Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 24
Sign: Scorpio
City: ROANOKE
State: VIRGINIA
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/29/2006
|
|
|
|
Thursday, August 16, 2007
 |
Category: News and Politics
Briefing on the income tax: The United Stated first flirted with an income tax during the Civil War as a way to gather funds quickly for the war effort; it was imposed on Aug. 5th 1861. In 1895 Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, the Supreme Court ruled that the property income tax, being enforced at the time was an example of a direct tax, which was not properly apportioned among the states by population, thus it was found unconstitutional. This decision made it very difficult for Congress to enact a national income tax, because the Supreme Court would have considered that to also be a direct tax. This was true until the 16th Amendment came along in 1913. The 16th Amendment essentially removed the roadblock that was Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company. It gave congress the power to tax every American's labor, and after a somewhat debatable State ratification procedure, the Congress had their national income tax. It was not until World War II when Congress introduced payroll withholding, which was really the icing on the cake for them. Payroll withholding enabled the government to take your money directly from your paycheck without you ever seeing it (many Americans today don't even realize what is withheld was their money to begin with). The entire process of Congress generating a national income tax is honestly controversial, examples that confirm this consist of: late night Congressional deals that resulted in the weeding out of opposition so that the votes necessary to impose the income tax could be acquired, the ratification of the 16th Amendment, which still cannot be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, and ultimately the government consistently thought they needed to sell this deal to the American people by hiding behind patriotism in times of war, but they never planned to repeal any of this "War Time" fundraising. These examples clearly show that our government didn't want the American people to know what this ugly thing really was, because if they did the income tax would have never left the floor of Capitol Hill. So they deceived the American people and they did it by using America's undying patriotism as a weapon against itself.
The Unconstitutionality Of The Income Tax: A direct tax is in the constitutional sense, a tax on property "by reason of its ownership". An indirect tax by definition is a type of tax charged on goods produced within the country. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution, also known as the Taxing and Spending Clause states "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States." It seems obvious that our founding fathers intended for our national tax system to be a national sales tax. Congress has overstepped their boundaries with the 16th amendment and completely contradicted Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 of the constitution, which states, "No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken." The 16th amendment states, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." It is clear that the 16th amendment is a direct contradiction of the Constitution. An amendment, by Constitutional standards is appended onto the original body of the text. An amendment is not meant to repeal the original text! Our Constitution has been interpreted in a manner that gives precedence over the original text, but the entire document is implemental. Under these principles, the 16th amendment is unconstitutional and should be challenged. The income tax is unconstitutional in other facets as well. For instance, if you don't file a W-2 or a 1040 with the IRS then you are liable to go to prison and then still have to pay your back taxes. This is a direct violation of The 5th amendment which states " No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury". Basically it is unconstitutional to be forced to self-incriminate yourself. It is also unconstitutional for the Federal government to keep records on its citizens. The records that the IRS keep on Americans is unconstitutional by our interpretation of Article 4, Section 1 which reads, " Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof." The national income tax is in direct violation of this nation primary guiding document: To add a little insult to injury, there is not a law in the books that requires Americans to pay an income tax at all. The United States tax code enforced by the I.R.S. calls paying an income tax voluntary, not a requirement. How about that?
Solutions: ·Get rid of the Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank), which is the sole recipient of the revenue gathered from the national income tax. The debt and interest owed by the U.S.A. would be nonexistent if congress would regain their constitutional right to coin currency. ·Dump the IRS and the national income tax (the interest bill and collection agency of the fed.) ·Implement a constitutional indirect national sales tax (fair tax) and/or constitutional direct tax (flat tax). ·Hold the government accountable for the collection of revenue and how it is utilized (no taxation without representation!)
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
 |
Briefing on the FEDERAL RESERVE: In the year 1791, Congress passed a bill backed by then Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton. This bill created the largest banking corporation of its time, the First National Bank of the United States. The bank was influenced by big money interest at the time and tenured by a twenty-year charter expiring in 1811. Under pressure from the American people the charter was not renewed. Moving forward to 1816, under the influence of big money interests once again, Congress passed another chartered bill creating the Second Bank of the United States. This bill met much opposition from the American people like the First National Bank. In 1828, President-elect Andrew Jackson led a successful campaign against this centralized bank with much support from the American public. The tenure of the bill expired in 1836 and was not renewed. The American people won and state-chartered banks along with privately developed "free banks" become vastly popular all across the country. During the Civil War Congress established national banks requiring the currency issued to be backed by government securities as to help trade amongst the states. The act was amended to enforce taxation of state currency while keeping the national notes tax-free. From the time period of 1862 until 1913 a collective of national banks joined forces under the National Banking Act of 1863 due to various financial scares such as the bank panic of 1907. A congressional investigation was carried out by Republican Senator Nelson Aldrich to find a solution to secure the nation's economy. The first step in this effort was the National Monetary Commission, headed by Nelson Aldrich himself. The mission statement was simple, to find a path to banking reform. Senator Aldrich set up two divisions within the commission, one to the study the American banking system and another to study various European banking systems. Aldrich became fond of the German centralized bank and brought back with him to America the general concept of a federalized central banking system. Of course there were many dissenters of this bill and it did not seem to have a chance of passing through Congress until Senator Aldrich, with the help of a few notable financiers came up with a plan, which was hatched in secrecy. The mentioned financiers included such executives as Frank Vanderlip, president of National City Bank (Rockefeller funded), Henry Davison, senior partner of J. P. Morgan & Company, Charles D. Norton, president of First National Bank of New York, and Colonel Edward House, future advisor to Wilson and founder of the Council on Foreign Relations. Paul Warburg, German banker extraordinaire and representative of Kuhn, Loeb & Company, led the discussions and helped draft the secretive plan. They met on the private Jeckyll Island off the southern tip of Georgia. Held up for 10 days, these powerful men devised a plan for our nation's economic future with only one elected official (Senator Aldrich) taking part in the molding thereof. The Aldrich Bill, partly drafted and fully sponsored by Senator Aldrich, was put before Congress and failed to pass. This minor defeat did not stop Senator Aldrich's plan to create the first privately owned central bank in American history. Appeasing Congress Aldrich made a few changes to the bill in order for it to be deemed acceptable. Congress with the help of newly elected president Woodrow Wilson passed the Aldrich Bill as the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, giving away the power of Congress to coin money. This bill much like the two before it did not set well with the American people and rural bankers. Many claimed the bill gave too much power and influence to the banking elite and eastern banking systems. Supporters of the new bill claimed it took away the power the New York bankers possessed over the currency, when in fact it was those same bankers who had helped draft the bill. When President Warren Harding took office after defeating Woodrow Wilson in the 1920 election he brought to office with him a time of great economic prosperity also known as the "roaring twenties". This expansion of wealth was due to the Federal Reserve's experiment with what was called "debt-money", money the Federal Reserve had loaned the country during World War 1. To make matters worse for our national debt Fractional Reserve Banking made it possible for the Federal Reserve to increase money supply by 61% over the course of three years, lowering the value of currency unknowingly to the public but making the notes more readily available to all. With this rise in the amount of currency came a rise in banking loans and stock market interests. The economy seemed to be booming to the public but one thing they failed to realize was with more notes comes less value for the dollar. This provided an opportunity for the Fed. to convert to a monetary policy of open market operations and the ability to purchase large government bonds through scare tactics of a threatening recession. Now flash forward to August of 1929, through the continuous buying of government bonds America's money supply began to tighten. With this insider perspective many of America's big banking moguls began to divest in the stock market and converted much of their wealth to cash and gold in order to keep their personal worth. While other stock holders on Wall Street placed 24-hour "call loans" forcing them to sell their stocks at only a fraction of above the loan not making much profit. The stock market then began to collapse and crashed on what is now known as "Black Thursday" resulting to a very dark time for America know as the Great Depression. On March 9th, 1933 President Franklin Roosevelt enacted the Emergency Banking Act (48 Stat. 1, Public law 89-719) declaring the federal government of the United States bankrupt and insolvent. Subsequently Congress enacted HJR 192 making all debts, public and private alike, no longer payable in gold replacing it with the un-backed Federal Reserve note. Ever since June 5th, 1933 (the date HJR 192 was enacted) the Federal Reserve note otherwise known as the dollar bill has become the legal tender for the United States although it has no true value. Why does the dollar bill not have any true value you ask? The gold was confiscated from the American people and government. As demanded by the Federal Reserve President Roosevelt issued presidential order 6102 on April 5th, 1933 that ordered all American citizens to give all their gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates to the various Federal Reserve banks all through out the country by April 28, 1933. Anyone who violated to corrupt the presidential order would be fined up to $10,000 or face up to ten years in jail. In some cases the violators faced both depending on the amount of gold still in their possession. This is shocking because Americans were being forced to turn over their hard earned private property! Shortly after receiving the gold stolen from the citizens of this country the Federal Reserve offered and sold the gold to non-U.S. citizens and foreign interests for $35 an ounce an amount that was well over what an ounce of gold was worth at that time! Since then the government has been allowed to keep this cycle going, by continuing to pay this interest owed to the Federal Reserve by the means of taxing the American people's labor! This is taken care of by the Federal Income Tax and the Federal Reserve's own collecting and policing agency, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS). THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE: The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional for a number of reasons. The most obvious display is that of Congress that passed the Federal Reserve Act, created on December 23rd, 1913, without the required Constitutional amendment (which if passed would have remained unconstitutional as well, much like the 16th amendment). Congress, and Congress alone have the constitutional power to coin, distribute, and determine the value of this country's currency! Not a private bank! Not a non-governing entity, In fact a court case has deemed it so, on December 7th, 1968 the "Credit River Decision" handed down by the Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Justice Martin V. Mahoney in the case of First National Bank of Montgomery Vs. Jerome Daly considered that the Federal Reserve's power to "create money out of thin air" was unconstitutional on both the State and Federal levels. Therefore declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and state bonds held by the Federal Reserve, national, and state banks to be null and void. Obviously this case set the precedent in the State of Minnesota, a precedent that has clearly been ignored to this day, if that were the case then nobody would be paying their mortgage at all. Solutions: - Get rid of the Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank), which is the sole recipient of the revenue gathered from the national income tax. The debt and interest owed by the U.S.A. would be nonexistent if congress would regain their constitutional right to coin currency.
- Dump the IRS and the national income tax (the interest bill and collection agency of the fed.)
- Implement a constitutional indirect national sales tax (fair tax) and/or constitutional direct tax (flat tax).
- Hold the government accountable for the collection of revenue and how it is utilized (no taxation without representation!)
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, March 09, 2007
 |
Reasons for Bush Impeachment:
- Bush did not receive support for the invasion of Iraq from the Security Council. Defying the U.N. he went ahead with his plans with disasterous consequences. - Bush has gone against many international treaties such as the Anti-Ballistic Missile and Germ Warfare convenents. - Bush's threats of atomic fire power against Iran is in complete disregard to the pledge Reagan made stating America would never start a nuclear war. - The Bush Administration has advocated and exercised illegal "eaves dropping" otherwise referred to as wire-tapping in the name of the War on Terror. - Bush's approval of the unconstitutional Patriot Act is a complete invasion of privacy and loss of rights. Promoting "eaves dropping" as well as monitoring computer and mail activities. - Bush's approval of the unconstitutional Military Commissions Act of 2006 suspends habeus corpus, advocates torture of detainees, and places restrictions on 9 out of the first 10 amendments to our Bill of Rights. - Bush's policing approach to spread democracy across the world to "failed states" is unconstitutional. - Bush's false claims stating Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction to this day hold no water. - The Guantanamo Bay tortures which are still taking place.
It is our duty as Americans to ensure we restore and keep a republic, not a democracy. Democracy leads to chaos because it is limitless. A republic places restrictions on government thus ensuring the right of the citizens. A republic means less secrecy and power on the government's behalf and more liberty and security to the nation's citizens. A republic is what our fore fathers entended us to be, this is why we have our constitution. To place restrictions on our government to ensure our liberty. Let's not lose that.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
 |
There is a dangerous riptide that is carving its way into the landscapes across our United States of America. This violent surge consists of the conservative talking heads that flood our radios and nightly news channels with arrogant and rhetorical party lines, and their equally hazardous whiny nay-saying baby counterparts. This mammoth wall of slippery slope sludge and parasitical opportunists is also is made up of spineless United States Congressmen, -women, and Senators that consistently remain in a state of flip flopping adherence to popular opinion polls and current Capitol trends. The lacerating edge of this all-to-consuming wave is the unhinged executive branch of this country that goes about simply altering, discrediting, or just all-together washing away any inconvenient roadblock that might immobilize their vehicle for imposing (executive orders) monarchial decrees. But now allow me to inform you about the source of this abominable tsunami of injustices. This riptide is the direct result of the apathetic and sloth-like tendencies of the gimmy! gimmy! entitlement generations have invoked a powerful quake that has set this surge in motion. The prevailing winds apparently point to the fact that Americans no longer wish to bear the "tedious chore" of being self-reliant and solely responsible for our health, our money, our families, our God given liberties, and the "laborious task" of creating success for ourselves. Rather our country folk would prefer to align themselves with the over-populated ranks that wish to surrender everything that the fleeting autonomous individuals of our society have fought to retain. Are we to believe that the majority of this country really wants to ride this destructive wave in? If so after this surrender of American dignity is over and everything that makes this country great has been completely purged from existence, these leaches will bask at the feet of your elected government, as the people that claim to represent you will expedited the redistribution of your forfeited hard earned income, and you will watch them…. powerless, as they suck you and other just like you bone dry. If this is a lingering persuasion, then you can mark my words the constitutionalists of this country will be nothing more than batteries, reluctantly enabling and funding the dominance of the controllable masses.
Matthew McMillan of Project Take America Back
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, January 04, 2007
 |
Taken from DownsizeDC.org ..... "The battle resumes now. A new Congress begins tomorrow. The Republic is in grave danger because the new leadership wants to make up for twelve years out of power. They're promising five day work weeks instead of four. And they're scheduling no extended breaks until August. Worst of all, they're kicking it all off with a 100-hour ORGY of legislation -- seven or eight bills, totaling nearly 400 pages of dense legalese filled with new boondoggles, more regulations, and increased spending. Little or no time will be provided to debate these bills, and virtually no time will be allotted to actually reading and studying them. Of course, we believe Congress should slow down long enough to READ THE BILLS. But there's no way a new Congress can read, understand, and debate so much legislation so quickly. The 100-HR Orgy really means the Democrats are about to prove that they can be just as irresponsible as the Republicans. Speaker Pelosi and the new Democratic Majority need to SLOW DOWN." We need to realize how horrible this is. This is no time to sit there and say, "Oh that's horrible, this country is going down." That accomplishes nothing! Call your Senators and Representatives and tell them to slow down! They have quite a while to make a change, if they decide to do it at all. What we need to realize here is that our Senators and Reps do not read the bills that often, their staffers do and then dictate it to them. This last Congress just turned down a bill that would require them to read the entire bill. In this 100 hour legislation extravaganza most if any of the bills will be read but simply paraphrased and voted on specifically on that basis. What people and CONGRESS fail to realize is that disaster can be found in the fine print. Let's take the REAL ID ACT that is being passed under a disaster relief bill as an example. Congress' job is to make the laws, have them be in accordance with the Constitution, and have them be in best interest of the people. The people can oust a bill before it is put into action. Contact your Senators and Reps and tell them to slow down, read the bills, and do their jobs to the best of their abilities! Take America back! Do not be afraid of big government, Sean Poff of Project Take America Back
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|