MySpace
myspace music


The Paula Kelley Orchestra



Last Updated: 12/7/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: Los Angeles
State: CALIFORNIA
Country: US
Signup Date: 1/31/2005

Who Gives Kudos:


Sunday, June 17, 2007 

Current mood:  geeky
Category: Music
At the time, Nico was great. Of course she couldn't really sing, but what she did was completely right for who she was, who the VU were, and all that shit Warhol was orchestrating. J Mascis, though a gifted writer and guitar player, isn't known for his mellifluous singing voice. He's gritty and not always in tune, but it's perfect for the kind of music he makes. And to drag in another medium, Picasso, before he got into his surrealist/cubist/abstract works, painted beautifully in the more of-this-world realm.
(You know, blue period, rose period, African period...I'm no art historian, not even close, but I know this.)
SO
Though the aforementioned artists are wondrous, their legacy has been left a certain detriment. Imitators always follow successes. Aspiring singers listen to J Mascis, or even Bob Dylan, and think "Sure, I can do that!" but what they lack is the thought, the art, if you will, that's behind it.
And yeah, I could draw a lady with two freakin' eyes on the side of her head! It just wouldn't mean dick. Sonic Youth - yes. A million shitty indie bands who can't play their instruments? Ugggghhhh.

To try and put it succinctly, there's a vast difference between brilliance in simplicity and incompetence trying to be passed off as "cool."


I mean, there's a reason Pablo Picasso was never called an asshole.


Currently listening:
Aquemini
By OutKast
Release date: 29 September, 1998
Randy

 
Excellent observation, but you'll never get me to listen to Bob Dylan.
Bad singing is just painful.
 
Posted by Randy on Sunday, June 17, 2007 - 11:33 PM
[Reply to this
Lychee

 
I have never seen this one of Picasso's. It is breathtaking. Do you know the title?
 
Posted by Lychee on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 12:57 AM
[Reply to this
Anna

 
Word word word word WORD lady. Couldn't agree more.
 
Posted by Anna on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 1:00 AM
[Reply to this
Jess

 
But... isn't that what punk was about? That "anyone" could do it? It was about the feeling BEHIND the music rather than the ability of play instruments.

Personally, I look at a LOT of art and wonder "what the fuck?" From Duchamp to Warhol to Pollack and beyond. All were brilliant artists. But "anyone" could have done it, right? "Anyone"' didn't, however. They did.

To me, art isn't always about something pretty you can display on your wall or "it has a good beat & I can dance to it". Sometimes art is ugly. It can be horrific to hear or see, but it tells a story. When I look at Duchamp's urinal, I don't see an ugly white urinal. I see a guy sticking it to the pretentious art snobs he hated.

When I see Warhol's multi-colored, multi Marilyn (I don't know what it's called) I see his commentary on fame and individuality.

Music can be harder. Pibb always makes the joke "I've got a guitar and I'm gonna use it!" to describe most of the bands today.

The Pibbster took me to a noise show a few months ago. I promised him 15 or 20 minutes. I couldn't bear more than 5. It was a guy simply... you guessed it... making noise. Static and beeps and whatnot. Boring as hell and really lame. And yet people in the audience were bobbing their heads and looking super into it.

Of course, I totally made fun of them. But, hey, who am I to judge? I will anyway, of course.
 
Posted by Jess on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 1:05 AM
[Reply to this
DC Cardwell

 
You're so right, Jess - and in fact, sometimes it's not that someone actually *did* it, but that "someone had to do it".

Like Neil Young's album of pure feedback, "Arc". The very fact that he did it has spoken to many people, myself included, and I have to admit I have never listened to it the whole way through, but I was also thrilled when I finally saw him live in Melbourne on the Greendale Tour and after the Greendale part he and Crazy Horse proceeded to do several extremely long feedback-drenched versions of an odd selection of songs. Part of me kept saying, "I wish he'd do some normal stuff", whereas part of me felt that it was palate-cleansing after the cutesiness of Greendale.

And then there's John Cage's 4'33" Of Silence, which, if he hadn't done it, someone else would have.

And by the way, it reminds me of the funny story about Mike Batt putting a track called 60" Of Silence on his album and getting sued by John Cage's publishers! I believe they settled out of court and Batt paid a 6-figure sum to the John Cage Foundation. But the best part was the quote from Mr. Batt to the effect that "I wish to draw attention that I was able to say in one minute what Cage took over four minutes to say!"

Cheers ~ DC
 
Posted by DC Cardwell on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 11:21 AM
[Reply to this
Eddie Japan

 
It kills me when people say Dylan is a bad singer. One may not like the sound of his voice, but he is a GREAT singer. (I should be so terrible.) 'One More Cup of Coffee' from 'Desire' is all the proof one might need.
 
Posted by Eddie Japan on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 12:36 PM
[Reply to this
Sander
Sander Wolf

 
It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever.
 
Posted by Sander on Thursday, June 21, 2007 - 10:47 PM
[Reply to this
azza

 
im sure there was someone out there who called him an asshole ....
 
Posted by azza on Monday, July 30, 2007 - 12:08 PM
[Reply to this
JORGES

 
probably just about everyone that knew him...
 
Posted by JORGES on Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 6:14 PM
[Reply to this