MySpace


A Feast of Shadows ~ Raven Blackheart returns 3/10



Last Updated: 11/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 28
Sign: Capricorn

City: PHOENIX
State: ARIZONA
Country: US
Signup Date: 12/20/2005
May 27, 2009 - Wednesday 

Category: Blogging
X-Posted at A Writer's Dream 5/25/09

This blog post was going to be split into two reviews for Star Trek and Terminator Salvation but I saw a link in both movies that would serve as a better theme for this blog.

Someone on a board I frequent mentioned that the new Salvation must have forgotten the strong complex female character of Sarah Connor in T2, the female Terminator kickin' booty in T3 and the leading women of The Sarah Connor Chronicles, the title character herself and android Cameron. After seeing the new Star Trek film I was disappointed (in more ways than one but I digress) that my fave character Uhura was relegated to the girlfriend/comforter role. What has happened to female in movies today especially in the sci-fi films and tv franchises that I loved growing up?

A long time ago I did a piece on the strong female characters and gave a whole list of movies featuring females in leading roles. The 80s were not only the golden age of SF tv and film but also started the trend of showing women as strong leaders, fighters, lovers and adventurers themselves. The 80s gave us Ellen Ripley who was the only survivor on a scout mission to a derelict space ship. After which she was hired to advise a team of marines (including the awesomely kick butt Vasquez) and ended up being one of three survivors with a heck of a character arc that culminated in a one on one female match against an alien queen.

Fast forwarding a little, we got Mace in Strange Days. A protective mother, former waitress turned limo driver who harbors a love for her misguided friend and ends up saving his butt more times than he can count (and she can do it with one hand tied behind her back as well). Maybe I'm just on a James Cameron kick because all of these females were written by the master himself. But we also got Princess Leia who was no damsel in distress and could take a gun and shoot with the best of them. We also got Geena Davis doing a one two hit as an amnesiac assassin in The Long Kiss Goodnight and as the underrated (yes, I said underrated) Captain Morgan of a pirate ship in Cutthroat Island. Recently Ms. Davis played the Commander in Chief in a show of the same name but apparently we're to forget such a thing considering how quickly it was yanked off the air. The Matrix movies were stellar in showcasing strong females in the midst of war with Trinity, Zee, and my favorite captain, Niobe. I love my copy of Enter the Matrix because it's a Niobe/Ghost showcase (can we get more of these two please?).

In The original series of Star Trek, Uhura may have been remembered by pop culture as just a hot chick with a wireless bluetooth in her ear, but enthusiasts and people who grew up watching the show knew that she was a trailblazer that showed not only women in space but women of color in space doing their job with grace, professionalism and dignity even when she's being a mirror image of herself. The 80s films gave us more of her character. In Search for Spock especially when she helps Kirk smuggle Bones out of the 'federation funny farm' and grab the Enterprise, Uhura was the one to tell a young lieutenant (Mr. Adventure) just where to go with his ideas about a woman "who's career was winding down".

What happened to women in film today? It looks like they're either disappearing altogether, or becoming random hot chicks to score with (in the countless gross out comedies), fodder for gruesome killing (in the countless horror movies) or eye candy trophies (in blockbusters like Transformers). The three main female roles in Terminator Salvation were not much than pregnant wife role (Kate Connor, after having more to do with the story in T3), Freedom fighter turned damsel in distress turned potential girlfriend (Blair Williams) or potential mother figure before being yanked out of the building.

Grant it, these roles were stuffed into a film that was already overstuffed with larger leading characters. And movies can't provide the depth that a novel can, but since studying the intricacies of screenwriting for a few years before I dove into narrative, I notice it's just a way of presenting characterization even in the littlest of forms. While novels allow you inside the character's head to see what their thinking and experience what they're feeling, movies can show you this with dialogue a flashback or two and through other visual cues. Screenwriters of the past took time to make sure the story was told to the fullest in the best way possible. Modern screenwriters (in mainstream Hollywood) rely on fast paced flash with characters and story just hanging along for the ride. Sci-fi films are becoming more wallpaper sci-fi (action movies in space with) and the futuristic roles for women are dwindling.

In tv, we had a great surge in female leading roles. The aforementioned Sarah Connor Chronicles' standouts wasn't Thomas Dekker's John Connor. While holding his own, Brian Austin Green's Derek Reese worked with show standouts Lena Headey and Summer Glau (with Shirley Manson and Stephanie Jacobsen coming in later). In the last couple of years Blood Ties gave us headstrong yet feminine Vicky Nelson, a private investigator, Patricia Mackenzie's misplaced otherworlder Rena in Charlie Jade, butt kicking Rachel Luttrell as Teyla in Stargate Atlantis, Freema Ageyman's Martha Jones in Doctor Who, Gina Torres' Zoe Washburn & Summer Glau's River Tam in Firefly and Serenity and Sally Richardson's Allison Blake in Eureka. All of which are in sci-fi (speculative) shows that's no longer on the air with us anymore (except for Eureka which is on its way back this summer).

Some would also argue Battlestar Galactica was pretty female driven but I'm not sure I'd hold much of the characters on the show up to a candle, especially the off and on Starbuck character. I would say the original was more progressive especially from the shining 'Lost Planet of the Gods ' episode that featured an all female viper squad lead by a woman of color. I did admire Dee's character who royally got the shaft in terms of characterization advancement but actress Kandyse McClure brought an amazing strength to each of her scenes that actually would have been cool to see as an alternate Uhura. It would've been great to see her as a new version Deitra. But I digress.

The science fiction genre has always been one about ideas. Whether a look into an alternative past or a dark dystopian or utopian satirical future, it has been one to ask and answer the question 'What if'. Although there has been some missteps in analyzing this future (for instance, most works focusing on the mainstream rather than including people of color or women) the genre has been open for more exploration especially since we've achieved some advancements in certain technology that has only been dreamed up decades and even centuries ago. On the contrary film has been a boys' game where often aspiring female directors were discouraged from pursuing careers in film "that belonged to men". I did a study on this during my speech course in college and found so little numbers that continued to dwindle as the years went on. The results are probably the same for female screenwriters who are usually relegated to romantic comedies and "chick flicks".

Perhaps the golden age of sci-fi and strong heroines finished in the 80s as far as film goes but with the rise of female driven paranormal romance and urban fantasy especially, books and stories are leading the way. After all, romance accounts for 55% of books sold in the industry and as more independent presses focus on this genre and good storytelling, perhaps the future will open up a range of possibilities for more and more chances at telling stories featuring women of the future.


Currently reading:
Fool Moon: Book 2 of the Dresden Files (The Dresden Files)
By Jim Butcher
Scanner

 
I find it interesting that you would downgrade the character Starbuck because she was "on again off again"... why does a person have to be 100% aggressive all the time? Even guys don't like to be aggressive all the time... <br /><br />I don't see that the "actively strong" female character is vanishing from movies and TV, if anything I've seen a focus on them.  Dark Angel, Medium, Le Femme Nikita, NCIS, 24, and more either have strong female influences, female characters or female lead characters. <br /><br />A gal I work with singularly ONLY watches shows with strong female lead characters. When I asked her why, she says she's only interested in shows that focus on those characters. While I have no problem with that interest, I find her reasoning, well... interesting... if I avoided shows (taking the opposite view for a moment) for that reason, I'd be called a chauvanist. <br /><br />Actually, in Star Trek, I saw Uhura in somewhat of a different light than you seem to... I felt myself being glad that the movie didn't portray her as going for Kirk... but in contrast; she was more attracted to the more professional, logical option. Personally as a Star Trek fan I'm more to the subscription of Spock the loner, but I've always thought Uhura and Spock from the original series would have been a good match, so I didn't have a major problem with it in this movie.  In fact, I was more dissapointed that they portrayed Kirk's womanizing so over the top that it made him seem... stupid. Is that how women WANT to see guys? I dunno.<br /><br />Back on the subject though... I don't see a failing or fading of those kind of shows... over the last 10 years I've seen a conglomeration of various characters and interesting (non-cookie cutter) types of roles for women. Chloe from 24... where would Bauer be without her expertese? Dead. Where would Galactica (the new one) be without Starbuck's help? Lost. And so on... <br /><br />I'd write more, but I'm currently watching Charmed. Another show (not of this decade) with strong women leads. :) <br />
 
Posted by Scanner on May 30, 2009 - Saturday - 2:38 AM
[Reply to this
A Feast of Shadows ~ Raven Blackheart returns 3/10

 
Actually we're on the same page here. Why DOES Starbuck have to be aggressive all the time? Because original Starbuck was a womanizer and thus we go "edgy" to give her characteristics like a man? Okay, why does "acts like a man" have to equal her automatically being considered equal to Apollo and thus having the show "move beyond gender inequality" because of that (according to some fans)? Strong does not equal outwardly 'go get him, Tiger'.  Dee's character (to me the strongest female on the show) showed this very fact. To me Starbuck WAS way aggressive on the show and her on and off was especially prevalent later on when she would be crazy screaming "we're going the wrong way" one minute while the next episode she'd be right as rain ready to lead them with a straight head.<br /><br />I think the lady you work with may the same type of reader that really enjoy urban fantasy books because they fit into the strong female mold. People want to see what resonates with them and most likely the very reason why we're aren't seeing as many strong female roles on the screen is why fans flock to UF books and/or the shows that DID show them. It's becoming more rare as time goes on.<br /><br />We'd probably have to agree to disagree on new Trek. I guess I'm into Spock and Saavik because of their history, what possibly happened in Trek 3 & 4 and also the continuation in the books. I enjoyed Spock and Uhura's friendship and kinda felt it was a bit cheapened with all the antics in the new film.<br /><br />Remember the Star Trek movie was written by two guys who are very into the 18-25 year old male mind (see their previous credits). If it had been written by, say Kasi Lemmons, you dang sure would be seeing a different type of character lol. But this movie was for the action crowd like Transformers (same writers) with the coveted 18-25 male demographic in mind. Is this how women want to see guys? Hehe funny you should ask because in my reading circles many women are praising the way romance heroes are. And I don't mean Fabio types. Jamie in Outlander comes to mind as the PERFECT male to many of it's readers and I can't say I disagree! Strong, sensitive, protective, somewhat Alpha with a good head on his shoulders new Kirk is not, (at the moment) but most of the heroes in romance genre literature are (and Prime Universe Kirk still is).<br /><br />Those may be good suggestions but again my mini rant was on the fact that they're disappearing now compared to back then. Charmed was many years ago during the era of all the females roles I gave up in the above post. We still got Ziva from NCIS who rocks. Now days it's dwindling especially in movies where we don't have many lead females like we did with the Geena Davises, the Sigourney Weavers, the Angela Bassetts. Especially not female superheroes because movie execs have gone on the record to say that they don't make enough money (which I think is more to how crappily put together the movies are, but I digress). It could be the former actresses are moving into the "mother/grandmother" category that film puts them into and the upcoming crop of Megan Fox's are only sufficient for eye candy. Lots of stuff may factor but the change is there.<br />
 
Posted by A Feast of Shadows ~ Raven Blackheart returns 3/10 on May 30, 2009 - Saturday - 8:07 AM
[Reply to this
Scanner

 
Actually, my mistake... Charmed was more recent than I originally had thought, airing from 1998 to only three years ago... for a total of 8 seasons (178 eps). Longer run than I thought!  I was a big fan of Kirstie Alley's Saavik, although Robin Curtis did an admirable job of continuing the role, KA was my idea of Saavik. Interestingly enough, Saavik was going to be used as the primary character in Star Trek 6, but after re-writes they instead introduced a new character, Valaris, played by Kim Catrall. :)<br />
 
Posted by Scanner on May 30, 2009 - Saturday - 11:56 AM
[Reply to this
A Feast of Shadows ~ Raven Blackheart returns 3/10

 
Oh yes! Kim Cattrall rocked that role, too. I'm glad they created Valaris because I would have been crushed if Saavik turned out to be a baddie. <br /><br />ST3 is my fave ST movie (I know, I'm a bad fan because I'm supposed to love ST2 above all but I loves me the Vulcan scenes of 3, hehe) so I really got into Robin Curtis although the consensus is she's a bit "dry". I think Kirstie rocked Saavik too though!<br />
 
Posted by A Feast of Shadows ~ Raven Blackheart returns 3/10 on May 30, 2009 - Saturday - 12:18 PM
[Reply to this