MySpace

Life, Love, and Spanking According to Erica Warning: May contain sarcasm, cranky rants, blasphemy, controversial opinions, etc.

Erica

Erica Scott


Last Updated: 1/25/2010

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
City: ENCINO
State: California
Country: US
Signup Date: 12/27/2005

Who Gives Kudos:


Tuesday, December 01, 2009 

Current mood:  confused
Back to reality, kids. Hope everyone survi... er, enjoyed their Thanksgiving. Yeah, yeah, I know. Shut up, Erica. Don't be a Grinchette.

I know this topic has been discussed before, but I'd like to bring it up again, and offer it up to you guys for your thoughts. It's the old spanking-and-sex dilemma -- do you combine them or don't you? Do you expect sex to go with/follow your spanking? If not, how do you handle those who do? And for those of us who just want spanking, are we selfish?

What precipitated this was an exchange I had with a gentleman on FetLife. We had "friended" each other and he initiated the messages, asking me about spanking and if I liked other things as well, like D/s sex, bondage, etc. I gave him the usual spiel about how I consider myself a "spanko purist" and while I love sex as much as the next person, I find a good thorough spanking session complete in itself. The answer he sent back was a bit jarring, to say the least:

I see no reason to spank someone if they aren't going to show their gratitude and appreciation for it. In the past, I have experienced people trying to use me and my skills and experience to give themselves a very excellent and erotic experience - and then feel that them letting me do that for them is their gift to me. Needless to say, I don't agree. It hasn't happened that often because most people are not that delusional and manipulative, and frankly, I'm a pretty strong presence to try to pull that on. But that attitude is revolting to me. I can smell manipulation and selfishness a mile away. It's not pretty. I'm not saying that you are like that. I'm saying that your boundaries, while understandable since you are in a relationship, are similar to the methods of those other people that I described.

Ouch. Manipulative? Delusional?? OK, he softened it a little with the "I'm not saying you are like that." But really, he might as well have. I still felt slapped.

I thought carefully about my reply -- I didn't want to seem overly defensive. So I wrote back:

Wow.
That's a bit... cynical, I think. I'm sorry you feel that way. And I'm sorry you've encountered people like that.

The men I have played with derive as much pleasure from giving an intense spanking as I do from receiving one. It's not a matter of "letting them do it." It's a matter of giving myself over to them, of giving them my trust and vulnerability. As a very independent and self-controlled person, that is not easy for me.

The last time I was spanked by my favorite play partner, he held me close on his lap while I clung to him and wept. I don't think he felt manipulated, or like I owed him anything.

I didn't expect to hear back from him, but I did. Just a brief reply, saying that his thinking was not cynical -- it was accurate and honest. I said nothing more. I don't like to argue, and clearly, his mind was made up. But this left me feeling out of sorts. Is this what most top men think? Is this more of a BDSM thing than spanko? (He is most definitely a BDSMer -- spanking was just one item on his long list of fetishes.) Am I selfish and manipulative because I enjoy spanking without "giving a reward" or "showing my appreciation"?

I don't feel like I'm giving spankers a gift by "letting" them spank me. I am giving them my trust and vulnerability, and giving them power and control. For a top, for a dominant, is that not worth something? For a sadist, is my pain not enough?
 
Here's my take on it. If someone is a true spanko, then they can fully appreciate all the nuances of a spanking scene and not think of it as a mere appetizer. If spanking isn't really their thing, just a little something extra they throw into the mix to spice things up, then it follows that they won't comprehend the satisfaction it can give, and they think it needs something else. This is why I prefer to play with true spankos. Because I want them to enjoy this as much as I do. Why would I even want to play with a man whose attitude is, "OK, if I spank you, what's in it for me?" Because if he's not getting anything out of spanking me, if he's just "doing me a favor" so he'll eventually get one in return, then I don't enjoy myself either. I want this to be mutual.

Was this guy a bit extreme, or is this attitude more prevalent than I think? Yeah, obviously, this is bugging me. Am I overreacting? Oversensitive? I'm not looking to bash the man who wrote the above comments; he's entitled to his opinion, and he expressed it civilly. It's my own issue that it's got me tweaked. 

OK, I know you guys are out there. I know you're reading, because I see the hit counter. I know you see my latest posts on Spanking Universe. So comment already. I want feedback, dammit.

IS it unreasonable/manipulative/selfish/delusional to want to have a spanking scene without some sort of sex as a foregone conclusion?

Off to the gym with me.   
eric
Eric Lee Nickell

 
Spanking and sex are two different things, like cake and ice cream.

Some people like them together, while others--like me--prefer them separately. 

Sure, people can have "hanky-spanky" before sex, but for serious bottom-burning, I don't think sex should be involved.

Many people have a different partner for each, and this would be a good thing to point out.

 
Posted by eric on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 8:23 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
Hey, you stole my cake-and-ice-cream analogy!  LOL
 
Posted by Erica on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:55 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
Wise words. I guess I just need to stick with those who the same way I do.

 
Posted by Erica on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:55 PM
[Reply to this
Craig Aych
Craig Aych

 
Please tell me you're asking this question rhetorically, just to get conversation going.

Rarely does a subject draw such ire out of me. Sure, I get apoplectic with your CHoSs, but only because people are SO STUPID.

In this case, I get irate because guys like this give tops a bad name. I hear from women frequently how sex is expected (or requested or desired) as "payback" from men, both in the BDSM and spanking scenes. Well, not just men. Women tops are right there, too. This makes me really angry. It puts bottoms on guard. Hell, it's hard enough to trust someone to have them spank you (or whatever you're into) but then, when it's all done and the bottom is all subspace-y and afterglow-y a guy says, "Hey, baby. It's time to reciprocate!" Ugh. UGH! Pigs.

Don't get me wrong. I'm no eunuch. But I get off on the spanking (or BDSM) itself. I relish the closeness and raw intimacy that comes with the aftercare. I absorb the nuance of emotion in those moments. Sure, I realize the guys reading this are thinking, "What a pussy." I get it. Go ahead. Laugh it up. Let me counter with this: any man who EXPECTS a bottom to reciprocate for "services" they deliver in a scene has no place being in it. Period.

Certainly, there are the opportunities that arise from that closeness, that intimacy, that comes when two people find themselves in an erotic, intense, punishing (or revealing, or emotionally raw) scene that could lead into something akin to sex. But to flat out, right up front, say that's part of the "transaction". Ack! Makes me sick.

I've talked about this with friends at SL and FMS parties. IMHO, there are men who attend these events that have as about as much interest in spanking as they do collecting Barbies. They are there in a role as a "top" (or a "bottom" or "switch") solely as a plan (or last resort) to woo a woman into some form of sexual act. These depraved men (and I pick on men because I think they're the majority, but not the sole sex responsible for these offenses) use this as a last resort, preying on the needs of masochistic women for their own ill gains. Have I expressed this makes me sick?

I'm not above a pleasurable scene, don't get me wrong, but invoice for services rendered, payable with sex, gets me angry and leaves me with a greasy french fry feeling in my stomach.

 
Posted by Craig Aych on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 9:38 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why I quite adore this man.
 
Posted by Erica on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:56 PM
[Reply to this
Craig Aych
Craig Aych

 
Hey, for the record, I'm not saying this for your adoration (though that's certainly a bous). I'm saying it because I MEAN it!!!

 
Posted by Craig Aych on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:59 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
I know that, you goose. Don't get your shorts in a knot.   I do appreciate your feelings in this. It's nice to know that not every man feels like that particular man does! It would be quite the miserable scene if that were so.
 
Posted by Erica on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 11:03 PM
[Reply to this
Jada

 
This exact issue is why I now attend the spanking parties and don't meet guys from personal ads for spanking anymore. I figure if they have paid the money for a party ticket and to get themselves to the venue, then they are into spanking, and the act itself will be enough for them. I refuse to feel obligated to do things just because someone has "done me a favor" by spanking me. I prefer someone for whom spanking itself is enjoyable enough to be a complete experience for both of us.

 
Posted by Jada on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 9:42 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
I get you about the ads, Jada. But it makes me sad that you've given up on the ads. I met my first spanker through an ad -- not to mention J! They can be great. Unfortunately, some opportunists using spanking as a gateway to sex ruin it for the good ones.

 
Posted by Erica on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:58 PM
[Reply to this
Alison
Alison Matheson

 
No it's not unreasonable. I consider myself a BDSMer and a spanko. And I consider both seperate. Furball and I share a D/s relationship. We also share a spankee/spanker relationship. The D/s part is more of a broadband emotional thing with physical perks. I've never been the best decsion maker. I've always felt uncomfortable being charge. I'm much more comfortable being told what to do and how to do it both in everyday life and in the bedroom. As far as spanking in that part of our lives, it's strictly a corrective measure. Even if the pain is the same as in a scene, I receive no pleasure and the only reward he gets is the knowledge. I want make the same mistake again for awhile. The spanko side is that Joey thinks his cocky side is a match for my bratty side.(Silly man) So we play. The differance is these are fun for both of us. In all our years together has he ever expected or asked for sex in return in both aspects.
 
Posted by Alison on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:49 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
With J and me, spanking is foreplay. But we're a couple! I mean, if I had sex with every man who has ever spanked me, good lord.   You and Joey have a good understanding, sounds like.

 
Posted by Erica on Monday, November 30, 2009 - 11:00 PM
[Reply to this
iggy

 
My take on it, for what it's worth, is that the gentleman in question just isn't a spanko and he doesn't get the whole thing.  For him spanking is just a technique used in a broader scenario that will always lead to sex and he can't wrap his head around the concept that people enjoy spanking as the main (and only) course and it's equally good for both parties.  I won't say his attitude is wrong, because it isn't for him, but it's narrow-minded.  Labelling anyone who doesn't practice something the same way he does as manipulative and selfish is just over the top, in my opinion.  I'd personally resent like hell anyone who tried to force sexual payback for giving me a spanking.  To me, THAT would be manipulative and selfish!  Spank me because you want to or don't bother at all.

 
Posted by iggy on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 - 12:51 AM
[Reply to this
Sarah Angel

 
amen sister!

 
Posted by Sarah Angel on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 3:18 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
Well said!
 
Posted by Erica on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 - 12:56 AM
[Reply to this
Alice

 
My stomach involuntarily turned into a knot as I read this guy's two emails to you.  While he expresses himself right to the point, unfortunately I have encountered this expectation VERY often, especially in the personal ads setting.  It is such a turn off to me, and does produce some momentary guilt for my being "selfish", that it squelches the fun of interacting via the assorted personal ads out there.
 
Posted by Alice on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 - 2:47 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
I think our job is to make a decision to NOT give in to that guilt, and just keep seeking the ones who are of the same mind as we are. Frustrating, though, sometimes!
 
Posted by Erica on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 - 4:57 AM
[Reply to this
Colleen

 
I think I told you that I lost my spanking partner because I refused to give him a blow job. From the MOMENT I met him, I knew that's what he expected, and even though he tried to put me at ease with words, still, I could FEEL it. Sure enough, two or three sessions in, when I was just beginning to relax and begin to really trust him, the antics started. I called him on it, he pretended not to know what I was talking about, and then he never called me again. Ever. Not even to say Hello. I'm glad to know my instincts were right on, but I was sad to lose an excellent spanker. I have had NO LUCK in finding another, especially when they hear that NO SEX is a hard limit of mine. NO SEX IN ANY FORM is what I tell them, and they all make their excuses and find a reason not to meet. Someday I would LOVE spanking for foreplay, absolutely LOVE it, but not with every single man who Tops me. I think it comes down to simple boundary respect, and asshats (to use your term) don't have respect for ANYTHING, while decent guys DO. I'm still looking for that decent guy. *sigh*

 
Posted by Colleen on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 - 4:15 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
I'm sorry, Colleen. Sheesh, the more I'm reading, the more I realize I've been damned lucky to find as many partners as I have in the past, who didn't expect "rewards." Again, I'm not saying it's wrong -- but it shouldn't be assumed. I mean, come on. People go to spanking parties (with their mates!) and play with multiple partners. They are NOT having sex with them!

 
Posted by Erica on Tuesday, December 01, 2009 - 5:00 AM
[Reply to this
Real_Discipline

 
I hate being asked that question or someone wanting me to ask them that question. For me, it fills an innate desire that I've always had. It's a chance for me to express myself with someone who knows how I feel and vice-versa. To be able to express a side of yourself that you must keep hidden from those in your every day life is a blessing. I also love to be there for someone who needs what I have to offer and being able to deliver that to them-letting them let go and go into that vulnerable space where I can truly take care of them in a very special way. It's hard to describe. I believe it's therapeutic for the spanker and spankee-that's what is in it for both parties. The catharsis is amazing. I was born to spank naughty ladies and part of my existence is to take care of them be delivering the spankings and discipline they need in a strict, stern, caring, and benevolent manner.

 
Posted by Real_Discipline on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 1:32 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
R_D, it really is refreshing to hear this point of view. Thank you!
 
Posted by Erica on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 1:48 AM
[Reply to this
Pixie

 
Goodness, I sure don't think it's unreasonable, manipulative, delusional, or any other negative term that this guy suggested.  And the only way that it's selfish is in the positive sense that you are considering yourself and your boundaries when seeking compatible play partners.
 
Posted by Pixie on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 3:48 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
Thank you, Pixie! Yup, my bad, having boundaries.
 
Posted by Erica on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 5:55 AM
[Reply to this
Don

 
IS it unreasonable/manipulative/selfish/delusional to want to have a spanking scene without some sort of sex as a foregone conclusion?

Speaking as one man, Hell No. He's just another jerk.

 
Posted by Don on Thursday, December 03, 2009 - 7:43 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
LOL -- thank you!
 
Posted by Erica on Thursday, December 03, 2009 - 7:47 PM
[Reply to this
George
George Keiper

 
My goodness I have a wife (increasingly vanilla) for sex.I have no problem discussing beforehand that I'm just interested in the spanking.My profile on a couple of other sights is very forthright about this.But I agree Erica,if you meet a perspective play partner who isn't strictly a spanko you may have to explain the ground rules a little bit firmer before the session.

So no you weren't oversensetive or selfish.He was a pushy,selfish jerk.
 
Posted by George on Friday, December 04, 2009 - 10:37 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
I don't think he was pushy, really... he wasn't trying to get me to change my viewpoint. But clearly, his agenda in the scene was different from mine. Unfortunately, this happens a lot!

 
Posted by Erica on Friday, December 04, 2009 - 7:12 PM
[Reply to this
James

 
Erica,
I've given both kinds - do I get sexually aroused during a spanking -yes.  Does it mean I am definitely going to have sex with the woman after I punish her -no.  another point that isn't being addressed is the fact that there are so many variations of spankings - and the relationship between those who give and receive them.  while my favorite is a disciplinary scenario I have given -and immensely enjoyed- erotic spankings.  If I  am spanking a person I am already intimate with a post spanking roll in the hay may be the next logical step.  If I am spanking someone who I am correcting or mentoring it would be inappropriate.  I have several different facets I enjoy others only one.

The key thing -and this is the good part of your exchange -is that both parties are clear about their expectations from the beginning.  Girls shouldn't pretend a spanking will lead to sex if it won't and guys shouldn't pretend it doesn't matter if it does. (And you can flip the roles around anyway you like to here.) The parties involved also shouldn't ignore this issue - it is good that this issue came about as early as it did for you.  

Jim

 
Posted by James on Friday, December 04, 2009 - 9:11 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
Hi Jim -- very good point. As long as the expectations are spelled out early, one can't really be faulted for one's preferences in this thing we do. I think what bothered me the most was not that he wanted/expected sex, but that he thought women who don't care to engage in that are manipulative/selfish.

True indeed about the different types of spanking. I love all the types, honestly. Just not with everyone! :-)
 
Posted by Erica on Friday, December 04, 2009 - 9:33 PM
[Reply to this
James

 
Erica,
I should have acknowledge that -there was no justification for the name calling accusing you of being manipulative etc.  You have been very open and upfront about your preferences - you put alot of yourself out there.  IF HE DOESN"T LKE WHAT YOU LIKE HE _ OR ANYONE else- can just contact someone who shares his desires.
Jim

 
Posted by James on Saturday, December 05, 2009 - 4:55 PM
[Reply to this
Dave

 
Well, I don't know who or what gave this guy a wedgie, but he should understand that not every encounter with the opposite sex is only for nookie.  Not even "in the scene" is his single-minded purpose universal, and he needn't take offense.  

There are those who want a one-on-one "domestic discipline" set up, others who enjoy spanking as a really good warm-up for sex, others who enjoy it for its own sake, etc., etc., etc.  If one of his contacts doesn't share his particular view, just salute and move along.  There's no reason to cast aspersions and have such a fit.



 
Posted by Dave on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 9:24 AM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
It's OK, Wolfie. People feel strongly about their predilections, I guess. I certainly do. Good luck to him.

 
Posted by Erica on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 7:07 PM
[Reply to this
Billy Zenn
Billy Zenn

 
IS it unreasonable/manipulative/selfish/delusional to want to have a spanking scene without some sort of sex as a foregone conclusion?

Of course not.  The operative idea here is that spanking between adults is consensual.  One shouldn't be taken to task for choosing to play in whatever ways are comfortable, and the wise person makes those choices clear up front.  Coercion and blithe, self-serving assumptions have no place in that dynamic, and those who attempt to get their way with these kinds of manipulation have bigger issues than spanking and sex.

If someone is a true spanko, then they can fully appreciate all the nuances of a spanking scene and not think of it as a mere appetizer.

This bothers my a little.  Honestly, I begin to get a little queasy when phrases like "true spanko" (or "true submissive", "true dominant", or "true" anything) begin to pop up.  I'm guessing you didn't mean it in that context, right?

I do, however, think it's a mistake to assume that those who combine spanking and sex somehow see spanking only as simple foreplay or "a mere appetizer."  Some doubtlessly do, but for others, spanking (and everything associated with it, from contact to aftercare) is a valid and equal expression of their sexuality; an integral part of who they are both personally and sexually.  I think we get into trouble when we begin to generalize about these things.

Cheers:) 
 
Posted by Billy Zenn on Thursday, December 17, 2009 - 12:16 PM
[Reply to this
Erica
Erica Scott

 
You're absolutely right, Billy. I was a little too simplistic there. My "mere appetizer" comment was about the "what's in it for me" types, and wasn't intended to include everyone who combines sex and spanking. Didn't mean to generalize -- I don't like that either.
 
Posted by Erica on Thursday, December 17, 2009 - 6:50 PM
[Reply to this
Zelle

 
I know I'm late to this party.. (snort!).. story of my life.. and probably why I HAVE received 'tardiness' spankings. (of course.. I seem to never be late to business related appts... just the romantic interest appts.. lol.. is that 'topping from the bottom'?? (uh-huh.. who am I kidding? LOL)

Let me start by saying.. I JUST REALLY WANNA POP THAT GUY THAT WROTE YOU!

Next... most importantly of course.. is the fact that my own 'pudendal nerves' on my booty are directly wired to the internal workings of my naughty bits. (insert: blush)

So spanking for me.. is a mega mega turn on! I have to be VERY CAREFUL.. as this is why I do not play with (most the time).. with anyone other than a significant other ... cause spanking for me.. is like foreplay TO sex. Matter o' fact.. "go ahead and keep that spanking going during sex too"... that is .. if you can handle me turning into a feral cat.. (insert: bigger blush here). Yeah.. I tend to go a bit wild and crazy if spanked "during" intercourse.. (omg.. insert major chair wiggles just talking about it here)

I'm also one of those people like Alison.. that loves a D/s dynamic in the relationship too. I wish to be considered an equal in the relationship.. but I will yield all final decisions to my TOP... gladly.. as I have to deal with enough decision making in my own businesses... and I love having a strong male figure around at home to rule that roost.

I would consider myself an alpha sub if I had to label myself (which I hate.. but it helps people to understand why I am like I am ... without giving them a two hour dissertation on alpha and female subs) LMAO

I AM NOT one of those hard core BDSM types.. I do get a tad (spew-cough-lol) 'sassy' or 'mouthy' towards my significant other. Never to be mean or nasty of course (well.. okay sometimes I drop the "F-Bomb" with no remorse) ...... it's just that hells bells.. I'm alpha.. you gotta be MORE ALPHA than me to put me in my place... in no uncertain terms. (insert: laugh out loud here)

I guess I've rambled enough huh? LOL

-- Oh... one last thing... I do make it absolutely clear.. if the person spanking me is not my significant other (like at a private play party.. as I never have played in a public venue).... I get real clear about what happens to me during a spanking.. cause I may try to even position myself so I can have an orgasm.. but I usually have no issues about the fact that there will be NO "S E X" with an 'outside" play partner... because I most likely.. know the person well.. and know that they can handle 'me'.. and that they won't get upset.. because they get enormous pleasure from their end.. as they have their own dynamic that works for them.. and I'm extremely thankful there are men like that out there in this world.

 
Posted by Zelle on Tuesday, January 05, 2010 - 6:21 AM
[Reply to this