MySpace

Jens Carstensen's Blog Tagline TK

Jens

Jens Carstensen


Last Updated: 6/25/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 39
Sign: Leo

City: Brooklyn
State: NEW YORK
Country: US
Signup Date: 12/8/2003

Who Gives Kudos:



My Subscriptions
Sunday, February 15, 2009 

Current mood:My Girlfriend's Still Asleep



Lately, i've been trying to get back into the swing of music writing. I
wrote a brief interview piece on Freshkills for the Worst Music
Magazine in the World (and you know what that is), and i've also been
contributing reviews and previews for an amiable new blog called
Knocks from the Underground (dot com). My dealings with them have been very pleasant thus far, and their appetite for local music has been
voracious. So, it's a good fit. I was going to write about the show i
saw last night, but i would've felt bad about ragging on the bands,
considering it was a party, and i had fun. So, no point on getting all
French Olympic Judge on the whole thing. Instead i wrote about the bar
(see next Note).

However, Knocks has sent me a couple of CDs to review. CD reviewing, i honestly don't know how people can do it. Even with Indie Rock
Baseball, where Hans and i chronicled just how incapable we were of
getting through an entire mediocre CD, our patience ran incredibly
thin. Now, having to adhere to a more normal style, i basically use the
artifice of a review to just go off.

Anyway, they politely declined the following article, and being a new
blog, trying to get in good graces on the scene, i don't blame them at
all. But, it amuses me, so i posted it here. Enjoy.

+ + + +

CD Review: Ghosts by The Gay Blades
February 3, 2009
By: Jens Carstensen

Rating: 1/11

While dancing the other night with my girlfriend at a 50s-60s garage
rock night, i came to a conclusion: Hip-hop has a lot more to do with
rock and roll than current rock music does.

Okay, probably not an original observation. Still, when you think about
it, pre-Beatles rock – my favorite music in the world, i should add –
was engineered almost solely to make people dance. The rhythms were
consistent, there was little in the way of dynamic or harmonic shifts,
and the purpose of the lyricism was merely to get listeners to the
chorus. Sometimes the lyrics were take-offs on nursery rhymes or
fables, sometimes they just counted or spelled something, sometimes
they were pointed one-upping of their peers, sometimes they just threw
some weird new words at you, and mostly they were written to avoid
fucking with the flow. Some of the performers even went by bad-ass /
goofy sounding stage names. Sound familiar?

None of these are the hallmarks of what we now call rock music. Which
brings us to the current state of rock, and specifically, the Gay
Blades. Or if we're continuing to look backwards, Foreigner.

Now, i am not asserting that the Blades of Gayness *sound* like
Foreigner, much like Mos Def doesn't sound like Chuck Berry, even
though he plays him in the movies [see above]. What it means is that
Gay Blades are filling the same professional empty-rock niche once
occupied by the Other Mick Jones and his trans-oceanic cohorts.

This means, making sure the rhythm bed is metronomic and stiff (today
achieved with pro-tools rather than expensive sidemen); the
instrumentation competently and inoffensively played (by having two
egos in your band instead of six); the compositions calculated and
fine-tuned while retaining the current indicators of "edge"; and the
tones rock-approved, thus resulting in a Consistent Rock Experience for
the listener.

Thing is: i kinda like Foreigner, especially when they had the sax
player from King Crimson. Or, at least i found them superior to the
similar bands of their era, like your Bad Company (mad hokey) and your
Boston (irredeemably histrionic) or your Journey (please stop
believing). I'd probably like Gay Blades too, if they didn't constantly
overestimate the wattage of their riffage and their grasp on their
vocal affectations. Once a dude with a mic sounds like he's pouting, i
want to punch him in the face, and the only way i can do that is by
skipping to the next track. I've done that about six times now.

And, it's not like i really mean to pick (solely) on the Gay Blades;
they just happened across my desk. It's not like they're inept. Really,
this could've been any of 100 bands. Which is another part of the
problem. Foreigner and their ilk had the muscle of payola (and a
saxophone player with a prog rock pedigree) to help separate them from
the pack of also-rans and advance their financial standing. Nowadays,
DJ coercion is more of a hip-hop thing [see above] so i'm assuming this
band lacks that resource. So what's the point of sounding so damn
professional if no one's paying you?

Right, right, the MUSIC. Well, actually, it's so they can cling to the
hopes of getting on "Gossip Girl." Still, since we're here, what does
the music sound like, anyway? If you've gotten this far, you probably
already know. Though, not much like you predict a band called the Gay
Blades would sound like. So, i can't front on their marketing acumen.
Still, expect a "dance-punk" beat or two, and lyrics about how catty
your friends / ex-lovers are, because that's what bands like this do.
Even the album title is boilerplate.

For those of you just joining us, just spin the first 30 seconds of
Ghosts. If it sounds like your bag of tangerines, go for it. It's
reliably surprise-free, and not as bad as the rating or the ranting
would indicate. In the meantime, wake me up when these guys, or one of
the many similar acts on the "scene", finally gets to its "I Want to
Know What Love Is" phase. Cuz i want them to show me.

+ + + +

Simulcast here.





Zachary
Zachary Lipez

 
I have no comment because I totally know these guys. So I'll just tell you this-the drummer of Green Machine, the band playing at Grand Hotel and Saloon last night, was wearing a shirt that said "I used to be lost in the shuffle, now I shuffle with the lost..In Bisbe,AZ.
"


 
Posted by Zachary on Monday, February 16, 2009 - 4:05 AM
[Reply to this