MySpace


Zoë

Zoe Markillie


Last Updated: 7/13/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 22
Sign: Scorpio

Country: UK
Signup Date: 1/6/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Wednesday, September 23, 2009 

Current mood:  scared
Category: News and Politics
I remember being on a family picnic when I was about six years old, and coming across a wild rabbit. I was immediately enchanted by this remarkably tame - and, of course, utterly adorable - creature and could not understand why my parents shouted at me not to stroke it. Naturally, I was inconsolable after watching them examine it briefly and my father walloping it over the head with a spade.

It was explained to me that they had seen that the poor thing was riddled with myxomatosis (my mother worked in a vet surgery and recognised the disease straight away), and so it was kinder to give it a fast, painless death instead of allowing it to die slowly and in agony. What had seemed like wanton cruelty was in fact an act of mercy towards a vulnerable creature that could not end its own suffering for itself.

That memory has always stuck with me, in an important-life-lesson-learnt sort of way rather than an emotionally-scarring-story-to-tell-my-psychoanalyst way, of course. It is one of the reasons I have always been strongly in favour of euthanasia*, and why I welcome the new clarifications of the law on assisted suicide, even if I don't think they go far enough.


My hero, Terry Pratchett, puts his reasons for supporting the legalisation of euthanasia far more eloquently than I ever could (and with a lisp and everything), so I'll keep it brief. No one with an ounce of compassion would allow an animal to suffer unnecessarily if they had the power to stop it. We consider it humane to put our pets out of their misery when their quality of life becomes unbearable; how, then, can it not be 'humane' to do the same for a fellow human being if they request it?


One argument usually dragged out by opponents of euthanasia is that of practicality: that people will be pressurised into agreeing to assisted suicide, or that we cannot be sure that they will not change their mind at the last minute. Clearly, the risk of this is minimal given the stringent checks and examinations that would be implemented were euthanasia to be legalised. Nobody is proposing a Vegas-style drive-thru euthanasia clinic with a quick lethal dose given by some dude in an Elvis costume and a cheesy photo for the folks back home.

Furthermore, the status quo is extremely flawed as it is, in terms of practicality. Given that partners and family members who help their loved one travel to Switzerland risk prosecution for assisted suicide even if they are not directly involved in the process, many people end up having to travel alone to the clinic, meaning that they die before their quality of life has become sufficiently low to truly warrant suicide. Opponents of euthanasia decry the fact that it ends life before its natural time, while not realising the irony that it is actually the criminalisation of euthanasia that cuts lives even shorter.

Another argument against is that of morality: life is sacred and we ought not to interfere with God's precious gift. Well, yes, in an ideal world, that would be the case but the government does not appear to have noticed that this is not an ideal world and most of the worst legal decisions that they make come from the misguided belief that we can make it into one. Strive for perfection, by all means, but at some point you have to cut your losses and just work with what you've got.

I have written at great length before on why I believe prostitution ought to be legalised so I won't go into that now, but the same principle applies: ideals are all very well, but it is often better to have a more realistic system that improves the situation in practice even if moral compromises have to be made. I do not approve of suicide, just as I do not approve of the selling of sex, but I accept that it will always happen and would rather make it as safe, dignified and humane as possible than cling to a stubborn ideal which only makes matters worse.

If there is a God, let Him judge our souls - not politicians.




* And in the case of certain people who insist on inflicting their droning about 'um-ba-rellas' on the world, as soon as possible. It's a mercy killing, all right - merciful to the rest of humanity.
Sunday, September 20, 2009 

Current mood:  lonely
Category: Travel and Places

I’ve just got back from a holiday in Istanbul. It is, under any circumstances, a marvelously exotic place: a city in two continents, home of the Hagia Sophia, a modern city borne out of an ancient civilization and, arguably, the birthplace of bellydance. Add to that the fact that I visited during Ramadan, with the fabulous street parties at night and general atmosphere of joy and celebration, and it certainly made for an exciting time. But what I found most interesting was the experience of being a woman in such a dichotomous place.

 

Istanbul is heavily influenced by Western society, yet is in a country with a 99% Muslim population (albeit to varying degrees of practice). It seems appropriate, then, that a city which cannot seem to decide what continent it is in also contains such a varied population, which is most evident among women. A cursory glance at an average street will reveal various women in full burkhas (some with just eyes showing, others with noses and chins as well), headscarves coupled with a reasonably conservative outfit, and also strappy tops and short summer dresses. Within the same city are the LA-wannabe chicks of the ultra-modern Istiklar Caddesi and the veiled, enigmatic women of the more religious Eyup.

 

I have seen several women in burkhas – in Britain and Egypt as well as Turkey – and they never fail to create a sense of uneasiness in me. Not, as you might imagine, through any kind of Islamophobia but rather because I always wonder what they think of me. Do they look at my bare knees or the top that is unsuccessful in hiding my cleavage and think me a slut? Do they resent my freedom or worse, do they pity me for the apparently inevitable consequences of my heathen ways in the afterlife? Perhaps this is the case for some, but I was surprised by the friendliness of these women, no matter how I was dressed; a few stared and perhaps even glared, but most smiled as they passed me and my boyfriend holding hands in the park. It seems that, for many, the act of covering up to whatever extent really is a free choice and not necessarily a prescription for all.

 

I also found my own assumptions challenged by the men that I saw with the burkha-clad women because they were, for the most part, seemingly nice, affectionate boyfriends and husbands. I always imagined that only a certain type of man would force – or allow, if you look at it the other way – his wife to wear such a garment. My boyfriend, certainly, is far too much of a feminist to let me wear one without a fight and a lecture about my complete equality, and so I assumed that these men must be absolute monsters. Yet they were generally normal, decent, modern men who did not appear to exert any oppressive power over their wives.

 

The clash of Islam and secularism, east and west, does lead to hypocrisy, however. Street vendors would generally call out to me, figuring that I, as a woman, would have more of a desire to buy things – yet they would automatically look to my boyfriend to give them the money*. Waiters would shake his hand as we were about to depart the restaurant but not mine out of reservation when it comes to bodily contact with someone else’s woman – and yet I had my backside groped no less than three times by elusive scoundrels who grabbed the opportunity (literally) while squeezing past me before slipping away through the crowd**. The same men would no doubt be horrified, however, at the public leering and wolfwhistles that I get on a not-embarrassingly frequent basis from builders in Britain.

 

Istanbul is, then, a city on the turn, with Islamic values of chastity and modesty battling against Western values of freedom and individuality when it comes to sex (in both senses of the word). It was encapsulated in a wonderfully surreal sight I saw whilst sitting in a park in Yedikule: a man walking along with his arm around a woman in a burkha. It will be interesting to see what develops.

 

 

 

 

 

 

* A not altogether incorrect strategy, as it turned out, since he did carry all the money, but that was only because I flat-out refused to wear a bumbag. (Fannypack for my American readers)

 

** Interestingly, this only happened on the day that I decided it really was too hot for a shawl, values of modesty be damned, and so walked about with uncovered shoulders. It may well be that they decided that a woman who walked about like that deserved all that she got.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 

Current mood:  amused
Category: Blogging
An extract from the community newsletter of Great Blakenham, a small village in Suffolk where my parents live. I shudder at the thought of them living in such a dangerous area, rife with violent crime.


"During the month of July, there were four crimes of note in the area.
During the day on Friday 3rd July, a newspaper was taken from a letterbox in the side passageway of an address in Gipping Road.
Overnight Tuesday 7th to Wednesday 8th July, damage was caused to a vehicle whilst parked in the car park of a public house on Stowmarket Road. Damage was caused by a sharp instrument being used to scratch the vehicle.
Overnight Wednesday 8th to Thursday 9th July, damage was caused to a plant pot in the rear garden of an address on Stowmarket Road.
Between Sunday 26th and Tuesday 28th July, entry was gained to the village hall by the side door being forced and confectionary items were taken."

The Bronx, it ain't. Somebody please get me a job with the Suffolk Constabulary.
Sunday, August 09, 2009 

Current mood:  worried
Category: Jobs, Work, Careers
This is a genuine conversation I had with a ten-year-old girl while working behind the bar at the local yacht club yesterday afternoon. Bear in mind that this child is the daughter of extremely wealthy, upper-middle-class parents (I mean, it is a yacht club, for crying out loud) and most likely goes to some very posh private prep school.



Child: "May I have a Mars Bar, please?"

Zoe: "Of course." *hands child the Mars Bar* "That's fifty pence, please."

Child: *looks horrified* "But I haven't got fifty pounds!"

Zoe: *laughing* "No, sorry, I said fifty pence."

Child: *confusion, perplexity and bewilderment all fight for space on the child's face* "What's 'pence'?"

Zoe: *trying to conceal horror* "Fifty pee."

Child: "Oh, right..." *hands over 50p and walks away with Mars Bar*



I mean, really.
Friday, July 31, 2009 

Current mood:  happy
Category: Jobs, Work, Careers
As part of my attempts to mingle within the newfound bellydance community in East Anglia, I went along to a hafla in a nearby town, run by another teacher. It was a wonderful opportunity to see what other dancers are up to, and also to talk to people who share my enthusiasm for this beautiful artform.

The teacher was really, really lovely and instantly made me want to hug her by coming up to me and saying that I must be a teacher because I walk like a dancer. Flattery really does get you everywhere. But what was most interesting was taking part in a mini workshop after the performances, just to see how other people teach.

She has a completely different teaching style to mine: far more bubbly and extravagent. While I do laugh and joke, trying to put my learners at ease, I tend to be more restrained and delicate, particularly when talking about certain movements or body parts. I think, more than anything, these differences represent our various specialities: while I favour the slow, graceful, almost ballet-like Lebanese dances, she tend to dance Cabaret style (ie how most of the Bellydance Superstars dance) which is much more brazen and sexy, mostly because it's American.

So while I try to steer clear of the sexy side of bellydance, emphasising instead sensuality and feminity, she completely embraced it, telling us to fling our backsides out, "like you want to be spanked," and, "think naughty thoughts... imagine you're rubbing up against a lovely, manly thigh". I describe certain moves in terms of 'ribs' and 'chest', trying to keep things tactful; she said yah-boo-sucks to all that and told us let our boobs wobble all over the place. And of course, both teaching styles have their qualities, and are perhaps suited to different people - teachers as well as learners. I certainly had good fun trying things her way, though I can't say I'll be telling my own class to, "imagine you've dipped your tits in paint and you're trying to smear it on a fence," any time soon as they'd probably be rather shocked...

Even as a teacher, I'm learning all the time, be it from workshops like these, the summer school I'm attending in August, or my own research. Sometimes, inspiration comes from the most unlikely of sources, including my own pupils. During one class, I was having real difficulty explaining how to do a vertical rib circle; no matter how much I broke it down or how slowly we did it, they just couldn't get it. That is, until one bright spark piped up, "Wait, I think I've got it... Just imagine you're wearing a bra with tassles on it and you want to make them fly round." Instantly, everyone could execute a damn near perfect vertical rib circle, all because of that brilliant image, which appealed to a very natural action, yet I had over-complicated it by breaking it down.

I like to think I'm growing as a teacher; I'm certain that both my teaching and dancing have improved since last year already, even without taking any classes myself. But I also know there's a lot to learn. One of the hardest things is learning not to be selfish as a teacher. At the last hafla, I did a couple of solos - partly to give my students a break, partly to give them a demonstration of more advanced dancing, partly because I'm a natural show-off. And they were extremely difficult to choreograph because I had to make them quite impressive to give them something to aspire to (and to justify my class fees!) while not being so complicated that they showed up my students (who were beginners) or made them feel inadequate in comparison. I've had the same problem this year; I already have a tabla solo choreographed, but I had to tone it down several notches because, though I want to show off everything I can do, a hafla my students are also dancing at is not the time nor place to do it.

My latest difficulty has been teaching styles I don't like or, to some extent, agree with. Mostly I go for the usual safe options: modern and classical Egyptian, Turkish, tribal (that's actual tribal, not American Tribal - I'm just not gothy enough to teach that), Lebanese, Bollywood, Flamenco fusion etc. But I've made myself teach them a bit of Cabaret too this year because, while running my hands through my hair and pouting like a glamour model while I do suggestive pelvic rolls isn't really my thing (or at least, not on stage!), it is a valid and popular form of bellydance and it's right that I introduce my students to it in as unbiased a way as possible. I'm still deciding whether I can bear to stoop to the levels (literally as well as metaphorically) of teaching them floor-work, which is widely used in American belly-dance but which always makes me wince because, well, it just ain't classy. We shall see.
Monday, July 27, 2009 

Current mood:  tired
Category: News and Politics
A surprisingly prescient extract from the marvellous Bill Bryson's even more marvellous 'A Short History Of Nearly Everything', published 2003 and which I've only just got around to reading:

"It is sometimes called the Great Swine Flu epidemic and sometimes the Great Spanish Flu epidemic, but in either case it was ferocious. The First World War killed 21 million people in four years; swine flu did the same in its first four months. Almost 80 per cent of American casualties in the First World War came not from enemy fire, but from flu.

...Viruses hide out unnoticed in populations of wild animals before trying their hand at a new generation of humans. No-one can rule out the possibility that the great swine flu epidemic might once again rear its head."
Monday, July 13, 2009 

Current mood:  happy
Category: Blogging
Proper commenty blogs will return at some point, I promise, but life has been strangely hectic at the moment. In the meantime, if you'll allow me, I'd like to indulge in a quick update of what's been going on in my life lately.
* * *
Last Wednesday, my mother and I participated in the Cancer Research Race For Life, along with her workmates at Jackson Civil Engineering (hence why we all did it in bright pink hi-vis jackets). It was a massive undertaking for her to walk three miles* and she had her walking stick with her, but she managed it. As we crossed the finish line, almost the last ones to finish, I was so incredibly proud of her. Two years ago, she couldn't make it to the end of the garden, and yet now she somehow found the strength to walk three miles.

 

* * *
I have finally heard from the school in France where I'll be teaching: it's the Lycee Rene Cassin in Montfort-sur-Meu, near Rennes. A Lycee is a sixth-form college so I'll be teaching small groups of pupils between the ages of about 15 and 18, which is absolutely perfect for me, since I would prefer to teach older pupils in any case as there is more scope for creativity in my lessons. Montfort is a small town, but I'm lucky enough to have accommodation provided for me in the shape of a one-bed apartment on the school premises (which may, admittedly, turn out to be a curse rather than a blessing). My contract starts on 1st October, but I'll be heading out to Brittany in late September. It's bloody scary how quickly it's approaching, but exciting nevertheless.
* * *
I've been teaching bellydancing once again in my local village, and also started up a second night in another town near Ipswich, which has been going well so far. But most exciting of all is the fact that I've been asked to teach at the Heart & Soul Dance Festival in Ipswich in August. It'll be my biggest gig yet, teaching both beginners and semi-professionals like myself, so no room for error. I'll be teaching Greek-style fire dance, but before you get your hopes up, it's not a pyromaniac's answer to Stavros Flatley, but rather a slow, sensual dance with candles. If anyone's interested in either coming to my class or one of the others - there'll be brilliant teachers there doing sword dancing, flamenco, bollywood etc - the info is here.
* * *
In more recent news, I can now say I have lived, having cycled through York at 40 miles an hour on a tandem, singing 'Daisy, Daisy'. It's something everyone should do at least once.



* The entry form explained that the course was 3 miles/5 km and she's still getting ribbed about the fact that she couldn't decide which distance to walk.
Monday, July 06, 2009 

Current mood:  hopeful
Category: Goals, Plans, Hopes
What, you didn't really think I'd give up trying to take over the world, did you?

As I'm sure you're aware, America and Russia have just signed an agreement to reduce their nuclear warheads to between 1,500 and 1,675. Which is all very lovely, of course, but an incorrigible power-crazed megalomaniac like me can't help but prick up her ears at this news and ask oh-so-nonchantly, "So, if you won't be needing them any more, I don't suppose you would mind if I...? Thank you so much."

And so I shall dress up as an official-looking cockney dustman*, in a charming little flat-cap-and-hi-vis-jacket number, turning up at both the White House and the Kremlin with a van and a clipboard to take away the warheads "to be destroyed". No one shall question the authority of a cockney dustman, and they wouldn't understand my cockney reply even if they did, so I shall get away scot-free with, ooh, 1,400 or so warheads between the two of them. Lovely jubbly. (See? I'm in character already)

But that's not quite enough, so I shall then implement the second part of my plan. I shall convince Mr Obama that all this brotherly love and 'resetting' of relationships is a damn good idea, and begin giving him relationship counselling with all the other nuclear-weapons-wielding nations his predecessor managed to piss off. We'll start off with some easy NPT ones, like France and China, and then move on to India, Pakistan, North Korea*** and Israel. Hell, why not even do Iraq as well, and make them promise to give up the nuclear weapons they don't have?

As the entire world bathes in the tears of their own joy as they finally settle their differences, promising to love one another and join together in perfect harmony in a rendition of a beautiful peace song for the Earth (maybe one of Michael Jackson's numbers as he's in the news a lot at the moment for some reason), I shall quietly go about collecting all the tossed-aside warheads and arranging them neatly around my HQ. The world will have a brief moment of glorious unity before I announce that they'd better stop singing and start working on gold doubloons to fill my swimming pool or I'll blow them all to smithereens. Mwahahaha.






* It is a well-known fact** that all dustmen of all nationalities on this planet are cockneys. It doesn't matter where they live; they are born with the innate ability to shout incomprehensibly at 6 in the morning to wake you up, and to always sound like they're starting a fight even when they're complimenting you on your shoes. Similarly, all chimney sweeps and greengrocers are cockneys too.

** Whose truth is less well-known.

*** Which will be worth it just for the hilarity of the relationship counselling sessions wherein I shall manipulate Kim Jong Il into admitting that sometimes he really does feel ronery.
Monday, June 29, 2009 

Current mood:  grateful
Category: School, College, Greek
To all those who supported my peers and I in our campaign to save Linguistics at Sussex, I offer you my heartiest of thanks: we did it!

Just to recap, at the end of the Spring term, the university made the shock decision to close its most successful degree programme, which was ranked 2nd in the UK, even beating Oxford. The idiocy of such a decision aside - with all its financial and practical consequences - what students and staff protested against most was the way in which it was made. At no point was proper procedure followed; no committees, staff or unions were consulted or given the opportunity to appeal or suggest alternative measures. Indeed, the university could not seem to make up its mind as to who made the decision in the first place; we were told at various times that it was the Vice-Chancellor using Chair's Action (AKA The Finger Of God), that it was the English department (who denied all knowledge of this), that it was the finance department (who also denied this, agreeing that it was a financial disaster to cut the department most likely to gain funding) and various other titbits of codswallop. Furthermore, the announcement was made just a few days before the end of term, in what we believe to be a deliberate move to make protesting difficult for the staff and students affected.

This attempt to quash the right to protest set a precedent for the university. At each rally, a ludicrously disproportionate number of security guards were posted to stop us rioting, which we had no intention of doing. A music festival with the aim of raising awareness of the campaign (at which I was supposed to be bellydancing) was forcibly cancelled by the university at the last minute, despite it being on Student Union property and a peaceful event. A number of students occupied a patch of grass near the front of campus, named the Camp Against Cuts, but were physically evicted - by an outside security firm, I might add, as the campus security guards were in agreement with us - prosecuted, and banned from coming on to campus except for lessons.

Yet these attempts, along with the petition that so many of you signed and for which I am eternally grateful, put pressure on the university to pay attention to us. We were told that the Teaching & Learning Committe would decide whether or not to ratify the decision. Despite the university's attempts to keep the time and location secret, we found it out and went along for a silent protest. It worked; the Committee voted to keep Linguistics and suddenly the university remembered that of course it wasn't that committee who decided, but rather the next ones up, the University Teaching & Learning Committee. The ones they'd told us not to bother lobbying because such an issue was 'under their radar'.

So we went along to that Committee meeting* and were unsurprised to learn that, after another vote to keep Linguistics, the university decided to take it to the highest level of all - the one they'd deliberately delayed the announcement to avoid it being discussed at the previous time - Senate.

And it worked. Senate heard our case and agreed that it was a badly-made decision, calling it a perfect example of how not to make important decisions. In the end, a compromise was reached: Linguistics will not be a degree programme in its own right, but all the courses that comprise it will continue at Sussex indefinitely, as part of interdisciplinary degrees, including English Language. It's not perfect, but it's a victory of sorts, and it's certainly a start.

Because of this, our hardworking faculty are guaranteed job security, rather than the threat of being tossed out in two years. It also means that first years starting four-year degrees won't face the prospect of having to switch their degrees to English Language or, worse, complete them at Brighton University with the new institution name appearing on their degrees.** And, if Linguistics will continue to be taught - and students will continue to come to learn it - there is always a chance that they might reconsider and reinstate the degree. We can only hope. In the meantime, thank you all.





* And had some good old-fashioned chanting. "You say cut-back, we say fight back!" etc. Very bizarre for me as I'm far too English to chant, plus it generally doesn't work in an RP accent, but I gave it a go anyway. If anyone's heard the Tom Lehrer genteel football fight song Fight Fiercely, Harvard, that might give you an idea of what I sounded like.

** A bit like starting a degree at Oxford, and then being told halfway through that you'll get a degree from Oxford Brookes.
Friday, June 26, 2009 

Current mood:  amused
Category: Music
When I log into Myspace, an advert announces:




Join Dizzee in silent protest

Stand up alongside Dizzee Rascal and Doves in silent protest against music torture


Further investigation revealed that this is, in fact, a campaign against the US military's use of loud music as part of sleep deprivation-based interrogation techniques and not, as I had first assumed, a protest against the release of Paris Hilton's new album.