Who Gives Kudos: MARIA - Fig.. (1) Genovese (1) Nikki (1) AsianRushFan (1) ☾↑ϯhe Crush.. (1) r3V☮Lutiona.. (1) T®M3Z 800W1.. (1) John aka EV.. (1)

	Josh [ReaD mY BloG] Josh McGowan	i really hate ur blogs   Posted by Josh [ReaD mY BloG] on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 9:19 PM [Reply to this]

	Josh [ReaD mY BloG] Josh McGowan	lol everybodys mad at me because i dont praise alex for all his work..well sorry i dont promote evil..and thats just what alex is!   Posted by Josh [ReaD mY BloG] on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 6:36 PM [Reply to this]

	T®M3Z 800W1661N5 Don'tread OnMe	We're not upset with you Joshy (we don't even care if that's your real name.)  Sometimes it's good for the troops to have a Posterboy for the "douchebag" category to throw darts at or use for lavatory paper, etc.  And pal... you exemplify the archetype!  Two douchebags rolled into one:  Shill & Yuppie!    Man you're lame at counter-intelligence programming! These people, even the ones like me that WASTE time regarding you, are intelligent enough to recognize what you're about... without even One of your keystrokes.  "You are the weakest link..."   Posted by T®M3Z 800W1661N5 on Thursday, November 12, 2009 - 12:04 AM [Reply to this]

	Josh [ReaD mY BloG] Josh McGowan	lol what r u trying to say? im working for someone? lol alex is the one that works for someone..i dont get paid shit for what im doing   Posted by Josh [ReaD mY BloG] on Thursday, November 12, 2009 - 7:05 AM [Reply to this]

	*_* yskisalbn,s	anyone with "read my blog" in there head line on myspace is obviously up to something but seriously if you hate someones blog why do you give them views and clicks?? and then post in them? seems kinda counter productive. you should focus on making your blog better for the readers you dont have (since apparently you care about it so much you advertise it everywhere you go)   Posted by *_* yskisalbn,s on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 1:44 PM [Reply to this]

	~Kathy~	If you hate them don't read them.   Posted by ~Kathy~ on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 1:08 AM [Reply to this]

	דָּנִיֵּאל Daniel Castaneda	Fuck You Then You Robotic FUCK HEAD!!! Go  Suck The Governments DICK SOME MORE!!!!   Posted by דָּנִיֵּאל on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 12:57 AM [Reply to this]

	evil grill	josh, i really hate your pointless whining. stop acting like a spoiled brat and do something useful yourself. btw, read my blog   Posted by evil grill on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:04 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Doctors Bribed To Push Swine Flu Vaccine On Reluctant Public Health authorities offer extra bonuses for each shot in an attempt to counter mass resistance to H1N1 shot Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet.com Tuesday, November 10, 2009 Doctors in Britain are effectively being bribed by health authorities to push the swine flu vaccine on a reluctant public after suspicions over the safety of the shot resulted in huge numbers of people refusing to take it. The government originally intended for the entire population of the UK to receive the H1N1 vaccine but less than half have indicated that they will take the shot. Multiple opinion polls have revealed that half of GPs in Britain have severe reservations and doubts over the safety of the shot. A much larger Nursing Times magazine poll in August also found that 30% of all frontline nurses said they would refuse to be immunized, with another 33% saying they were unsure over the vaccine. 50% of pregnant women in the UK have also said they will refuse the vaccine. This resistance has prompted health authorities to bribe doctors to push the vaccine on the public in the form of new bonuses for each and every shot they give, on top of those already in place. “NHS managers in Birmingham have told family doctors they will be able to get extra payments – on top of the £5.25 they already get per jab – if they meet targets on vaccination rates,” reports the Daily Mail. “If they vaccinate more than 90 per cent of those deemed at risk of the disease in their area, they will get 50 per cent more per jab, meaning they will be paid £7.88 for every person they vaccinate.” Doctors who achieve a 40 per cent uptake will receive an extra 10 per cent bonus. In total, the bonuses are potentially worth thousands of pounds per practice. (ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW) Critics expressed outrage that doctors were effectively being bribed to become drug pushers for the government. Jackie Fletcher, of vaccination support group Jabs, said: ‘There are huge questions about the integrity of vaccine decisions if doctors are paid to give them. ‘All vaccines carry a risk of side effects. Can we be confident GPs will tell patients about these risks if they are being paid extra to ensure a high uptake? ‘Rather than paying bonuses, the Department of Health should be investigating possible side effects.’ As we highlighted last week, mass resistance to the vaccine has prompted elitists to devise deceptive schemes in an attempt to get more people to take the shot. During a recent Council on Foreign Relations meeting, Andrew Jack, Pharmaceutical Correspondent for the Financial Times, conceded that “the anti-vaccine movement is having a field day on the internet” and that the CFR, via its many members which occupy prominent positions in the establishment media, should conspire to counter negative information about the swine flu vaccine. At around the same time, Sir Liam Donaldson, the Chief Medical Officer in England, described people who express doubts about the swine flu vaccine as “extremists”. During another part of the discussion on whether or not the vaccine should be made mandatory for health workers and school children, Lone Simonsen, Research Professor and Research Director at the Department of Global Health, George Washington University, suggests creating an artificial scarcity in order to ramp up demand for the vaccine. “I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that’s in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that — there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.” Simonsen says, much to the amusement of the other attendees at the symposium. But this is exactly the scam being run by the corporate media. Endless stories about shortages in supply, allied with footage of members of the public queuing for hours to receive the vaccine, have created a contrived sense of scarcity, similar to how toy companies manufacture a stampede for a particular item before Christmas by floating stories about something being low in stock. Watch a clip from the CFR meeting below. Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Fall Of The Republic Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today!   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 9:45 PM [Reply to this]

	Obsidian BLAZE Corleone aka La Doña {RSS} Blaze Corleone	LA Report!!! Ok, during the past few days, they have been CHEMTRAILING like crazy.  Shit knocked me on my ass for a couple of days 'cause I had to go OUT in that shit.  As I watch all those Ukraine videos, a thought struck me.  There is a posting for a new job for Angelinos...some kind of security for the railroads?  According to the posting, hardhats and appropriate attire necessary to possible "protect" the railways from ????  This I find to be curious as FUCK, because I am under the impression there is going to be something on those trains to rile people enough for it to need protecting.  I'm noting that there is a lot of police activity again, more than usual, lots of "gun nuts" (yeah, whatever makes gun control seem feasible, eh?).  Dammit..let me go find that job posting and I'll be back.  It looks suspicious to me, 'cause it isnt' like trains are NEW here, but I have never seen, nor heard about a job like this....I'll be back... B.   Posted by Obsidian BLAZE Corleone aka La Doña {RSS} on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 4:31 PM [Reply to this]

	Obsidian BLAZE Corleone aka La Doña {RSS} Blaze Corleone	OK...it's called a construction flagger position.  It is to protect the railway and employees from the public?????  Specifically... Flagging includes standing at a railroad crossing. The flag person will act as a crossing guard to protect railroad equipment and employees from the public. Since WHEN do railroads need crossing guards?  ijs.... B.   Posted by Obsidian BLAZE Corleone aka La Doña {RSS} on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 4:39 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	It really is amazing how many people will defend and promote vaccinations without even having a clue of the modern day malicious intent regarding population control against the population of this world. Its like hanging out with someone that wants to huff gold spray paint all night and when you tell him his face is yellow and his lungs are gold then he goes back for another huff like a mind controlled slave to Sherwin Williams. After all the lies and despair this nation goes through in a given year then how is it that the majority of an American public actually thinks that a "pushed" vaccination for a labmade virus is a good idea ?   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 9:55 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Fort Hood: A media orgy of rumors, speculation and falsehoods Much of the initial coverage turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that? by Glenn Greenwald http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15948   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:08 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:28 PM [Reply to this]

	robbie/the ground crew.	HHMMMMM DO U KNOW WHAT THAT SIGN MEANS ?  IT,L BE NO SUPRISE TO YOU MY FRIEND,   Posted by robbie/the ground crew. on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 2:33 PM [Reply to this]

	**BRENDA**	bet the average sheep has no clue   Posted by **BRENDA** on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 3:54 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Where Will They Get the Troops? by Dahr Jamail and Sarah Lazare http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15987     Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:16 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	INTERVIEW WITH A PUPPET Interview with the President: Jail Time for Those without Health Care Insurance? November 09, 2009 6:30 PM From Sunlen Miller: During an exclusive interview with ABC News’ Jake Tapper today, President Obama said that penalties are appropriate for people who try to “free ride” the health care system but stopped short of endorsing the threat of jail time for those who refuse to pay a fine for not having insurance. “What I think is appropriate is that in the same way that everybody has to get auto insurance and if you don't, you're subject to some penalty, that in this situation, if you have the ability to buy insurance, it's affordable and you choose not to do so, forcing you and me and everybody else to subsidize you, you know, there's a thousand dollar hidden tax that families all across America are -- are burdened by because of the fact that people don't have health insurance, you know, there's nothing wrong with a penalty.” Under the House bill those who can afford to buy insurance and don’t’ pay a fine. If the refuse to pay that fine there’s a threat – as with a lot of tax fines – of jail time. The Senate removed that provision in the Senate Finance Committee. Mr. Obama said penalties have to be high enough for people to not game the system, but it’s also important to not be “so punitive” that people who are having a hard time find themselves suddenly worse off, thus why hardship exemptions have been built in the legislation. “I think the general broad principle is simply that people who are paying for their health insurance aren't subsidizing folks who simply choose not to until they get sick and then suddenly they expect free health insurance.  That's -- that's basic concept of responsibility that I think most Americans abide by,” Mr. Obama said, “penalties are appropriate for people who try to free ride the system and force others to pay for their health insurance.” The President said that he didn’t think the question over the appropriateness of possible jail time is the “biggest question” the House and Senate are facing right now. Read more from Jake Tapper’s interview with President Obama HERE. -Sunlen Miller   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:20 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:27 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Google says Murdoch stories can be taken off Published: Tuesday November 10, 2009 Google said on Tuesday, in response to threats by Rupert Murdoch to ban the search engine from listing content from his news empire, that any company could ask to have stories taken off. In an interview in his native Australia, Murdoch accused Google of stealing stories from News Corp. newspapers for the Google News service, and said he might ban them once he introduces charges for the papers' online editions. Google said it was up to individual news organisations to decide whether they wanted their stories listed on Google News, and there were "simple technical standards" that would remove them if they wished. "News organisations are in complete control over whether and how much of their content appears in search results," it said said in a statement issued in London. "Publishers put their content on the web because they want it to be found, so very few choose not to include their material in Google News and web search. But if they tell us not to include it, we don't." It added: "If publishers want their content to be removed from Google News specifically all they need to do it tell us." Google said its news listings service and web searches were a "tremendous source of promotion" for news organisations, sending them "about 100,000 clicks every minute". It added that Google News's approach was "fully consistent with copyright law", as it only showed the headline, short snippet of the story and a link to the publishers' site where readers could read the full version. News Corp owns an enormous number of newspapers around the world including The Australian, the New York Post and The Times of London, and is planning to soon charge all its online readers.   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:23 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	HECK, THIS SITE IS WAY BETTER THAN GOOGLE NEWS TIMES 500. PROVE ME WRONG.   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:26 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	4409 -- Man gets $2300 in tickets riding his electric bike. Forty Four O Nine  Website: http://www.youtube.com/user/RP4409 Date: 11-10-2009 Subject: Videos by 4409 A load of pirates including 7 ships...errrrrr I mean squad cars and about 17 cops was used to detain a man on an electric bike...WTF   Nicholas Bravo also known as SpikeBravo here on you tube was pulled over going to church sunday where he was harrased by a group of thugs looking for cash.   They gave SpikeBravo a bill with 5 charges totalling and estimated $2300.00   I believe this Pirate KNOWINGLY charged SpikeBravo with the intent to harass.   Any idiot can look at the statutes and figure out that the electric bike it NOT a moped with a piston engine.   Phoenix Police Department Officer name: J. Schlender #7726 Squaw Peak District (602) 495-5007 Ask for Srgt Coutts   ....   This pirate was clearly acting under the color of law and "MAY" have violated Section 242 of Title 18 USC.   Phoenix Police Department Officer name: J. Schlender #7726   Full video of the stop will be up in a day or two you will not want to miss it!   you can checkout spikebravo at http://www.youtube.com/spikebravo   Donations can always be made to the 4409 liberty fund at http://www.Formula4409.com   Media inquires please contact: media@Formula4409.com   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:36 PM [Reply to this]

	Erik	Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:52 PM

	Erik	Colombia “Hands Over Its Sovereignty” to U.S. with Military Accord, Says Chavez Published on November 4th 2009, by James Suggett - Venezuelanalysis.com U.S. Ambassador to Colombia William Brownfield (center left) and Colombian Foreign Relations Minister Jaime Bermudez (center right) signing the accord on October 30th (EFE) Mérida, November 4th 2009 (Venezuelanalysis.com) – Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Colombia became a “colony” when it granted the U.S. permission to expand its military presence in Colombian territory in an accord signed on October 30th, the details of which became public on Tuesday. “Colombia decided to hand over its sovereignty to the United States... Colombia no longer governs its territory,” said Chavez in a televised meeting of his Council of Ministers. “Colombia today is no longer a sovereign country... it is a kind of colony.” The ten-year accord grants the U.S. access, use, and free movement among two air bases, two naval bases, three army bases, and “the rest of the installations and locations” in Colombia, in accordance with Colombian law. The bases and any enhancements carried out on them by the U.S. remain the property of Colombia. Meanwhile, U.S. military, civilian, and diplomatic personnel, contractors, ships and planes working under the accord are exempt from customs duties, tariffs, rent, taxes, and most inspections of its cargo, according to the deal. In addition, the accord grants diplomatic immunity to U.S. personnel. To reinforce this immunity, “Colombia will guarantee that its authorities will verify, in the least amount of time possible, the status of immunity of the personnel of the United States and their dependents who are suspected of criminal activity in Colombia, and will turn them over to the appropriate U.S. military or diplomatic authorities,” the accord states. The purpose of the increased military cooperation, according to the preamble to the accord, is to “promote and facilitate regional cooperation in order to counteract the persistent threats to peace and stability, such as terrorism.” The Venezuelan government argues that the U.S. plans to infiltrate Venezuela and conjure evidence that links Venezuela to drug trafficking and Colombian guerrilla insurgents in order to justify a military intervention. It also argues that the granting of immunity to U.S. officials will facilitate human rights abuses. After the negotiations of the military accord were made public in July, Chavez said the U.S. would use the accord to “dominate all of South America,” especially its natural resources, and that Colombia would become an “operational center that will permit the U.S. to cover all of South America with its planes, spies, spy satellites, intelligence and counterintelligence agencies.” U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have repeatedly denied such allegations and asserted that the accord pertains strictly to the U.S. and Colombia. In a press conference in August, Clinton said, “This is about the bilateral cooperation between the United States and Colombia regarding security matters within Colombia.” However, the U.S. military’s financial documents contradict Clinton and Obama’s public declarations. The Pentagon budget for the year 2010 says the Department of Defense seeks “an array of access arrangements for contingency operations, logistics, and training in Central/South America,” and cites a $46 million investment in the “development” of Colombia’s Palanquero air base as a key part of this. According to the 2010 fiscal year budget of the U.S. Air Force Military Construction Program, the purpose of the upgrades to the Palanquero base is to “enhance the U.S. Global Defense Posture Strategy,” and the base “offers an opportunity for conducting full spectrum operations throughout South America.” The budget refers to the Palanquero base as a “Cooperative Security Location (CSL),” and says it “provides a unique opportunity for full spectrum operations in a critical sub region of our hemisphere where security and stability is under constant threat from narcotics funded terrorist insurgencies, anti-US governments, endemic poverty and recurring natural disasters.” “A presence [at the Palanquero base] will also increase our capability to conduct Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR), improve global reach, support logistics requirements, improve partnerships, improve theater security cooperation, and expand expeditionary warfare capability,” the budget continues. “Pre-war Situation” In a recent radio interview, Colombian Ex-President Ernesto Samper said Colombians “should not deceive ourselves” about the fact that the accord will allow the U.S. to bring more advanced spy equipment into the country. He also implied that the possibility of war as a result of the deal is not far-fetched, considering how Colombia-Venezuelan relations have deteriorated since July. “I would say we are in a pre-war situation; the poorly managed issue of the bases, Venezuela feels threatened by the bases, the government signs on to the bases without a public discussion of the issue, and all this starts to accumulate,” he said. “The situation can harden and reach extremes.” Brazil’s Response To avoid such a conflict, Brazil suggested that Colombia and Venezuela sign a non-aggression treaty, and offered technical support if the two countries launch joint border surveillance operations. “It would be very interesting if Venezuela and Colombia were to agree to a system of joint surveillance of their common border, and I would not rule out a non-aggression pact,” said Marco Aurelio Garcia, an advisor to Brazilian President Luis Inacio “Lula” da Silva, in an interview with the Colombian newspaper El Pais. “We would help with the technical means, such as surveillance planes,” he said. With regard to the U.S.-Colombia military deal, Garcia said, “It does not seem correct to us. We cannot impede Colombia from making its decisions, but there is a lack of guarantees that an imbalance in the region will not be produced,” said the presidential advisor.   Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:51 PM

	Erik	Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:49 PM

	Erik	Spy vs. Spy (With a Nod to Mad Magazine) Anita Barnett Did you see 60 Minutes last night? The first story was about how vulnerable our government’s computer systems are and our utility companies and our banks. All these have been hacked into or otherwise compromised. “Otherwise” being electronic components that were installed had been embedded with code that could allow them to be controlled by someone outside the system. (Brazil has already had their power grid shut down a few times in a few different places.) Who does this? Foreign governments and organized crime groups. During the interview, Jim Lewis, a director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Steve Kroft that we do the same thing. We get into the systems of other countries.  Mr. Lewis sounded sort of proud as he said “we are really good” – the “top of the league”! Oh? The US has the best hackers on the planet? Then Mr. Lewis said when Russia and China asks how we can complain about them getting into our stuff when we get into theirs, he said it was worse for them to get into our systems.  Mr. Lewis said we depend on the internet more than other countries and it is woven into our economy and military in ways that other countries haven’t done. I turned to my son who was watching this with me and said, “Look at that guy polish his halo!”  As he continued to justify and explain it dawned on me that this is Spy vs. Spy (with a nod to Mad Magazine) and this stuff has gone on probably ever since there were at least two different government entities. Unfortunately, it will continue to go on til the end of this age. This sort of thing started off with no technology – just humans getting into other humans’ government and military business for the purpose of gathering information, then it just advanced as technology advanced.  I suppose it would have moved on to interception of communications when it was just letters being carried from one person to another to use of binoculars and listening devices and wire-tapping and so on. It would be interesting to read a good book on the history of spying. The internet is just the latest technology. As far as our power grid, Ret. Admiral Mike McConnell, who is the former director of National Intelligence, said he “would be shocked” if our power grid has not been infiltrated. He said it could be gotten into in a way that could start in one place and spread. All anyone would have to do is cause a generator to self-destruct. I think it’s nuts that those generators can’t be readily replaced. They used to be made here in this country but not anymore. Did you know they have to be ordered from overseas and it takes 3 to 4 months to get the new one? Have you ever lived without electricity? I have for a few days after a hurricane and it’s different. I’m glad I have a gas stove so I can cook and my water is also heated by gas. I have a clothesline but would have to do laundry by hand. Gas can not be pumped without electricity. Many jobs could not be carried out without electricity. I supposed retail stores would figure it out but how would food be trucked in? Would there be tanker trucks that would normally deliver gas to the gas stations parked on parking lots and selling fuel right out of the truck? That was done after one of our hurricanes. (Can’t remember which one – they all start to run together after a few of them blow through.) What really concerns me is folks in hospitals and people who have to have kidney dialysis (like a relative of mine). What would they do without electricity? Would they have to go to another part of the country to get the treatment they need? Well, I guess this is what modern warfare would be. While we wonder about ‘dirty bombs’ and missiles, our water supply could be contaminated or, our power grid or banking system could be wiped out. Yeah, someone could wipe out the records at the banks. Wouldn’t that be a mess? But as serious as all this is, I am not so scared of the enemies of this country as I am of my own government. I’ve told as much to my senators and congressman, too. I live near ports and refineries and this would be just the place to hit if someone wanted to mess with us. I remember hearing that we were a target when we had the Cuban Missile Crisis and I was only about 6 years old. What has always concerned me more was that our government would compromise my freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, religious freedom and privacy, in a misguided effort to keep me ’safe’. From whom? From a take-over by another country who would take away my freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, religious freedom and privacy? They have always played their spy games. But don’t go overboard and chase after US citizens. I’m just a homemaker down here in the armpit of Texas and I want to be left alone. ADDED NOTE....SHE LEFT OUT THE ANGLE THAT THE WHOLE 60 MINUTE REPORT COULD BE JUST ANOTHER DUPE ON THE PUBLIC USING THE WHOLE ISSUE AS AN EXCUSE TO POLICE THE INTERNET.     Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:48 PM

	Erik	Posted by Erik on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 - 10:38 PM

	ॐThe Third Eyeॐ ☼☥Children ☯f LIGHT☥☼ Om Mani Padme Hum	Wow. They've stooped to a whole new low. This is an act of desperation. They try to control everything, but it seems they are having trouble controlling our minds now. LOL!   Posted by ॐThe Third Eyeॐ ☼☥Children ☯f LIGHT☥☼ on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 12:04 AM [Reply to this]

	Erik	I figure that if i keep posting all the politicians in drag then the population will snap out of their programming.   Posted by Erik on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 6:54 PM [Reply to this]

	AsianRushFan	I hate corruption   Posted by AsianRushFan on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 12:33 AM [Reply to this]

	Fred Fred Dawes	you can't get more political   Posted by Fred on Wednesday, November 11, 2009 - 4:29 AM [Reply to this]

	John aka EVIL_NEVER_DIES	If it's good for ya , why do the doctors wear masks and gloves? Same reason they leave the room when they do a catscan on you, The Radiation will kill the Patient- Not the Doctor!   Posted by John aka EVIL_NEVER_DIES on Friday, November 13, 2009 - 6:04 AM [Reply to this]

	is what it is Dina Benigni	atleast alex is doing something about it, getting the word out., read u bible joshy., especially revaltions., and think   Posted by is what it is on Saturday, November 14, 2009 - 8:55 PM [Reply to this]