 |
Category: News and Politics
Published: 18/10/2009 The Southern Cross Climate Coalition (SCCC) has called
on the Federal Government to reject the Opposition’s proposed amendments to the
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, saying they take the scheme
backwards.
“The Government should reject the Opposition’s amendments
unless they are substantially changed because, as they stand, they take the
scheme backwards,” said ACF executive director Don Henry.
“A strengthened
and passed CPRS would enhance Australia’s ability to push for a strong global
agreement at Copenhagen and grow clean energy jobs in Australia while a weakened
one will not,” said Sharan Burrow, President of the Australian Council of Trade
Unions.
“Australia should be promoting credible and effective domestic
and international mechanisms to help achieve an effective global climate
agreement,” said Climate Institute executive director John Connor.
“That means a stronger CPRS with built in financing for investment in
clean technology and avoiding deforestation in neighbouring developing countries
and helping them prepare for the unavoidable impacts of climate change. The
Liberals’ proposals do not address this key issue.”
“Australia is one of
the most energy inefficient and least carbon competitive economies in the
developed world,” said Clare Martin, CEO of the Australian Council of Social
Service. “While there are some energy efficiency measures in the amendments, to
promise more unconditional handouts, subsidies and exemptions for polluting
industries would be a blow to low-income Australians.”
“Neither Malcolm
Turnbull nor Kevin Rudd can claim the CPRS is ‘environmentally effective or
economically responsible’ by taking backward steps,” said Greg Bourne, Executive
Director of WWF.
The Southern Cross Climate Coalition (SCCC) recently
wrote to the Government and Opposition urging both sides of politics to
strengthen and pass the CPRS and warning that the SCCC would not support the
legislation if it was made ineffective or irresponsible by backwards
steps.
View the article here
3:41 PM
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|