MySpace





-Fair Use Notice- This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is presented soley for educational and research purposes per Section 107 U.S. Copyright Law. For full disclaimer, please view in main index. -DISCLAIMER: Please note articles posted are for information purposes only. We do not necessarily endorse the content of articles contained, nor content of links provided. Nothing contained on this site is intended to encourage or incite illegal, harrassing or violent acts. The information reproduced on this site is done so in good faith on the understanding that the originators have checked the validity of the content before posting. Any names, addresses, telephone numbers and faxes of companies/individuals associated with animal exploitation & animal cruelty is given for the purpose of allowing the public to voice their concerns in a legal manner about a company's / individual's association with animal cruelty/scientific fraud. When emailing, phoning or faxing a company / individual, please remain polite. Impolite correspondence will detract from our efforts. Articles are in no particular order of importance.
LiveVegan

Live Vegan


Last Updated: 12/21/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Country: AU
Signup Date: 10/18/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Thursday, December 24, 2009 
For anyone who has any doubt that the animal 'rights' "movement" has lost it's way:

"Vegan" Outreach & other new welfarists explicitly support "happy" meat. View this love letter to Whole foods
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/media/links/p24/supported.pdf

An interview every vegan should hear
http://www.examiner.com/x-4198-Vegan-Examiner~y2009m12d15-An-interview-every-vegan-should-hear?cid=exrss-Vegan-Examiner

PETA: A Corporate Tangle of Contradictions
http://unpopularveganessays.blogspot.com/2009/12/peta-corporate-tangle-of-contradictions.html

Eating Animals, by Jonathan Safran Foer
http://unpopularveganessays.blogspot.com/search/label/Jonathan Safran Foer

Humane Society of the United States: 1/2 billion $ in revenues since '05. Not a penny for an abolitionist vegan campaign. http://bit.ly/3UA8mQ

Peter Singer, Happy Meat, and Fanatical Vegans
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/peter-singer-happy-meat-and-fanatical-vegans/

Peter Singer Supports Vivisection: Why Are You Surprised?
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/peter-singer-supports-vivisection-why-are-you-surprised/

Peter Singer and the Welfarist Position on the Lesser Value of Nonhuman Life http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/peter-singer-and-the-welfarist-position-on-the-lesser-value-of-nonhuman-life/

Listen / Read this debate between Erik Marcus (Vegan.com) and Prof. Gary L Francione on abolition vs welfare
http://www.gary-francione.com/francione-marcus-debate.html

Essays on the economic efficiency of welfare: http://is.gd/4WJZC http://is.gd/4WK9n http://is.gd/4EmQz

Picking the Low Hanging Fruit: What Is Wrong with Single-Issue Campaigns?
http://unpopularveganessays.blogspot.com/2008/10/picking-low-hanging-fruit-what-is-wrong.html

Vincent Guihan - "Welfare group admits welfare doesn't work, proposes more welfare to fix the problem" http://weotheranimals.blogspot.com/2009/11/welfare-group-admits-welfare-doesnt.html

Thursday, December 24, 2009 

Watching vegan US congressman Dennis Kucinich talking about the inevitability of peace http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i31UW0ghOdA http://www.enduswars.org/
Monday, December 21, 2009 
Monday, December 21, 2009 

Current mood:  blissful

We'll never change the world unless we change people's hearts through a vision of nonviolence; that begins with veganism. – ....Gary.... L Francione ....



We will never change the world unless we change people's hearts through a vision of nonviolence; that begins with veganism. -- GLF....


We will never change the world unless we change people's hearts through a vision of nonviolence; that begins with veganism. -- GLF....


Ahimsa begins with what you put in and on your body. Veganism is an essential component of Ahimsa. --- GLF....


Although there are few vegans writing on animal ethics/philosophy, the number is growing with people like Gary Steiner and Rupert Read. ---....Gary.... L Francione....


Many welfarists say that we must reduce suffering pending the end of animal use. But how many of them call for an end to use? Almost none.---- GLF....


We'll never change the world unless we change people's hearts through a vision of nonviolence; that begins with veganism. --- GLF ....


The moral schizophrenia of the RSPCA is shocking.Dogs & cats matter; others animals are "Freedom Food." --- GLF ....


Single-issue campaigns give public the impression that some forms of exploitation are worse than others. --- GLF....


Single issue campaigns can never work as long as animal exploitation is the unquestioned default position. --- GLF....


"The primary value of single-issue campaigns is to act as fundraising "vehicles.....


Xmas time is so depressing; people celebrate the birth of Christ by doing exactly what Christ said not to do: be materialistic and consume. --- ....Gary.... L Francione....


Veganism is a necessary step on the road to Ahimsa. ---GLF....


Animal welfare does not move toward abolition; it merely makes animal exploitation more efficient. ----GLF....


“As far as I'm concerned, veganism is the single most important form of social activism that anybody can engage in.”—Gary L. Francione....


Advocates do not need to campaign for welfare reform; most reforms will happen because they are economically efficient. --- GLF....


Gary L Francione "Welfare reform further enmeshes animals in the property paradigm and does not move them closer to nonhuman personhood."....


Gary L Francione: "You want to save an animal through direct action? Go to a kill shelter and adopt. No drama required /Just responsibility"....


Gary L Francione "RSPCA claims that it cannot promote veganism for legal reasons. Surely, that is a joke"....


Animal welfare does nothing to eradicate the property status of animals. Animal welfare standards are generally linked to what is required to exploit animals in an efficient manner. That is, animal welfare generally protects animal interests only to the extent that it provides economic benefits for humans. This explicitly reinforces the status of nonhumans as commodities, as property. --- GLF....


Welfare and abolition aren't 'different tactics to meet the same objective'. They're opposed views. --- GLF ....


Ahimsa begins with what you put in and on your body. Veganism is an essential component of Ahimsa. --- GLF....


Gary L Francione: "Racism, sexism, heterosexism, and speciesism are all forms of violence. We should reject all violence."....


Those who profess to embrace Ahimsa but who continue to consume flesh or dairy do not understand the meaning of Ahimsa.-- GLF....


Fur=wool=leather=silk. Distinguishing fur from other forms of animal clothing is like distinguishing beef and pork. -- GLF....


Gary L Francione "Think about fasting today. With all the obsession over food, it can help focus our thoughts on those thousands who die daily of starvation."....


Animal welfare reform does not weaken industry; it strengthens it. Animal welfare increases production efficiency & public comfort. - Prof Gary L Francione....


The best way to celebrate Thanksgiving (apart from being vegan) is to go to a shelter and adopt someone. If you can, get a special needs. --- GLF....


By claiming criticism is "divisive," new welfarist groups mean "do not interfere with our business model. They pretend to promote animal interests when it is just a matter of business. - --- GLF....


Veganism is an act of nonviolent defiance. It is our statement that we reject the notion that animals are things and that we regard sentient nonhumans as moral persons with the fundamental moral right not to be treated as the property or resources of humans. -- Prof. Gary L. Francione....


Social movements do not regard critical thinking as "divisive." Cults, however, discourage critical thinking. -- GLF....


"I am often asked why I bring civil rights / women's rights / gay rights into my work. Answer: All forms of discrimination are related and represent violence." Gary L Francione....


"We would never think it appropriate to be "flexible" with respect to rape or pedophilia. "Flexible" veganism is no more appropriate." -- GLF....


"WHY does the RSPCA think it's okay to love dogs but eat "Freedom Food" cows?" From Twitter -- GLF....


"The real movement consists of people who labor in relative anonymity without thanks and praise. They just work. They educate, care for animals, etc." --- GLF....


"No woman is safe anywhere in a patriarchal world because her interests are systematically and structurally undervalued." -- Prof. Gary L Francione....


Prof. Gary L Francione: "I am somewhat bewildered as to why so many people seem to want to link veganism with atheism. Religion has been a source of mischief re: animals for sure. But so have many other institutions, such as capitalism. Religion can be misused. But so can golf clubs. Religion also represents important... spiritual expression and almost all emphasize love and peace and some equate God with love."....


"The choice is not between animal welfare or nothing; the choice is between perpetuating the property paradigm or rejecting it." --- GLF....


"Ethical veganism represents a commitment to nonviolence." -- GLF....


"Welfare reform is structurally constrained by the status of nonhumans as property; animals are protected only when it benefits humans." Gary L Francione....


"Why do welfarists always refer to welfare reform as "compassion"? "Complicity" is actually more accurate-welfarists help increase efficiency." GLF....


There is absolutely NO evidence that welfare reform, which has been around for 200+ yrs now, ever leads to anything but MORE exploitation. --- GLF....


"If something's horribly unjust, the solution is to eradicate the injustice not pretty it up to make it look less horrible" --- GLF....


"Today's resolution: talk to a non-vegan friend about veganism. Help her/him to see what you see." --- GLF....


Fact: the "happy meat" movement is making things go backward. Absurd to talk about happy slavery being a "teaching" moment --- GLF....


Veganism is an act of nonviolent defiance. It is our statement that we reject the notion that animals are things and that we regard sentient nonhumans as moral persons with the fundamental moral right not to be treated as the property or resources of humans. —Gary L. Francione (..October 24, 2009..)....


"Violence has never solved any of the world's problems; violence is the cause of those problems." GLF....


"Veganism is the one thing you can do today/right now/right this very second to make a statement about nonviolence and who you are." -- GLF....


"The history of humankind is the history of violence; if violence ever really achieved peace, the world would be at peace. It isn't." "People who promote violence against institutional users fail to understand that as long as demand persists, someone will fill that demand"--- Gary L. Francione....


"Veganism is the only coherent response to our recognition that animals are members of the moral community." GLF....


"The only way animal exploitation will stop is if we shift the paradigm away from animals as property and toward personhood." ---GLF....


"Exposes of "cruelty" do NOTHING more than reinforce the idea that HOW it is done is what matters." --GLF....


"The "happy meat/animal products" movement threatens to destroy the animal rights movement." GLF....


"You do not need a big org or expensive campaign to go vegan.You do not need any "leader."You need one thing: your desire to embrace Ahimsa." Gary L Francione....


"Do not let today end without having a discussion with someone about veganism." Gary L Francione....


"Got Ahimsa? Go Vegan." -- GLF....


If you think that being vegan is difficult, imagine how difficult it is for animals that you are not vegan. -- GLF....


Veganism is not difficult. What is difficult is living with yourself knowing that you are participating in the exploitation of the innocent. What is difficult is maintaining the incredible denial required to justify non-veganism. If you believe in non-violence, then be non-violent in your life and don't make non-violen...ce a matter of abstract thought. Go vegan. [Random tweets by GLF....


Random Tweets by GLF: "I am often asked why I bring civil rts/women's rts/gay rts into my work. Ans: All forms of discrimination are related and represent violence."....


Random Tweets by GLF: "Just got the Heifer Int'l catalog.All the "hip" stars telling us how guinea pigs/lambs can provide more protein for poor people. Disgusting."....


Random Tweets by GLF: Translating new welfarism, lesson #1: "Stop bashing [org x]" = "I have nothing of substance to say to critique of org X." Translating new welfarism, lesson#2: "You attack vegetarians" = "I cannot deal w/ your point that no diff. between flesh & other prods." Translating new welfarism, lesson#3: "...divisive" "bashing" "attacks" = nest of words used to avoid substantive discussion.....


Random Tweets by Gary L Francione : "The *only* question in the vegetarian/vegan debate is whether we can defend a distinction between meat and other prods. We cannot." "Meat is murder. Dairy is murder. Wool is murder. It's all murder. There are no lines to draw, no way to make it "okay." Go vegan."....


Random Tweets by Gary L Francione : "We cannot justify domestication. But we have an obligation to care for those domesticates that are here now. Please adopt."....


"Vegetarianism" no longer has any meaning and often includes fish as well as dairy. There are no distinctions. Less than vegan=exploitation." -- ....Gary.... L Francione....


"Meat is murder. Dairy is murder. Wool is murder. It's all murder. There are no lines to draw, no way to make it "okay." Go vegan." -- ....Gary.... L Francione....


"The *only* question in the vegetarian/vegan debate is whether we can defend a distinction between meat and other prods. We cannot." --- Gary L Francione....


Gary Francione: Animal welfare reform only makes our exploitation of animals more economically efficient; it does nothing to recognize their inherent value.....


Animals have an interest in not suffering; they also have an interest in continuing to live. A "humane" death is still unjust. Focusing on intensive agriculture misleads people into thinking that the issue is treatment; the issue is use. The primary problem is not intensive animal agriculture. The primary problem is ...animal agriculture. Go vegan. (Random Tweets from Gary Francione)....


"Race, sex, sexual orientation, species: none of these has any relevance to moral value" ~ Gary L Francione....


"It is a mistake to see issues of human and animal exploitation as mutually exclusive. On the contrary, all exploitation is inextricably intertwined. All exploitation is a manifestation of violence. All discrimination is a manifestation of violence. As long as we tolerate violence of any sort, there will be violence of every sort. As Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy noted: “As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.”" Gary L Francione.


"Never seek to be part of the mainstream. It is polluted with the very worst toxin: indifference." Gary L Francione...

"If you are a vegan, you can still engage in violence. But if you are not vegan, you cannot be a nonviolent person." Gary L Francione....



Veganism is our moral/spiritual commitment to nonviolence. Nonviolence starts with what you put in and on your body.....


Heterosexism is a form of violence. Animal advocates should never support heterosexism.....


There's no such thing as a "humane" slaughterhouse or a "non-abusive" one. Death that is more "humane" is not more just. ---GLF....


"30 years ago, animal people were arguing that we needed welfare reform to help animals "now." It did not work; it won't work; it cannot work. We have had animal welfare for more than 200 years & we are exploiting more animals today in more horrific ways than at any time in history." Gary L Francione ....


"Violence against institutional users makes no sense; they are just filling a demand generated by consumers. End demand: go vegan."- ....Gary.... L Francione....


"Many animal advocates think that theory/ideology is useless - an academic extravagance. Nothing could be more untrue. Theory is indispensable. Without it, you don't know whether to spend this afternoon talking to people about cage-free eggs--or NO eggs"- Gary L Francione....


"Speciesism is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of morality.Speciesism is immoral, just as racism, sexism, homophobia are immoral" Gary L Francione....


"If animal advocates consistently campaigned for abolition of animal use--and thereby sent a clear message to the public, the reaction of industry would be to engage in welfare reform anyway. At least we will be positioned to be speaking clearly and delivering a clear message about veganism. So we would be further ahead. Gary L Francione....


"Cage-free = one big battery cage. It's torture."....


The problem is use not treatment but because animals=property, treatment is always bad.....


We have had welfare reform for 200 years now. We are using more animals in more horrific ways than at any time in human history. Welfare reform does not work. It cannot work. Animals are chattel property. Given that status, and the reality of markets, including and especially the fact of international markets and "free trade" agreements animal welfare will rarely if ever provide more protection to animals than what is economically justifiable." G L Francione


"The bottom line is that animal welfare focuses on the treatment of animals. As a result, it seeks to regulate animal exploitation to make it more “humane.” Animal rights, as represented by the abolitionist approach, focuses on the use of animals and seeks to abolish animal exploitation." from "A Most Misleading Label" by Gary L Francione
....


"Free-range" and "cage-free" are made up catchphrases intended to sell more eggs at inflated prices." --- GLF


"I stand by my view that species discrimination is no different from
racism, sexism, or heterosexism, but I am reminded just how much work
remains to be done to dismantle the pervasive structures of prejudice
in our society." Gary L Francione....


"Regulating animal exploitation through welfare reform is like regulating torture by adding padding to the water board. If the conduct is wrong, we should advocate its cessation, not propose that we impose harm in a “better” way." --G. L. F


"Speciesism is morally objectionable because, like racism, sexism, and heterosexism, it links personhood with an irrelevant criterion. Those who reject speciesism are committed to rejecting racism, sexism, heterosexism, and other forms of discrimination as well." Gary L Francione.


"Veganism is the application of the principle of abolition in your own life; it represents your recognition that animals are not things. Veganism is the recognition of the moral personhood of nonhuman animals. " Gary L Francione
....


"The reality is that we are never going to see any change until we shift the paradigm away from violence to non-violence; away from 'humane' treatment to the abolition of use." —Gary L. Francione....


Other Quotes of Note....


I have lost more friends than this over arguments about animal ethics. One lapidary conclusion to be drawn here is that people take deadly seriously the prerogative to use animals as sources of satisfaction. Not only for food, but as beasts of burden, as raw materials and as sources of captive entertainment — which is ...the way animals are used in zoos, circuses and the like. These uses of animals are so institutionalized, so normalized, in our society that it is difficult to find the critical distance needed to see them as the horrors that they are: so many forms of subjection, servitude and — in the case of killing animals for human consumption and other purposes — outright murder. --- Prof. Gary Steiner....


"Truth does not become more true by virtue of the fact that the entire world agrees with it, nor less so even if the whole world disagrees with it." —Maimonides


“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.” —Mohandas Gandhi....


"Dr. Martin L. King, Jr.

Monday, December 21, 2009 
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 

Current mood:  calm

I thought I'd share this very interesting blog post by Gary L Francione. It's a couple of years old. To see his recent posts, just go to http://www.abolitionistapproach.com

“Oh my god, these vegans…”

http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/oh-my-god-these-vegans/
  by Gary L. Francione in Blog

In the ongoing debate between those who promote the abolitionist approach and those who promote the welfarist approach, some of the welfarists claim that they support veganism so there is, in reality, little difference between the two approaches on the matter of eating and using animal products.

To the extent that welfarists support veganism, it is important to understand that the abolitionist position on veganism is very different from the welfarist position on veganism.

The abolitionist sees veganism as a non-negotiable moral baseline of a movement that maintains that we should abolish all animal use, however “humane” our treatment of animals may be. The abolitionist position maintains that nonhumans have inherent value and that we should never kill and eat them even if they have been raised and killed “humanely.” Abolitionists regard veganism as an end in itself—as an expression of the principle of abolition in the life of the individual.

Abolitionist vegans do not campaign for welfare reforms that supposedly make animal exploitation more “humane.” It is, of course, “better” to inflict less harm than more harm, but we have no moral justification for inflicting any harm on nonhumans in the first place. It is “better” not to beat a rape victim but it does not make rape without beating morally acceptable, or making campaigning for “humane” rape something that we should do.

Abolitionists regard veganism as the most important form of incremental change and spend their time and resources on educating others about veganism and the need to stop using animals altogether, rather than on trying to persuade people to eat “cage-free” eggs or flesh produced from animals who have been confined in larger pens.
To the extent that welfarists endorse any form of veganism (and many do not), they see veganism not as an end in itself but merely as a means to reduce animal suffering. They do not regard animal use as the primary problem; they think that it may be acceptable for humans to kill and eat nonhumans and that the primary problem is how we treat animals. Welfarists who promote veganism argue that because it is difficult to obtain animal foods that have been produced in a morally acceptable manner, we ought to be vegans for the most part but that it is acceptable to be “flexible” vegans and to eat non-vegan as well. Because welfarists focus on treatment rather than use, they campaign for things like “cage-free” eggs or alternatives to the gestation crate.

Most of those who subscribe to this view agree with the position of utilitarian theorist Peter Singer, who provides an excellent example of welfarist “veganism.”

Singer does not think that it is necessarily a problem that we use nonhumans for human purposes because he does not regard the killing of animals as necessarily immoral. According to Singer, animals (with the exception of nonhuman great apes and perhaps a few other species) are not self-aware and do not really care that we use them but only about how we use them. This leads Singer to say that it may be morally acceptable to be “conscientious omnivores” if we are careful to eat only animals who have been raised and killed in a “humane” manner.

For example, in a 2006 interview in The Vegan, Singer states:
[T]o avoid inflicting suffering on animals—not to mention the environmental costs of intensive animal production—we need to cut down drastically on the animal products we consume. But does that mean a vegan world? That’s one solution, but not necessarily the only one. If it is the infliction of suffering that we are concerned about, rather than killing, then I can also imagine a world in which people mostly eat plant foods, but occasionally treat themselves to the luxury of free range eggs, or possibly even meat from animals who live good lives under conditions natural for their species, and are then humanely killed on the farm.
In Singer’s May 2006 interview in Mother Jones, he states:
[T]here’s a little bit of room for indulgence in all of our lives. I know some people who are vegan in their homes but if they’re going out to a fancy restaurant, they allow themselves the luxury of not being vegan that evening. I don’t see anything really wrong with that.
I don’t eat meat. I’ve been a vegetarian since 1971. I’ve gradually become increasingly vegan. I am largely vegan but I’m a flexible vegan. I don’t go to the supermarket and buy non-vegan stuff for myself. But when I’m traveling or going to other people’s places I will be quite happy to eat vegetarian rather than vegan.
In an October 2006 interview in the new welfarist magazine, Satya, Singer states:
When I’m shopping for myself, it will be vegan. But when I’m traveling and it’s hard to get vegan food in some places or whatever, I’ll be vegetarian. I won’t eat eggs if they’re not free-range, but if they’re free-range, I will. I won’t order a dish that is full of cheese, but I won’t worry about, say, whether an Indian vegetable curry was cooked with ghee.
Singer argues that there are times when we have a moral obligation not to be vegans:
I think it’s more important to try and produce a change in the right direction than to be personally pure yourself. So when you’re eating with someone at a restaurant, and you ordered something vegan but when it comes there’s a bit of grated cheese or something on it, sometimes vegans will make a big fuss and send it back and that might mean the food is wasted. And if you’re in company with people who are not vegan or not even vegetarian, I think that’s probably the wrong thing to do. It’d be better off just to eat it because people are going to think, ‘Oh my god, these vegans…’
There is, of course, no moral distinction that can be drawn between flesh and dairy products or eggs. Therefore, Singer would be committed to the position that if you were in a restaurant with non-vegetarians and ordered a vegetarian meal only to have it come with bits of bacon or other flesh products on it, or if your non-vegetarian host served you flesh at a dinner party, you may well be obligated to eat the flesh to stop people from thinking, “Oh my god, these vegetarians…”

I discuss Singer’s view on the issue of killing animals at length in my essay, The “Luxury” of Death.

Singer’s focus on the treatment rather than the killing of animals leads to the position that veganism is simply one of a number of ways to reduce suffering, but that there is nothing mandatory or required about veganism because there is nothing inherently wrong with killing animals. Indeed, Singer regards being a consistent vegan as “fanatical.”

And many welfarists talk about veganism in this way. For example, Paul Shapiro, Director of the HSUS Factory Farming Campaign, states
The reason I’m vegan is because I see it as a tool to help reduce animal suffering. Vegan Outreach has written about this extensively, and I agree with them. They write that vegan eating ‘is not an end in itself. It is not a dogma or religion, nor a list of forbidden ingredients or immutable laws—it is only a tool for opposing cruelty and reducing suffering.’
In other words, veganism is just another way, along with bigger cages and other welfarist reforms, to reduce suffering. This is how Shapiro apparently justifies promoting “cage-free” eggs as “socially responsible,” campaigning for other welfare reforms, and working as part of the coalition that supports the Certified Humane Raised and Handled label.
For the welfarists, the basic issue is animal treatment, not animal use. As Singer states:
It’s pretty difficult to be a conscientious omnivore and avoid all the ethical problems, but if you really were thorough-going in eating only animals that had had good lives, that could be a defensible ethical position.
In February 2007, I had a podcast debate with Erik Marcus from Erik’s Diner. Marcus is an enthusiastic promoter of insignificant animal welfare reform, including “cage-free” eggs.

But, as the debate made painfully obvious, Marcus exaggerates the protection provided to animals by welfare regulation despite his not having knowledge of the relevant facts. Moreover, he is seemingly unaware as to how welfare reforms are making animal exploitation more socially acceptable and increasing consumption, as well as how these reforms are in the economic interests of institutional animal exploiters. An essay by British sociologist Dr. Roger Yates reveals the stunning ignorance of Marcus and his HSUS colleagues about the basics of institutional animal exploitation.

Marcus, like the other welfarist “vegans,” maintains that it is acceptable to eat foods that are not vegan as long as they are “essentially vegan” and he regularly promotes animal products that are supposedly more “humanely” produced. I do not question Erik’s sincerity, but I disagree strongly with him.

This casual attitude about veganism is characteristic of the welfarists. In a December 2006 article about Dan Mathews of PETA, Mathews and the writer went to McDonald’s to eat and the writer asked if it was okay to order a cheeseburger. Mathews is reported as saying “‘Order what you want,’. . . .’Half of our members are vegetarian and half think it’s a good idea.’” Putting aside that Mathews eats at McDonald’s and tells the reporter to order what he wanted, and proclaims without apparent consternation that only half of the PETA membership is “vegetarian” (let alone vegan), Mathews himself ate a product—the “veggie burger”—which not even McDonald’s claims is vegetarian given that it is cooked on the same grill with meat products and handled along with animal products.

The abolitionist rejects the welfarist position on veganism both because it explicitly endorses speciesism and exploitation, but also because it is counterproductive as a matter of strategy. If you explain to someone that there is no moral justification for eating any animal foods, she may not give up everything right away, but you have stated a clear and consistent position and you have provided a clear goal to which to aspire. If you tell her that it is morally acceptable to do less than become a vegan, you can be certain that she is unlikely to see any need to go further. When you have people like Singer, the so-called “father” of the movement, telling people that they can act morally by being “conscientious omnivores,” that is exactly what many people will do.

In conclusion, there is a world of difference between the veganism of the abolitionist and the “veganism” of the welfarist. The latter sees veganism as a means of reducing suffering but does not see it as a moral baseline.

There is a world of difference between a person who takes the position that sexism is always wrong and one who says that we should be “flexible” about sexism and allow ourselves the “indulgence” of a bit of sexism, or even that we have a moral obligation to engage in sexism in certain circumstances because we should avoid eliciting the reaction, “Oh my god, these feminists…”
Gary L. Francione
2007 Gary L. Francione
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 
The World's Need
a poem by Ella Wheeler Wilcox


O many gods, so many creeds,
So many paths that wind and wind,
While just the art of being kind
Is all the sad world needs.


Voice of the Voiceless
Version 3

by Ella Wheeler Wilcox, 1896 Poet Laureate of Humanity

I am the voice of the voiceless:
   Through me, the dumb shall speak;
Till the deaf world's ear be made to hear
   The cry of the wordless weak.
 From street, from cage, and from kennel,
   From jungle and stall, the wail
Of my tortured kin proclaims the sin
   Of the mighty against the frail.

For love is the true religion,
   And love is the law sublime;
And all that is wrought, where love is not,
   Will die at the touch of time.
And Science, the great Revealer,
   Must flame his torch at the Source;
And keep it bright, with that holy light
   Or his feet shall fail on the course.

For he who would trample kindness
   And mercy into the dust--
He has missed the trail, and his quest will fail:
   He is not the guide to trust.
Oh shame on the mothers of mortals
   Who have not stopped to teach
Of the sorrow that lies in dear, dumb eyes,
   The sorrow that has no speech.

Oh, never a brute in the forest,
   And never a snake in the fen,
Or ravening bird, starvation stirred,
   Has hunted his prey like men.
For hunger, and fear, and passion
   Alone drive beasts to slay,
But wonderful man, the crown of the Plan,
   Tortures, and kills, FOR PLAY.

He goes well fed from his table;
   He kisses his child and wife;
Then he haunts a wood, till he orphans a brood,
   Or robs a deer of its life.
He aims at a speck in the azure;
   Winged love, that has flown at a call;
It reels down to die, and he lets it lie;
   His pleasure was seeing it fall.

The same force formed the sparrow
   That fashioned Man, the King;
The God of the Whole gave a spark of soul
   To each furred and feathered thing.
And I am my brother's keeper,
   And I will fight his fight,
And speak the word for beast and bird,
   Till the world shall set things right.

Published by the American Humane Association, Albany, N.Y.
Submitted by Maynard S. Clark 25 Jan 2002



Tuesday, September 29, 2009 
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 

Current mood:  chill
Sunday, August 16, 2009 

Want to see a "humane" slaughterhouse vid?

***WARNING*** NOT SUITABLE FOR MINORS. All of this legal under US standards. More information (soon in English): http://www.mataderos.info
Video of Spanish slaughterhouses, part of the Animal Equality investigation about slaughterhouses, started in 2008. Visit their website: http://www.animalEquality.net


Go vegan for peace for all land and sea dwelling beings and for climate change




To find out more about how animals are enslaved on Earth
Watch  Earthlings http://www.earthlings.com

To subscribe to my Youtube channel
http://www.youtube.com/livevegan

Join me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/livevegan
Join me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/LiveVegan/104975033629