By Michael Deibert
Presented
to the Applied Research Center and the Latin American and Caribbean
Center at Florida International University in Miami, Florida, August
2009
(Read the original article
here)
At
present, Haiti is passing through a delicate and significant period,
one which, while giving hints of hope, also provides ample grounds for
caution.
Though there have been significant and laudable
improvements in the country’s security situation under the mandate of
Haitian President René Préval, inaugurated in May 2006, these gains
remain fragile and Haiti’s political situation relatively tenuous, and
two stubbornly recurring factors of Haiti’s political life will have to
be addressed in order to concretize them.
Though he has been
criticized in some quarters for ineffectiveness, I believe that it is
hard to overstate the impact the restoration of relative peace around
the country since Mr. Préval took office has had on the life or
ordinary Haitians. Whereas only a few years ago the authority of the
state extended little even in the capital, Port-au-Prince, where entire
neighborhoods were held in the sway of various politically-affiliated
armed gangs, citizens of the capital, including those in poorer
quarters, can now largely go about their business without the
ever-present fear of being kidnapped or being caught in an exchange of
fire between the gangs, Haitian police and forces of the 9,000 member
Mission des Nations Unies pour la stabilisation en Haïti, known by its
acronym MINUSTAH.
Haiti’s long-crumbling road system is being
gradually rehabilitated, especially in the country’s south, and its
ever-erratic electricity situation has also improved somewhat. The
appointment of Michèle Pierre-Louis, a respected and independent-minded
civil society leader who formerly directed the Fondasyon Konesans Ak
Libète (Knowledge and Freedom Foundation or FOKAL), as Prime Minister
in September 2008, should also be viewed as a positive sign in a
country where the Prime Minister’s office, technically the head of
government according to Haiti’s 1987 constitution, has often meant
little more than a rubber stamp for the presidency.
On the
economic front, there has also been some good news, with the June
announcement by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the
the Inter-American Development Bank collectively canceling $1.2 billion
of Haiti’s debt, in one broad stroke erasing almost two-thirds of the
country’s outstanding debt. The latter institution went even further,
approving an additional $120 million in grants to aid Haiti in
improving sectors such as infrastructure, basic services and disaster
prevention.
Also, in the United States, the Haitian
Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2008
(HOPE II), with strong support in the U.S. congress, built yet further
on a 2007 measure that provided certain Haitian textiles with duty-free
status when entering the United States, perhaps a boon for Haiti’s long
near-moribund textile industry.
The amelioration of Haiti’s
security situation is, in my view, due to several factors, not the
least of which has been the steady and principled leadership of Mario
Andresol at the head of the Police Nationale d’Haiti (PNH), bringing
back competence and accountability to an institution that, during the
2001 to 2004 rule of Jean-Bertrand Aristide and to a lesser extent the
2004 to 2006 interim government that ruled Haiti before Mr. Préval’s
election, was viewed chiefly as a highly politicized bludgeon used by
Haiti’s executive branch against its enemies, real or perceived.
A projected five year UN-supported police reform program is now in its
third year of implementation, currently providing Haiti with 9,200
police officers, with that number projected to grow to 10,000 by year’s
end. For a police force that numbered only 3,500 at the start of the UN
mission (of whom over 1,500 had to be dismissed), the target of 14,000
police officers by the end of 2011 would not seem overly optimistic.
This surge in police recruits is a far cry from the situation between
September 2004 and June 2005, during which a PNH officer was being
murdered every five days in Haiti. On the judicial side of law
enforcement, Haiti has recently re-opened its school for magistrates
after being shuttered for many years.
However, there are some
structural problems to Haiti’s political culture that need to be
addressed if the calm that we have seen in Haiti over the least few
years is to be anything but cosmetic, and if a longer process of both
political and economic development can occur.
By now everyone
is no doubt familiar with the litany of woeful statistics that so often
get repeated about Haiti in gatherings like this: The fact that over 4
million of Haiti’s nearly 9 million people live on less than US$1 a
day, that only the people of Somalia and Afghanistan suffer from higher
rates of hunger, that 90 percent of Haiti’s tree cover has been
destroyed for charcoal and to make room for farming, resulting in
erosion that has destroyed two-thirds of the country’s arable farmland
and leaves it vulnerable to torrential floods such as those caused by a
trio of hurricanes that killed at least 600 people last year.
As already noted, some steps are being taken at an international level
to address Haiti’s economic woes and, though far from adequate, small
steps to try and address Haiti’s environmental disaster are being taken
by such indigenous groups as Tèt kole ti peyizan Ayisyen and the
Mouvman Peyizan Nasyonal Kongre Papay.
Despite this, though, I
believe that the two hard grains in Haiti’s political culture that must
be addressed, both by the Haitian government and by the international
community, if the changes I have outlined are to be anything more than
temporary. These grains are those of impunity and corruption, the
continuing presence of which have the ability to undermine all of the
progress that we have so far seen.
The guilty pleas this past
May of two Miami telecommunications executives, Juan Diaz and Antonio
Perez. in connection with their roles in a conspiracy to pay and
conceal more than $1 million in bribes to former Haitian officials
during the Aristide’s government’s tenure is a step in the right
direction, but it unfortunately has yet to be see reciprocal
prosecutions on the Haitian side for those who accepted the bribes.
Despite the ratification of the UN Convention against corruption by
Haiti’s parliament in 2007 and a vigorous speech about the problem of
corruption in Haiti by Préval in May of that year, as a Haitian friend
of mine recently told me, corruption is a low-risk, high-return
initiative in Haiti, one has every chance of becoming very rich, and
very little chance of being punished.
Going hand-in-hand with
a culture of corruption and impunity, historically in Haiti, armed
government loyalists with no formal law enforcement role have
essentially became contractors of the state, a phenomenon that held
true with the Tontons Macoutes of the 1957-1986 Duvalier family
dictatorship, the attaché of the 1991-1994 defacto era and the chimere
of Aristide’s 2001-2004 mandate. Under the aegis of the state, such
affiliated members, rewarded irregularly through various forms of
government largess, were allowed to exist as a competing armed group to
the official security forces, and given free reign to commit some
sickening crimes, such as the April 1994 killing of Aristide supporters
in the northern city of Gonaives and the February 2004 massacre of
Aristide opponents and civilians in the central Haitian town of St.
Marc, the latter a crime for which no one has as yet been tried.
Though this phenomenon, as far I can tell, is no longer present at the
heart of Haiti’s government today as it has been in the past, the aba/a-vie
option of mob politics remains an attractive one to many of Haiti’s
political and extra-political actors, as we saw with the riots of May
2008 and recent chaotic protests in favour of raising the country’s
minimum wage. Legitimate grievances can quickly be manipulated by those
seeking instability in Haiti for criminal or political gain.
Though there is a palpable difference now from the years of the second
Aristide government and the interim government, when police and
security services were objects of fear and distrust in the country and
brazen corruption existed at the very pinnacles of power, the Haitian
public now needs to feel that the police and judiciary are responsive
institutions, not simply commodities that, like so much in Haiti, are
for sale to the highest bidder and out of reach of the ordinary
citizens.
By my count, there have been 7 UN missions in Haiti
over the last 17 years, all of which had been requested by the Haitian
government in power at the time. There can be 7 more over the next 17
years, but I believe if these two core issues are not aggressively and
substantively addressed, the international community risks only
solidifying the already deep and decidedly deserved skepticism that
many Haitians have for the political process as it currently exists in
the country, as evidenced by recent feeble electoral participation, and
the institutions propped up by it, both local and foreign.
The
people of Haiti, and by this I mean the poor majority, need to feel
that they have some sort of stake in the kind of society that Haiti’s
politicians, business elite and the international community are trying
to create, because without the reality of a power structure that is
responsive to the needs of its citizens and transparent in its
governance, the window of opportunity that we are currently provided
with will shut rapidly, and those hoping for its closure, and along
with that continued drift and anarchy in Haiti’s political system, will
once again step into the void, to the detriment of Haiti and its people.