MySpace


Missy



Last Updated: 7/8/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Married
Age: 29
Sign: Aries

City: TRAVERSE CITY
State: MICHIGAN
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/3/2006

Who Gives Kudos:



My Subscriptions
Saturday, July 29, 2006 

Current mood:  curious

This article was on CNN today. It somewhat reminds me of the woman whom clammed to be Anastasia . True she was said later by DNA not to be Anastasia however that could be a cover up via the Russian government or even American government I love conspiracy anyway what i would like to know is what prof did this man have he was a decedent of henry the VII does he have any males and besides isnt Furgy a decedent of Henry VII wouldnt that make HER children next in line so here is the story what are your thoughts

(AP) -- The British royal family in the early 20th-century sought advice on whether a former policeman who claimed to be the true heir to the throne could be declared insane, according to government documents released Friday.

The records, released by the National Archive, show royal annoyance with Anthony Hall, who claimed during the 1920s and 1930s to be a direct descendant of King Henry VIII and his second wife, Anne Boleyn.

Hall made repeated public speeches setting out his claim to the throne, challenging the then-monarch, King George V, to fight him in court for the right to the crown with the loser to have "his head lopped off."

In a July 1931 letter to the Home Office, the king's private secretary, Sir Clive Wigram, suggested Hall should be institutionalized.

"His Majesty quite agrees that a stop should be put to his effusions but feels that it might not look very well for a man who is obviously demented to get six months' imprisonment," the letter said.

"Would it not be possible to keep him under observation with a view to his final detention in an Institution, without actually putting him in prison?"

'Eccentric, but not obviously demented'

Home Office official Sir John Anderson replied that while Hall was "eccentric and wrong-headed, he is not so obviously demented or insane that he could be dealt with without recourse to court proceedings."

Palace hopes were dealt a further blow when Hall was examined by doctors, including Dr. Walter R. Jordan, an "expert in lunacy."

Jordan concluded that Hall's actions, "though he should be able to recognize their futility and impropriety, are not absolute proof of unsoundness of mind."

Hall was a thorn in the monarchy's side for years. Repeatedly arrested and fined for using "scandalous language," he persisted in his claim.

In 1931, he published a pamphlet, "Open Letter to King George V," which said that as king he would abolish government and taxes, write off the national debt, create full employment and ensure free health care for all.

Hall eventually stopped making public speeches during World War II, and died in 1947.

Dez & Liz
Des n Liz Waters

 

Definately not a cover up, don't see any reason why either. And why was it on CNN? Can't stand that network, too many lies and half truths.

Anyways, it didn't make a ripple here at all. There are many people here in England who have claims to the Monarchy, and this man may have been a decendant of King Henry VIII, but NOT to Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn. Her pregnancies and miscarriages were well documented.

Remember, Henry had one son that was legitimate, and that was Edward. But he died shortly after he ascended to the throne because he was sickly. Henry was well noted for his extra marital affairs and the only OTHER noted male he had was with Anne Boleyn's sister Mary. It was through her he met Anne. Mary gave birth to a son, Henry Fitzroy. Because she birthed a male, Henry assumed (remember, they didn't know anything about genetics then!) that Anne would produce a male for him too. If this weirdo WAS a decendant, he wouldn't have a claim AT ALL to the throne because Henry Fitzroy was born on the wrong side of the blanket. In other words, he was a bastard. Therefore, the claim is obselete. Helpful?


 
Posted by Dez & Liz on Wednesday, August 02, 2006 - 1:01 PM
[Reply to this
Missy

 
I totaly understand that but isnt furgy or dianna decended from henry VIII laginamenly so wouldnt that make her children hte rightfull heirs to the throne
 
Posted by Missy on Friday, August 04, 2006 - 5:24 PM
[Reply to this