MySpace
myspace music


Barry Beatmaster



Last Updated: 11/19/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: London
Country: UK
Signup Date: 3/7/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Saturday, January 19, 2008 

Current mood:  energetic
Category: Automotive
educating children about technology and predictions for the future can be a dangerous thing. especially if when they grow up they wonder what happened to all the developments they were promised, but which never materialised.

as a child I read Usborne science books, and the ones entitled "Electricity" and "Future cities" featured some ideas for alternative sources of power that fascinated me.
these books dated from the 70's.
the first book had a vision for a filling station of the future, which instead of supplying petrol or diesel, replaced batteries for electric cars- spent batteries slid out, and charged ones in.
the second had many proposed uses for solar panels for generating electricity and pre-warming water for central heating/washing use in homes, and use of wind power, and 2 alternate visions of city life in the future, sometime around 2020 or so-
the first if we kept living the same way we are-
petrol and diesel vehicles continued to run on the roads, and kerosene airliners in the skies.
the sky was grey with pollution, people wore smog masks to breathe, trees withered away on the grimy street.

the second if we changed our ways; large trucks were gone- liquids were moved by underground pipeline, freight by electric railway. cars and small goods vehicles were electric. airliners powered by hydrogen- the exhaust being mere water vapour. needless to say, trees and general greenery flourished and everyone looked healthier and happier.


also in Future Cities were visions of large flat screen televisions, email, online shopping, recording video onto discs, and "wristo's"- communication devices built into watches.


so now in the 21st century we have DVD recorders for £50, mobile phones the size of matchboxes, internet shopping, lcd tv's......and we're still driving around in filthy, maintenance-hungry petrol and diesel-fuelled cars, the air in busy cities is foul, respiratory illnesses are prevalent, and to top it all there's the widespread controversy over climate change.

what happened to electric cars? we're told electric cars have limited range, poor performance and are generally crap.

however, people are buying them in london- take the G-Wiz
cheap to run, exempt from the congestion charge.
45mph top speed, 40 mile range- although that will increase when lithium-ion batteries are offered for it next year.
so electric cars are rubbish? that must be why no major manufacturer is building one.

Check this out- the Toyota Rav4EV
top speed= 78 mph, maximum range= 120 miles.
great- only it was discontinued.

why? watch the excellent documentary film "Who killed the electric car?".

when the California Air Resources Board caved in due to car manufacturers' pressure and withdrew the zero emissions vehicle mandate which originally forced them to develop electric cars, all of them- the Toyota Rav4EV, Honda EVplus, Ford Ranger EV and the main vehicle featured in the film- the GM EV1, were recalled from their leases, and nearly all were crushed.


note the bit on that page-
"Whether or not Toyota wanted to continue production, it was unlikely to be able to do so, because the EV-95 battery was no longer available. Chevron had inherited control of the worldwide patent rights for the NiMH EV-95 battery when it merged with Texaco, which had purchased them from General Motors. Chevron's unit won a $30,000,000 settlement from Toyota and Panasonic, and the production line for the large NiMH batteries was closed down and dismantled. Only smaller NiMH batteries, incapable of powering an electric vehicle or plugging in, are currently allowed by Chevron-Texaco."

Texaco and Chevron, if you didn't know, are oil companies.

in the film a brilliant clip from the Naked Gun 2 1/2 is used, in which a consortium of evil businessmen is being shown various energy-saving inventions that threaten them-
solar cells, compact fluorescent tube bulbs, heat-saving glass panels- and the electric car.

"but don't worry", the evil leader tells them, "no-one will ever know about them".



Update-


news from an EV driver's blog
new developments in the production of electric goods vehicles-

Smith Edison van

Smith Newton 7.5 ton truck

130 mile range, 50mph top speed, and Sainsbury's are planning to use them.

the scene portrayed in that usborne science book is feasible after all. an electric vehicle revolution is possible.



and in a shock announcement, General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner calls for an end to petrol cars, and offers ethanol as an alternative, greener fuel.

"Electrically driven vehicles are the answer in the medium to long term," says Wagoner ,"but we need to do something else in the interim."

they offered the electric car, then killed it off, and now are still dodging offering it again, even though they know it's the answer, and they have all the technology.

Currently watching:
Who Killed the Electric Car?
Release date: 14 November, 2006
Barry Beatmaster

 
ps. some other inventions I recall reading about in childhood days-

an all-electric battery-powered full-sized bus in a science encyclopedia (dating from the 70's)

Leyland gas turbine truck (38 ton artic) in the Ladybird book of commercial vehicles (dating from 1969)

Lectra Haul giant dumptrucks (listed in the Observers' book of commercial vehicles- stating that production started in 1963) with a diesel engine turning an alternator powering electric motors in the rear wheel hubs. regenerative braking is employed- when the vehicle needs to slow down, rather than waste energy as heat in conventional friction brakes (which is a lot of energy when you consider the weight involved- 100 tons-plus) , the wheel motors are switched to act as generators to charge batteries that can power the motors when the vehicle needs to accelerate again, thus saving diesel fuel.
there you have it- hybrids, maybe as much as 40 years before the current fave Toyota prius.
 
Posted by Barry Beatmaster on Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 11:12 AM
[Reply to this
Barry Beatmaster

 
in the film they examine the advertising GM used for the EV1

energy advisor S.David Freeman comments "y'know, we never saw adverts showing the car scampering up a hill with an attractive man or woman draped around it- that's how you sell cars"

one of the youtube comments; "that was creepy -like a film about the effects of nuclear war or something."

funny how GM made an electric car look so scary, yet back in the 70's managed to make a 255 ton dumptruck look cute in comparison. note the girl shown driving it.

GM wanted the EV1 to fail to attract buyers, so they could convince the CARB to revoke the zero emissions mandate.
 
Posted by Barry Beatmaster on Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 6:11 PM
[Reply to this
Barry Beatmaster

 
EV1 TV ad

just as offputting.
 
Posted by Barry Beatmaster on Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 6:22 PM
[Reply to this
Barry Beatmaster

 
yep, high price of solar cells is the main deterrent to consumers.

I guess it's up to the government to offer incentives via subsidies for householders to install solar panels, and housebuilders to fit them as standard.

the paradox about the electric car is that it is too good a product for the consumer, from the companies' point of view-

it's like a printer that needs no replacement cartridges, or a mobile phone that needs no credit.
once the car's sold there'll only be the odd bit of income from (fewer) replacement parts and servicing (at longer intervals)-
hence cheap printers/phones, expensive cartridges/phone credit, cheap cars/expensive fuel, servicing and spare parts-
cheap central heating boilers/expensive fuel & maintenance?

that's why car makers are reluctant to offer plug-in hybrids- hybrids with extra battery capacity that you can charge for yourself at charging points or even at home.

they don't want drivers to be free to choose their source of power- ironic when the car is considered to be a symbol of freedom- in reality it ties its driver to a huge industry.

I saw another G-wiz Reva today. the electric car is around, and is in demand, albeit in slightly comical, flawed form without major manufacturers to produce it.
 
Posted by Barry Beatmaster on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 5:09 PM
[Reply to this
Wheelz
Wheelz Wheeler

 
Like all these things,its gotta be throw away,short life span,then needs to buy again..As with music, phones,clothes.Where these things were bulit to last,now go wrong,can't repair,cheaper to replace..Consumerism ,beast it is, with that all powerful market forces..Gotta keep buying..

Watching French news today,south coast a few places starting to sell bio fuel..chip fat collected from local restaurants..no tax,half price,any diesel vehicle runs on,how long before thats stopped,yet why is it illegal,its a free market ,well as long as you do not jeopardise the main players..

See they've got Bluetooth now sown up,making it so you need same hardware,sotware,installed in device your using..wonder when that was coming..slip up there,no money to be made..All about profit these days,save the planet,carbon neutral setting makes me laugh,plant a tree as a price to pay for flying..we gotta see through that one..All started going wrong when main political parties started getting there money from big companies,multi internationals..running the world now mate..
 
Posted by Wheelz on Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 6:00 PM
[Reply to this
Barry Beatmaster

 
another book I read years ago was "Military Vehicles of the world", and the British Army Bedford 4X4 trucks' diesel engines were listed as being able to run off vegetable oil, ethanol- multi-fuel.
the models shown were from the 60's onwards.

it sounded like no more than very simple adjustments (if anything at all) were all that was needed to allow the use of these renewable fuels.

no need for reliance on foreign oil.

I just watched the BBC1 documentary about the coalition forces' utter lack of a plan for rebuilding Iraq following the removal of Saddam.
combine the statement of a UK official that they'd look back at Iraq in 20 years in the same way as Vietnam, with the statement by a resources expert in "the War for oil" 2003 documentary that the Iraq war would be looked back in future years as the first of the resources wars, and we have a very bleak view of the future.
 
Posted by Barry Beatmaster on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 9:20 PM
[Reply to this
Barry Beatmaster

 
however there was a promising news article about the expansion in EV production

-it may actually turn out to be profitable.
electric goods vehicles make good sense for stop-start city operation- and are cheaper to run.
 
Posted by Barry Beatmaster on Monday, January 21, 2008 - 1:19 PM
[Reply to this