MySpace


Larissa Shmailo

Larissa Shmailo


Last Updated: 11/22/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe
June 27, 2009 - Saturday 

Current mood:  hopeful
Category: Writing and Poetry


Madwoman Exercises a Civil Right 1996


(Still true today? Up to you.)


It isn’t like other illnesses, people say. True.  People who are blind can write off their readers and dressers, the people and things they need to get to work are tax-deductible.  Can you imagine a similar right for mentally ill people, someone to help them - probably on a temporary basis - to get to work?  I can.  My question is: can you?


The friends and loved ones of deaf people have installed TTD lines on every major phone system in the nation,  have founded a college,  have sat in courtrooms for years to get their significant deaf others jobs.  Can you imagine a college for us? 


It might be cheaper to send ambulettes to the homes of the orthopedically disabled than to design and operate special chair lift buses.  But that would be too socially isolating, would make them feel different.   So there are chair-lifts on every ....New York City.... bus and passengers don’t mind giving up a seat or waiting as the driver helps them aboard.  


How many blind and deaf people are there?  It doesn’t matter -  we put Braille in the elevators and the ATMS,  and volume control on pay phones because they are worth it.  How many people use chairs?  Again, it doesn’t matter - every new building in the nation must have wheelchair access and a big bathroom stall.   How much does that cost?  It doesn’t matter.  It’s important.


Mentally ill people are making progress.  Pete Domenici, who has a mentally ill daughter, discovered his insurance isn’t paying her bills. Insurance for mental illness caps at about $10,000 a year in most states; cardiac illness, by contrast, caps at about $1,000,0000.  Insurance parity has carried in a few states but is far from commom.


Seeing a loved one suffering from a “physical illness” is stressful, but not a moral failing on the part of the sufferer.   It is distressing to see someone seize or throw-up, but usually not reason to avoid them afterwards.  It is wrong to abandon a friend with AIDS dementia, a wife with cancer (it is done, but frowned upon).  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness stills  warns practitioners to carefully distinguish between Axis I diagnoses and organic brain disease.  “Oh, she was angry and irritable because she had a brain tumor.”  We understand, it’s all right.  After all, anyone could get a brain tumor, and as the AIDS educators have worked so hard to point out,  anybody could get AIDS.   Anybody - even Superman - could wind up in a chair.


But mental illness is different.   It’s not like other illnesses:  the basic norms of social conduct and communication are violated.  It is unpredictable, hard to take.   And there is always the suspicion, even among the most enlightened, that “they” bring it on themselves.  80 percent of Americans, according to a recent survey, don’t believe mental illness exists.  Thomas Szasz  (M.D) calls it bad interpersonal game playing, an issue of morals, bad habits, cowardice,  not the realm of a scientist but of a priest.  We are possessed by the devil, undisciplined, over-react to stress, practicing learned helplessness.   It’s considered a triumph that today, probably, the majority of direct-care mental health workers, who undergo little or no training for their work,  don’t think their mentally ill clients are  David Berkowitz.


We are difficult patients, the mental health field keeps telling us,  frustrating and difficult.  Recovery is slow, rare.  On top of our neurobiological disorders,  the reality of which some professionals have come to accept,  there are the behaviors, probably common to most people under stress and in pain, but most frequently diagnosed as part of treatment for the mentally ill, and with which we are often permanently labeled:  arrested development,  self-destructive, manipulative-exploitative, masochistic, and  just plain selfish.  With this baggage, until recently, only a few religious orders wanted anything to do with us at all.  It takes very special people to work with the mentally ill, we are told.   The average person is comforted by that thought as he stops seeing and calling a mentally ill friend, feeling far less guilt than he would avoiding a friend with a “physical illness."  


Even the recovering mentally ill are somehow too disturbing to be around, and tolerated only if they never mention their illness and treatment.   Our leadership,  our strongest potential spokespeople, the functioning mentally ill,  the recovering mentally ill who work and have families and look “normal,”  who could be a bridge for us to the public at large, are counseled by doctors and friends not to mention the fact of their illness. It’s often good advice.  Like gay people of past decades, the risks of coming out are too high - shunning,  lost promotions (remember Thomas Eagleton?), the social burden on children.  So these hidden mentally ill,  who, under severe handicap, have fought serious, often devastating illness to raise families,  hold jobs, and contribute to society,  are silent.   What is the cost of this silence?


When a person who is blind or in a wheelchair eschews disability payments and comes to work every day,  we admire them.  One of the finest things about Americans is our admiration of people who overcome obstacles. Why is this admiration denied mentally ill people?


A few years ago,  a group of visually impaired people and their loved ones picketed a TV station because one of their sitcoms showed a blind man in a store gleefully breaking property as he unsuccessfully navigated the aisles with his cane.  That kind of depiction isolates us,  said the protesters,  makes people think we can’t live and work in society.   The salient point here is not the first amendment issues.  It is the firm conviction that visually impaired people deserve the right to live and work in society.   For the mentally ill, the jury is still out.


Mentally ill people are often difficult, there is no doubt on that score.  Sick people tend to be difficult.   Being ridiculed and shamed for having an illness makes it worse.  And of course the medical bills, only fully covered if you enter the disability system,  don’t help.  Accommodations for the mentally ill, say the ADA experts, are difficult.  Let’s face it, recent court rulings have said,  if you are sick enough to need accommodations, you are probably too sick too work.  Yet the thousands, possibly millions of mentally ill employees who have learned to accommodate themselves, who have successfully hidden their illnesses behind more accepted reasons for occasional sick leave, prove this wrong  (but try asking about psychiatric coverage on a job interview).


There are millions of us, everywhere.  We sit next to you at the office and listen to you joke about crazy people;  if we were to make such jokes about your diabetes, you would be appalled.


We may see insurance parity in our lifetime.  The time may come when a mentally ill person might get tax write-offs for services he or she needs to successfully work, but I doubt it ( Special transportation?  A dresser?  Are you crazy?  Well, yes...). Will we ever see an America that says -   maybe, just maybe, this could happen to me?  As long as our illness is a matter of bad habits, I don’t think so.   As long as our symptoms, expressed behaviorally, are viewed as iconic and communicative - probably not.


Perhaps it is the knowledge that people under stress can and do  “break down” that makes us so frightening.  Perhaps it is the very ubiquity of our illness,  our common human susceptibility to emotional pain makes people shun the mentally ill  - after all,  unlike cancer,  it truly may be catching.

.. ..

As I am writing, hundreds of cyclists are returning to New York from a Boston AIDS cyclathon.  Princess Diana is being mourned - the television shows her embracing AIDS babies,  urging others to be unafraid of them,  teaching the public that these children and all people with HIV need and deserve human contact and love.  Perhaps the mentally ill,  including those denied jobs and apartments and left homeless,  will one day merit a royal hug too.  In the interim, equal medical coverage and the right not to hide our disability in the work place and society at large will help.


We, mentally ill people,  may not be that different from you , with our mutant genes and imbalanced neurochemistries and our illnesses that mimic the temporary disorders of thought and emotion that other people experience.  We - some twenty to forty million Americans - drink grape soda, buy television sets, select HMOs, and corporate America might wake up to that fact and profit by it.  If we are not different, then like any of you, we need human contact - the formal and informal social networks that keep all people sane,  and without which any human being regresses.  We simply are looking for the Braille in the elevator or a door handle we can reach to show we are welcome.  ....

Currently listening:
Looking for a Home
By Odetta
Release date: 2001-08-28
• .:. •

 


I think you have hit on the reason for so much denial when you used the word "ubiquity".

These issues will always be complex particularly in legal systems which cynically exploit psychological labels on behalf of clinically-sane clients.

Yet we need to understand the root of the fear that such things may be "catching".

Anyone who has been a part of a well-intentioned group which has suddenly been turned into an ugly and angry mob can attest to the fact that paranoia can be transmitted and can push normally stable individuals into sub-human and irrational forms of behaviour.

Nazi Germany was a case in point and the many vicious pogroms, inquisitions and persecutions which were fomented by fundamentalists and the Church Militant.

The key issue is one of fear.

As accepted definitions of madness remain unclear and anyone can be accused of being mentally ill at any time and so there is an understandable sense of danger involved through association.

Everything you are saying is absolutely correct but the real problems in acceptance stem from a lack of moral courage and mature understanding rather than goodwill.

We have not even begun to understand, let alone to accept, the widest definitions of Consciousness and we desperately need intelligent art-forms to begin to raise awareness of genuine human issues rather than to keep producing cheap derivative re-runs based on serial killers and other dangerous psychopaths.

"The Three Faces of Eve" may have not been accurate in terms of its portrayal of a real condition but it at the very least helped its audience to develop an empathy towards someone whose sense of Self had become severely fragmented.

I tend to measure the greatness of works of art by what feelings and understandings they inspire in me and the degree to which they are thought-provoking.

Such things are becoming increasingly rare in a money-driven commercial media which is in the hands of corporate monopolies and whose primary target market is the lowest-common-denominator.

If we want to change attitudes then our independent art can provide us with both the means and the opportunity.



 
Posted by • .:. • on June 27, 2009 - Saturday - 5:32 PM
[Reply to this
flame in the snow

 
Everyone is mentally ill, especially those who don't admit to it. It's what I used to tell my friends on the playground at school ... "We're all a bit weird, just some of us are weirder than others."

Services for the mentally ill -- now, that is definitely an issue I could get behind!

 
Posted by flame in the snow on June 27, 2009 - Saturday - 5:33 PM
[Reply to this
Some Bad Hat Harry
Evan Myquest

 
As it comes up to the one year anniversary of my old teacher's, Tom Disch, suicide I cannot help but think all our definitions and labels are inadequate. Yes, we all have instabilities--some of us just hide them better, has been my mantra for years. These days the masks are coming off too fast for comfort.

I remember when JFK said the mentally disabled weren't a federal problem and put so many people on the streets for the States to help. When the States double-crossed him and did nothing the real shame of the US was evident.

Personally, I blame the pressurization of the ultra-competitive society here but even that's simplistic. In my lifetime I've seen such bad mental health among the corporate/gov't leaders it's hard to have hope.

I want to think we will do better in the future with the new mind science techniques. I'm not so sure we will. So much room for abuse. Our clockwork oranges in a pill. We cannot seem to take care of healthy people these days.

Perhaps federal health insurance can do something. It would be the time for decoupling healthcare and employment--for any type of healthcare.

As for human contact--you are correct, and timelessly so--at a bare minimum we could at least start with empathy of heart. It's been a long time since Kesey pulled back the asylum roof. ~m

 
Posted by Some Bad Hat Harry on June 30, 2009 - Tuesday - 11:53 PM
[Reply to this