MySpace


Nathan Bransford



Last Updated: 8/22/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 29
Sign: Cancer

City: San Francisco
State: CALIFORNIA
Country: US
Signup Date: 1/20/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Wednesday, January 30, 2008 


wow.

Thank you very very much for everyone who has entered the Surprisingly Essential First Page Challenge! There are many a Surprisingly Essential entry (around 400 between Blogger and Myspace), and the thread will be open for entries until tomorrow at 5:00 PM Pacific. Please continue to enter in the original contest thread and only in the original contest thread. Some people have missed the mark. I know the original post is getting so large that some people (especially those who are on dialup) are having some trouble entering. If you absolutely cannot make it work, you can e-mail me your entries and I'll post for you. But for the sake of my inbox, please try everything short of summoning the entire Geek Squad of America to your house before you take that last resort!

In other news, I hope Holly will be speaking to me by the end of the week! Have you checked out her blog? Promised her cat toys and ski encouragement? I hope so! I seriously cannot thank Holly enough for agreeing to help out. This is quite a task.

And in other news, I hate to mar what has otherwise been an extremely fun contest that I am still very excited about (despite the morale meter dipping), but I think I need to address this, so here goes. Some people have expressed concern that their entries are being critiqued on other blogs, and that this isn't something they signed on for. I'm sympathetic to these concerns -- while this is a public forum and people can see their entries, they might not have known that others would be critiquing their efforts, and ultimately I'd just like everyone to feel good about participating. Yes, being critiqued is something that happens when you're a writer, but this contest is just supposed to be fun. It's not like anyone is getting paid for this.

So I proposed what I feel like is a very fair compromise: I asked people who were critiquing to please refrain from critiques for the moment, but since I know there are many people who would love to hear feedback, I'd be happy to mention their blog on tonight's update to send people their way if people want critiques. That way, the people who want critiques can get critiques, and the people who don't want critiques don't have to be critiqued. Everyone wins! Even the monkeys, and they never win.

Unfortunately, while one critiquer was extremely gracious about bowing out (I really can't thank her enough, she was very kind about it), another has disagreed, I haven't heard from the third, and ultimately I can't really enforce this compromise. The critiquers aren't excerpting material, and besides offering a compromise, my hands are somewhat tied here. People are going to do what they're going to do, apparently. So I apologize to those who are uncomfortable with what's happening, but I hope it won't mar their enjoyment of the contest. I tried!

Ultimately, I hope we can move on from this -- I hesitate to say there's a lesson in this (there isn't!), but from here on out I'm going to be deleting further comments that relate to this issue (I'm serious about this). Let's just all enjoy the contest and let's all just get along, and really: we need to remember that Spencer is the real problem here.

Thanks again to everyone who entered! Keep on entering (I didn't plan on sleeping tomorrow night anyway... or the next day), and I'm seriously amazed and impressed by all the talent out there. You guys are awesome.
Mary McMyne

 
Four hundred entries + contestant complaints,
and you're not yet mainlaining bourbon.
What ARE you mainlining?!?!
Dear god man. SYMPATHY!!! Sympathy!!!
 
Posted by Mary McMyne on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 3:36 AM
[Reply to this
Furious D
Duncan MacMaster

 
I avoid trying to pass judgement on anyone else's work when I'm so harsh on my own.

I'll refrain from reading critiques of my entry, since it's just a first draft and I'll be tearing it to pieces later myself.

I'm arranging bribes, do you and Holly interested cash, checks, or one free cover-up each for the atrocity of your choice?
 
Posted by Furious D on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 3:37 AM
[Reply to this
Odo
Odo fitz Gilbert

 
Nathan -- You are absolutely bug-f**k nuts! 400???

I checked out Holly's blog and she's great fun. Thanks for the forward. She seems to think (as of the current moment) that it's *only* 250. You should get a morale-meter for her, too, and update it hourly. :)
 
Posted by Odo on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 7:45 AM
[Reply to this
Author, J. W. Coffey
J. W. Coffey

 
If you put your work out there, it's going to be critiqued. Live with it. Gotta find something to post later. :-) See how *I* fare with the madding crowd.
 
Posted by Author, J. W. Coffey on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 2:15 PM
[Reply to this
earthshoes
Mary Paddock

 
Nathan,

At this point, this is going to sound like something of a dumb question. But you've just stated that we should post to the "original thread" and I'm becoming paranoid as there are actually two original threads--one on My Space and one on Blogger. You've only given the link to the Blogger thread as the original thread, but in the rules you refer to posting our entries in "this thread" in both places.

Are those of us who are posting on My Space missing something important? Should we move our entries to Blogger?

Many thanks for this and excuse me if I'm being obtuse.

Mary
 
Posted by earthshoes on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 6:54 PM
[Reply to this
Nathan Bransford

 
It's fine to post on the original Myspace thread too.
 
Posted by Nathan Bransford on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 7:16 PM
[Reply to this