MySpace
myspace music


Steve Hefter and Friends of Friends



Last Updated: 12/2/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: Portland
State: Oregon
Country: US
Signup Date: 2/3/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Friday, December 21, 2007 

Current mood:  hungry
But still feisty. Fuck it.

Open correspondance with Michael Byrne, City Paper Music Editor:

From: Steve Hefter [mailto:shefte2@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:25 PM
To: City Paper Music Editor
Cc: senorfrench@gmail.com; gretalynne@hotmail.com; george@challenge-club.com; patrickhughes462@hotmail.com; dougkeen@gmail.com; michaelcward@comcast.net
Subject: grievances

 

Mr. Byrne:
 
As music editor of the City Paper, the only well-circulated and oft-read arts-oriented periodical in the city, I think you have a responsibility to the music-listening- and making- population of this town. The bands and their fans rely on you to ensure they receive the coverage they're due in the town where they play, if nowhere else.  So, what entitles a band to such recognition? I'd argue it should primarily be based on the quality of their work (their live show and recordings) and committment to artistic integrity, but I understand dilligence (willingness to tour, hustle, and remain visible) is the other justifiably realistic component of the equation.  There are a handful of bands in this town deserving of coverage and you've definitely seen to it that a few of them show up in print Wednesday. However, some weeks, such as this one, boggle my admittedly already boggled mind. 
 
The taper guy?  No offense to him- I'm sure he's a nice enough guy- but he's basically just a middle-aged dude who goes around taping bands, giving them a free copy, and archiving his recordings.  I'd wager to guess he'd refer to it as a passionate avocation himself (I didn't bother to read the article because, frankly, who gives a shit?) but it's somehow headline-worthy to you.  What makes this remarkable and the countless unmentioned albums, shows, and endless other music-related antecdotes not?
 
Sure, my frustration stems from what I perceive to be a snub of my band. I admit I can't be objective about that and you're certainly entitled to your opinion and snubbery. I know we've worked our asses off to finish two albums and tour when we can despite unavoidable clockpunchery, limited funds, and a difficult town to feel great about playing music in and to.  I know we've earned the respect of writers, musicians, and artists whose opinion is far more important to me than yours or your paper's, and is more than enough affirmation to continue grinding it out. 
 
I don't claim to be virtuosically brilliant or mind-bendingly profound, and breaking even on a CD will always feel like a blessing to me, but remember, next time you write an article about a middle-aged dude who tapes shows as a hobby, there are still 100 more local musicians dreaming about their tapes really meaning something to somebody.
 
Respectfully,
 
Steve Hefter


From: mbyrne@citypaper.com
To: shefte2@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: grievances
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:18:10 -0500

Steve:

 

1) All apologies if you feel your band was "snubbed."

 

2) There are far more than "a handful" of bands here deserving of coverage.

 

3) I'm not going to defend an article you didn't read. Assume it's implicit.

 

4) You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.

 

If you are looking for coverage in City Paper (perhaps you're not?), we'd encourage you to send in a CD, shoot us a letter, tell us why your band should be covered.

 

Best,

 

Michael Byrne

 

Music Editor

City Paper

812 Park Ave.

Baltimore, MD 21201







Michael:
 
What's somewhat mesmorizing is this:
 
a) you don't remember getting my CD after I requested that you at least peruse it prior to our 10/26 CD release show (which was really quite an enjoyable experience at the TH I'm sorry you missed) even after you responded initially, asking for the general release date
 
 b) irregardless of (a), you seem to have no idea who I am or why I'm writing (I'm not so hard on myself to not be somewhat shocked you've never seen my name, being the City Paper Music Editor)
 
 and
 
c) your focus on my use of "a handful" when I was explicitly advocating on behalf of the many bands going unnamed and unnoticed, undeservedly.  ]
 
I didn't read your article because of a1) my frustration stemming from (a) through (c) and b1) that dude has taped both bands I'm currently in. Hell, we were appreciative but the recordings are not not necessarily all that useful, them being one-mic jobs generally.
 
I do appreciate you writing back though, and we'd love any publicity, good or bad from the City Paper.  Check out the CD I sent, our myspace site myspace.com/hefterandfriends, our sonicbids site sonicbids.com/hefterandfriends and my solo myspace site myspace.com/heftonus, if you're inclined.  Thanks again for your time.
 
-Steve Hefter




Currently reading:
The Road (Oprah’s Book Club)
By Cormac McCarthy
Release date: 28 March, 2007
Previous Post: bitunes | Back to Blog List | Next Post: Point Counterpoint
jaslass

 
love it, mr. feisty grump old bear!
its good for reporters to hear we expect them to set the bar (especially by what they cover)
and be ever mindful of the local scene. i, for one, have been amazed at the music out there in this town and have become a real convert in the support of local bands.
thank you for sharing a bit of your fucked up world!
 
Posted by jaslass on Saturday, December 22, 2007 - 6:32 PM
[Reply to this
Steve
Steve Colmus

 
This is a rough draft of a letter I wrote to City Paper las month, that the good cheer of the holidays somehow persuaded me to not send. I am rethinking this, now:

I am writing in regard to the "Critic's Choice" article written by Michael Byrne in the 12/19 issue of City Paper, in reference to the upcoming Judd & Maggie show at the Talking Head. For starters, its not only badly written ("perfectly matching sets of...voices" to describe two people), its factually incorrect - Judd & Maggie haven't been affiliated with RCA Records for over a year, a fact that a simple visit to their MySpace page would have brought to your attention.

But my bigger complaint is that this article encapsulates everything that makes City Paper such a letdown to the local music scene. You are incapable of honestly supporting anyone not in your cabal of cool - namely, anyone not numbered among Wham City and its brethren. When you do bring attention to other acts, the compliments are so back-handed they leave knuckle-marks - this so-called "Critic's Choice" referred to the band as "cheesy and overbearing" and “decidedly 'uncool,'" before briefly making a negative reference to the fact that the group might possibly be singing about Jesus. It was such a needless bitchy and information-less take on the band, that I’m lead to question what the purpose was of singling them out - do you seriously feel as through you've positively "hyped" the show? Is that not the point of the “Critic’s Choice”?

With press like this, I almost feel bad complaining that you don't cover real local music enough, but this same show is a great example of your drastic shortcomings in that area as well: there's no mention - even in the Short List - that either Steve Hefter and Friends of Friends or Water School - two local bands who both released albums this year - are playing that night. How lazy can you get?

This is only one instance, but it’s a truism to local musicians at this point that the City Paper is not interested in what we’re doing - with few exceptions, your music writers don’t come to the shows and don’t care about the bands, minus the handful of sanctified hipsters. Nobody needs or wants a mindless cheerleader, but it’s a crushing blow to the local scene that the only “alternative” weekly is too bored to care or too catty to be helpful.
 
Posted by Steve on Sunday, January 06, 2008 - 8:36 PM
[Reply to this
Steve Hefter and Friends of Friends

 
Steve:

I don't know if I'm really glad I missed that CP smart-assery or disappointed I didn't have that as additional fodder going in. Why be so unnecessarily smarmy? You couldn't have said it any better- why make it a critic's pick primarily only to use it as an excuse to flash your little, laminated badge of street cred?

http://cpgo.citypaper.com/calendar/event.asp?whatID=100279
 
Posted by Steve Hefter and Friends of Friends on Sunday, January 06, 2008 - 9:05 PM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: bitunes | Back to Blog List | Next Post: Point Counterpoint