MySpace


MJ



Last Updated: 5/21/2007

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Married
Age: 46
Sign: Leo

City: INDIANAPOLIS
State: INDIANA
Country: US
Signup Date: 6/29/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


Wednesday, January 10, 2007 

Current mood:  pissed off
When does a person cross the line from private citizen to public figure?

A friend of mine--who knows what an avid eBayer I am--alerted me last night to a story he'd found on a gay gossip message board. Seems that eBay CEO Meg Whitman was featured in an article in Monday's New York Times, detailing her efforts to raise money for former Massachusetts Governor--and gay rights opponent--Mitt Romney, who is making a bid for the White House in 2008. Here's her quote:

"I've never done anything like this before," said Meg Whitman, the chief executive of eBay, in a break from her callers. "I start out by saying: 'You won't believe where I am! I'm at the Boston Convention Center with four or five hundred other people dialing for contributions for Mitt Romney.' "

Romney, you may recall, is avidly against gay marriage or civil unions, championing a state constitutional amendment in Massachusetts which would take it from the only state to allow same-sex marriage to yet another which officially bans gay and lesbian couples from making legal commitments.

The NYT article upset author and Out magazine columnist Josh Kilmer-Purcell, who emailed Hani Durzy, the director of media relations at eBay, for a comment. Durzy replied that Whitman was a private citizen and could "conduct her personal life in a way she deems appropriate."

Which would be fine and good (if regrettable) were it plain old Meg W. soliciting money for Romney. But once she appears in print as Meg Whitman, the chief executive of eBay, it's her clout as head of the largest internet auction site in the world that makes the item newsworthy. In effect, she's using her position to publicize her politics. That, in my definition, is when she steps over the line and leaves "private citizen" behind.

So, how do I think eBay should respond to the growing outcry from the GLBT community and its supporters? I think they should do two things: first, remind Whitman that as a public figure, she represents eBay, and should avoid publicly offending millions of eBay customers. If she refuses to stop shilling for bigots, then in my opinion she is the wrong person to head a corporation with a large and diverse clientele, and should be replaced. Second, I think eBay should release a statement distancing the company from Whitman's support of Romney.

As Josh Kilmer-Purcell suggested, I emailed Hani Durzy at eBay, and received what looks like an identical reply from Carolyn Frongner, whose title is Manager, Office of the President:

Dear Marlys Pearson,

Thank you for contacting Hani Durzy regarding the recent announcement about Meg Whitman's participation as a National Finance Co-Chair for Mitt Romney's President Exploratory Committee.

As a private citizen, Meg has opted to support a longtime friend and
former colleague in his quest for the 2008 Presidential nomination.  Meg's decision is a personal choice and is not representative of the views or opinions of eBay Inc.  eBay thoroughly respects Meg's ability to balance the day-to-day operational needs of our business, while also maintaining an ability to conduct her personal life in a way she deems appropriate.

Thank you again for your correspondence. We appreciate you getting in touch with us to express your views.

Carolyn Frongner
Manager, Office of the President

I hope she'll appreciate my reply, then, too:

Dear Carolyn Frongner,

Such a disappointment to receive a canned reply instead of something that addressed my concerns. My point was that, contrary to "your" assertions (or whomever's, since other people are receiving the same letter signed with different names), when you allow Ms. Whitman to shill for candidates under her title, she IS representing eBay, and is a public figure, not a private citizen.

I'll be blogging about this soon, and hope you hear from many more people. Until Ms. Whitman is told to desist from using the company name to raise money for bigots and a public statement is released distancing eBay from Mr. Whitman's discriminatory views, I will be boycotting eBay and urging my friends, associates and readers to do the same.

Sincerely,
Marlys Pearson

As I sit at my desk and look around the room, I can see literally dozens of items we've bought from eBay over the years: vintage Barbies, books, movie posters, dvds, computer games, collectibles of all kinds. If I crane my head and look around the corner, I can see plenty more recent purchases under the Christmas tree (yeah, it's still up). Like I said, I love eBay. But I will not spend any more money there if they allow the company name to be used in support of anti-gay politicians like Mitt Romney.

If you care, get eBay to care, too. Send an email to Hani Durzy, Director, Corporate Communications eBay Inc., at hdurzy@ebay.com--or directly to the Office of the President at csme@ebay.com and let eBay know how you feel. Then spread the word through your blogs, websites, MySpace pages and bulletins. And in the meantime, stop buying from eBay, until they listen.
Michael

 
Marlys, you go...!! I stopped using EBay a while ago, guess it was my Spidey Sense that halted me, but somehow there was something fascist and weird about it the few times I did utilize it's services....
 
Posted by Michael on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 12:19 AM
[Reply to this
Ruben Olague-Sweet
Ruben Olague Sweet

 
And I always thought that eBay and Target tied for having the Gayest commerials on TV! Whoda thunk??? Thanks for the info!
 
Posted by Ruben Olague-Sweet on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 12:28 AM
[Reply to this
Clayton
Clayton Littlewood

 

Dear Marlys - thank you for this blog - I'll let all my friends know. I won't be using e-bay again. Clayton


 
Posted by Clayton on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 12:47 AM
[Reply to this
NL Gassert

 
Thanks, MJ, for clueing us in. I had no idea.
 
Posted by NL Gassert on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 1:56 AM
[Reply to this
heather

 
you know, this is unfortunate, it truly is. but nowhere in the article did i see that meg is using the eBay name to drum up money for this guy. she was simply one of - many - high profile folks making phone calls. i think the likelihood that her position, alone, may have influenced a random person to contribute to the campaign is preposterous. and as the HR person said, what she does on her own time is up to her. she's not using company money or resources to support the man, this is all personal. so boycotting ebay because of something she does on her own time is a little much. in my opinion.

that said, i think the whole thing sucks and it's good for people to be vocal about their outrage.
 
Posted by heather on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 4:14 AM
[Reply to this
MJ

 
Well, this entire blog post explains why I don't agree with you, so I won't repeat myself. Thanks to everyone for commenting!
 
Posted by MJ on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 12:02 PM
[Reply to this
Author Amanda Young
Amanda Young

 
Thank you for posting this. I hadn't heard a peep about it. 
 
Posted by Author Amanda Young on Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 5:27 PM
[Reply to this
URIAH BARBER
Jack Barber

 
I don't watch CBS,NBC,ABC,FOX, there all to much like 3's company........My wife loved that show, it was so boring, lying to the land lord to live with 2 girls...did that make it right?
 
Posted by URIAH BARBER on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 - 1:00 AM
[Reply to this
♣├Ģęņţ┤♣

 
Hate to burst your bubble,

I believe there is more anti-gay people out in this world that could careless if you boycott Ebay. I think we should concentrate on boycotting gay rights, cheers!!
 
Posted by ♣├Ģęņţ┤♣ on Monday, April 02, 2007 - 12:26 AM
[Reply to this
Tom

 
Actually you are correct. There are more anti-gay people in the world than pro-gay people. People who were left-handed used to be thought evil and burned at the stake too.

You're not left-handed are you? You could change you know... if you really wanted to. Being left handed is a choice, after all. You could just as easily choose to use your right hand. Given that this is true, I don't see why we should give full rights to left-handed people, do you? It only seems fair that they not be allowed to marry. We don't want to take a chance on them producing left-handed children do we? Doesn't everyone know by now that left-handers can't be trusted? Why wouldn't a person use their right hand if they could?

And what about people who are overweight? Being overweight is definitely a choice because all you have to do to lose weight is exercise and eat a proper diet. (That's so easy!) You aren't overweight are you? No, overweight people can't be allowed the same rights as everyone else. How about we forbid the overweight from marrying until they get skinny and stay skinny for at least 5 years? That would be good, huh? We don't want overweight people adopting children either, right? They might set a bad example, and then the kids might end up overweight too.

And what's up with people with red hair? You don't have red hair do you? Hair should be blond or brown or black. Red isn't a proper color for hair. Shouldn't we enact laws requiring redheads to either dye their hair a normal color or spend their lives with a shaved head? And of course they shouldn't be allowed to marry either. If they reproduce there is always the chance we will end up with more redheads.

Do you think these suggestions are ridiculous? Go back and read your own.
 
Posted by Tom on Wednesday, August 22, 2007 - 6:02 AM
[Reply to this
ben

 
Help spread word about ahhge.com – alternative to ebay

Hi all,

Tell all your friends about ahhge.com - free auction site.
Help make ahhge.com an alternative to ebay.


Thanks.

Ben
 
Posted by ben on Tuesday, September 09, 2008 - 1:41 AM
[Reply to this