I have been filming a documentary for over a year now.  Expected completion date is once I graduate from law school with a Bachelors in Law, or a Doctorate of Jurisprudence.    Both the Bachelors in Law and the Doctorate of Jurisprudence are correct and exist at the same time for the same degree.  Depending on which part of the ego maniac with an inferiority complex is in control of my self perception at any given time is how I will define my education, humility has little to do with it.  This film is proof that:

EVERY FEMALE PORN STAR PERFORMER STATES ON CAMERA THAT IF SHE "HAD A CHOICE" SHE "WOULD USE CONDOMS ON THE WORK SITE"  

So, in over a year of footage, many many mas many girls, with a lower level of informed consent than I have, claim that they don't have a choice and if they did they would use condoms on the work site.

Furthermore, at least one condom mostly company does give performers a choice.  That company's agent claims 90% of the performers chose to use condoms when they really do have a choice.  So, only a few, 10%, would chose to not use condoms on the work site.

Isn't that sorta proof enough that the porn industry in California is acting intentionally putting performers in harms way resulting in a needless and preventitive public health epidemic of STD infections burdening the tax coffers of those employed????

Thus, there is no choice industry wide, the level