MySpace
myspace music


Andy Bull - New Album Streaming Now



Last Updated: 11/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: Sydney
State: New South Wales
Country: AU
Signup Date: 3/25/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Thursday, October 29, 2009 

And yet more irony still….....

 ....

Thank you for trawling through a cyber-universe overflowing with stupid opinions and for eventually settling on this particularly stupid one.....

 ....

Before I go on, I wanted to just share a brief thought I had on “ironic” writing; or rather, why it can be so difficult to read sometimes. If you’ve ever flicked through an “Indie” or street press publication, on the lower scale, I mean, then you may be familiar with the kind of satire that often pads out the articles within. Satire, irony- it sounds noble, but sometimes it’s just mean, acerbic, and condescending, even though at first it seems smart and alluring.....

 ....

Let me paint a picture. In my imagination, if irony were a person, she would be that smart, sassy girl in the university tutorial with the striking combination of intellect, peroxide blonde bangs, and thrift shop daggy-but-sexy cardigan which make her sexy and appealing. Compounding this appeal is the fact that she’s supremely cynical. She is very unimpressed by the other students. She speaks with the manner of somebody who is smoking a cigarette, that is to say that she seems preoccupied by something that you are not doing; at worst openly disinterested by the things within her surrounds, and at best, aloofly bemused by them. This includes you. Which makes you only more determined to impress her, to be the one thing about which she has a positive word to say. A brief moment of eye contact, or even better, a nod of agreement to your comment on the tutorial reading, feels like electricity. Ultimately though, if you ever manage to talk to this girl, or maybe somehow have lunch at her table in the cafeteria, you’ll probably find that her cynicism wears thin after a while, and she’s not the most interesting person you’ve ever met after all. What seemed at first to be sophisticated and intelligent begins to feel stifling and futile. And then you feel bad because in your mind, you may have pictured her naked in tutorial, which only validates her defensiveness and cynicism of you in the first place. Which makes you think, maybe people use irony, satire, and cynicism as a means of defence? And maybe the more pressure an individual is put under, the more pronounced those defences become? Sarcasm, which is the bitterest application of irony, is the opposite of sincerity; which in tempered quantity is essential to our personal relationships. At some point you have to look at your lover/friend/family member straight up and say; “I love you”, rather than shift around uncomfortably, sit on your hands, roll your eyes and scoff “yeah, like, I totally love you or whatever”. It’s tiring to walk around wearing a suit of armour and at some point you will need to take it off. (Anyway, as a side note, girls like that always already have boyfriends who are older, more dangerous-looking, and more sophisticated than you. And if you thought she was a cynic, boy, wait until you meet him. So don’t feel bad, she doesn’t hang out with people like you in the first place.)....

 ....

 Anyway, before I fell into that digression about dating university girls, what I meant is that I don’t want to be patronised by the person whose work I’m reading. Satire for the sake of cruelty is useless (also known as being a bitch); and ultimately it alienates me as a reader, because I don’t want to feel like I might be the kind of person you would rip on for kicks if I met you in the street (then again, other people love reading Perez Hilton, so what would I know?!). But, I hear you say, nobody should be safe from satire; after all, satire is meant to be the great leveller, the voice of truth that shines a light on everybody, that makes all transparent, without allegiance or bias. Sure, but the person writing satire might just be an idiot, or be insecure, or have a massive chip on the shoulder, or driven by a personal ulterior motive; in which case the only thing they’re shining a light on is their own partisan opinions, which aren’t relevant to anybody else. It stops being about a search for “truth” at that point, and starts becoming an exercise in “clever wordplay”. (Yes I know, this column is mostly that, except generally it’s less ‘clever,’ and more ‘tedious’… See how I can cover my own tracks by taking the piss out of myself before you do? It’s my form of immunity, although it will probably imprison me, as there is only so long I can apologise for my opinions before you get sick of reading it and I get sick of writing it. No sense in pretending I’m not playing that game. Hmmm, ironic.)....

 ....

After all, if true satire has no allegiance, then it has no allegiance to the author either. What I mean to say by this is nobody wants to read an ironic article and feel like the author is just some smug know-it-all casting the first stones. It’s generally not in the author’s best interest to do that either, because then, what credibility does the author actually have?  ....

 ....

I, of course, have no credibility as a writer in any case, which works out rather well, because I can immediately distance myself from my unqualified and cockamamie theories the moment they escape my mouth. I maintain no responsibility for the things I say; which is the most twisted bastardisation of freedom of speech, the singular prerogative that the internet has afforded my generation. And now that nobody needs to maintain any responsibility for the things they say, now that internet-anonymity has clad us in the most impenetrable armour of all, perhaps there is no more need for irony? No more need for saying one thing but implying another? You can say whatever the hell you want, and best of all, you don’t have to qualify it, craft it, stand by it, think about it, or take responsibility for it. Which, in the end, makes communication completely meaningless, and therefore, without a reason to exist at all. All you need to do is look at a Youtube video response post, or a chat room, or an online opinion wall, to fully appreciate the liberty individuals have to be emphatically and violently racist, sexist, homophobic and generally dreadful, without any fear of accountability. And they are doing so without any sense of irony, just the twisted “freedom” of irresponsibility. At which point, suddenly, irony does start to look more civilized, and more useful in combating the brutality and barbarism of the status quo. ....

 ....

For instance, maybe Harry Connick Jnr was too sincere in his discomfort at the Black-Face routine on channel 9? His intentions where honest, but maybe if, while on the judging panel, he’d given it a score of“10” and called it the “smartest, most respectful and historically aware skit he’d ever head the pleasure of seeing” his point would have been clear, but he would have escaped the hate mail (delivered, of course, over the internet by individuals hiding safely behind the anonymity that Harry Connick Jnr is not himself afforded.) Although, doubtless, were that the case then many would miss the irony in his statements anyway, so he would probably bare the brunt of disapproval from both sides.....

 ....

In conclusion, I cannot be held responsible for anything I have written here that you agree and/or disagree with; if you agree with me then we can be assured in our own correctness, and if you have a problem with something I have written, then you have simply misread it,  or missed the irony, for in fact, no matter what your particular opinion is, I actually agree with you, and I disagree with all the other people who disagree with you. I have no interest in arguing, because as I have just mentioned, there is no sense in arguing over what we already agree on! In the spirit of ironical ambiguity, I mean the thing I mean and the opposite of it too. ....

 ....

You see this way, I can wrangle it so that my lack of anonymity (you can see who I am) doesn’t render me responsible. I might as well be dragonslayer69 or sexygirl84. All I have to say is that I don’t believe anything I write. Which may or may not be true, and you can never know. But apparently that is the only way to broach difficult subjects and avoid committing to saying anything concrete, and, ergo; I might avoid hate mail. ....

 ....

Until next time.....

 ....

P.S. - Love… its still the only thing there’s just too little of.....

Noni Doll

 
I broke my arm on Thursday night, and was really looking for something to pick me up.

You know my first thought when Mum opened the internet for me?

"I wonder if Andy has a new blog post?"

Thanks for taking my mind off the agony, mate. And for the record, I too denounce credibility. It's overrated.



 
Posted by Noni Doll on Monday, November 02, 2009 - 1:37 AM
[Reply to this
mali

 
wow.
Insightful.

..I agree. (or perhaps I don't and that statement was blatent sarcasm lost in the transaction of this land of interwebs.)
Either way, my comment was only originally going to state: "I bet you were good at english"
=)

x.
 
Posted by mali on Monday, November 02, 2009 - 5:23 AM
[Reply to this