 |
Category: News and Politics
So, briefly after the debate last night, commentators started trying to place the spin on the debate. The basic word that seemed most used to describe McCain is "hammer" and the word used to describe Obama was "trying"....
What did you all think? I especially want to hear from people who are more likely to vote for Obama on the issues here. On the issues, yes, I'm definitely voting for Obama, but how much does style mean? (Okay, my heart may belong to Matt Gonzalez or at least Dennis Kucinich...
(I was never that fond of Paul Simon saying he'd rather be a hammer than a nail. There's got to be a third choice!
Though I like Steve Malkmus saying "I'm trying..." and all that...)
Hillary Clinton attacked Obama (unfairly) for being too much style and not enough substance...but that's not the issue here.
One thing I haven't heard enough talk about in progressive, or democratic circles, is that however great Obama is as a public speaker, McCain may very well be a better debater, at least in this debate.
He comes off more aggressive, more personable, more of a glint in his eye, more taking directly to the audience. He wasn't afraid to criticize Obama's position (often by lying, but unfortunately that doesn't matter in a debate when many of the members of the audience don't have access to news that actually reports the facts such as GEORGIA INVADED RUSSIA first, to some extent, with U.S. prodding, and certainly the prodding of Karl Rove, and others closely linked to John McCain).
Because of Obama's so called "new politics" of being "above the fray" he failed to "sink to McCain's level" and thus, instead of getting little jabs in like McCain did, ended up coming off flustered, and talking over McCain, sometimes belaboring his point tediously and losing the interest of even the vast majority who are rooting for him on the issues.
I say this not to criticize Obama, but to help prepare him for the next debate. Yes, he's definitely the better candidate, but I fear and dread that once again he's making the same mistakes that John Kerry did, that Al Gore did, that Michael Dukakis and Walter Mondale did. For all McCain's obviously faults, he came off much stronger in the debate than I thought---again largely by lying (HE CARES ABOUT VETERANS????!???!?!?!? You're crazy!) in part because he has that 'straight talking' snake-oil salesman element of irreducible RASCALITY that Clinton, Bush II (if not Bush I) and Reagan had that, on a charisma level, definitely counts for something.
I can't just sit there with the "progressives" and democrats and say "this stuff SHOULDn't matter." I hope it doesn't, but if Obama can play this game, and cut the stuttering a little more, it doesn't mean that what's better about Obama will be lost in the process....Okay, enough of my high horse for now....(I'll hope I'm wrong...)
12:56 AM
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|