 25, 2009 - Friday - 6:05 PM

	Timothy	Simple logic honey.  Put millions more on the public dole, while DECREASING compensation to doctors and nurses.  Make no provision to check whether people are here legally, and continue the open boarder policy.  All this will lead to cuts since it will cost way MORE than anyone DemoCrap is projecting.  You tell me this will not lead to cuts?  You are living in a dream Neo.  Doctors will leave their profession in droves when this ass sticks his nose in their compensation package.  Who the hell does he think he is?  He's behaving like Stalin. Like I said, it is a waste explaining simple logic with a liberal.  None of you get it.  You just drag out your government stats that mean NOTHING.   Posted by Timothy on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 11:45 PM

	Cherokee Cherokee Parks	Try reading Section 1401 of HR 3200. And be sure to also follow the references to the changes in US Code.   Posted by Cherokee on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 2:25 AM

	Lisarae	OK, I looked at HR 3200, the actual document, I was unable to find section 1401, could one of you be kind enough to copy and paste that actual section for me?  thx.   Posted by Lisarae on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 3:53 AM

	Cherokee Cherokee Parks	http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-3200 That's the link to the entire bill. Scroll about halfway down, under Title IV, Subtitle A--Comparative Effectiveness Research.   Posted by Cherokee on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 6:59 PM

	Lisarae	I have a feeling that none of you are going to do this, how much you wanna bet?   Posted by Lisarae on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 4:23 AM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	It means exactly what it says.  Someone else decides your medical coverage instead of you and when you become a burden because you are too old, who is to say that your health needs will not be rationed for someone else?y Do you have studies of people who are waitings lists in Socialist countries that provide health care?  Look at the studies of the pros and cons and then tell me why America has the number one health care system in the world? You are aware that the American Health Care system is the best system, right? - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 4:55 PM

	Lisarae	We rank # 37 in health care.  The World Health Organization has carried out the first ever analysis of the world's health systems. Using five performance indicators to measure health systems in 191 member states, it finds that France provides the best overall health care followed among major countries by Italy, Spain, Oman, Austria and Japan. The findings are published today, 21 June, in The World Health Report 2000 – Health systems: Improving performance*. *Copies of the Report can be ordered from bookorders@who.ch. The U.S. health system spends a higher portion of its gross domestic product than any other country but ranks 37 out of 191 countries according to its performance, the report finds. The United Kingdom, which spends just six percent of GDP on health services, ranks 18 th . Several small countries – San Marino, Andorra, Malta and Singapore are rated close behind second- placed Italy.   When you say, “Someone else decides your medical coverage instead of you and when you become a burden because you are too old, who is to say that your health needs will not be rationed for someone else?”, this is a theory, then? Not a fact?  Can you back this up with some evidence that it would be true?   I’m pretty sure that this new plan would make it easier for people like my dad who is 87 to afford his prescriptions.    I have friends in Canada who are pretty happy with their medical system.  And no one dies there for lack of medical care.    In my state, the governor, Pawlenty, wants to take away medical care for people who are on general assistance.  I work at a homeless shelter, and many of our residents suffer from severe mental illness.  If he takes this away and they cannot afford their mental health drugs, well, it’s going to further burden the police, courts, emergency rooms, etc.  and make it harder for them to function in any kind of housing.   Posted by Lisarae on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 11:50 PM

	DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum Doc ManJay	By the way, is that a head you are holding under your arm?   - Doc   Posted by DocManJay© - E Pluribus Unum on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 6:34 PM

	Lisarae	Haha, that is a painting called "Golden Silence"  by Isabel Samaras.  It is Jeanie from "I Dream of Jeanie" leaning on the freshly severed head of Major Nelson.  Remember that TV show?   Posted by Lisarae on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 11:36 PM

	Thea Thea Allison	At what TRUE cost though "Bill"?  Let's take a look at every country that has Universal Health Care.   Posted by Thea on September 22, 2009 - Tuesday - 12:27 PM

	Lisarae	In western Europe and Canada, they cover everybody for less than $4,000 per capita a year. In this country, it’ll be $7,500 per capita this year.   Posted by Lisarae on September 23, 2009 - Wednesday - 7:51 AM

	ty Tyron chad hamilton	60% taxes My Dear!! if you paying those taxes, it no Big!! Surprise the Gov. like get you back to work soon!!   Posted by ty on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 3:05 AM

	Lisarae	A single payer plan is more cost effective than the one we have.  And i don't weigh the worth of human life in dollars.  I want everyone to have health care, not just those that can afford it.  I'm not too crazy about my tax money going to pay for these pointless wars that are doing nothing but killing our citizens, killing families overseas, sending our troops home with PTSD, and giving Iraqi children stress disorders.  I guess to me it is all about sensibility and compassion, not the almighty dollar.  The standard of living in those counties with universal health care is pretty good overall.   Posted by Lisarae on September 24, 2009 - Thursday - 4:03 AM

Previous Post: I guess I am stuck with the Republican Party. | Back to Blog List | Next Post: UPDATE: HAS THE LINE BEEN CROSSED?