MySpace

This is My Opinion and I am sticking to it. VOTE OUT EVERY SINGLE LIBERAL WACKO

NextPrez2008



Last Updated: 3/10/2008

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Divorced
Age: 55
Sign: Leo

City: Manheim
State: Pennsylvania
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/31/2007

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
Look everyone the fact is if you can't stomach voting for the lesser of 2 evils (lets face it the lesser of two evils is still EVIL) then Write me in in your state............ John Bootie your independent candidate.
Saturday, October 04, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
Sarah Palin Is the Reagan Candidate...

Friday, October 3, 2008...

Written By: Ronald Kessler...


WASHINGTON, DC (NS/NewsMax) -


Sarah Palin won the debate with Joe Biden because she came across as
the Ronald Reagan candidate.

Like Reagan, Palin projected pride in America, optimism about the
future, and determination to reform the government and vanquish our
enemies.

Like Reagan, she was at times self-deprecating. Like Reagan, she took
a swipe at the mainstream media. And like Reagan, she made it clear
she was not afraid to take views contrary to conventional wisdom in
Washington.

Palin immediately displayed her confidence and showed who was boss by
asking Biden, "Hey, can I call you Joe?" While Palin did not display
the intricate knowledge that Biden did, she was impressively well-
informed and enunciated a bright bottom line on each issue. Her values
and principles came across as consistent and understandable.

While Biden avoided any gaffes, his delivery was like Al Gore's:
pedantic and therefore boring. While Biden obfuscated on issues such
as whether Barack Obama had said he would meet with Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to negotiate without preconditions, he was far
more truthful than John Kerry was in his debate with George W. Bush.
But Biden detracted from his performance by occasionally smirking as
Palin spoke.

As Palin suggested, Biden's constant attacks on the Bush
administration during the debate did nothing to illuminate what he and
Obama would do in the future.

Despite concerns that moderator Gwen Ifill, who has written a book
that favors Obama, would stack the deck in favor of Biden, she was a
consummate professional. It is refreshing to see a journalist act like
a journalist instead of a prosecutor. The result was an informative
and entertaining debate.

Palin made a convincing case that, when it comes to change, she and
McCain have done it. She could have added that Obama has mainly
changed his mind. When she referred to Biden's comment that paying
higher taxes is patriotic, Palin illuminated the distinction between
her outlook and his.

"In the middle class of America, which is where Todd and I have been
all of our lives, that's not patriotic," she said. "Patriotic is
saying, government, you know, you're not always the solution. In fact,
too often you're the problem; so, government, lessen the tax
burden . . . on our families and get out of the way and let the
private sector and our families grow and thrive and prosper."

When it comes to the economic crisis, Palin issued a call to arms that
resonates with everyday Americans.

"I think we need to band together and say never again," she said.
"Never will we be exploited and taken advantage of again by those who
are managing our money and loaning us these dollars. We need to make
sure that we demand from the federal government strict oversight of
those entities in charge of our investments and our savings and we
need also to not get ourselves in debt."

Then she appealed to the bedrock values espoused by Reagan. "Let's do
what our parents told us before we probably even got that first credit
card," she said. "Don't live outside of our means. We need to make
sure that as individuals, we're taking personal responsibility through
all of this."

As they have with President Bush, many on the left and in the media
have demonized the Alaska governor as an intolerant redneck. But while
Palin firmly said she considers marriage to be between a man and a
woman, she noted that many of her friends have diverse lifestyles. In
fact, while she did not say this, one of her closest female friends is
gay.

Most of all, Palin came across as genuine and real. In a convincing
way, she referred to her family as ordinary Americans. Her frequent
positive statements about America were heartfelt and so much in
contrast to the hate-filled statements we hear constantly from the
left. Even Biden seemed to glance at her at times with admiration.

Fittingly, Palin closed with a reference to Reagan saying that freedom
is always just one generation away from extinction.

Palin's performance confirmed McCain's vice presidential choice. In
the end, people make their decisions on whom to vote for based in
large part on character and values. They want to know if the candidate
is genuine.

In the Saint Louis debate, Palin showed she is.


Editor's Note:


Ronald Kessler is Chief Washington correspondent of
Newsmax.com and
has been a regular guest on "The Captain's AMERICA Radio Show"...

Watch the Polls to show a 'positive bounce' for the McCain/Palin
ticket within the next 72 hours because of the Alaska Governor's
performance as rated by voters across America...*MCB* ...

--~--~------ ---~--~-- --~------ ------~-- -----~--~ ----~
You received this message because you are a member of "The Captain's
AMERICA" radio program Google group...

Enjoy the priviledge that you now share with others who want to know what
others don't...

God Bless Each & Every One of YOU, and may God continue to Bless America!

Have A GREAT Day & God Bless America!

'Matt'

Matt Bruce
'The Captain'
Retired 25 Year Fire Rescue Captain
Vietnam Veteran
AND...
Host-"The Captain's AMERICA" Show
"The Home Of Common Sense Radio"
Heard LIVE Monday Thru Friday 12 Noon & 7 PM ET
Heard On Net Talk World, Windows Media & I-Tunes...
Weekends Overnight On The Accent Radio Network...
And On:
BX Media/Coolcast Radio
Global Radio
International Broadcasting Company/Stock Talk LIVE
LIVE 365
Net Talk World Radio
Talk 2K
UBroadcast
Saturday, October 04, 2008 

Category: News and Politics

Good Morning everyone, 

My campaign received this email and as I usually do I am posting it so you can see how I replied. 

One Line Textbox 1 Ralph

One Line Textbox 3 What Are You About 

Textbox 1 Dear John,

I'd like to know what are you views on the situations that affect the USA.
Financial, wars that are going on, etc.? Whould you be able to send me some info
on what you are about?

Thank You,

Ralph

Good Morning Ralph,

John Bootie here, I hope you didn't start thinking wow, he's not going to reply to my email!!!

 

Actually I have been thinking of how to reply to you. 

 

Thank you for taking the time to first: notice my campaign, next checking out my website, and finally emailing me.

 

I am just an American who has said enough.  I believe in truth, justice, and the AMERICAN way.

 

A government that at one time was: of the people, by the people, and for the people.  Some where along the way the system, our fore-fathers developed for the people, was high jacked.

Economy:

As you read my website and blogs that go with it you will see what I stand for.  I think the spend hardy Congress and President, have combined in the thinking that the government can and will spend its way out of our problems.

This way of thinking is like applying a band-aide to a severely bleeding wound. If you don't fix the core problem the band-aide is of no use.  The financial problems have taken years to finally come to the surface. The major problem with fixing the core problems is, the people who created them are the same group that says let us fix them.

In my humble opinion, we have to tighten the belt both as a government and as individuals. Every one should be outraged that the spending bills masquerading as bailouts, are loaded with pork barrel projects and ear marks spending to get the votes needed to pass.

We need people to stand up, while we still can, and say enough; that comes through the ballot box.

 

War on those who would destroy the freedoms of the world:

As in 1941, we were attacked on 9/11. Some people want you and I to forget that ever happened.  It's my son and daughters generations JFK, or Pearl Harbor.

Like it or not we have no choice in fighting for freedom. After all it was and never will be free without fighting for it.  As a young nation we fought to become free and over the generations we have fought to remain free.

General Ray Deairno (pardon the spelling), has been asked to take General Petraeus' place in Iraq and the NATO forces in Afghanistan, are doing what has been asked of them.  I support the work they do and I would continue it until peace is available for every person in the world that wishes to have peace. 

Popular stance?  NO... Not to some, but the only one that would allow the USA to remain free, and to assure the freedom to speak our minds.  Some of the countries that condemn our fight for peace don't allow their citizens to say what they would like too.

I don't hear either McCain or obama, or liberal peace-nic giving us any alternatives, that would work. 

Germany, and France have tried dealing with these jihadists, and have received violence in return.  People who would use their own wives and children as suicide bombs can't be reasoned with. CAN THEY?

 

Ralph I hope I have given you some insight on what you asked of me.

Ralph all I ask as I campaign is for people to ask their candidates to earn your vote.  Today, its money and lobbyists, and the media that wants to predict the out come of this election not US.

May  the one and only true living GOD  watch over you,

John Bootie

www.jonhnbootie08.com

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
John Bootie and the Bootie campaign want to  ask you to contact every single person you know.    Via email and telephone to stop this insane bailout deal that will cripple our economy to a point of near no return.
 
The Congressional bailout package is not in the nations best interest.
 
Today's House vote that failed was a indication that our leaders with a conscience  see the true package as anything but good for our nation.
 
95 Democrats voted like we feel and 133 Republicans did as well.   Call your house member if he voted NO say Thank you and continue to represent you well.  If he voted yes tell him you want him to vote NO next time.  Call your senators and say VOTE NO.

It's time to stand up and ask, tell or  beg everyone you know to STAND UP and SAY NO...
 
Any deal, without absolutely NO earmarks or pork barrel spending, is not in the nations best interest.
 
Tell your house members and senators that you want a CLEAN bill.  If we get one at all...
 
First it must stop all spending that is not directly related to the economy and NO money to special groups like ACORN or LaRaza.
 
It also should have a way to recoup the losses from banks that made truly bad loans and the ability to recoup losses from borrowers who filed false loan applications.
 
BELOW you will find the house vote from 29 September 08. and two petitions if you wish to sign them as well in getting this nation back to the people.
 
Thank you and God bless you,
 
John and Jason Bootie.
www.johnbootie08.com
 
 
 
STOP THE BAILOUT!

Sign our petition at
http://conservativehq.com/active-petitions/petition-to-stop-the-bailout/

Congress and the administration are preparing to pass a bailout of Wall Street and of the corrupt and incompetent corporations that –along with Washington politicians and bureaucrats – are responsible for the current mess.

It is going to cost each family in America $10,000, and perhaps much, much more.  And that's just the beginning. 
 
Once this bailout passes, more businesses will head to Washington, hat in hand, for
more of YOUR money.  Every bailout will lead to more bailouts, until taxpayers are left with nothing.

And the power of Washington politicians and bureaucrats and their lobbyist friends will grow and grow, with no limits.
 
 
 
 
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 674
(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

      H R 3997      RECORDED VOTE      29-Sep-2008      2:07 PM
      QUESTION:  On Concurring in Senate Amendment With An Amendment
      BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes

..TR> ..TABLE>

---- AYES    205 ---

Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 140 95    
Republican 65 133   1
Independent        
TOTALS 205 228   1
..TR> ..TABLE>
---- NOES    228 ---

Ackerman
Allen
Andrews
Arcuri
Bachus
Baird
Baldwin
Bean
Berman
Berry
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd (FL)
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown, Corrine
Calvert
Camp (MI)
Campbell (CA)
Cannon
Cantor
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Castle
Clarke
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole (OK)
Cooper
Costa
Cramer
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cubin
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis, Tom
DeGette
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Donnelly
Doyle
Dreier
Edwards (TX)
Ehlers
Ellison
Ellsworth
Emanuel
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Everett
Farr
Fattah
Ferguson
Fossella
Foster
Frank (MA)
Gilchrest
Gonzalez
Gordon
Granger
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Herger
Higgins
Hinojosa
Hobson
Holt
Honda
Hooley
Hoyer
Inglis (SC)
Israel
Johnson, E. B.
Kanjorski
Kennedy
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kirk
Klein (FL)
Kline (MN)
LaHood
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mahoney (FL)
Maloney (NY)
Markey
Marshall
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum (MN)
McCrery
McDermott
McGovern
McHugh
McKeon
McNerney
McNulty
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Melancon
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy, Patrick
Murtha
Nadler
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Pallone
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peterson (PA)
Pickering
Pomeroy
Porter
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rahall
Rangel
Regula
Reyes
Reynolds
Richardson
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Ross
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Sarbanes
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schwartz
Sessions
Sestak
Shays
Simpson
Sires
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Souder
Space
Speier
Spratt
Tancredo
Tanner
Tauscher
Towns
Tsongas
Upton
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Walden (OR)
Walsh (NY)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (FL)
Wexler
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (OH)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
..TR> ..TABLE>
---- NOT VOTING    1 ---

Abercrombie
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Baca
Bachmann
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Becerra
Berkley
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Boustany
Boyda (KS)
Braley (IA)
Broun (GA)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Buyer
Capito
Carney
Carson
Carter
Castor
Cazayoux
Chabot
Chandler
Childers
Clay
Cleaver
Coble
Conaway
Conyers
Costello
Courtney
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (KY)
Davis, David
Davis, Lincoln
Deal (GA)
DeFazio
Delahunt
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doggett
Doolittle
Drake
Duncan
Edwards (MD)
English (PA)
Fallin
Feeney
Filner
Flake
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Giffords
Gillibrand
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goode
Goodlatte
Graves
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Hall (TX)
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Heller
Hensarling
Herseth Sandlin
Hill
Hinchey
Hirono
Hodes
Hoekstra
Holden
Hulshof
Hunter
Inslee
Issa
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Jordan
Kagen
Kaptur
Keller
Kilpatrick
King (IA)
Kingston
Knollenberg
Kucinich
Kuhl (NY)
Lamborn
Lampson
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee
Lewis (GA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Lynch
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul (TX)
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Mitchell
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Musgrave
Myrick
Napolitano
Neugebauer
Nunes
Ortiz
Pascrell
Pastor
Paul
Payne
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe
Price (GA)
Ramstad
Rehberg
Reichert
Renzi
Rodriguez
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Rush
Salazar
Sali
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Scalise
Schiff
Schmidt
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Shadegg
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Solis
Stark
Stearns
Stupak
Sullivan
Sutton
Taylor
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Tierney
Turner
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Visclosky
Walberg
Walz (MN)
Wamp
Watson
Welch (VT)
Westmoreland
Whitfield (KY)
Wittman (VA)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
..TR> ..TABLE>
Weller
Powered by
Google Translate
English
Albanian
Arabic
Bulgarian
Catalan
Chinese
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese
Norwegian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Monday, September 15, 2008 

Category: News and Politics

Subject: FW: CAN I BORROW: A CHRISTIAN story from Robert Black

 

 

 

Can I Borrow $25?
 

 A man came home from work late, tired and irritated, to find his   5-year old son waiting for him at the door.


  SON: 'Daddy, may I ask you a question?'
  DAD: 'Yeah sure, what it is?' replied the man.
  SON: 'Daddy, how much do you make an hour?'
  DAD: 'That's none of your business. Why do you ask such a thing?' the man said angrily.
  SON: 'I just want to know. Please tell me, how much do you make an  hour?'
  DAD: 'If you must know, I make $50 an hour.'
  SON: 'Oh,' the little boy replied, with his head down.
 SON: 'Daddy, may I please borrow $25?'
  The father was furious, 'If the only reason you asked that is so you can borrow some money to buy a silly toy or some other nonsense, then You march yourself straight to your room and go to bed. Think about why
  You are being so selfish. I don't work hard everyday for such  childish frivolities.' The little boy quietly went to his room and shut the door.
 
 The man sat down and started to get even angrier about the little boyʼs questions. How dare he ask such questions only to get some money?
 
  After about an hour or so, the man had calmed down , and started to think:
 
  Maybe there was something he really needed to buy with that $25.00 and  he really didn't ask for money very often. The man went to the door of the little boy's room and opened the door. 'Are you asleep, son?' He asked.
 
'No daddy, I'm awake,' replied the boy. '
 
I've been thinking; Maybe I was too hard on you earlier' said the man. 'It's been a long day and I took out my aggravation on you. Here's the $25 you asked for.'
 
  The little boy sat straight up, smiling. 'Oh, thank you daddy!' he yelled. Then, reaching under his pillow he pulled out some crumpled up bills.
 
The man saw that the boy already had money, started to get angry again.
 
The little boy slowly counted out his money, and then
   Looked up at his father.
 
'Why do you want more money if you already
  Have some?' the father grumbled.
 
Because I didn't have enough, but    Now I do,' the little boy replied. 'Daddy, I have $50 now. Can I buy an
   Hour of your time? Please come home early tomorrow. I would like to have dinner with you.'
 
   The father was crushed. He put his arms around his little son, and he begged for his forgiveness.
 
It's just a short reminder to all of you working so hard in life. We should not let time slip through our fingers without having spent some time with those who really matter to us, those close to our hearts. Do remember to share that $50 worth of your time with someone you love.
 
   If we die tomorrow, the company that we are working for could easily replace us in a matter of hours. But the family & friends we leave behind will feel the loss for the rest of their lives.

  From my house to yours


  'The light of God surrounds us.
   The love of God enfolds us.
   The power of God protects us.
   The presence of God watches over us. 
  Wherever we are God is and all is well.'


  From my home to yours - enjoy.


  Please don't break this even if you only send it to one person.

Monday, September 15, 2008 

Category: News and Politics

Good Afternoon everyone,

Below you will see a Self proclaimed Liberal and ATHEIST's Views of Governor Palin's daughter since she got pregnant out of marriage.

His theory is that trig is really Bristol's and that she must have gotten pregnant again within days of Trig's birth.

Any repect I had for this gentleman has gone out the window.

Here is my reply to his email and you can see his original comments below.

Ken, my daughter also got pregnant out of marriage.

So, I take it your calling every child or adult that is not married and gets pregnant. You calling that child in your words, you called Governor Palin's daughter "a round-heeled slut as a daughter".

I see how you view people today. Don't bother replying I get how you think parents are. You just called every parent who's children no matter the age has a child with out being married "a round heeled Slut".

John Bootie

From Ken, I will not share his last name.

I've shared a document with you called "Granny Palin":



But, the important thing is
THE EVIDENCE CAME OUT.

THAT is why I do what I do.
NOBODY ELSE IS DOING IT.

I TRY to be Fair.
I have NO Axes to grind.

Most don't even look at the FACTS
they
FOLLOW THE DRUMMER.


That is why most investigations
are given to independent agencies or special prosecutors(Persecutors?).


Any investigation
even a Bias one is
better than NO investigation.

I try NOT to be bias
but
as you can see
MOST Readers Are Bias.

Look at the OJ Trial
the first one
I didn't agree with the verdict,
but TRIED to base MY opinion on FACT.



A birth certificate tells nothing except what the alleged parents want the government to know.


Mine is a lie, it does not show my parents.


Hadn't thought of that,
but LET'S SEE IT.

NOT showing it
to me
means
they have something to hide.

PLUS, the
FACT
that there
are NO records in the Newspaper Archive
of the birth.
But, ALL other births are there.

Wonder Why?
I do.


And, as the Navajo Tribe claims, we always know who the mother is, but onlythe mother knows who the father is.

Jews believe that way too.

Anyway, everyone is not looking at the real question. Do we want a Vice-President with a round-heeled slut as a daughter?


But THAT would be BETTER
than a VP that everybody KNOWS will lie.
NOT Good.


What sort of message is THAT sending? Why is the "Moral Right" not paying attention to that?



Is this the example good "Christian" people want to send out? Where is the Moral Outrage?


Right here.
The ONLY one I have seen.
I mean ALL in one place.


Where is the Indignation? Where are the Bible Thumping Bigots condeming adultry and out of wedlock birth? I think I detect a slight air of HYPOCRACY?


I see a LOT of that in Politics.
BOTH Parties.

That is why I often ask -
WHY would anyone belong to a Political Party?

Thanks
Saturday, September 13, 2008 

Category: News and Politics

I want this Judge on my list of nominations to higher courts.

John Bootie

www.johnbootie08.com

 

Judge Throws Out $1 Million Lawsuit Over Broken Designer Umbrella

Saturday, September 13, 2008

NEW YORK —  It's a rainy day for the owner of an upscale Manhattan restaurant who filed a lawsuit against a supermodel over a damaged designer umbrella said to be worth $5,000.

State Supreme Court Justice Joan. A. Madden threw out the lawsuit on Friday, calling motions filed by the attorney on behalf of Nello Balan a "waste of judicial resources." She fined Balan's attorney $500 for filing a frivolous claim.

Balan sued supermodel Le Call for $1 million, claiming that he lent her a Jean-Paul Gaultier-designed umbrella — and that she returned it to him in two pieces.

Balan claimed emotional distress and said that the model had intentionally damaged the umbrella.

Attorneys for both sides have declined to comment.

Saturday, September 13, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
Words Obama Will Regret
-by Ken Blackwell
..TR> ..TABLE>
On Monday, Senator Obama uttered one sentence that could haunt him until Election Day. He said of Senator McCain and Governor Palin telling voters they would bring change, "they must think you're stupid."
Given his stances on the surge, social issues and his past, Mr. Obama will regret those words.
Let's start with social issues like Second Amendment freedoms.
Mr. Obama denies that he's ever supported banning handguns, right after the landmark Heller case where the Supreme Court struck down Washington D.C.'s handgun ban.
When a 1996 questionnaire surfaced that had asked if Mr. Obama supported banning all handguns, his one-word written answer was "yes." He said an unnamed staffer must have filled it out without his knowledge. Then another copy surfaced — this one with his handwriting on it. He says he must not have read that particular question. Sure.
On the hot-button issue of abortion, last month saw a growing concern over Mr. Obama's opposition to the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which states if an abortion is botched and a live birth results, the baby is entitled to medical care. The federal version of this law unanimously passed the U.S. Senate.
However, when a version of this bill came to the Illinois Senate, Mr. Obama opposed it. When confronted last month with the fact that the federal version of this bill had been supported by the likes of Ted Kennedy and Barbara Boxer, Mr. Obama said the he would have supported the federal version. Those suggesting otherwise were lying, he said. Then it was revealed that a second bill was introduced in the Illinois Senate, and this one was identical to the federal version. Mr. Obama opposed that bill as well. He has yet to come up with an explanation on that one.
And there are Mr. Obama's associations. Let's start with the infamous Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Mr. Obama expressed shock that Rev. Wright would say things like "God damn America" and say the American government created AIDS to commit genocide against black people. Yet he belonged to that church for 20 years. He was married by Rev. Wright, had his children baptized by him, and even took his book title from one of the good reverend's sermons.
When Rev. Wright's outrageous diatribes surfaced, Mr. Obama refused to renounce him. Then when Rev. Wright repeated the same statements at the National Press Club, and Mr. Obama had clinched the nomination, suddenly he denounced him. Why? He said Rev. Wright's statements in D.C. were unlike anything he had heard before and he was shocked. But those statements had been in the news for months. Are we to believe that Mr. Obama had not read or heard any of the news for weeks? Or that he never heard anything similar in more than 20-years of listening to Rev. Wright's sermons? Hmm.
Bill Ayers is another stunner. Mr. Ayers bombed a police station and the Pentagon, and recently said he wished he had done more. He is an unrepentant terrorist, but is popular among the ultra-left in Chicago. When Mr. Obama was asked about Mr. Ayers, he implied that he barely knew him.
But once again facts have surfaced. We now know that Mr. Ayers hosted a fundraiser for Mr. Obama. They served for years together on a board with only a few people, and they worked closely on financial matters during those years. Does that sound like someone he barely knows?
And then we have the Iraq war. Congress authorized war against Iraq in 2002. The vote in the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate was an overwhelming bipartisan majority of 77-23. The intelligence provided to Congress was profoundly flawed, but based on the intelligence presented, Congress voted for war. That is why those voting for the war included John Kerry, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton,and — yes — Joe Biden.
Yet Mr. Obama, who was in the Illinois Senate at the time and thus had no vote, opposed the war.
He says that this shows his superior judgment, and that those voting for the war, like John McCain, lack the judgment to be president. But his vice presidential pick Joe Biden voted for the war, and Mr. Obama says Mr. Biden has the judgment to be president. How do you reconcile that?
And finally we have the surge. Mr. Obama opposed it, saying it was doomed to fail. Yet the troop surge has succeeded brilliantly, and all but the most dedicated diehards admit it. Now Mr. Obama acknowledges that it succeeded, but does not admit his predictions of failure were wrong. How were they not wrong?
These actions have made a pattern. Mr. Obama has changed his position on numerous occasions, cannot explain why he has done so, and yet his campaign expects us to believe that he never changed his mind on any of those issues.
He must think we're stupid.
Powered by
Google Translate
English
Albanian
Arabic
Bulgarian
Catalan
Chinese
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese
Norwegian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Friday, September 12, 2008 

Category: News and Politics

My view of America if we sit idly by.... as the Liberals do nothing.....

September 11Th 2008. WOW, 7 years ago today, do you remember where and what you were doing? I know I do. I was right about midway between Shenksville and the Pentagon.

When the first stories of a small plane hitting one of the Twin Towers broke over the TV and radio waves. We are lucky to still hear about that day, thanks to the Liberal media and elitists who think the senses to gruesome and horrendous. They want to hide the facts and pretend that it was a conspiracy theory. That our own government either knew it was coming or had a hand in it.

But lucky for me, I also remember that fateful day November 22, 1963, the day President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was shot and killed in Dallas. As with 9-11 America was kicked while some people pretended as if nothing happened.

December 7TH, 1941 was a day in Infamy, for my parents generation. Every 20 or so years we seem to dose off to be awaken with a kick in the stomach. NO I didn't forget the 80's. March 1981, the day America held its breath after President Ronald Wilson Reagan was shot by John Hinkle. Lucky for America he lived.

Today John Hinkle is trying to become a FREE man. If the Liberals have there way, he will get his wish.

Liberals want to say it's our fault, or that we deserved it, or we started it. Not one of them thinks we should be fighting the war on terror. Most of them want to fight terror in a court room.

But if they get their wish it would be President Bush that would be tried for terror. Not the terrorists. For 7 years now the LIBERALS have tried every way they cam imagine to either get Bush out of Office or end the war on terror.

IF we would just talk to them, or if we would just be understanding of how they think or feel.

BS Its time to stand up and be counted.

I am Number 1, to say Kill them before they kill our men, women and children. Before we have suicide bombers and IED's exploding here in our cities and towns. Leave it to the liberals and it will not be long.

Stand up and be counted,

John Bootie

Tuesday, September 09, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
Good Evening everyone,
 
Wow, when it rains, IT STORMS.... Oprah Winfrey this weekend.  Drew her line in the sand.  She said she won't have Sarah Palin on for an interview.  Even though she had obama, on her show and campaigned for him. 
 
She has made it very clear that she believes that  a persons skin color; is both more important, than women of her own gender or giving fair time to all view points.  I thought it was only "The View" that had a clear liberal bias. 
 
I thing that every person who watches "The Oprah Show" should start protesting both her show and her sponsors.  
 
Yes she does have a right to choose her shows guests.    We also have the clear right to protest her show if we don't like what we see or don't see.  Once you have one candidate on then you should show neutrality, and allow equal time to others view points.
 
 
After all isn't it Liberals that want fairness in broadcasting? 
 
Isn't it the Liberals who want to bring back the one sided "Fairness Doctrine".
 
They only want fairness when it suits them.  In no means do they want equal time for everyone. 
 
Oprah has clearly shown this.  For a  show that is probably 80% or more women viewers.  You would thing she would show the world how far women candidates have come. 
 
Not just once but twice, she has snubbed women candidates.  First she refused Senator Clinton access during the primaries. Now she's said NO to Sarah. 
 
A caller to one of the radio talk shows today made a very good observation.  Americans clearly personalize things.  He pointed out that We call people we like by their first names like: Rush, Sarah.  And we call people we don't have a great and clear kindness for by other names.  People call them Bush, Chaney, or obama.  Interesting isn't it.
 
I think as the caller said an opposing station should have Sarah on in the same time slot and see who has the better ratings for that day.
 
Not that very long ago, obama called most Americans. "Bible toting, gun hugging, angry Americans".  Well now we need to give a big round of applause to our newest member, Sarah Palin.  She is a life member of the NRA, she can clearly hunt, fish, and shoot better than most Americans.
 
She is a bible believeing, GOD fearing,  practicing CHRISTian.  She puts her life, family, and citizens of this great nation, in GOD's amazing hands.
 
SO, I can say as the tide seems to be truly turning in favor of McCain/Palin.  May the one and only true GOD.   Bless AMERICA and the whole world.  It is my hope that he will give the voters "that turn out to vote", the wisdom to vote for the Candidates who hold the closest values that voter holds dear.
 
John Bootie