MySpace

Climbing Out of the Rabbit Hole

Dodo

Ted Camat


Last Updated: 11/30/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Divorced
Age: 24
Sign: Gemini

City: Houston (Spring)
State: Texas
Country: US
Signup Date: 9/26/2004

Who Gives Kudos:



My Subscriptions
[19 Oct 2008 | Sunday] 

Current mood:  tired
Category: Life
[This is what a friend and mentor of mine wrote. I agree 100%. How I feel can be well expressed in the last 3 paragraphs about being principle-driven and being present... having "Presence." It's something you can FEEL without having to logically understand.]

I know what you're thinking... but don't worry... I'm not going to have a political discussion here. My political views aren't important anyway... But I have to say, I've been really entertained by the Presidential Debates. You see, I tend to view everything through the lens of a social scientist. I'm always analyzing the subtle dynamics in social interactions. And the recent presidential debates have been, as always, a clinic in social dominance.

What most people fail to understand is that the content of each candidate's message is pretty insignificant compared to his non-verbal communication. The candidates that tend to fare well are often the most dominant in their mannerisms. But these mannerisms are not what you'd think - a lot of what conveys dominance is counter-intuitive, and communicates directly with your subconscious, and NOT your conscious mind.

You see, as the candidate talks, your conscious mind is listening to his WORDS. But your unconscious mind is watching the WHOLE of his OUTPUT, or "Expression." Your subconscious is concerned with some basic questions: "Does he believe what he is saying?" "Is he used to people submitting to him and getting his way?" "Is his intention selfish or altruistic?" "Is he calm and happy, or depressed - is life defeating him, or is he dominant and in control of his situation?" The interesting thing is that the guy who's coming with the most anger, the most attacks, and the "tough war veteran" attitude is actually NOT the most dominant of the two candidates.

---

Now all political persuasions aside, let's look at the clear winner in each debate in terms of social dominance (which is the real competition between these two guys). Here's my favorite Obama quote from the debates...

When questioned about being personally attacked, and called a "terrorist" at McCain/Palin rallies, Obama replied: "I don't mind being attacked for the next three weeks. What the American people can't afford is four more years of failed economic policies. When people suggest that I pal around with terrorists, then we are not talking about issues."

Wow. This is powerful stuff, and I'll explain why. There's a lot going on here, but for clarity, I'm going to break down Obama's mindset in three categories:

1.    Emotional stillness
2.    Strong, unwavering focus
3.    High-road ethos

If you've been following the debates, and each party's campaign, you'll agree that Obama is super-cool. He never comes undone, never gets upset. He's either calm and attentive, happy and lighthearted, or determined and assertive. But he's never angry, defensive, annoyed, or flustered in any way. And I don't think he's faking. From my trained eye, this guy is for real. He has his emotional state completely under control. He is SELF-CONTROLLED. And this stems from having a STRONG, UNWAVERING FOCUS.

In the quote, you can see how Obama's focus is never swayed or distracted. His mind is filled only with his primary concern - becoming the President, so that he can use his policies to improve the lives of Americans. Now the question of whose policies are better is not my concern here. You can make an argument for both candidates. The difference between the candidates is that Obama cannot be distracted from his message, while McCain, in several instances gets caught defending himself, and attacking Obama. Obama just coolly repeats his message, and his basic argument that McCain's policies will resemble those of George W. Bush.

Look at the quote. He could have easily criticized those at the rally for being racist or ignorant. But that's not the point, and he knows it. The debates are not about who said what at some rally. The debates are about who will run the country for the next four years. Instead of ridiculing the McCain camp for allowing such ignorant behavior, he instead brings the focus back to the purpose of the debate. "When people suggest that I pal around with terrorists, then we are not talking about issues." He transitions this distractive focus right back to what we should be paying attention to. ...And he does this, I think, because he WANTS to focus on the real issues, because he believes MORE STRONGLY in his plan than McCain does.

---

If you look at the history of each party's campaign, McCain's camp has changed their slogan, their message, and their policies several times in an attempt to keep pace with Obama. Now I don't know if Obama is just operating on a higher intellectual plane than McCain, or if he has a better staff, but this guy's campaign has been flawless and powerful since day one. And that tells me a lot about what kind of administration he will have if elected. I'm still not sure if his policies will help or hurt my life situation, but the level of organization and integrity he exacts from his team can only help our country. Even their image branding - an American Flag re-worked as a sunrise on the horizon - beautiful.

Lastly, Obama's primary intention relies on a strong inner-map of values. A man can only stand strong if he knows what he stands for. The problem is most guys don't actually know what they stand for. Obama has a very clear set of ethics based on his core values. He knows what is important to him, and he doesn't compromise that. He values certain policies, but overall, he values helping the lower and middle class improve the quality of their lives. On the other hand, McCain probably puts the success of large and mid-sized businesses first, as he feels this will eventually create more jobs.

But the difference is in how McCain defends his opinion compared to Obama. And the difference is sub-communicated with body language, eye contact, vocal tonality, and overall emotional state. Obama puts his values first and foremost in his mind. He doesn't allow his energies to be sucked into the games of negative politics. He plays his game and he plays it well. He focuses only on what he feels is important, and doesn't get emotionally upset when others act hostile or try to distract him from his focus.

This is dominance personified.
Currently reading:
Attaining the Worlds Beyond
By Michael Laitman
Dodo
Ted Camat

 
i'm down
from one certified psych student
to another well-read one ;)
we have really good talks bro
 
Posted by Dodo on [19 Oct 2008 | Sunday] - 6:51 AM
[Reply to this
Christian

 
That's right!

Obama/Biden '08.


http://www. youtube. com/watch?v=_TiQCJXpbKg
 
Posted by Christian on [25 Oct 2008 | Saturday] - 6:25 PM
[Reply to this
Dodo
Ted Camat

 
honestly, I'm not really into politics, even if I can't avoid it
but I AM into social behavior. I like a lot of what Obama's said
and even expressed "DAMN. ouch" comments to his statements and delivery
that was enough for me to like what he says

what ultimately won me over was seeing McCain trying to tear Obama down
and always always always talking about his fu cking experience and background
which to me means he's dependent on his "identity"
I HATE THAT!
he's got nothing to back himself up but his reputation
whereas Obama doesn't seem to need any reputation whatsoever
he handles himself well, rolls with the punches, and I'd still love to chill with him

I don't really care who you are or where you've been
I'm mostly interested in what you're becoming and where you're going
stop talking about your trophy past
w/o that McCain wouldn't have sh it to talk about

---

that said, i still have to factor in who Obama is off-camera
and specific policies the guys are throwing around
as far as i'm politically concerned,
my boy Ron Paul was shunned, censored, ridiculed, ignore, and taken out early
so i really don't care

in the end, these are external things that won't help me with my immediate situation
and the deadlines i have today, this week, next month
being overly concerned with it simply isn't practical
i don't like politics. neither did Jesus
 
Posted by Dodo on [31 Oct 2008 | Friday] - 12:51 AM
[Reply to this