Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 25
Sign: Scorpio
City: Philadelphia
State: Pennsylvania
Country: US
Signup Date: 9/1/2005
|
|
|
|
22 Aug 07 Wednesday
 |
Folks, my brand new, hassle-free (at least for me) blog is now operational and ready to be viewed! My MySpace blog will no longer be used from now on. Go check out the new blog at: http://martarusek.blogspot.com/.
Thank you for your support, and I look forward to hearing your comments at Marta Rusek Is Trying...!
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
16 Aug 07 Thursday
 |
Current mood:  contemplative
Ladies and gentlemen, it's great to be back. I had a marvelous time in Denton, Texas, and I got to meet some very amazing individuals. For those that don't know, I was lucky enough to venture to the University of North Texas last week for the University Film & Video's annual conference. Every year, the members of this organization get together to deliver academic papers, show movies, exchange ideas, and dine on exquisite food. I myself presented a paper (my very first academic paper written outside of college, not to mention my first presentation to a group of highly intelligent professionals) on horror films, and based on the feedback I received later, my presentation was not only informative, but engaging and enjoyed by the professors and grad students who attended. I hope to write another paper and make another presentation at next year's conference. I'm considering tackling either a paper on the role of film music in narrative filmmaking, or an examination of the portrayal of HIV/AIDS patients on film. Of course, being the overly-excited individual that I am, I may end up with a paper on a completely different topic by this time next year.
I highly recommend that everyone who reads this does something that really takes them out of their element and offers them a chance at an adventure. I once read in some self-help list that a person should do at least one thing that scares them everyday. For me, my biggest fear is change. It's not that I don't want to progress forward to bigger and better things - the issue is that I don't want to lose the things I love most, and the process of change will eventually do just that. I love my family, I love my home, I love the movies I watch and the ducks that live in the creek behind my childhood home. None of them deserve to be lost. And yet too much connection will weigh me down and prevent me from getting to where I want to be. I no longer desire the role of the Next Steven Spielberg. I want to teach film theory and screenwriting in my hometown. That is what will make me most happy - talking about my passions with equally-passionate college students, in the town that gave me so much of my identity. But sooner or later, I will probably have to leave in order to get the academic credentials I need to teach.
The thought of missing out on the things that give me the feeling of happiness is quite frightening. But going to a place thousands of miles away from home proves that I have it in me to do what needs to be done. I'm like a blend of the characters from The Wizard of Oz: I always had the courage, the brain, and the heart to make my way towards destiny, but in the end, I just want to go home.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
05 Aug 07 Sunday
 |
Beginning Monday, I will be in Denton, Texas for the University Film and Video Association's 61st Annual Conference. I'm excited not only because it's my first conference and I get to go all the way to Texas to see it, but because I will be presenting my first academic presentation to film professors from around the country. My presentation is based on an academic paper entitled "It's Only A Movie": The Impact of Societal Events on Horror Films Released During the Vietnam War and the 2nd Gulf War. I've loved horror films since I was 10, so I opted to tackle a topic that I knew alot about and would enjoy presenting/discussing with others. Below is a brief description of my topic that will double as a handout for my audience. I hope you enjoy it, and I will be back with new blog entries after August 12th! "It's Only A Movie": The Impact of Societal Events on Horror Films Released during the Vietnam War and the Second Gulf War By Marta Rusek Speculation abounds as to whether or not there is a proven connection between film content and societal events. In the area of American horror films, many directors and writers have insisted that their work was a response to a larger societal issue. Wes Craven's Last House on the Left from 1972 is considered one of the most violent cinematic responses to the Vietnam War, while Eli Roth's Hostel, a gory tale of American college students being tortured to death in a murder-for-profit business in Slovakia, was released two years after reports of the infamous Abu Ghraib scandal were released to the American public.
The directorial "reactions" to these wars attracted millions of moviegoers and grossed millions of dollars in profit, and further fueled a nation-wide craving for violent, political-societal allegories. For this study, I used published books and articles written by university professors, movie critics, and horror aficionados, as well as internet articles, because the face of the horror film is always changing, and the writings of online magazines and newsletters offer contemporary, up-to-date musings on recent horror releases.
I contend that the modern horror film offers audiences the chance to invest their feelings during both times of war and times of peace, but at the same time these horror films are fueled by the reaction of filmgoers and filmmakers to societal events beyond their control. The American horror films of 2007 feature pornographic representations of violence and killers who are ordinary and even likable because of how well audiences can relate to them and their goals.
American horror films are violent in times of war or times of alleged peace, but the content of a horror film that is released during or immediately after a major conflict (i.e. Vietnam, the Iran Hostage Crisis, the First and Second Gulf War) is considerably more gruesome in its depictions of murder and dismemberment, and the anti-hero killer that drives the story lives and functions in our human society, as opposed to being a killer who exists only in the dreams of children or is a doll brought to life by voodoo rituals. The goal of "It's Only A Movie" is to identify the dimensions of these "reactionary" horror films, the impact of these dimensions on moviegoers, and why the horror sequel just won't die.
P.S.: As soon as possible, I will be shutting down the blog here at MySpace and open one elsewhere. MySpace is progressively getting hostile towards free speech and its downright impossible for me to post new entries. Other MySpace users have complained about censorship here, too.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
05 Aug 07 Sunday
 |
New enty up soon. The MySpace blog system is acting up again.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
04 Aug 07 Saturday
 |
You know you've been watching waaaaay too many detective/crime dramas on TV when you can solve the murder before the detective does. Tonight, I watched yet another exciting episode of Monk (Tony Shalhoub is worth every Emmy he gets nominated for), and things were going swimmingly until halfway through the show, I solved the murder even before all the clues had fallen into place. Even worse, I didn't just know WHO did the crime, I knew HOW they pulled it off. Even so, it was fun to see how Monk explained the murder, which is a testament to the abilities of the writers of the episode.
I'm not sure if it's an issue of how the episodes are written, or if I've watched too many of them, but the fact is that more and more, from Law & Order and its countless spin-offs to Monk, I'm finding it incredibly easy to solve the cases before the detectives and then decipher the prosecution's plan for action before it happens. The only logical reason to explain all this is my uncanny knack for catching and remembering details. Lucky for me, I had one of Philadelphia's finest assistant district attorneys to learn from. Dad taught my sister and I the value of paying attention to our surroundings and to people, because he worked in a division of the D.A.'s office that prosecuted child victimizers. He noticed all too often that children couldn't adequately describe the location where they were attacked, or give reliable details about who attacked them.
So I guess I owe my father a great big thank you: now I can solve murders on TV shows before the onscreen detectives can. But perhaps there is another reason I'm getting so good at putting two and two together: routine. Every episode of Law & Order, Monk, and even the Harry Potter book series has the same routine, or formula, if you will. In Law & Order, the cops investigate and eventually find the guy. The D.A. presses charges, but the defense attorney suppresses key evidence or passes a motion that makes the D.A.'s case alot harder, or, in the worst case scenario, charges are dropped altogether. But there's always a small detail that has been overlooked that ends up blowing the case wide open. Key witnesses are found, evidence is reexamined, hard questions are asked at trial, and the perp is forced to accept a plea or the jury finds her/him guilty.
With Monk, Det. Monk knows the identity of the murderer early on, but has to make the case based on his painfully careful attention to detail, which I've picked up on: I know, based on watching more and more episodes, that no detail is irrelevant. I always watch Monk's hands and the direction of his gaze, too.
As for Harry Potter, the same formula exists in every single book - a problem arises thanks to Harry, which prompts Hermoine to say "This is pretty serious!" A brief investigation ensues, but goes nowhere. Then in January (after the Winter Holidays, where everyone has had time to relax, even Voldemort), there's a break in the case, which propels the story forward. The case/problem is always solved before the end of the school year at Hogwarts.
And that's how I've been able to solve the crime before the TV detectives do. I doubt I would last more than two seconds as a real detective or a lawyer, but thanks to my father and my training as a screenwriter, which has helped me to break down even the most complex stories to find a formula that can be worked into a 90-page script, I think I've exhausted any hope of being an idle viewer during TNT and USA's crime shows. Thank goodness I still haven't figured out the formula for The Closer.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
01 Aug 07 Wednesday
 |
I had the opportunity to ponder two perplexities today. My first quandary revolved around why French onion soup is given a higher price that regular soup. In most restaurants I visit, there's a special soup of the day, one or two regularly served soup choices, and then there's the French onion, which is given a higher price, and is usually excluded from the soup or salad choice that accompanies the entrees. French onion soup is a soup like any other, complete with a broth and tasty items contained therein. What possible distinction could place it above chicken noodle or cheddar broccoli? Could its French heritage be a factor? I have yet to see an Italian wedding soup given the same prestige. Is it the cheese on top? Or the cute little crock pot that holds it all? The only conclusion I can reach is that it is an unspoken rule of restaurant menu etiquette. All soup is created equal - except for the French onion.
The second issue that has me perplexed, not to mention quite bothered, is that when it comes to talking about the bad things that have happened to us, or the wrongs we have perceived, everyone opens their mouth and has an opinion to share on the subject. I commented on a blog a few days ago that discussed teachers who had clipped their wings, and I noticed that since the blog entry first went up, more than 100 people had commented on the teachers who made their lives a living hell. Today, the same blog invited people to share their favorite teachers. Only 21 individuals (myself included) bothered to comment on their favorite teachers. I'm sure this same trend extends across many topics. Lots of people complain about their government, but few ever discuss what they like about it. Millions of people complain about riding airplanes or their telephone company's service, but view people ever stop to marvel at the technology that makes these feats possible. And there are plenty of people who are eager to badmouth their teachers, doctors, and police officers, but even when these individuals do something right or amazing, no one notices that they've done anything at all.
Have we all become that cynical and pessimistic in the 21st century? Or has this sort of thing been happening all along? Can we return to a time of gratitude and wonder? Or are we doomed to complain ourselves to death? I have my health, hot water when I need it, a roof over my head, and food when I'm hungry. I'm a college graduate without a job, but at least I've had more time to devise my presentation for the University Film and Video Association's annual conference next week and work on a screenplay that I'm very passionate about. I guess it's all a matter of balance. I should be grateful for my lot, but at the same time, I should create goals for myself and find a cause worth investing in. It sure beats being dead. Or a dung beetle.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
30 Jul 07 Monday
 |
From MR. SHOOP'S SURFIN' SUMMER SCHOOL MIDTERM http://sergioleoneifr.blogspot.com/2007/07/mr-shoops-surfin-summer-school-mega.html
1) Favorite quote from a filmmaker Walt Disney: "I'm not interested in pleasing the critics. I'll take my chances pleasing the audiences."
2) A good movie from a bad director
The Exorcist
3) Favorite Laurence Olivier performance Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights
4) Describe a famous location from a movie that you have visited (Bodega Bay, California, where the action in The Birds took place, for example). Was it anything like the way it was in the film? Why or why not? I live in Philadelphia, and I've gone up the Art Museum steps more times than I can remember. It's just not the same without Bill Conti's music.
5) Carlo Ponti or Dino De Laurentiis (Producer)? Dino De Laurentiis
6) Best movie about baseball? Bull Durham
7) Favorite Barbara Stanwyck performance? Phyllis the femme fatale in Double Indemnity
8) Fast Times at Ridgemont High or Dazed and Confused?
Fast Times. Amy Heckerling wins everytime.
9) What was the last movie you saw, and why? (We've used this one before, but your answer is presumably always going to be different, so…)
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. I've seen all of them in a theater, starting with Sorcerer's Stone in 2001.
10) Whether or not you have actually procreated or not, is there a movie you can think of that seriously affected the way you think about having kids of your own? Window Water Baby Moving by Stan Brakhage. Only time I've ever seen a live birth AND afterbirth in the same film. My body recoils at the mere mention of the title.
11) Favorite Katharine Hepburn performance
Tie: Bringing Up Baby and The Lion in Winter
12) A bad movie from a good director Hannibal by Ridley Scott
13) Salo: The 120 Days of Sodom-- yes or no?
No. I barely got through Cannibal Holocaust. And I'm an overprotective aunt of a beautiful nephew. My tolerance for children being mistreated in cinema is considerably low.
14) Ben Hecht or Billy Wilder (Screenwriter)?
Billy Wilder
15) Name the film festival you'd most want to attend, or your favorite festival that you actually have attended.
Seeing Fulton and Pepe's Brothers of the Head at the Philadelphia International Film Festival was fun.
16) Head or 200 Motels? I've seen a few minutes from each, but I'm not sure I could choose one over the other until I'd seen them in full. Loving both The Monkees and Frank Zappa equally doesn't help, either.
17) Favorite cameo appearance Billy Crystal in The Princess Bride
18) Favorite Rosalind Russell performance
Auntie Mame!!!!
19) What movie, either currently available on DVD or not, has never received the splashy collector's edition treatment you think it deserves? What would such an edition include?
Sally Potter's Orlando. Collector's Edition would include deleted/extended scenes, a slideshow of Sandy Powell's costume designs, music video for the song 'Coming,' and a making of featurette.
20) Name a performance that everyone needs to be reminded of, for whatever reason
Cate Blanchett as Queen Elizabeth I in Shekhar Kapur's Elizabeth
21) Louis B. Mayer or Harry Cohn (Studio Head)?
Harry Cohn, if only for It Happened One Night
22) Favorite John Wayne performance?
Sean Thornton in The Quiet Man
23) Naked Lunch or Barton Fink?
Naked Lunch. David Cronenberg can do no wrong, as far as I'm concerned.
24) Your Ray Harryhausen movie of choice The Golden Voyage of Sinbad
25) Is there a movie you can think of that you feel like the world would be better off without, one that should have never been made?
90% of the horror film sequels out there.
24) Favorite Dub Taylor performance Bonnie and Clyde
25) If you had the choice of seeing three final movies, to go with your three last meals, before shuffling off this mortal coil, what would they be? Star Wars: A New Hope, Orlando, and Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, the first movie I ever saw in a theater.
26) And what movie theater would you choose to see them in? Any theater where the toilet seats are made of gold and clean themselves.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
29 Jul 07 Sunday
 |
So far this summer, we've seen Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie, Lindsay Lohan, and a slew of other celebrities get busted. The crime of choice seems to be drunk driving, but drug possession and spousal abuse have factored into some of these run-ins with the law as well. Celebrities have always had a love-hate relationship with the law - the same laws that protect celebrities from overzealous photographers and fans also insist that they adhere to the same kinds of responsibilities as everyone else. Driving safely, respecting the property of others, not harming the people around us - we all agree to keep these responsibilities so long as we live in the United States. But what is reason for the sudden surge in celebrity lawbreakers?
Part of the answer can be attributed to the paparazzi. They are more aggressive and fearless than they were fifty years ago, and the boundaries that photographers and reporters used to respect when it came to public figures has virtually disappeared. As a result, it's difficult for a celebrity to blow her nose without the paparazzi knowing and being there to document it. It creates a great deal of stress, knowing that your every move is going to be photographed and circulated, and even more stress when you realize that everyone is waiting (even hoping) that you slip up, preferably in public.
As much as we may look with disgust at these men and women who spend their days going through a public figure's trash or stalking them to get a photograph that will earn millions of dollars, it is too easy to blame them entirely for the behavior of a celebrity. But even more disturbing than the actions of the paparazzi are the actions of the members of the justice system who believe they are serving the community's best interests when they decide to sentence an individual like Nicole Richie to four days in jail. Nicole Richie has an addiction which has and continues to affect her ability to function in society, and she is obviously not in any hurry to get help for herself. Under California law, the maximum an individual can serve for drunk driving is one year, along with the necessary fines. A judge is required to consider the circumstances of the crime: in this case, Ms. Richie had been arrested before for - you guessed it - drunk driving. For this current offense, she was driving on the wrong side of the road and could have killed someone.
Unfortunately for us, Court Commissioner Steven K. Lubell opted to give her 4 days in jail, along with a $2,048 fine and orders to seek treatment for her alcohol problem. Had this been anyone else, especially if the person was poor and could not afford an expensive attorney, they probably would have received harsher sentencing for the first DUI offense, not to mention that they would have been charged with a felony if it was their second DUI charge (most U.S. states charge the second DUI as a felony, not a misdemeanor, as was the case with Nicole Richie). Thanks to the sentencing of celebrities like Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie, the message has been sent to the rich and famous that they are free to break any and as many laws as they please - it's not like they're gonna spend more than a few days in jail (with exquisite preferential treatment, of course). I say shame on the judge who puts a celebrity's image above the law, and shame on the police officers, corrections officers, and sheriffs who openly treat celebrity convicts better than the men and women who are already behind bars. Convicted felons, in spite of their crimes, are still human beings, who no doubt have a tremendous amount of anger towards anyone that is treated better than they are. For that reason, I hope Paris Hilton never gets into trouble again. If she were to be placed in the general population of a jail, she would be at the mercy of the inmates.
Despite the lenient judges and bloodthirsty paparazzi, the full blame of breaking the law and exposing innocent people to potential harm, not to mention send a negative message to impressionable children, should be placed on the celebrities themselves. Being a public figure does not and should exclude a person from observing the same laws and life experiences as the common man and the common woman. Part of the reason I think my country is on the verge of collapse is because a serious "every man for himself" attitude is so prevalent in today's society. Celebrities love getting in the front of the line, getting the best treatment, buying the biggest houses, and even eating the freshest food. There's nothing wrong with wanting it all, or having it all, for that matter. It's when someone decides that they want to place themselves above the law, and bypass the judicial process, that they've gone too far. People must be made to face the consequences of their actions, no matter who they are. Why? Because by living in this country, by making a home in the United States and enjoying the rights and privileges that come with it, one implicitly agrees to follow the laws that make this American life possible. When a judge makes a mockery of this agreement by handing down lenient sentences to individuals who, although they are famous, pose a risk to the public, they open the door to more egregious instances of mishandling the law. If the law can't protect everyone, it will be followed by no one.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
25 Jul 07 Wednesday
 |
Since I graduated from college in May of this year, I've been to eleven on-site job interviews and participated in five phone interviews. Although I'm impressed by these feats, it should be noted that it took more than two months and 125 resumes (with cover letters, of course) to get to this point.
It's a tough world out there for college grads, but despite that, I wouldn't change a thing about my job hunting experience. As a result of the countless e-mails, phone calls, and letters, I've managed to gain eleven opportunities to experience how professionals communicate and conduct themselves in a non-academic environment. Each time I get an interview, my mother says the same thing: "Assume you won't get the job, and use this interview as practice for the ones to come." Oddly enough, treating an interview as a practice scenario has enabled me to relax, showcase my best qualities, and observe the responses of my interviewers. And it's paid off, too. I've learned that all employers want the same thing, even if the jobs are different, from an ideal job candidate: flexibility, reliability, a strong sense of organization, the ability to work alone and as a team member in a group, the ability to prioritize tasks, and the ability to communicate clearly and concisely.
To that list, I'd like to add the ability to listen and loyalty. It's true that most of us can hear the world around us, but how many of us actually listen to the people we're talking with? Pay strict attention to your boss or coworker when they speak to you, and do your very best not to speak while they are speaking. When I speak of loyalty, I refer to the length of time a person spends at a company. A friend suggested that I stay with a company for at least three years before I consider looking for my next career step. With the exception of men and women who work in the film industry, the first thing a potential employer looks at in a typical resume (beyond your skills) is how many jobs you have occupied in the last five to ten years. If your resume has more jobs than it does the number years between graduating from college and now, you may want to consider taking a job with the intention of staying with it for more than two years. An employer wants someone who will be productive and remain with the company for awhile, not an individual who will jump ship less than a year later.
Before you even consider the job interview, consider the methods that will get you that interview. At this moment, there are millions of college students, young and old, looking for the first post-collegiate job, but if you polish and invest in the ideas below, you will gain a greater advantage:
The Resume - Think about the last five years and write down all the jobs you have occupied in that time. Now write down the major skills you acquired and the major duties you performed on those jobs. Using that information, go onto Microsoft Word, pick one of the delightful resume templates, and add the information where needed. I personally don't use an objective because I have yet to see a professional resume that has one, but to each her own. In my resume, I include a Professional Experience section (which includes all PAID job experiences that are relevant to the job I'm applying for), a Related Professional Experience section (non-paying and volunteer jobs that are worth noting), an Awards & Presentations section (pretty self-explanatory), an Equipment & Software Proficiency section (note all software and equipment you already know how to use well), and last is my Education section, which names where I want to school, the name of my major, what degree I obtained (Bachelor's Degree, in this case), and when I graduated. If you think it is necessary, include your GPA. Since a resume is such an important tool in the job search, show it to as many professors and experienced job seekers as you can. If you know anyone who has experience interviewing and hiring job candidates, definitely get their input as well.
The Cover Letter -This letter is as important as a good resume, because sometimes you can't fit all of the skills you learned in a job on the resume. I use cover letters to discuss specific tasks I have accomplished at a past job and how this accomplishment relates back to the job description of the position I'm applying for. If you can prove to a potential employer that you have the experience they're looking for and you're able to back up that experience with a specific instant where you used it well, you will make a very positive impression. Keep the letter short – no more than four paragraphs on one page – and clearly state the reason why you are writing this letter. The first sentence of my typical cover letter reads: "I am very interested in applying for the (JOB TITLE) position at (COMPANY NAME)." I use the first paragraph to mention that I have all the skills mentioned in the job listing (I also mention where I found the listing), and name a short list of basic skills I've done in the past, such as answering phones and sorting the mail. The second paragraph details a specific instance where I needed to put my organization and technological skills to use, and I explain the positive outcome (don't tell a potential employer you failed to complete a task – use an instance where you succeeded) of my ability to stay on task. My third paragraph details my other two major skills: writing and customer service skills. I discuss how I've used them and what awards I received as a result of using these skills well. The final paragraph should reiterate your desire to be considered for the job, and that you have the skills to do it well. Don't forget to thank the person reading (if you don't know who to send it to, address it 'To the Human Resources Department'), and give them a way to contact you. My final sentence reads: "Thank you for your time and review of my resume, and please feel free to contact me using the phone numbers and e-mail address on my resume." Like your resume, you will have to tailor your cover letter to different audiences, addressing specific skills as they relate to the job description. Avoid sending the same generic letter to all the companies you apply to – you never know if they compare the letters they receive, and by demonstrating that you can adapt your letter and resume to any company, you prove your versatility and value.
Apply for Multiple Jobs - As you can see with my stats, the odds of getting called for an interview are slim unless you apply for as many jobs as you can. I started applying for at least four a day, and I did my best to start the search before I even graduated from college. There are also job listing search engines that you can join. I personally found Monster.com to be useless, but I fared better on Idealist.com and smaller, local job search engines. Pay close attention to the Required skills and the Preferred skills that are listed on the job listing. Required means you absolutely, positively must have them in order to succeed and be productive for the company. If you have any or all of the Preferred skills, you will stand a better chance of being seriously considered for the position. That being said, apply for anything you think would be a good fit for you. You may discover that, while you don't possess all of the Required skills, a company may like you so much that they'd be willing to train you so that you can have and use those skills on the job. Remember, the more jobs you apply for, the better your chances are. The worst they can do it say no.
Mock Interviews - If your school doesn't have a career development center, pick up the phone and call your university's president NOW and insist one is created immediately. Seriously, do it NOW. If that's not possible, arrange to meet with a career development representative from a nearby university. As paying students, you have the right to access a department where trained professionals are available to review your resumes and cover letters, and offer something called a Mock Interview. These are fake interviews, but you are required to dress up in an outfit/suit that you would wear to a real resume, and conduct yourself as if you were being interviewed for a real job. Typically, the Mock Interviewer will tape your session, and when it is over, she/he will review it with you. The purpose is to ensure that you're able to discuss your skills and achievements in a professional manner and prove to the interviewers that you are THE candidate for the job. It's actually a lot of fun, and incredibly helpful. I have yet to hear of anyone who got a Mock Interviewer that made them cry or feel worse. A college's success is measured in how well they prepare future professionals, so these interviewers want to help you land a job.
The Interview - There are four simple, yet important rules to follow for all job interviews: dress professionally, bring copies of your resume, arrive 15 to 20 minutes before the designated meeting time, and relax. Remember my mother's advice and treat it like a practice run. Smile, look people in the eye, shake hands with enthusiasm and confidence, and don't speak until the interview is finished. It's okay to let a little bit of your true self out, but at the same time, you are essentially trying to sell the professional edition of yourself. Pretend you're a limited edition action figure. There's only one of you, and you want the interviewers to understand that you're the best, since there is no one else like you, with your exquisite skills and eager personality. Also, research the company's website before the interview, then come prepared with questions of your own. Typical questions I ask include, "What is the next step after the interview?", "What is the corporate culture of the company?", "Are you interviewing anyone else for the position?", and "What are you looking for in the ideal candidate?" Whatever you do, NEVER ask "How much will I be getting paid?" See the next section for reasons why.
Money - No one works for free, but it's a good idea not to put too much emphasis on how much you will make at a potential job. The best bit of advice I ever got was to hold off on giving a salary requirement range. Why? For starters, you don't want to come off sounding like that is the most important reason you want the job (it shouldn't be – the experience you get from the job should be your top reason), and if you give a range that is too high, and exceeds a company's budget for that position, it will kill your chances of being considered. Hold off until the last possible minute. In cover letters that are required to give a salary range, I usually write: "I'm not familiar with the salary range of past (JOB TITLE)s, and I don't know what kind of budget you are working with, so I'd prefer to discuss the issue in person, to allow room for negotiation." If I am called for an interview, and the individual on the phone doesn't mention the typical range and doesn't ask me what my salary requirement is, I go to Salary.com and check to see what people in that particular job earn in the area the job is located in. So if the question of salary comes up during the interview, I can say, "Based on my research, the typical range is (number) to (number), but as I mentioned in my cover letter, I'm very willing to discuss a range that would accommodate your budget." Research…it's a good thing.
Thank You Notes - The process of convincing an interviewer doesn't end after the interview is over. Be sure to ask all of the interviewers for their business cards. Using the address on those cards, send a hand-written (not typed) Thank You note within 24 hours of the interview. If your interview was on a Friday, it is okay if the letter doesn't arrive until Monday. This is your final opportunity to make your candidacy stand out. Make each letter different by pointing out something unique of each person. For example, you might tell Mike the Interviewer: "I appreciate your detailed description of the position. It gave me additional details that I didn't see in the job description I read on Monster.com." Meanwhile, you may tell Jane the Interviewer: "Thank you for the tour you gave me of the office. I enjoyed the interesting facts you gave me for each room we visited." At the end of the note, mention that you are still interested in the job, or some variation of the idea that you are the best candidate for the job. Example: "Thank you for discussing the position with me. I am convinced that I would do an excellent job at the company, and I would enjoy working there, too." I use the words "Yours truly" to close my note, but "Sincerely" works just as well. Thank you letters help you stand out among the other candidates, but they also convince potential employers that you are skilled in the art of connecting with people through letters. Development departments in major companies and non-profits appreciate that skill most especially.
It may take some time for a recent college grad to get their first real job, but putting forth the effort and treating the process of hunting for a job as a job in itself (albeit a non-paying job) will make all the difference. The more you write and adapt cover letters and resumes, the more you will improve your writing skills, which are becoming more and more necessary in the working world. The more you interview, the more confident you will become when it comes to selling your abilities and skills. Most important of all, you will come to trust your instincts. Just because the job pays a lot doesn't mean it will be a good fit for you. A truly great job offers you the opportunity to grow as a human being and advance in the company or in the industry you have chosen to pursue. Take the job that offers you the chance to acquire new and useful skills and paves the way to bigger and better opportunities. Just remember to remain loyal and pay attention as you do it.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
16 Jul 07 Monday
 |
Of all the films in the Harry Potter franchise, the fifth installment marks the first time our hero truly earns his place in story. This time around, Harry must contend with the newly-enfleshed Lord Voldemort, the media (or the equivalent of one in the wizarding world), and the prim and proper Dolores Umbridge, the newly appointed Defense Against the Dark Arts prof. Times have changed in the world of Hogwarts, and not for the better. Harry and Dumbledore face an uphill battle against the Ministry of Magic and the Daily Prophet, both of which seek to discredit the duo's claim that He Who Must Not Be Named has indeed returned to re-ignite his reign of terror. Believing that they are in grave danger, Ron and Hermione persuade Harry to school them and his fellow classmates in the art of defense.
Thankfully, director David Yates takes a cue from Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban director Alfonso Cuaron utilizes a motif to unify the story and its many complexities. Whereas Cuaron used clocks and the concept of time to movie the story forward, Yates opts for newspapers and the idea of truth. Yates and company cleverly make use of newspaper headlines in the Daily Prophet as a means to deliver information quickly and concisely, but at the same time shows audiences the often biased nature of printed media. We the audience believe Harry wholeheartedly because, after all, we did see him take on the Dark Lord in the previous installment. But this is the wizarding world, and although witches and wizards are capable on conjuring up magnificent spells and potions, at the end of the day they are very much like Muggles - they only believe that which they see with their own eyes.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is decidedly more violent than the previous films, which, despite the PG-13 rating, did very little to deter children from attending (or in my case, failed to deter parents from bringing their infants and overactive two-year-olds to the theater). Despite the darkness of the story or the onscreen atmosphere, it is hard not to see this film as somewhat of an allegory to our world today. As the controlling Dolores Umbridge points out to a defiant Professor McGonagall: "If you question my authority you are questioning the authority of the Ministry of Magic itself, and that is considered disloyalty!" Umbridge's remarks represent the sorry state of things today, where questioning even the most remote of issues conjures up the terms "loyalty" and "disloyalty," and the brazen accusation that you're "with us or against us."
There can be no doubt that is Harry's film. Daniel Radcliffe proves that he is the definitive personification of the character, and he earns his keep in this harrowing segment of the saga. For the first time, he is truly on his own and taking advantage of his true leadership potential. Before, from The Sorcerer's Stone to The Goblet of Fire, his adventures were more like unfortunate mishaps with lucky breaks, which Harry himself admits to his friends and his viewers during the course of this film. This time, Harry is strong enough to stand up to the people who mean him harm. He still lets his emotions get the best of him, as we see in the first five minutes of the film, when he stands up to his bullying cousin when Dudley and company tease Potter about his dead parents. As the film progresses, the message regarding Harry and his intense relationship with emotions comes clear - lose the emotions or lose your life. In the world of witchcraft and wizardry, unprotected and carelessly kept emotions provide Voldemort a suitable path into the head of an unsuspecting wizard, where he can wreak havoc and mayhem to the point of insanity. So it would seem that men with emotions, real or fictional, are highly contemptible, but for different reasons. Even with the frilly cloaks and velvet wizard caps, there is a still a strong sense of masculinity alive and well in the Harry Potter universe.
A rich, exciting journey worth experiencing again and again, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix proves that delivering a Harry Potter film word for word from the book from which it is based is a practice of the past. We have thankfully left the territory of Chris Columbus and entered into a realm where detail-oriented viewers are rewarded and the director isn't afraid to take the them into more intelligent territories. It is obvious that these young actors and actresses have been given more room to explore the dimensions of their characters, and their performances are better for it. Most importantly, the audiences are given room to interpret and enjoy the film as they choose. As an adaptation of a novel in a beloved series or even as an anti-war message, the fifth Harry Potter film gives everyone, especially the lagging film industry, a much-needed summer boost.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|