MySpace


Cory



Last Updated: 6/5/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 37
City: LEES SUMMIT
State: MISSOURI
Country: US
Signup Date: 6/25/2006

My Subscriptions

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Sunday, May 04, 2008 

Category: Life

This is my third season of using Dutch White Clover in my lawn in order to lessen my use of fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, water and do my part to help the local bee population (my daughter isn't so happy about the bees).

The first year was pretty easy because there just wasn't much clover or weeds, so other than the grass thinning out a little, there wasn't much change.  The second year, the clover really took off because there wasn't much competition from grass, but the dandilions, plantain, chickweed, and other lawn weeds were a continual problem.  I tried hand pulling, spot spraying with Trimec and just mowing more often, but really never got control of them.

This year, I did a little more research and found something I never would have expected:  2,4-D the very broadleaf herbicide that spelled the end of clover mix lawns back in the 1950's can be used to control many other broadlead weeds in clover!   There are some qualifiers here, but they're not hard to follow:

1.   Make sure you are only using 2,4-D or 2,4-DB.  Most big box stores and nurseries only sell combination weed control.  If there are any other active ingredients, you will kill the clover too!  I found some at a farm supply store.  The brand name was Amine-400, but there are others.

2.   Use the lowest dosage recommended on the label (this will vary depending on the concentration you are using).

3.   Do not apply when clover is in bloom.

4.   Do not apply more than once a per month.  Once in the spring and once in late summer is about all you can do.

5.  Do not apply in the fall.  If the clover goes into winter before recovering from the 2,4-D application, it will likely not survive the winter.

There will be some injury to the clover, but it will recover in a couple weeks while most of the other weeds will slowly die off.

I know this sounds like cheating.  If one of my goals was to use less herbicide, this seems like the opposite, but the alternative is to spot spray  every couple weeks, hand pull weeds or mow more frequently - none of which were very effective or environmentally friendly.  I figure this is a happy medium.


Saturday, February 09, 2008 

Category: Life

Last spring, I started construction on a solar heated water system for my home.  The goals were simple: Keep the cost under $1000, provide at least 50% of the needed btus used to heat our water, be relatively maintenance free, reliable and finally, it couldn't be an eyesore.

I was partially successful in meeting those goals and with a little more work, all but the first one should be met.

While I have spent about $1200 on the project so far, some of that money was spent building components that didn't end up being used (trial and error can be pricey).  If I omit those expenses, I'd be somewere around $1000 right now.

Durring the summer months, I think I was hitting about 30% of used btus from solar and now that we're in winter, I doubt it's over 10%.  While this is a little disappointing, I have only built and installed one 3'X7' collector so far.  I'm confident with the addition of two more panels, I would be getting around 70% of used btus in the summer and 50% in the winter. 

By keeping the plumbing and electrical as simple as possible, I have succeeded in making it relatively maintenance free.  I check to make sure I haven't lost any propylene glycol way more than I need to because so far I haven't lost any.  The collector pump is controlled by a timed switch (10am to 4pm) and a temperature switch pre-set to 110F on the panel.  If the sun isn't providing much heat, the pump is off.  While this is a crude setup, it cost me less than $40 (ebay can be great for this kind of stuff).  A computer controlled setup starts at around $200 and I'm not convinced it would be more effective.

The heat exchange pump (only used when we actually use hot water) pumps water from the heat storage tank (225 gal. water) to a flat-plate heat exchanger (ebay again) mounted above the gas water heater and is controlled by a switch in the utility room.  This is not exactly how I planned it, but for now, it works.  Later, I'll install count down timer switches in the kitchen, bathrooms and laundry room.  This will allow for easier access and waste less electricity because with the touch of a button, the pump starts and will automatically shut off in 10,20 or 30 minutes.  I considered a flow switch which would have made it totally hands free, but after some research, decided against it (trying to avoid DC power and don't want the pump on for washing hands).

As far as reliability, I'm satisfied.  The only time the system was down was when I drained the collector loop of water and switched to propylene glycol for freeze protection.  Due to some trapped air, it took me a couple days to get it back up and running correctly.

Finally, I'm proud to say it is not an eyesore.  Our house faces east, so the collector is next to the side of our house.  I decided to mount the collector(s) on 4"X4" posts near the ground instead of on the roof for ease of maintenance and plumbing was easy and out of sight.  The frame of the collector is made of wood with several coats of black paint and the pipes and fins of the collector are painted black with a single pane of glass covering it.  I think it looks great, and you have to look for it , so it's not in anyones face.

My only regret so far is my choice of a heat storage tank.  My quest to keep costs down compromised my judgement and I bought a 225 gallon polyethylene tank designed for agricultural use.  It cost me about $200 which is several hundred dollars less than a comparable size tank made of steel, fiberglass or polypropylene.  According to the manufacturer, the tank may soften and deform at 120F.  With three panels, I can see it getting well over 120F in the summer.  I'll have to install an upper limit switch to shut off the pump.



Sunday, December 09, 2007 

Category: News and Politics
As we enter another Presidential election year, the old line proclaiming "If he wins, I'm gonna move to another country." is bound to come from the mouths of the most partisan members of our society.

My question is: Where would you go and why did you pick that place? Do you think they want you there?
Friday, October 19, 2007 

Current mood:Thankful
Category: Life
Long story short:  I dropped my wallet in the Wal-Mart parking lot.  Someone found it and turned it in to the customer service department.  They called my house to let me know I could come and get it.  The man who found it called my house to make sure all $43 was still there when it was returned to me.  It was!

I wish I were home when he called so I could thank him personally, but since I wasn't, I'd like to thank him, and everyone who would have acted as nobly as he did.  Thank You!

Cory



Tuesday, September 18, 2007 

Current mood:  aggravated
Category: News and Politics
Over the last year or so, there have been several incidents involving police officers and tazers that have turned out to be shocking demonstrations of abuse of power.  This last one involving the University of Florida campus police was the straw that broke the camel's back for me.
I have all the respect in the world for the men (and women) in blue and want them to have all the tools they need to keep themselves and the public safe from harm.  When tazers were first made available to the police as an alternative to using their side arms, I was all for it.  The idea that an officer could use a non-lethal weapon to protect himself, the public and even the suspect from serious physical harm when confronted by a dangerous situation seems ideal.
That said, it has become disturbingly clear that Tazers are not always being used to subdue dangerous criminals.  More and more, we are seeing video of police officers using their Tazers as weapons of intimidation and actually using them on people whose only offense is acting unruly.  This is not what I had hoped they would be used for. 
The fact that they are using these weapons with full knowledge that they are probably on camera while doing it makes it abundanly clear they don't even know what they are doing is wrong.  I fear what they may be doing with them when they don't think they are being recorded.
I think it may be time for police chiefs across the country to re-examine their descision to provide these weapons to street cops and limit them to the most serious of situations.
Thats my take.

Don't ask me why the size and font differs within this post.  I tried to fix and couldn't figure it out.  Sorry.  If anyone has any tips on how I can avoid this annoying distraction in the future, I'd be most appreciative if you would share it with me.
Thanks.



Saturday, July 14, 2007 
Wednesday, May 02, 2007 

Category: Food and Restaurants

Bee hives are dying in droves!


While this type of thing apprears to have happened several times in the past, the thought that a mass die-off of honey bees to pollinate certain crops is pretty scary (especially if you like to eat!)

They haven't found a cause for CCD (Colony Collapse Disorder) yet and it seems likely that they won't figure it out for quite a while.  So what should be done about it?  Find alternative pollinators.

Thankfully, there are several other varieties of bees that are very good at pollination and have inhabited North America for many thousands of years.  Honey bees are not native to North America and while we have come to be dependant on their work in pollinating plants, native pollinators have been quietly doing that work as long as there have been plants to pollinate.

With a probable temporary near elimination of honey bees in North America, we need to be setting aside small tracts of land near crops that need to be pollinated that will support a native bee population including alkali bees, leafcutter bees, alfalfa leafcutter bees, bumblebees, sweat bees, squash bees, digger bees, orchard mason bees, shaggy fuzzyfoot bees, carpenter bees and hornfaced bees.  None of these bees can be transported to pollinate crops so they need to live near the target crop and must have other sources of food when the target crop is not in bloom. 

Allowing native plant species to grow on set aside land will provide year round food sources for native bees and leaving that land ungroomed will provide a habitat where native bees can flourish.  Also, many broad spectrum pesticides will need to be used with much more caution not to destroy nearby bee populations.

Restoring a diverse bee population is an insurance policy that could divert a famine like our country has never seen but it will require planning and preparation.


UPDATE:  MYSTERY SOLVED!!!

The blame seems to have been a microscopic parasite from Asia.  The treatment is easy, cheap and effective.  Wonderful news!

www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/43163/story.htm

Saturday, March 24, 2007 

Category: Blogging

I'm okay with that :)


Well, the Clover I seeded last spring and fall is filling in nicely now.  The lawn is going through some changes (withdrawl) that I knew would be coming but it is still difficult to repress the instinct to go buy some high nitrogen fertilizer.  I keep thinking 'maybe if I just put it down at half the rate...'  Perhaps I am the one suffering from withrawl.

Weed control has become a much more time consuming task now that I have to spot spray the weeds instead of spraying the entire lawn.  I expected the Dandilions, Plantains, Chickweed, Creeping Charlie and Violets but I didn't expect the Oxalis to flourish like it has.  Oxalis and Creeping Charlie usually take several applications to kill so I'll be busy this spring.

Two good surprises have been the natural addition of Black Medic and Ladino Clover.  Black Medic is another nitrogen fixing trifolate and is difficult to distinguish from white clover when not in bloom.  My daughter found what she thought was a four leaf clover but it was really a four leaf Medic - probably more common but I'm still impressed!  Ladino Clover is a larger variety of Clover.  I welcome it but know that after a few mowings, it will probably die.

You may be wondering why I want to get rid of Creeping Charlie (another nitrogen fixing ground cover) and Oxalis (a tasty and attractive trifolate).  Creeping Charlie has a coarse look and is not something I want to walk on barefoot.  Oxalis would be a welcome addition if it were a darker shade of green.  Against the background of grass, Clover and Medic, Oxalis stands out like a....well, like a weed ;}

The earthworm population seems to have exploded and the Robins have taken a special liking to my lawn.  My observations are purely ancedotal but so far, I've come to the conclusion that high nitro fertilizers and herbicides are detrimental to the earthworms.

Thats all for now.


Friday, March 02, 2007 

Category: News and Politics
..>1966 ..>
Table E-1. 













Revenues, Outlays, Surpluses, Deficits, and Debt Held by the Public, 1962 to 2006          
(Billions of dollars)
































Deficit (-) or Surplus Debt





On- Social Postal

Held by

Revenues Outlays Budget Security Service  Total the Publica
                             















1962 99.7
106.8
-5.9
-1.3
n.a.
-7.1
248.0
1963 106.6
111.3
-4.0
-0.8
n.a.
-4.8
254.0
1964 112.6
118.5
-6.5
0.6
n.a.
-5.9
256.8
1965 116.8
118.2
-1.6
0.2
n.a.
-1.4
260.8
130.8
134.5
-3.1
-0.6
n.a.
-3.7
263.7
1967 148.8
157.5
-12.6
4.0
n.a.
-8.6
266.6
1968 153.0
178.1
-27.7
2.6
n.a.
-25.2
289.5
1969 186.9
183.6
-0.5
3.7
n.a.
3.2
278.1















1970 192.8
195.6
-8.7
5.9
n.a.
-2.8
283.2
1971 187.1
210.2
-26.1
3.0
n.a.
-23.0
303.0
1972 207.3
230.7
-26.1
3.1
-0.4
-23.4
322.4
1973 230.8
245.7
-15.2
0.5
-0.2
-14.9
340.9
1974 263.2
269.4
-7.2
1.8
-0.8
-6.1
343.7
1975 279.1
332.3
-54.1
2.0
-1.1
-53.2
394.7
1976 298.1
371.8
-69.4
-3.2
-1.1
-73.7
477.4
1977 355.6
409.2
-49.9
-3.9
0.2
-53.7
549.1
1978 399.6
458.7
-55.4
-4.3
0.5
-59.2
607.1
1979 463.3
504.0
-39.6
-2.0
0.9
-40.7
640.3















1980 517.1
590.9
-73.1
-1.1
0.4
-73.8
711.9
1981 599.3
678.2
-73.9
-5.0
-0.1
-79.0
789.4
1982 617.8
745.7
-120.6
-7.9
0.6
-128.0
924.6
1983 600.6
808.4
-207.7
0.2
-0.3
-207.8
1,137.3
1984 666.5
851.9
-185.3
0.3
-0.4
-185.4
1,307.0
1985 734.1
946.4
-221.5
9.4
-0.1
-212.3
1,507.3
1986 769.2
990.4
-237.9
16.7
*
-221.2
1,740.6
1987 854.4
1,004.1
-168.4
19.6
-0.9
-149.7
1,889.8
1988 909.3
1,064.5
-192.3
38.8
-1.7
-155.2
2,051.6
1989 991.2
1,143.8
-205.4
52.4
0.3
-152.6
2,190.7















1990 1,032.1
1,253.1
-277.6
58.2
-1.6
-221.0
2,411.6
1991 1,055.1
1,324.3
-321.4
53.5
-1.3
-269.2
2,689.0
1992 1,091.3
1,381.6
-340.4
50.7
-0.7
-290.3
2,999.7
1993 1,154.5
1,409.5
-300.4
46.8
-1.4
-255.1
3,248.4
1994 1,258.7
1,461.9
-258.8
56.8
-1.1
-203.2
3,433.1
1995 1,351.9
1,515.9
-226.4
60.4
2.0
-164.0
3,604.4
1996 1,453.2
1,560.6
-174.0
66.4
0.2
-107.4
3,734.1
1997 1,579.4
1,601.3
-103.2
81.3
*
-21.9
3,772.3
1998 1,722.0
1,652.7
-29.9
99.4
-0.2
69.3
3,721.1
1999 1,827.6
1,702.0
1.9
124.7
-1.0
125.6
3,632.4















2000 2,025.5
1,789.2
86.4
151.8
-2.0
236.2
3,409.8
2001 1,991.4
1,863.2
-32.4
163.0
-2.3
128.2
3,319.6
2002 1,853.4
2,011.2
-317.4
159.0
0.7
-157.8
3,540.4
2003 1,782.5
2,160.1
-538.4
155.6
5.2
-377.6
3,913.4
2004 1,880.3
2,293.0
-568.0
151.1
4.1
-412.7
4,295.5
2005 2,153.9
2,472.2
-493.6
173.5
1.8
-318.3
4,592.2
2006 2,406.7
2,654.3
-434.0
185.2
1.1
-247.6
4,829.1
                            















Sources:  Congressional Budget Office; Office of Management and Budget.




Note: n.a. = not applicable; * = between zero and $50 million.





















Saturday, February 24, 2007 

Current mood:  hopeful
Category: Life
While I heard of the Fair Tax proposal several years ago, I paid little attention to it because I saw little chance of it ever happening. This past week though, I have been doing our taxes and have come to the conclusion that the tax system currently in use in the United States is so filled with loop-holes, complications, incentives, disincentives, and down right corruption that the entire thing needs to be retired to the history books.

If you haven't heard of the Fair Tax, I'll try to give you a brief summary and a link in case I've sparked your interest.

The Fair Tax would repeal the 16th amendment to the Constitution. The federal income tax and the IRS would be eliminated. All federal tax would then come in the form of a national sales tax of about 23% on all consumer level purchases of new products. Used items and services would not be taxed. Families or individuals would be sent a monthly check equal to 23% of the pro-rated spending up to the poverty level determined by the Health and Human Services department. For example, a family comprised of two adults and two children, would be 'prebated' 23% of $26,400 (poverty level) or $6072 in 12 equal payments. This insures that the poor would literally pay no federal taxes!

23% SALES TAX!!!! ARE YOU NUTS?!?! That was what first went through my head when I first heard of the idea. Then I actually read the rationale behind it and was convinced this would not mean a 23% increase in prices of things I need to live.

You see, we don't see it this way (by design) but in reality, we are paying as much or more in tax on everything we buy now than we would pay under the Fair Tax. Today, we have payroll taxes (FICA and medicare), personal income tax and corporate income tax all rolled into the price of everything we buy today. It doesn't matter if we are rich or poor, those taxes are still part of everything we buy.

Under the Fair Tax, we would know exactly what part of our expenditure is going to the federal government and what is actually paying for the product. Retailers would likely be able to sell items for about 25% less than they do now and when the 23% sales tax is added, there could be a net drop of 2% in the final cost to the consumer.

One change the Fair Tax might bring about that I feel would be especially good for the average American and our environment is a likely reduction in wasteful consumption because of a drop in the cost of services to repair items. Under the Fair Tax, used items would not be taxed nor would the services to repair them. The secondary value of used goods would actually go up and should encourage people to depend less on disposable goods like plastic spoons, butter tubs, pop bottles etc… and encourage people to have things like appliances, computers, cars and houses repaired instead of throwing them away and buying another one. It is a sad reality today that an incredible amount of our trash is only generated because it costs less to buy a new one than it does to repair the old one.

Want to find out more? Link to Fair Tax website.http://www.fairtax.org/
Thursday, February 22, 2007 

Category: News and Politics
Friday, February 16, 2007 

Current mood:Serious
Category: News and Politics
     We can end this debate easily if you just tell me that the radiation emitted from the Sun never ever ever changes.  This issue is never addressed by the sky is falling crowd. 

     Here is why I believe they don't even consider the Sun might be the cause:  If the Sun were the cause there would be no reason to blame wealthy people and to most of the world, you are a wealthy person.  Class warfare has always been a powerful tool of politicians and this is the ultimate weapon in class warfare.

     The whole carbon credit system is based on moving money from wealthy countries to poor countries and getting nothing in exchange - not saving the planet.  If they were really serious, they wouldn't defend the idea of exempting developing countries who's carbon foot print is expanding exponentially like China, India, Indonesia etc...
Link

     Do you really think it is better for the planet to have raw materials shipped halfway around the world, made into finished products (producing as much or more pollution than it did when it was produced here) and then shipped halfway around the world again?  I think it would be more environmentally friendly to mine it here, manufacture it here, use it here and dispose of it here (crazy idea I know).

     Also, with the carbon credit system, we would pay India to tear down a coal-fired power plant to offset our greenhouse gas emissions but not dare to tell them they can't build a new coal-fired power plant.  So they do and we pay them to tear it down too. Ad infinitum.  This is much more wasteful than just letting them keep the origional one and keeping our money (power plants require a lot of material and a lot of energy to build). 
Link

     Don't get me wrong Kevin, I'm all for conservation of resources, cleaner industry, cleaner transportation and eliminating wasteful consumption.  I'm not for hiding a wealth redistribution scheme behind a fake 'Save the Planet' banner.
Saturday, February 10, 2007 

Current mood:  amused
Category: Religion and Philosophy

MR. BRANSON!  I'VE GOT IT!  I'VE GOT IT!

IT'S CALLED A TREE!

Please send the 25 million in US Dollars - I need it quick so I can buy great big airplanes and trot around the globe telling everyone how smart I am like you and your good buddy Algore.

Thanks!

Cory





Saturday, December 16, 2006 

Current mood:  content
Category: News and Politics
One of the fundamental differences between the Left and Right is how they would like to help the disadvantaged members of our society and world. The Left usually agrees that it is the responsibility of government to take care of  the people who do not or cannot take care of themselves.  The Right usually agrees that it is the responsibility of everyone to lend a helping hand to his fellow man. Most people in the middle would ask 'what is the difference? Isn't the government of the people, by the people and for the people?'

The difference is stealing. Not just money but self-esteem.

Imagine if you will that you and your friend Rick were walking downtown to see the Rocky Horror Picture Show for the 23rd time and you happen to run into a homeless man and his dog begging for 42 cents so he can buy some bologna. Your debit card has made carrying a wallet much more comfortable but has left you without a penny to help this poor man. Your sense of obligation won't let you just keep walking. You see that Rick is feeling a little uncomfortable too so you reach into his pocket and take out a $20 bill and hand it to the man. Problem solved. Right?

Wrong! First, you just stole money from your friend! It doesn't matter if you used it to do something good, it is still stealing. Second, you stole your friend Rick's chance to do something good himself. This may not seem like that big of a deal but if you ask people why they don't give money to the poor, many will say 'that's what I pay taxes for' yet nobody I know feels as good about paying taxes as they would after helping a homeless man get something to eat. Last but certainly not least, the homeless man feels no sense of gratitude towards Rick and likely doesn't respect you much either knowing you sacrificed nothing for it.

Gratitude is an interesting feeling. The dictionary defines it as 'appreciative of benefits received". I would add that there is a little bit of good guilt that comes along with it. It is this good guilt that motivates people to better themselves and engage in acts of kindness themselves. Gratitude is what is truly lacking among the receivers of government aid. Does the money come from you and your friend Rick? Yes. Does the beneficiary see it that way? No.

In conclusion, the government needs to stop taking money from us to give to people. Instead, we as induviduals need to give money, time and talents to people who need it. I am certain this strategy would result in lower poverty rates, lower instances of depression in society and a greater love for our neighbors.
Friday, December 01, 2006 

Current mood:  content
Category: Life
Here are the top five ways to lose credibility:

1.  Using profanity.  Calling someone an asshole does nothing to validate your position and leads many to believe your intellect is on par with that of a school yard bully.

2.  Comparing with Nazis.  While there have been some important lessons learned by studying the Nazis, all too often people compare their political opponents to Nazis.  Occasionally using this device would be effective but if you pull it out of the closet every time you want to villainize someone, it quickly loses effect and then falls under the category of profanity.  Unfortunately because everyone else is using this device so much, nobody can really use it effectively anymore.

3.  Announcing you are intellegent.  If you really are intellegent, why would you need to tell everybody?  This is a sorry attempt to get people to belive your position is credible.  If you have to resort to telling your opponent how intellegent you think you are, you have already lost the debate.

4.  Rambling.  If you use a five page essay to make a position that could easily be covered with two paragraphs,  not only will you lose the readers attention but you run the risk of duplicating yourself and bringing in unrelated content.  You will look like you are grasping at straws.  As my 6th grade teacher used to say, "Use just enough ribbon to go around the box"

5.  Lying.  This one may seem obvious and easy to avoid but if you frequent many political blogs you will find an endless supply of speculation that is stated as fact.  Just because you found a source that states something as fact or just insinuates it, does not make it true.  If you use erronious sources to back up your statements of fact, it won't take long for your opponents to catch you and successfully paint you as a liar.

If you have some other ideas that should go on this list, feel free to comment.