MySpace


david



Last Updated: 3/9/2007

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 26
Sign: Cancer

City: New York
State: NEW YORK
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/19/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Tuesday, February 27, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
Again I've decided to post a thesis from my Moltmann/Metz class. This time it covers about the first hundred and forty pages of Theology of Hope . Thoughts anyone?

Thesis: Moltmann's vision consists of hopeful promises revealed in dynamic history finding their culmination in the now, future and ultimate horizon.

The foundation of Moltmann's vision (hope) comes from the revelatory promises of God; hope, driving theology, is rooted in promise, and therefore, capable of standing in "contradiction to the reality" of present experience (18). These promises come in the midst of history, but at the same time orient a believer from the "dawn" of the day, looking forward with expectation although still mired in one's circumstances (31).

Since history is framed by promise, history is in flux, which is to say, that history is dynamic. The fulfillment of promise continues throughout history, and this "overspill" changes history from merely singularly event oriented to a continual fulfillment or revelation of the promise (107-108). Thus the active story that history tells, framed by promises, is re-imagined at every fulfillment; the promises become larger and larger as the fulfillments become bigger and bigger (105). Thus history, or the representation of the past, is changed continually in light of the revelation of promise/fulfillment and in turn "will lead us to open ourselves and our present to that same future" (108).

However, hope is not merely related to promises, but also fuels our human faith, in fact, hope and faith are inextricably linked. Faith, our belief in the divine, "hopes in order to know what it believes"; it is hope, from our faith, that drives our vitality so necessary to faith (33). Thus faith and the hope of the future explodes the future into the present and the future to come, resulting in church engagement with the world funneling the vision of the future – "righteousness, freedom and humanity" – into the current events of today (22).
Currently listening:
Under the Iron Sea
By Keane
Release date: 20 June, 2006
Previous Post: conservatives and fundamentalists | Back to Blog List | Next Post: Niebuhr
david

 
Love... who would've guessed it was/is the greatest? oh wait, that sounds like scripture actually. We've talked about it in class actually, wondering where it is. At the beginning of Theology of Hope Moltmann doesn't really meantion the word love, hence it isn't in my summary/thesis, however, that is not to say it doesn't exist within the work. It seems to the me, that while Moltmann is categorically merging and separating hope and faith throughout the book, love is the underlying foundation. Faith and hope do not exist without love.

Also, this idea you bring up about "heaven" doesn't seem so Moltmannian within the context of Theology of Hope , because there is little talk about a final culmination, rather, there is really only talk about the ever increasing horizon and if the horizon is reached, this God is fundamentally a God of promise - one who makes new, grander promises to fulfill. Also, it seems to me that this idea of reaching fulfillment and staying in fulfillment is a way of realizing the path of hope (the past, which then looks towards the future while in the present). For instance, after it has been raining in Portland for three months straight, the skies part, the shorts come on, and lounging outside commences. We soak up the delicious sun, thinking about the dramatic change, but all the while (at least for me) looking forward to the warm days of summer. This is all to say, that realizing the fulfillment of a promise is a time of sweetness and enjoyment. And then follows from God more divine and increasing promises.

However, the trust in hope is not without love. It seems that in Theology of Hope that Moltmann just kinda assumes it (which he similarly does for his hermeneutic). I think he brings out love a bit more in other books of his that I've read - The Crucified God and The Way of Jesus Christ - particularly when Moltmann sits on the dialectic of the suffering and resurrected Christ.

With all that said, I'll be sure to look up Jenson's book after classes get out this semester. School is keeping me busy enough as it is, but thanks for the recommendation. Theology centered around suffering, hope, faith, and love is rich and envigorating.
 
Posted by david on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 - 3:41 AM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: conservatives and fundamentalists | Back to Blog List | Next Post: Niebuhr