MySpace


Kirk Ultra



Last Updated: 7/8/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 28
Sign: Pisces

City: SANTA CRUZ
State: California
Country: US
Signup Date: 4/30/2004

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Saturday, September 12, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Tuesday, July 07, 2009 
An excellent article from Washington's Blog on the profound influence of Goldman-Sachs.

Does Goldman-Sachs Rule The World?


Tuesday, March 10, 2009 

Category: Life
EFF Launches Surveillance Self-Defense Project

Surveillance Self-Defense (SSD) exists to answer two main questions:
What can the government legally do to spy on your computer data and
communications? And what can you legally do to protect yourself against
such spying?
After an introductory discussion of how you should think about
making security decisions — it's all about risk management — we'll be
answering those two questions for three types of ..
First, we're going to talk about the threat to the data stored
on your computer posed by searches and seizures by law enforcement, as
well as subpoenas demanding your records.
Second, we're going to talk about the threat to your data on
the wire — that is, your data as it's being transmitted — posed by
wiretapping and other real-time surveillance of your telephone and
Internet communications by law enforcement.
Third, we're going to describe the information about you that
is stored by third parties like your phone company and your Internet
service provider, and how law enforcement officials can get it.
In each of these three sections, we're going to give you
practical advice about how to protect your private data against law
enforcement agents.
The Surveillance Self-Defense Project


Wednesday, February 25, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Ammiano Introduces California Bill to Decriminalize, Tax, Regulate Marijuana
California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) today introduced a bill to decriminalize, tax and regulate marijuana. Not medical marijuana -- all marijuana.
Everybody needs to support this. Everybody. Legal marijuana in California means money for the state economy at a time when the global economy is collapsing, and it means innocent people not having to go to jail.

It would also be a major blow against organized crime.

Official: Mexican Drug Turf War has Led to a Surge in Violence
Robert Pastor, a Latin America national security adviser for President Carter in the late 1970s, calls the problem in Mexico "even worse than Chicago during the Prohibition era."

He said a solution similar to what ended that violence is needed now.

"What worked in the U.S. was not Eliot Ness," he said, referring to the federal agent famous for fighting gangsters in 1920s and '30s. "It was the repeal of Prohibition."
(found via Drug WarRant)

From the hilarious Joe Rogan Blog
Cigarettes kill over 400,000 people a year in this country alone.

Alcohol kills over 75,000.

150 people die all over the world each year because coconuts fall on their fucking heads.

Marijuana? 0.

That’s 0 EVER.
Show this Assemblyman as much support as you can.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 

Current mood:  hopeful
Category: News and Politics


I originally wrote this in the comments section of another myspace blog which was discussing whether or not Michael Phelps' punishment for smoking pot was appropriate. It was written in a rush, and I'm sure I've expressed these ideas in a much more elegant way in earlier articles, but something started troubling me about it as soon as I hit the "submit" button. Specifically, it appeared as though a link I'd put at the end of the comment to the blog of Michael C. Ruppert has been censored.

Here's the first comment:

All drugs should be legal. 100% of them. Pot, crack, heroin, coke, LSD, shrooms. The bad ones and the good ones together. Keeping drugs illegal keeps mafias and drug cartels in power, it keeps politicians corrupt, it keeps bombs and chemical weapons dropping on innocent foreigners, it keeps millions of innocent americans in prison, and it does NOTHING to keep drugs off the streets. There is not one city in this country where drugs of every kind are not easily obtainable. Ending the war on drugs needs to be the number one political priority of every person who wants to make the world a better place. It's the glue that holds the global corruption together.


Somebody responded to this, saying:

some of the most elusive answers to the problems of the future are found by examining the past...

why are drugs illegal? They never used to be? In fact, so called hard drugs of today were popular and prevelant in consumer products even...

Drugs became illegal in this country as a result of the controlled substance act, this created different level and classifications of all drugs from cocaine to codeine, becase all drugs, aka controlled substance can be harmful if not used for specific purposes in documented controlled amounts...

basically, if cocaine, acid, weed, etc. had not caused a problem they would never have became illegal


To which I responded:

Have you ever seen the advertisements they used when they were first trying to make cocaine illegal? They're some of the most racist things you will ever see, all about why cocaine should be banned because of how crazy and horny it made black people. Pot was made illegal through propaganda films like "Reefer Madness" so that the hemp paper (environmentally friendly, and it's what our constitution is printed on) would no longer be able to compete with the paper-from-wood-pulp industry (which has resulted in mass deforestation all over the world). The guy who owned the paper mills is the guy who owned the newspapers that started all the anti-marijuana hysteria in the first place. LSD and other psychedelics were made illegal because they were fueling the antiwar movement during in the 1960s.

And speaking of looking at history, look at the Italian mafia. The Italian mafia was nothing before alcohol prohibition (alcohol had been outlawed for all the same reasons as all the other drugs that have been banned over the years - "it's evil and it makes people do evil things"), but once alcohol was made illegal, it created a marketplace that ONLY the mafia had access too, and which they profited from incredibly. It made them powerful enough to shove senators and presidents around. Alcohol prohibition gave them their power and their wealth, just like making narcotics illegal has made the drug cartels (not to mention Al Qaeda, who get huge amounts of their money from running heroin) some of the most dangerous forces on the planet.

In the 1960's the CIA started moving crack and heroin into California to destroy the Black Panthers (intentionally creating the gang situation as it is today), fund an illegal war in South America, and of course to line their own pockets. It was all part of the Iran-Contra scandal.

And it's all still happening today. Just a few weeks ago the United Nations admitted that the only thing keeping all the banks in the world from collapsing right now is drug money. And now here we are stepping up the war in Afghanistan, the heroin capitol of the world.

The way the world works makes a lot more sense when you understand money laundering. Obviously drugs like coke, meth, and heroin are insanely bad for you, but making them illegal and trying to put people in jail for it cures NOBODY, and is drowning the entire planet in crime and war. Legalization/decriminalization would end all that. Nobody's going to rob anybody for the expensive drugs they get from violent gangbangers when they can just get a 99cent McNeedle down at the store.

Everybody should check out Drug WarRant, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, Narco News, and the excellent and incredibly thorough book Crossing the Rubicon by Michael C. Ruppert. Cheers to Search for keeping the topics interesting!


And here's where we come to the censored link. It's the last one in the paragraph quoted above: Michael C. Ruppert. Why doesn't it work? This is the page that comes up when you click on the link:




You have reached a link that is no longer in service. That means the
link was very naughty, and, much like head lice, had to be eliminated
before it spread.





You may be asking yourself, 'Hey, what was it about that link that got it in trouble?' An excellent question! Usually, it's one of the following reasons:




-     

The link was spam! No one likes spammers, and we don't like their links.




-     

You almost got phished!
There are people out there who want to steal your MySpace password.
They want to log in as you and send spam, harass your friends, change
your profile, and generally run amok. Phishing pages are usually
designed to look like MySpace to trick you. Other sites may also ask
for your MySpace login information to customize your profile, insert
videos or slide shows, track visitors, or any number of other
things.Don't make it easy for them. ONLY USE YOUR MYSPACE LOGIN INFO ON
WWW.MYSPACE.COM!!




-     

Viruses are not fun! Neither is adware, spyware, or malware. We cut the links to places that are known sources of infection.





If you really did want to check out some spam, viruses, or phishing
pages, we're really sorry to have interrupted. We're sure you can find
it elsewhere. There's plenty on the Internet.

Michael Rupperts blog does not spread viruses, it is not a phishing site, and it is not spam. His blog is published in Blogger, which is run by Google and is completely safe.

Here is a direct link to his site, without html so you can copy and paste it - http://mikeruppert.blogspot.com/

Michael Ruppert used to be a cop in LA and helped to expose CIA-run narcotics trafficking in that city. He went on to become one of the most important investigative journalists on the planet. Congressmen read his site. His work is completely invaluable.

Go read all of Ruppert's writings, and go give MySpace an earful (screen full?) for refusing to allow us to link to his site.

I've written to MySpace to ask why the link has been blocked, and will post whatever replies they send.

Fight censorship wherever you can!

Tuesday, November 04, 2008 
This is a copy of an email I sent to my brother a few minutes ago about the election. My obsession with national and international politics had me basically forgetting about state and local politics until basically the last minute, so here's all the research I could gather together in the last few seconds for anybody else out there who did the same thing.

Vote for Cynthia McKinney!

***

What up!

Ok, here are all the ballot initiatives:

Prop 1A - Yes

Prop 1A is the prop for the high speed train in California, we definitely need this. People need better public transportation in this town.


Prop 2 - Yes

Prop 2 is an animal rights act, it makes it so animals actually have to be allowed to move around once a day.


Prop 3 - Undecided

Prop 3 gives 2 billion over 30 years for the construction of private children's hospitals. I'm undecided because the money is going to private hospitals instead of public, which will play into the whole insurance-companies-running-the-world thing. On the other hand it's money for children's hospitals. So there's major pros and cons on this both sides of this one. I'll probably be undecided until I'm actually in the voting booth.


Prop 4 - No

Prop 4 would force girls to notify their parent's before having an abortion. Very uncool.


Prop 5 - Yes Yes Yes

Prop 5 makes it tougher for people to be put in jail for certain drug crimes. It also makes it tougher for them to be put back in jail for drug-related parole violations. A big giant yes on this one.


Prop 6 - No

Prop 6 is funding for the police. They've got plenty of funding already. No.


Prop 7 - No

Prop 7 is a renewable energy bill, but long story short, it's basically a giant scam. Written by the people who would be directly benefit from it. It shuts small energy companies out of the market.


Prop 8 - No

Prop 8 is the gay marriage prop. Definite no on this one.


Prop 9 - No

Prop 9 alerts victims when a criminal is getting out of jail. Could be a good idea, could be a bad idea, depending on the situation. It also requires criminals to pay restitution to their victims, though I'm not sure what the definition of victim is in this prop. I'll probably vote no on it, because it seems like the kind of thing that could be abused. Another thing I just discovered about it is that it makes it a lot tougher for people to get out of jail in general, and stretches out parole times. Sounds like something designed to benefit the prison industrial complex. I'm voting no.

Prop 10 - No

Prop 10 provieds 10 billiion for alternative energy research, but a) written and supported primarily by an oilman looking to start selling natural gas, and b) written by people who either don't know or don't care about the true nature of our planet's energy problems. Prop 1A builds the state an efficient high speed train system primarily powered by solar power, so that's the best energy/environmental proposition i see on the ballot. Props 7 and 10 seem like scammy money-holes.

Prop 11 - Yes

Prop 11 is basically a weaker version of the prop Schwartzeneger tried to put through last election. The previous version put judges in charge of redistricting, but that didn't make it through. This one puts a bipartisan committee in charge of it, which isn't quite as good as having judges do it, but is much better that what we have now. The way it is now lets select politicians (usually republicans, like with that whole thing in Texas a few years ago) draw up the congressional districts themselves, which makes it much easier to get "all republican" or "all democrat" districts. The prop cancels out a lot of shadiness, so a definite yes on it.

Prop 12 - Yes

Helps keep Vets in their homes, lets them pay mortgages to the state instead of private banks. Ducky is a vet and she says its good.


As far as state representatives go, according to this search page here ( http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm ) you are in Nancy Pelosi's district, which means you should vote for Cindy Sheehan, and should tell everybody you know or see to vote for her too. If I'm wrong and you're in the district below it, you may have a chance to vote for Carol Liane Brouillet for congress. I only just heard of her, but she's a 9/11 truth activist and she sounds cool. http://www.scsextra.com/election/details.php?cid=229

As far as all the smaller offices go, I've barely even had time to research my own, lol, so who knows. If you're researching your own mayor's or city council people, a good quick way to see if you should vote for them is to see where they stand on medical marijuana. That's usually a good indicator of whether or not they're supportable.

Good parties to vote for, if you're just going by party on any of the catagories: Green, Peace and Freedom, Libertarian. NEVER NEVER NEVER vote for American Independent, they're essentially Nazi's.
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
DrugWarRant - Stupid Prohibitionist Tricks

Margret Kopala, The Ottawa Citizen, with her article: How to win the drug war

There has been little mention in this election campaign of the most pernicious evil of our time. Yet recent reports from a UN agency leave little doubt that the war against drugs is being won and that, with full engagement, victory is if not possible, then very nearly possible.

...little doubt that the war against drugs is being won? Now that's first-class delusion.

The World Drug Report 2008 launched in June by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reveals how opium and cocoa cultivation, whose heroin and cocaine extractions are the scourge of Canada's inner cities, are now largely confined to rebel-held areas in Aghanistan and Colombia. It also reveals how worldwide deaths from illicit drugs at around 200,000 a year pale in comparison to deaths from legal substances such as cigarettes (five million a year), and alcohol (2.5 million). "The drug problem was dramatically reduced over the past century," says UNODC executive director Antonio Maria Costa, "and has stabilized over the past 10 years."

In other words, prohibition works.


Well actually, the reason that most of the heroin and cocaine comes from Afghanistan and Colombia is that we've made it very profitable for the black market to operate out of those two locations and that they are able to supply most of the demand in the world despite all the drug war efforts. If we actually cut down the supply enough in one of those areas, it would pop up somewhere else.

And it's pretty bizarre to assert that the fact that less people die from illegal drugs than legal ones is a result of prohibition.


Read more here
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
Michael Kane - Price of Oil, Purging Voters, and Election '08

However this time around in the election cycle, it appears Wall St. is favoring an Obama administration. While that is an arguable point, it is not arguable how much money has poured into his campaign from financial giants. It is possible that the levers of power on Wall St. – primarily JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs who can largely manipulate the oil markets by the sheer volume of puts and/or calls they purchase – will attempt to bring the oil markets higher as we approach November to help Barrack.

But not so fast…

Also in the mix are allegations from journalist Greg Palast that most of the key swing states have already fixed the election.

In swing state Colorado the Republican governor has recently conducted the biggest purge of voters in American history – dumping 1/5 of registrations. (guess what the race is of most of these people)

In swing state Florida the governor is refusing to accept 80,000 new voter registrants. (guess what the race is of most of these people)

In New Mexico, Ohio and Nevada similar tactics are being implemented by Republican interests to lower voter turn out – targetting Democratic voters.

Here Greg's interview on this topic here.

The result is a fascinating circus to watch; enjoy the circus because Rome is taking away your bread.


Michael C. Ruppert - Open Wide the Jaws

The Republicans are throwing the election to the Democrats like it was a flaming bobcat on meth. I shudder to contemplate what might be left of the economy by January. I repeat that this is all good. It is leaving functioning infrastructure intact. But the speed with this is unravelling has made me worry about the possibility of civil unrest before the election. I do not think it likely, but it is remotely possible. Civil unrest before the election -- if serious enough --might give Bush the pretext to go CoG. CoG means continuity of government and the suspension of virtually every right we thought we had. Simple mathematics argues against this likelihood however. There are nowhere near enough troops inside the country to impose martial law. The military is stretched beyond belief and the combat veterans are worn out from multiple deployments and Stop Gap. The soldiers and Marines are not in a good mood. They want to go home to take care of their families. Martial law won't fly; not with 270 million firearms in private hands. Hell, probably two thirds of all law enforcement personnel in the country have just seen their pensions cut in half or worse.

I think about the martial law possibility about the same way that I have always viewed the likelihood of a U.S. attack on Iran. It isn't going to happen. And just as with a U.S. attack on Iran, the consequences could possibly be world-ending. So if civil unrest really does occur, then stand back and get out of the way because it might not be predictable or controllable. Chaos is a great way to escape from a crowded murder scene. Start a ballroom brawl so that the sheriff is too distracted to round up a posse.

What did we see today? Exactly what I anticipated. The global markets are melting down and we need to wait just a short time before the tsunami travels all the way around the world and lands back here again. There is so much great history if one studies the Great Depression. That map seems to be working here, except faster and with harder hitting shocks. Ain't progress grand?

. . .

Now that the crisis has taken a global hold I suspect that we will see George Soros moving in the currency markets. How is anybody's guess. . .
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
This is an interview with Naomi Wolf, author of The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot and Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries. It should definitely be watched.

Part 1



Part 2



Part 3



This article from Army Times seems relevant as well

Here's Naomi on The Colbert Report

..

I've really got to get her books.
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 

Category: News and Politics
George Washington's Blog - There's No Difference Between Martial Law and the Threat of Martial Law

If a bully threatens to beat up a skinny kid if he doesn't give him his lunch money, and the bully doesn't have to follow through because the kid does fork it over, does that mean that the aggressive kid isn't a bully?

Of course not. He's a bully because he threatened to beat up the skinny kid and used coercion to get his way.

Well, Congressman Sherman said that congress was threatened with martial law this week. Specifically, he says that Congress was told martial law would be imposed if they didn't pass the Paulson bailout proposal.

Martial law means that the separation of powers which the Founding Fathers enshrined in the Constitution are destroyed, and an all-powerful executive branch calls the shots.

Is the threat of imposing martial law any different than actually imposing it?

No. Congress is just like the skinny kid.

Just because it forked over $700 billion or more in our lunch money based upon coercion by the thugs in the executive branch doesn't mean that the thugs are still following the separation of powers or anything else in the Constitution.

Read more here!