MySpace
myspace music


Kit Walker



Last Updated: 11/22/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

City: San Francisco Bay Area
Country: US
Signup Date: 4/2/2006
Tuesday, July 15, 2008 
i recently became aware of a particular blog, that "reviews" music, in particular, "jazz/rock", and they have a "review" of an album i made years ago with guitarist Neal Schon, which i helped to produce, and co-wrote most of the music on the CD. It is a double CD called "Electric World". The person who runs the blog is called "crimhead". It would be great, except that he offers links where he "shares" the music as free downloads, which as far as i know, is illegal.

http://jazzrockz.blogspot.com/

i encourage you to visit that site, and let him know what you think.

below is my letter to "crimhead", concerning what he is doing there:


hello crimhead,

one more thing: it was just pointed out to me that you are "sharing" this music for free with people. i didn't get it at first. So generous of you to "share" so freely what belongs to others! Because in fact half of most of the tunes on that Neal Schon album belong to me. So you are freely "sharing" my property with others. Would you mind telling me why you feel justified in doing that?

Somehow it feels wrong to me. I spent many many hours, weeks, and months of life energy and time working on that project, not to mention all the work i put in before then, to even be able to get to the point where i could do that kind of thing. That included hours and hours and years of practicing my instrument, for no pay, paying for lessons, and then years of playing in bands, writing and recording music, learning computer skills, etc etc etc.... not to mention the countless life-choices and sacrifices that come up when you choose to do music as your life work. It is not an easy row to hoe, if you are truly dedicated to it. Ask any true musician, they will tell you the same thing.

If we have no respect from listeners and fans for the sanctity of our life work, then how do you expect to continue to have quality music to appreciate? And in fact, it is already taking its toll. There is a proliferation, like a fungus, of prefab, cut-and-paste, push-button "music", assaulting our senses, hearts, and souls these days, with an ever lowering "ante". Real musicians are being forced into needle-in-a-haystack status by the sheer volume of soulless crap that's being released by "everyman" these days. No one is making any money, and musicians are going the way of the dinosaur. And folks like you are just helping it along.

Although i appreciate that you want to help turn people on to our music, i just don't understand how you can rationalize giving it away for free, with not even the slightest thought of the people who created it, and the sacrifices they have made in their life to bring it to you.

I encourage you to post this message, and i hope it will open up a dialogue with the "users" of this site. If we, the musicians, share our music with you, what are you willing to share in return? It's a give and take kind of world here. We all need to cooperate these days, in a way where we all win. Right now most of the musicians i know are just barely making it. Even people you might think are doing well. CD sales have plummeted, and yes we are glad to see unscrupulous record companies lose their power, but don't forget that all that music you love would not be there without the musicians. It's like going into someone's garden and walking out with their vegetables. I'm sure you wouldn't approve of that if it happened to you.

so, crimhead, please don't be "crimehead". it's a little too close. How can we work this out?

peace

Kit Walker
Previous Post: inside/outside | Back to Blog List | Next Post: Poetry
Divakar

 
Dear Kit,

I posted this on Crimhead420's blog "Divakar said...

Hi crimhead420,

I read Kit Walker's blog about this review and the way you make Neal's (and also Kit's) music available.


I understand Kit's concern and have asked myself if your approach is right on because: why make the whole album available for free download? why have a disclaimer saying 'support the artists' and not even having a link to their website or the album's website where people can buy the music, listen in to the music etc.
?
You can only share what is yours.
So please, show some real respect!

Divakar"

I had a quick look at your website and saw that you are at last. fm too now. I have some problems there, because they changed their policy. So I stopped uploading my music there, because I do not understand the legal side of it.


Your music is great as ever!

Much love
Divakar
 
Posted by Divakar on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 4:34 AM
[Reply to this
Frank Briggs

 
First of all I take exception to the use of the word "Sharing" here.

This is not "sharing" this is "copying"

http://www. templetons. com/brad/copymyths. html

Copyright is basically the "right to copy".

If you don't "own" the copyright or have permission (in writing) from the copyright owner you are "infringing" on the legal copyright owners "rights" and therefore committing "copyright infringement"

Sorry to get so infantile with this Kit but, apparently there is a need to.


Sharing (or "To Share"); is to make joint use of resources (such as food or money), or to "give something away"...this is where the pirates get confused.
You give "it" away "a single something"

Example: I loan Kit a CD of mine to check out. He listens and gives it back. That is "Sharing" music, as there is still only one copy between us.


If that CD wasn't my own work and I "burned a copy" as we call it, that would be "copying" someone's copyrighted work and I would be committing "Copyright Infringement".


When you "UPLOAD" to a server you are in reality "COPYING TO" the server (as you still retain your copy)

When you "DOWNLOAD" from a server you are in reality "COPYING FROM" the server (as the server still has it's copy). I honestly don't know what is so hard to understand.


BTW Musicians have bent over backward to accommodate the new technology. Have you ever seen so much free music Crimhead? iTunes lets you make up to 6 copies and really doesn't do much if you exceed the limit. DRM is just a little inconvenience more than anything else.


I checked out the site and found a few others. Crimhead (Stan) should read Gary Willis' blog on "sharing" I saw that some of Gary's records are posted. I will need to contact him.


Isn't it incredible that the "Copyright Owners" have to prove they own the rights to get the music down??!! (after the damage is done)
Shouldn't you have to prove you own the rights before you put them up??!!

Promotion and "Fair Use" hmmm. to my knowledge fair use is a 30 second clip. I took the time to download one of Crims offerings (how generous). I already own it.

It is full length with artwork.
Greg Howe "Soundproof"
this has only been out a few weeks, over 2000 hits to Sharebee. What is that like $20,000 in lost revenue? That would be split between the label and the band btw Tone Center is putting out OHM's new album.
How do you think it will effect us?

Few get rich in music. This particular genre is going to hurt more from a few thousand downloads than Britney will, but that isn't the point. These people do not have the right to do this and they are too stupid to see that they are hurting the very people they admire. I will never wrap my brain around that one.


I just got an email regarding Crimehead. His ears must be buzzing.


AbstractLogix told me they are halting new releases for now.

They recorded the new Jeff Sipe, Machacek, Garrison album with a $200. Zoom recorder and they are going to release it.
They said and I quote "If we sell 100 at least we will make a little money"

So a word to all the Crimheads "I hope you dig LOFI because that is all we will be able to afford"

What a Wonderful World "not"
 
Posted by Frank Briggs on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 4:36 AM
[Reply to this
Previous Post: inside/outside | Back to Blog List | Next Post: Poetry