MySpace


Happy



Last Updated: 7/4/2006

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Age: 103
Sign: Capricorn

City: VERONA
State: PENNSYLVANIA
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/28/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Friday, September 22, 2006 
Okay, the question of the week is: What the Fuck?
I got the boot from TV.com, and you want to know "WHY?"
This is my side of the story....
I got a PM that said I was banned for gaming the system and exploiting bugs.
The thing is, I didn't do anything different, well…..
(those guys are bastards I'm innocent)

One thing that I did (different) was submitted to a show I was trusted on… I got the white screen… so, like everybody else I re-loaded the page and hit the backspace button  still white screen, so, I did it all over 'till the white screen went away.  It was a summary I was submitting so 8 points + the number of times I reloaded and backspaced , I ended up with 9 submissions and a considerable jump in points on that guide.…(my theory is someone noticed that jump and told the staffies)

Now the TV.com staff is vague about what exploiting bugs is or how(or not) to exploit bugs. Because they don't fix bugs, they only make more. (so I'm the poor helpless victim)

One option I thought was good was to disable automatic PM's, with 10,000 submissions you would get 10,000 PM's. That was a no brainer I  disabled automatic PM's. but with every CNet feature there are bugs. I did not get MOST of the PM's with the rejections (I got no PM's with approvals) telling why or whatever they would say in the rejection PM's. I got one and only one that said "refer to previous PM" WTF? I resubmitted the same thing and asked in the comments what they were talking about because I did not get MOST of the rejection PM's… they said "you got that one" …

….. Now (actually then ) I had a lot of guides. I did not need to "game" points on my own guides when I could just as easily submit to new guides, that's why I had an asinine amount of guides. I liked to push the limits of what I could submit that they would accept. Half the submission rules they have are because they didn't like what I was submitting so they changed the rules. I did exploit rules, not the bugs. Sentence fragments: I'd add the few words to make a complete sentence(2 points). I used to submit Astrological signs, Eastern and Chinese(4 points) Hair and eye color (4 points) political party(2 points) and who had the same birthday (2 points) they used to accept those now they don't .
So if they don't accept those as trivia's, anymore, I should get as many points for deleting them and they would accept that. (who's the Idiot here?)  I guess that's gaming.
And they changed the rule about currently as in Bob currently lives in New York should be As of 2006, Bob currently lives in New York …so, I went back and changed the ones they already accepted. Oh, the Quotes in the trivia section got me quite a few guides.

I guess it might be considered an Exploit by some incompetent people, typing in a URL so as to edit a bio that has the "Edit Bio" button is disabled.
http://www.tv.com/usersubmission/celebrity_bio.html?celeb_id=
and the persons ID#
Well they probably would consider that "exploiting a bug".

All good things...

Previous Post: HappyYellowBanned | Back to Blog List | Next Post: HappyYellowBand
R.J.

 
If the program was written better, it seems that they could prevent a user from submitting, if they honestly thought the user was "gaming". Instead of banning outright. And banning you from all three sites is a bit asinine, because MP3.com doesn't even accept submissions.

Well, you can blog here. And there is the Flickr . You're behind on picture posting, I bet.

 
Posted by R.J. on Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 2:00 AM
[Reply to this
Stiggy

 

Ah, I should never have sent you that friggin' summary!  I only did cause ~he~ said in the Corner Gas forum that he was going to start submitting things again (he didn't last season after the whole hoo-haw)

But for them to make "exploiting bugs" a banable offence is just utterly ridiculous.  How the fuck do they know if you're exploiting it or just being aggravated by it.  I mean, how do they know if it's your fault or the bug's fault?

They're asses.


 
Posted by Stiggy on Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 3:19 AM
[Reply to this
Gina

 
I swear Happy, that is such B.S. They ban you because of their suspicions of you gaming, yet all they do to friggin' n00bs who copy the same review of a particular show's epiodes and just suspend them for like 2 days.  You know we got your back.
 
Posted by Gina on Monday, September 25, 2006 - 12:07 AM
[Reply to this
hellboundforjoy

 
That makes no sense. They spend their time banning users for such pettiness. Why don't they use that time and energy to fix the damn bugs? WTF?
 
Posted by hellboundforjoy on Monday, October 02, 2006 - 12:19 AM
[Reply to this
jimmy

 

ah dude, that sux! (and by dude, I mean I just realized that you're a chick...)

I used to refer your profile to newbies who were bitchin about 'Oh I can never earn a Person Editorship because you have to know the person or be the person!' to which I'd reply 'Shoot, HappyYellowBall must know or be a load of people!'

Are you going to SO?


 
Posted by jimmy on Wednesday, October 04, 2006 - 4:02 AM
[Reply to this
Happy

 
I’m a chick? How did you come to that conclusion?
 
Posted by Happy on Thursday, October 05, 2006 - 1:50 AM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: HappyYellowBanned | Back to Blog List | Next Post: HappyYellowBand