MySpace


Monday, April 09, 2007 

This weekend, the New York Times online ran the first chapter of my book Framing the Debate, and a full-page review in the print version of the coveted Sunday books supplement--the holy grail of the publishing world.

"My book in the NYT!" I told my family, jumping up and down with joy. But the thrill was fleeting. Rising at dawn Easter morning to buy the paper, I quickly realized that the NYT "review" of my book was little more than a pretentious stunt by a gotcha journalist. One thousand words later, I stood accused of radiating "cynicism" and "undemocratic" vision, of treating the public like "Pavlovian" dogs, and of infecting the world with "insidious" immorality on par with the murderers of Julius Caesar.

Et tu, Feldman?

(continue reading...)

Richard
Richard Grayson

 
It's funny.  I read the review, and now, on Tuesday, I recall it vaguely as a positive review.  That's what tends to happen.  I've had really terrible reviews -- or at least mixed ones -- in papers and magazines, and then people a week or month later will congratulate me on the "great" review.  I suspect the same will happen with your back.
 
Posted by Richard on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 - 3:44 PM
[Reply to this
Jeffrey Feldman

Jeffrey Feldman


Last Updated: 3/16/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Who Gives Kudos: