MySpace
myspace music


Gabriel



Last Updated: 10/29/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: BROOKLYN
State: New York
Country: US
Signup Date: 2/8/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Thursday, September 17, 2009 
Just woke up too early and thought I'd check into the old blog before going back to sleep.

As earlier, I had entered in info for a tour of Europe with Naomi Shelton & The Gospel Queens.  So I checked out the ole' myspace blog again. 

I did a little editing.

I've got the writer's bug in me.  Happens each Autumn.  

So I edited one past blog but want to add here.

–––––––––––––––

That I really like Jim Campilongo's playing.  In a past post I wrote in a brief feeling comparing his style with these "modern jazz" guys like Rosenwinkle.  But I didn't quite express it the way i wanted to.

When I write that Jim is approachable, I mean that harmonically.  He is not using patterns and scales to outline outside harmonies played really, really fast.  He's not sitting around thinking, "those guys did this mode, so where can i take this next modal thingy-magoo."

He is using the scales and patterns we all do.  And he does take them "out" and creates great and very interesting harmony and lines.  But it doesn't sound like predetermined patterns to go for a certain sound.  He's telling the story and some parts call for diminished or whole-tone ideas, and others call for a country-style, and some for a darker-toned jazz phrased approach.  

i've been trying to see him every Monday at the Living Room.  I finish rehearsal with the Queens at 10pm in Crown Heights and its really convenient to get there.

His group is great and through the summer its been a real pleasure watching him workout with the group.  Mr. and Mrs. Mouse is my favorite tune.  Its got this pulse in one part that is just delicate, pretty, but tough at the same time.  

Hamster Wheel has a great country groove.  A lot of his tunes do, actually.  

Its been great really getting to know his tunes, hearing them, the group locking in week after week.

See, he's been doing this weekly gig for years.  Maybe 5?  And in general, summers are a time to shop/ shed, workout a group and iron out kinks and such.  Because a lot of folks are away.  You'll get tourists and fans, but in general, it don't bring as many people to the gig, the summer months.  That's just the way.  And Jim's a bandleader, knowing its a nice opportunity for him and the group to nail the songs.  Its what the top groups do.  

And then when last Monday rolled around, I went and there was a great energy.  The place was packed as it is in fall with the return of the populace.  And Campilongo and the guys responded.  They played their set and expanded the songs in really interesting ways.  It was great to see this.

Its kind of like Brando in Street Car.  People are blown away by the intensity and they should be.  They are blown away by the rawness and the seemingly spontaneous energy.  And its there.

But before the movie, Brando was doing this as a play for what?  A year?  More?  I mean, its the the time you put into anything that allows you the freedom to stretch.

That's what I love about Campilongo and his group.  It just makes sense.  They play a kind of "working man's" jazz.  Its got country, blues and some sonic "outside" playing that will blow you away.  But its not trying to sound different or "out there" for the sake of it.  It sounds like it should.  Its honest music and these are honest musicians.  

Or to put it another way: its a bunch of guys who want to balance a male identity of response to the glorious ideal Beauty.  There is something eternal, beautiful out there.  For the sake of time, lets just call it art.  Or aesthetics?  Or "Plan 798 code A5er"?  

And when you want to approach Beauty you can do it like a tough guy, a sensitive guy, a direct person, or a shy person.  You're not going to get it in whole, because if you ever did, you would find you wouldn't want it.  And you know this, it all plays into it. 

That's it, then.  Their music has something about the approach to the Ideal. That's what I like about it in very abstract terms that probably only means what I want it to mean to myself.  But that's okay.  

Wow.  5:25.  I'm going back to sleep.  I'll edit this when I wake up mysteriously and can't go back to sleep, sometime a year from now.
Thursday, May 14, 2009 
Hi Hiedi, 

It's good to hear from you. I'm glad you liked the story. I had actually read only the synopsis of the story when we met, and then finished reading it on my i-pod on the trip back. 

I love it too, but I wish that when the velveteen rabbit gets changed into a real rabbit, it isn't quite so magical.

While the ending is pretty and fit for those times, I'd rather he not become a perfect "fairy-like" bunny with a fairy-tale wonderful existence. 

I feel like he should still have a normal bunny life, of munching on grass, hopping around, but also avoiding predators, and just getting old and aging. If he is to become real, can he become fairy-tale real? That loses the empathy for me, the humanist resonance which is all through bit of social parody in the beginning, and throughout. For me, he needs to become real with all the responsibilities of "being real," to choose that life of the rabbit for good or bad, better or worse (till death do him part). 

Then the story becomes heartbreaking in joy and sadness when he sees the boy and the boy sees him, but only the rabbit knows about their past world together (the element of "recognition" so beautiful in any drama). 

In this story, there is a degree of how love brings different world's together, how love fosters these different worlds, nurtures them, how life pulls these worlds apart. And while sad, each "real" person or critter moves on in their world, their existence with love as an active force for seeing more, being more, embracing more of the infinite possibilities out there.  Its not a romantic kind of love, where two people feel together like they've merged with the cosmos and the infinite and this and that.  Its two people (or a boy and a critter, I guess) through a degree of work and love-as-progress actually expand their notion of self to incorporate more of "what's out" is what I'm trying to get at.


The story resonates for me, and helps me to try to verbalize ideas in one of my favorite books, "The Road Less Traveled" by M. Scott Peck, which I'm trying to do above.  And then there are all those poems, like the ones by good ole' "T.S. Elliot."  

I've got your email address, so lets please stay in touch. I still want to hear about St. Lucia. I really like it there, rain or not. I'd like to visit again. And if you come to NY, we should definitely get together for a couple Piton (of course, its better here if your visit coincides with you at 21 years of age, and an influx of Piton into the New York market).

Best,

Gabriel

Wednesday, May 13, 2009 
Hey Mark, 

Thanks for the email and links.  Its fun to be in touch with that sound again.  When I was in jazz school at NYU, back in '99, Kurt was my favorite.  I remember seeing him last Winter at the Iridium.  I never go out to concerts anymore, but I couldn't resist-it was a great show.  

Trends in jazz are real hard for me to pin down.  Kurt and Adam Rogers, I like, along with guys like Mike Stern and Hiram Bullock and (maybe I'm wrong about this), my feeling is that there is a direct line of fusion jazz that treads the fine line between intellectual and emotion.  I guess all music does, but fusion guitar is the trickiest in terms (for me) of taste, probably because you can get so much flash in there, too, along with great balance of lines.  I really like Kurt, and again, its great to get back in touch with that sound.  But I really, really like this guy:



And I think I like him because for one thing he's approachable.  I can do this stuff (and I can't touch Kurt.  I remember a master class he did and the time and dedication he put into it to get to that level is beyond me).  

But man, I really like how Jim Campilongo comes out of country, blues, trad-jazz tradition, where there is heavy adherence to the song itself.  Its not the same as Kurt and those guys at all.  Its not really a thing to compare, in terms of approach and aims and all that jazz.  But man, that traditional sound, through a real pure Fender amp, and then some sonic/harmonic bends, is really ethereal/ surreal for me.  It gets me really hyped about a clean sound, purity, and an approach back to jazz through roots music/ Americana.  And that's why I'm really into Robert Keeley for gear.  I can't remember if we talked about him: http://www.robertkeeley.com/home.php

He mods Boss pedals and does his own.  It seems that the overall thing with Keeley is note clarity.  I have his Fuzz/Overdrive, Ts-808 mod, Tr-2 mod and soon his BD-2 mod.  And the recommended George L. cables.

Can I really hear the difference?  Am I playing out enough to care?  Probably not.  But for me, all this gear is like shopping for really cool shoes.  They won't change my life, but they'll make me feel cool, and a little taller.  

It'll be fun to jam sometime, do some jazz or blues?  And I'll try not to talk your ear off, but I've got so many amp questions.  I just played in the St. Lucia Jazz Festival, and they had a Twin for me, through a PA, and I thought I had all my settings where I wanted them to be, but it didn't quite sound like I wanted.  What I'm hoping for is to buy a Blues Jr. to keep clean all the time, get all my settings how I like them on my pedals, then somehow find a ratio so that I can show up with my pedals, but on a Fender clean house amp and translate my settings at 15watts to 40watts, if that be the case.  I'm sure I'm over thinking the whole thing, but its just a thought.  Anyway, have a great day, and thanks again for being in touch.  

Best,

Gabriel

Tuesday, May 12, 2009 
You know, I just really need to keep up on this blog.  I need to change around my expectations, too.  I'm writing everyday, putting my thoughts out, but lately its just been an email to a friend, and usually concerning guitar tone or thoughts.  Not necessarily unboring.  Not necessarily.  And what do I care if you think I'm boring or not?  I don't even know who you really are, Posterity?  

So, I think the saddest thing would be lost opportunity.  And I get blocked thinking these things have to say something.  But they don't.  They are a blog and a brief record of my thoughts of the day that I can look back upon.

But as a brief record, they aren't really that open or true, I suppose.  I mean, I'm really thinking about a lot of little things that I just don't want to put here.  It just  seems like too much minutia.  Like, I need a new acoustic.  And I'm still trying to figure out my tone on electric guitar with some different pedals, but I'm not even playing out for lead stuff that much (I play a lot, but its a very clean, rhythm sound).

St. Lucia was fun, but it rained the whole time.  But it happened.  It was fun, but do I need to tell the story?  Yeah, funny things happened.  It rained so hard during our set that while playing, the sound guys had to run around and flip over mic stands and push at the bulges forming in the tent, to push the water off the side.  The group after us had to cancel for fear of electrocution, or something.

But the place was beautiful and the people were really nice and lovely all around.

I'd love to go back and really see the place.  I drank the lager, the Piton.  I refused all over types of beer out of loyalty.  It turns out a lot of the islands have their own lager.  I think that's cool.  I sliced up a local plum and put it in a la mexican beer.  I thought it would be a neat marketing spin and could take off.  I want a Piton shirt now, and for this to be a fad, one that the St. Lucians don't actually do, the plum in a Piton. American's love ritual.  I bet we could make it happen,,,

(like how I throw "we" in at the end).

Happy Mother's Day week to all!


Thursday, April 30, 2009 

If everything goes according to plan, the shit will hit the fan at half-past two tomorrow morning.

For the experiment, I'm using 100% horse manure, sourced from an organic farm in upstate New York.  The fan was built by fan-mechanic-guru, William Wilkins; all from found parts stripped from abandoned buildings in his native town of Roanoke, Virginia.

The thrower will be outfitted with lab-grade goggles, one scrungie, and a painter's drop cloth.

It will take place in a large room with the fan in the middle and the thrower at designated distances away.

It will go down like this: 

Toss 1, from 10 feet away: 1 one-pounder tossed underhand to fan.  The fan will be set to moderate speed and as in all throws, the face-plate blade guard will not be on.

Toss 2, from 5 feet away: 2 one-pounders tossed underhand to fan, one at a time.  The fan will be set to high speed.

Toss 3, from 2 feet away:  1 one-pounder tossed overhand to fan.  The fan will be set to ultra-high speed.

Toss 4, from 1 foot away: 2 one-pounders.  The thrower in this case will outstretch his or her arms and with each hand flick the shit into the fan.  

I will be watching all of this and taking notes directly on the other side of the fan.  What I'm looking for in my experiment includes:

Will the thrower actually go through with it?

Will any of the shit hitting the fan somehow project backwards in my direction and at what speeds/ distances?

Will the thrower mutiny and attack me with the horse manure?

Will clean-up be difficult afterwards?

Yup.  I feel well prepared for this experiment.  I feel good about it and my data will analysed, synthesized and hopefully make me a winner.


Tuesday, April 28, 2009 

alright, I had my first rehearsal with Jimmy to go over the tunes.  I've always listened to James Brown but just never learned the songs themselves.

As a matter of fact, I've never really learned the songs I listen to, outside of jazz standards.  I mean, if we were to jam and you'd call out a classic rock or bluegrass or any tune, I could hear the changes, I could play it, but I wouldn't know the actual parts.

Which is a shame, because you have to learn songs in order to get your own playing, your own songwriting together. 

I remember growing up with such an emphasize on individuality and originality as if knowing other people's work, or sounding like someone else was a crime.  "Posing" was the worst thing you could do.  And to some degree "posing" should be called and ridiculed in people when it is a general affection in their manners.  But at the same time, no one is an individual, nothing is created.  Everything is a synthesis of existing ideas and patterns.  We need guides, models, heroes, people and things to emulate.

That being said, even if this particular group's steady guitarist does in fact get his passport to go through, and they don't need me for the St. Lucia gig, to just learn these turns properly is a real blessing.  I've told myself hundreds of times to learn tunes I love, but can't get motivated to do so.  This has got me motivated. 

And now I can show up with other folk and really do the tunes.  If Funk Fred from my regular gig (a guy who played with JB for 33 years), if he wants to just run some tunes, I'll have a lot more options.

And this and that.

And speaking of segues.  You learn because the more people's styles or tunes or whatever you emulate, the more you hold on to what you want to hold on to.  You tend to filter, trusting some sort of innate instinct or perhaps its just judging by what in your daily life makes you successful.  You emulate, absorb and use what you use.

I was coming from Jimmy's in Brownsville and heading over early to the Gospel Queens rehearsal in Crown Heights.  Getting off the train the weather was nice.  Real nice.  I decided it was time to finally embrace the warm weather.  This past hot weekend, I'd been working, so this was my first real time in the sun.  I needed food and went to Popeyes for fried chicken.  It was tasty and felt nice sitting in the sun, the trees, the flowers blossoming; that great spring smell returns.

And I thought about an old essay by Walter Benjamin that many a college kid read.  And I thought: I must rewrite it, subbing the word in the title "art" for something more relevant to today's mindset.

Get ready for your copy of: "Meat in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction."

If i remember correctly, Benjamin, writing in the 30s I think, talks about how art has been revolutionized by mechanical reproduction.  While some may think the Mona Lisa on a postcard is schlocky, he's saying that it enables a socialist view of power structure by directly bringing the possibility of seeing art to the people.  Art, which enables, can now be seen by anybody anywhere.  And while a picture of the Grand Canyon may not be the same as seeing the Grand Canyon in terms of evoking a sublime experience, but maybe its close.

Or maybe I have the argument all convoluted.  I read the thing some nine years ago.  Maybe he's saying that fine art represents a moneyed class based on exclusivity.  And that mechanical reproduction is a democratic means, not necessarily to bring art to people's lives (he's no Matthew Arnold, right?) but to just break down the other hierarchy?   

Point is: can this essay and discourse on art be directed towards factory farming, at least an analogy (and maybe in opposition to Benjamin's ultimate point)? 

If seeing a post card of the Mona Lisa the same as seeing it?  Sure, there is the ambiance, the deifying of the artist and the actual museum experience.  But is that part of the art? 

Secondly, can one reproduce an image, ignoring the texture from the oil, the actual lighting, the closeness to the material?  What is lost when an image is not only taken from its original place, and reprinted in copy, but also mass circulated, part of the popular culture, seen on an everyday basis?

And what about meat?  What happens when an animal is taken from its normal habitat, what chemicals are lost when it is stressed out constantly in its holding pens, eating improperly, led to a pretty terrible death from a really terrible, short existence?

And when the meat is mass circulated?  When it is so part of our everyday that it is mindlessly consumed, so that there is no connection between the eating and the animal? 

And then to break it down (or make it even more sloppy), is the abundance and availability of meat democratic?  Or does it just bring everyone down a notch?

Just asking.

Monday, April 27, 2009 
Scientists quibble over the true nature of the beast, how to fight it, how to keep its menace in check, if it is actually a danger, if it is eternal, if it even is...an is...

Me?  I don't care.  Because I got a good night's sleep last night and I'm up early feeling rested and its a beautiful day and I'm going to drop off my laundry, enjoy the sun a bit and get back to practicing on this day off from work.

That'll teach them a scientists a lesson.  

I've been reading "Tortilla Flat" by John Steinbeck.  It is a charming little book.  I feel like the writing has this wit about that manipulates the omniscience of the narrator around the story in such a stylized way, a way that I happen to write when writing about quirky characters and their quirky actions.  I wonder if this is one of his first novels?  Or one of his more "fun" novels?  Because the similarities in his style in this book (I can't remember how his other books read), reminds me of what I think is fun but amateurish in myself.  

Harumph.  

So anyway.  I got the call from Jimmy Hill.  I have a rehearsal today and another with the group and I can't see how things would go otherwise then planned: flying out with the James Brown All Starz Tribute Band to beautiful St. Lucia for their big festival.  

Sure, its only from the 6th to the 8th, playing on the 7th.  I guess I'll miss seeing Amy Winehouse and sadly, Michael McDonald.  I'm sure they will miss miss seeing me–somehow I think this.  

I guess I'll never be able to play my original tunes written with Michael in mind for him, hoping he'd pick one up, help polish it off and co-write and produce and make us millions off of it.

I guess somebody else will have to sing, "Saturation of Soul."  Who could that be?  Maybe Amy?

Sunday, April 26, 2009 

Some days you have to ask yourself, "Will I get a follow up call from Jimmy Hill and the James Brown All Starz Tribute Band after his initial call four days before about filling in for a gig on St. Lucia in approximately two weeks?"

Man, I hope he calls me back.  I want to go to St. Lucia to play the music of James Brown with a hard hitting band. 

But you know, it doesn't even have to be St. Lucia.  In general, the more James Brown I play, the better I feel.  Maybe its the beat, maybe its being part of the tradition, maybe its the opportunity to lay back and just groove with a solo here and there.  

Or maybe its because destiny has offorded me insight into the new revolution of musical/ religious aesthetics, and like Paul to Jesus retelling the Jesus story some hundred years later, perhaps I am the star child to bring the music of James Brown into focus, into a doctrination that can bring salvation to the cosmos.

Or maybe I just wanna go St. Lucia.  I'm not sure.  But a return call would be exceptional.

G.  

Monday, April 20, 2009 
First of all, somebodies been reading my blogs!  I'm at 67 hits today and its only 3:11?  Who are you?  Reveal yourself to me?  Who has been reading so voraciously? 
 
And with that, I present: "A few things I really, really want."
 
I want a social networking site called something like "Space-Face-Book."  Sure, if you knew my family, you'd know this name to be my mother's catchall phrase for networking sites, but I see where she's going with the name and I believe I have the concept.
 
Its a networking site for the imaginary year 3000!  Everybody posts status updates like, "Just got back from Alpha Centurion 5; what a dump!"  And instead of favorite categories like music and books its something like, korgons and zoobots.  I don't know.
 
In space-face-place, everybody would just have to play along.  It would be part D&D role playing, part reality, and that part of reality that is D&D role play.
 
______________________
 
How about Neurotic-space where you sign up yourself, but also secondary views of yourself to second guess your initial postings.  Like:
Post 1:  Gabriel is enjoying weather
Post 2:  But he knows he should be concentrating on his work
Post 3:  But isn't there some balance, some enjoyment of the day and work time available
Post 4:  Get back to work.
 
See, I can and already do this in any site, but its always in the comment section after my initial statement.  In the Neurotic site, I would have specific different accounts or sub-accounts to post from.
 
__________________
 
And why not Schizo-space?  A social networking site for you and only you and your multiple personalities.  Nobody else can post.  Maybe they can read, but they can't post. 
 
__________________
 
Did you ever play computer games like Sid Meyer's Civilizations?  Or Age of Empires?  I loved those games.  You start out as a small farming tribe, build basic houses, mine for resources, gain knowledge, develop your technology and amass land.  You build armies and destroy your neighbors and build walls and dominate and destroy and dominate and expand and destroy.
 
I'd like to take all the elements to one of those games and switch out the rise of a civilization or empire for a game on wine making.
 
You start with a piece of land.  You can choose what kind of soil, rock, slope you wan to start on.  You choose the grapes and you go through the harvest.  You gain capital and can invest in new technology for picking, for pressing, for bottling.  You choose vinification methods, when to pick.  The computer throws in different weather elements, competition from neighbors, etc. 
 
You have your first harvest, start the vinification process and that continues all while you are getting ready to plant your second crop.  And you have to deal with negociants, reviews, pests, tourists and wine tastings, all while getting into the big details:
 
Will you continue low yield production of your best crop in hopes of achieving a single vineyard status wine of perfect balance whatever style your style may be?  Will you be able to blend from different vineyards for a better than average quaffing wine for the general market?  Will taste trends gear towards your style, be it more dense and fruit-forward or more earth and mineral driven?  Will you gain enough capital to buy other's vineyards and utilize their crop and conquer and destroy and conquer and destroy?
 
I really think kids would be into this game. 
Friday, April 17, 2009 
The thing that cracks me up is that its a beautiful day outside and I'm in the wine store bored, no customers.  I'm hungry.  It's a little past noon. 

I have food in the back, some packaged salmon, an orange, a near empty can of Pringles.  I eat mindlessly, experiencing the flavors but in a dulled sense, with no wonder, no thoughts, no focus on the consumption, the consumee, the interchange.  Just savoring the salty, meatiness and such but half awake.   

And as I empty the crumbs from the Pringle can into my mouth, the act reminds me of sunshine, summer camp, water fights. 

Ah!  It was such fun!  At sleep away camp, an activity planned by the bunks; all the kids from an age group running around splashing and splashing.

Maybe one or two of the rich kids had SuperSoakeres, but there was honor in invention, in empty tennis ball containers, and of course, I preferred empty Pringle cans from care packages my mother and father sent up. 

(Ah!  The care packages, how we all waited at mail time for our lucky day when the stuffed box or envelop was tossed on your bed and you ripped it open with all others watching, and the candy, the goods, and feeling special, picked out and loved by Fate, by parents; such a gift).

The water fights were so fun, so simple.  You'd run into the bathhouse, wait in line with the other kids, fill up your Pringle can, run outside, wait for someone else to pass, and toss it on them.  Then you'd run back into the bathhouse and do it again. 

I don't remember participating and teaming up with others.  In my mind it was each kid for themself.  Everybody was on their own, a level playing field, a play-act imagining what a water-filled war zone would be like.  Just running in, filling up, running out, dowsing and being dowsed and doing it again. 

There was something special in how one moment one was all alone against all others, then a moment later we're back, lined up for our "ammo" refilling patiently in the bathhouse.  There was something almost civic, egalitarian.  I don't remember talking to others, just waiting, then running back out and joining in; back out into the crazy possibilities of splash/ be splashed/ or both at once.  Then more water. 

Maybe that is the source of nostalgia.  I remember these water fights when I was probably nine or ten years old.  It would have been my first time by myself with a bunk for the full month.  The two years before, I'd stay with my dad, a volunteer camp doctor, and only for a week.  I'd hang out with the kids during the day but stay with my dad at night. 

These memories and affection must be rooted in that transition when I had to make friends on my own, when I couldn't quite get over my shyness and fit in.  I couldn't quite have a best friend or small group.  It was just me, part of the bunk of 11 within a larger group of bunks in my age range.  I would interact, participate briefly and return to my mental realm.

In the water fights, though.  I felt we were all there, playing, equal. 

And man it was funny when the cardboard container that is the Pringle can was so soaked through it disintegrated, slowly at first.  It would always start breaking apart at the top, and kind of unravel, the top corner peeling away and that was that,