 |
>
> The arguments which I am about to use will sound
> pretty wild to most Americans, as we do not have
> the background in Law and History to easily
> understand.
>
> first I will give some background explanation;
> then
> I will explain how one becomes chattel property;
> then I will explain how to keep it from happening
> again
> in the future; and finally, I offer REMEDY to undo
> and
> rescind your chattel property status. Feedback
> will be appreciated.
>
> 1.) BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
> Most Americans have become unknowing Sureties
> and Chattel Property, through implementation of
> CHATTEL PAPER for the so-called National Debt of a
> Congressionally created bankrupt Corporation (UNITED
> STATES) under the auspices of a Congressionally
> owned
> Corporation called "United States" (note the
> spelling
> difference) as created by the Sovereign States
> through
> approval and implementation of the United States
> Constitution.
>
> Unrecognized by most scholars, the Congressmen
> under the Articles of Confederation called
> themselves "We the People" in the Preamble of
> the Constitution for the "United States of
> America".
>
> If one understands the rudiments of capitalization
> in
> the English language, one knows that capitalization
> of
> the first letter in "People" designates a very
> specific
> and special "People"; in this case, Congress and
> their
> very specific Posterity, i.e. future Congressmen.
> They could not have meant the people of the several
> states, as that would have been rather vague and
> non specific, and would therefore have meant
> spelling "people" with a small "p".
> Once ratified, this vested in Congress broad and
> plenary power and authority unrecognized by the
> sovereign people of the several nation states. The
> =46ederal Government bankruptcy is not a bankruptcy
> of a nation, but rather is a bankruptcy of a private
> corporation called "UNITED STATES" belonging
> exclusively to Congress, via the Corporation,
> "United
> States", all of which is without full disclosurel,
> for
> the benefit of present and future United States
> Congressmen.
>
> 2.) HOW IT IS DONE:
> "..Chattel paper=B4 means a writing or writings
> which evidence both a monetary obligation
> and a security interest in ... specific goods. ...
> When a transaction is evidenced both by such
> a security agreement ... and by an instrument
> or a series of instruments, the group of
> writings taken together constitutes chattel
> paper." (UCC =A7 9-105(1)(b))
>
> The foundational writings for Chattel Paper are the
> corporate issued Marriage License and Birth
> Certificate, which, when taken together are proof
> of the commercial DELIVERY "TRANSACTION" (in the
> hospital Delivery Room) and creation of a "personae"
> (mask; i.e. your corporate name or Strawman
> identity) by a corporate federal or state agency.
>
> If one looks up the term "Delivery" in Black's Law,
> 4th ed. at page 515, one finds "DELIVERY. The act
> by which the res or substance thereof is placed
> within the actual or constructive possession or
> control of another." While the term"res" normally
> means thing or property, it can also apply to
> people,
> when they are considered to be chattel property,
> i.e. "human resources".
>
> If one looks up the term "Marriage License" in
> Black's Law, 6th ed. at page 973, one finds that
> the license is required for legalizing
> INTERMARRIAGE:
> Looking up "Intermarriage" at page 815, it says "see
> Miscegenation": Looking up "Miscegenation" in
> earlier
> editions, e.g. Black's Law, 1st ed., it says
> "MISCEGENATION. Mixture of races; marriage between
> persons of different races; as between a white
> person
> and a negro."
>
> The public schools teach that the negro race here
> in America was freed by the 13th Amendment, and
> became citizens of the United States via the 14th
> Amendment. But many subsequent Supreme Court
> decisions show that U.S. citizens do not have the
> same rights and priveleges as state Citizens. And
> in California, the Legislature passed a Statute
> saying
> that one was a California Citizen, or else he was a
> Citizen of one of the several states of the Union,
> or
> else he was an alien. So, it appears, at least for
> California, that all U.S. citizens are aliens, who
> have
> to pay taxes and have only priveleges rather than
> Rights.
>
> The 13th amendment states that slavery is
> acceptable as punishment for crime, but not
> otherwise. So the question becomes "what is the
> crime, and when was the conviction." Is the crime
> "intermarriage" or "miscegenation"? Perhaps. But
> could the crime be the crime of using Foreign
> Currency
> to tender for debt, rather than paying debt? The
> Emergency War Powers Act of March 9, 1933 makes any
> U.S. citizen who uses foreign currency within the
> United States, into an enemy of the United States.
> Is
> that the crime? I believe so.
>
> When you formally adopt your corporate personae
> by claiming to be a citizen of a congressionally
> owned and purposely bankrupted corporation, by
> applying for a Social Security Number, you have,
> in law, requested a U.S. citizen benefit in the form
> of
> future expectations of Social Security benefits,
> in exchange for regular Social Security payments,
> thereby becoming the "debtor" to the "secured
> party" (the lienholder in due course of the federal
> bankruptcy debt). Therefore the "series of
> instruments" (Birth certificate plus the Social
> Security Application Form) is evidence of a
> monetary obligation (by the lienholder, the
> International Monetary Fund and the Federal
> Reserve System of the United Nations banking
> system, through the bankruptee, the UNITED
> STATES, via the agency, Social Security
> Administration) and a security interest in specific
> goods (YOU)! Thereafter, when one signs and files a
> =46ederal Tax Form 1040 under penalty of perjury, or
> signs some other agreement such as a Traffic
> Citation NOTICE TO APPEAR, one has completed the
> "series of instruments" or "group of writings"
> which "taken together constitutes chattel paper"
> making you into CHATTEL PROPERTY (Human
> Resource) under the Uniform Commercial Code.
>
> 3.) HOW TO KEEP IT FROM HAPPENING AGAIN:
> The Personae which you and the government
> corporation(s) have created, together with all of
> your d/b/a's, are not your private property until
> you have copyrighted them. Your various "word of
> art" Personae's are "literary property" as
> recognized and sanctioned by positive law
> (Copyright definition, Black's Law Dictionary, 6th
> ed., pg. 336). You have an intangible and
> incorporeal right to the use of your name, as
> recognized or granted in Law. But in order to
> protect one's SENTIENT SELF against intrusion of
> chattel paper interests by the Congressionally
> created or controlled enforcement agencies (e.g.
> the IRS, and the Executive Courts), one must take
> extreme care not to make public use of one's
> personae by signing any federal, state, county,
> city,
> or other government agency document without
> copyrighting one's signature and name (also
> including the social security number) on the
> signatory instrument (1040, Traffic citation, etc.).
> The instrument containing your copyrighted
> signature may not be used or copied for profit in
> commerce, by the for-profit Court without violating
> copyright law.
> The copyright is created simply by writing
> "Copyright =A9" followed by the date, e.g. 10 June
> 2000, or June 10, 2000, at the beginning and END of
> the document, or following your signature and
> names. They are bound down by the corporate
> Copyright Act (17 U.S.C.A. =A7 102) dating from time
> of publication of the copyright of your name(s) in
> written form. While the Feds have attempted to
> abolish the distinction of Common Law Copyright,
> their own courts hold them to be unsuccessful.
> The corporate Act protects the copyright once it
> is recorded in some concrete way in a tangible
> medium. Protection under the corporate Act is
> good until 50 years after death of the author (17
> U.S.C.A. =A7 302(a)). Civil damages for copyright
> infringement are located at 17 U.S.C.A. =A7 502 et
> seq.; and Criminal damages are located at 18
> U.S.C.A. =A7 2319. The Judge and Prosecutor may not
> use your copyrighted material without incurring
> copyright infringement liability; e.g. it appears
> that
> they may not prosecute a traffic citation against
> you if you copyright your signature at time of
> execution.
>
> 4.) REMEDY BY RECISION:
> It appears that recision of the Birth Certificate
> and
> of corporate rights to the Social Security Number
> can be accomplished in several ways:
> a.) Mail back to the issuing agency(ies) the birth
> certificate(s), social security card, etc., marked
> REFUSED FOR FRAUD or some other equivalent
> notation, together with an Affidavit claiming your
> signature(s) as copyrighted private property. I
> suggest that you also might wish to copyright the
> Social Security Number assigned to your all
> capitalized d/b/a name.
> b.) Publish your refusal with the County Recorder
> by hand delivery to the proper Officer (the County
> Recorder or Deputy Recorder), not to some clerk. In
> California, the 1872 Civil Code (the copyrighted
> master index to the non-copyrighted Statute Laws
> dating from 1850) states that delivery into the
> hands
> of the Proper Officer means "Recorded" at Law.
> c.) Publish and mail certified copies of an
> Affidavit and an Abatement, both sworn true,
> correct, and certain, to the Officer in Charge of
> each offending Agency, via certified mail, returned
> receipt requested. The Officer should be identified
> as John Doe d/b/a Officer in Charge, or whatever
> his or her name and title happen to be. This makes
> the Officer liable in both his private capacity and
> in his d/b/a corporate capacity, thereby making his
> homeowner's insurance policy as well as any
> corporate bond available for future remedy.
> d.) Publish your Refusal by newspaper in the Legal
> Notices section once a week for four weeks and
> obtain a certified statement from the Pater that
> you have done so, or else post on fence-posts and
> power poles in your community.
> e.) The "HANDBOOK OF COMMON-LAW PLEADING" BY
> BENJAMIN J. SHIPMAN, 3rd ed., 1923, is one of
> several handbooks of the "Hornbook Series" as
> published by WEST PUBLISHING CO., ST. PAUL, MINN..
> This info is so powerful that West Publishing has
> denied ever publishing said handbook. At Ch. 16,
> =A7
> 225, pgs 388 - 392 is listed PLEAS IN ABATEMENT.
> In the middle of page 392 is stated:
>
> "The corporate existence of the defendant
> can be denied only by a plea in abatement.
> A plea of general issue alone admits the
> corporate existence of either plaintiff or
> defendant. The plea of nul tiel corporation
> is a specific traverse, which as regards the
> plaintiff is a plea in bar; but as regards
> defendant it is a plea in abatement and must
> give the plaintiff information by which he
> may amend.
>
> =46or example, if you contest the amount of a bill
> by
> the IRS, you thereby admit that the IRS's has the
> right to bill you, and that only the amount is in
> question. Whereas a plea of "nul tiel corporation"
> against the plaintiff IRS, would deny their court
> action, as the IRS is not an agency of the United
> States, and has never registered with your
> Secretary of State, and therefore has no standing in
> your state to do business or commence a court
> action. The IRS must then enter proof into
> evidence, countering your sworn plea, or else have a
> judgement entered against them. However, if you
> do a cross complaint for "nul tiel corporation", and
> you do said complaint as a U.S. citizen, you have no
> standing to complain as you are considered at law
> as chattel property, or at the very least as a
> member
> or franchise of a bankrupt corporation, meaning in
> Law that you are bankrupt and have the very limited
> liability of a bankrupt corporate franchise.
> One must be very careful how one presents oneself
> in the statutory-executive-Admiralty courts to
> maintain the proper status of a non-bankruptee
> state National having UNLIMITED COMMERCIAL
> LIABILITY. Also, one should let the IRS know that
> the
> IRS has filed on the "wrong side of the court", so
> that
> they have the opportunity to amend to the right side
> of the court, the equity side of a JUDICIAL court,
> which is outside of the bankrupt corporate forum,
> venue and jurisdiction of the Admiralty side of the
> executive courts now in common commercial use
> against U.S. bankruptcy Sureties (i.e. YOU).
>
> A claim of Unlimited Commercial Liability is one of
> the keys to freedom: U.S. citizens, in Law, are all
> corporate bankruptees with very limited liability.
> A claim of unlimited liability on one's own
> authority
> is a statement to the Judge that you are not
> bankrupt, and therefore could not possibly be a
> U.S. citizen franchisee or chattel property.
> I believe that the case in Washington state, wherein
> three Supreme Court Judges resigned within 48 hours
> of filing of a lawsuite wherein the claimant,
> Kenneth
> Wayne of Pierce County, states at paragraph number
> 3:
> "The Claimant, Kenneth Wayne, brings this
> Petition for Redress in his own name, and
> under his own authority as retained at
> Article 10 in Amendment to the
> constitution..."
>
> And again at paragraph number 4, Wayne states that:<BR style="font-family: Arial</font></span>
12:46 AM
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|